THE TRUE KING OF CANADA: STANLEY D'ALMEIDA

   <script type="text/javascript" src="https://cdn.ywxi.net/js/1.js" async></script>                        



THE TRUE KING OF NORTH AMERICA, BRITAIN, RUSSIA, SPAIN AND NOW PORTUGAL!
A Declaration Of War
The Laws of Yoga
Contact & Photos
gossip






 
The Crucifixion of Stanley D'Almeida:
STANLEY D'ALMEIDA HAS BEEN CRUCIFIED AND MURDERED 40 TIMES OVER 40 YEARS: BY THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYAN-SYSTEM "BLONDIES" AND SATAN, IN CANADA: THE REASON THE SYSTEM TRIED TO MURDER STANLEY REPEATEDLY FOR 40 YEARS IS BECAUSE HE IS THE KING OF NORTH-AMERICA AND CANADA, UNDER NATURAL LAW: AND THE "BLONDIES" AND SATAN WANT TO CLING TO POWER BY MURDERING THE KING! AS THE KING OF ALL MANKIND STANLEY IS IMMORTAL, INVINCIBLE, AND INDESTRUCTIBLE: THUS THE ONLY REASON STANLEY IS STILL ALIVE IS BECAUSE OF HIS IMMORTALITY PREROGATIVE: ALTHOUGH THE "BLONDIES" EXPENDED ENOUGH MURDEROUS FORCE TO HAVE KILLED ANY OTHER MORTAL MAN --AND NO THANKS TO THE SYSTEM WHO TRIED THEIR UTMOST TO MURDER HIM AND FAILED LIKE THE PUSSIES THAT THEY ARE!! NOW AS KING: STANLEY IS A PARAGON OF VIRTUE: PERFECT: ABOVE THE LAW: INCAPABLE OF SIN: INCAPABLE OF CRIME: YET HE HAS BEEN TORTURED, FORCEFULLY POISONED, AND DETAINED IN CANADA's AND THE WORLD'S WORST PRISONS AND PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS FOR ~40 YEARS: ALTHOUGH HE HAS NEVER COMMITTED A CRIME, NOR HAS HE EVER BEEN MENTALLY-ILL: THIS ALL CONSTITUTES A CONSPIRACY BY SATAN AND THE "BLONDIES" TO COMMIT "HIGH TREASON" BY ATTEMPTING TO MURDER THE KING OF CANADA: THE KING OF NORTH AMERICA: AND THE KING OF ALL MANKIND: FOR WHICH THE ONLY JUST PUNISHMENT IS DEATH, DEATH, AND ONLY DEATH: ETERNAL DEATH: OF THE SYSTEM"S BODIES, MINDS AND SOULS, THEIR ANIMALS, THEIR ANCESTORS, THEIR DESCENDANTS, CO-CONSPIRATORS AND ALL THAT CONSPIRED WITH THE SYSTEM TO MURDER AND CRUCIFY STANLEY!!! THE MODUS OPERANDI OF THE SYSTEM'S 40 CRUCIFIXIONS WAS THEY WOULD RELEASE THE WORST, MOST HORRIFIC KINDS OF MURDERERS (CHILD-MOLESTERS, PEDOPHILES, HOMOSEXUALS, LESBIANS, RAPISTS, SERIAL KILLERS, FRENCH-SEX-FIENDS-PARTAKING-IN-INTERRACIAL-SEX-WITH-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYANS THE-FRANCO-ONTARIANS, INFERIOR RACE: JEWS, BLACKS, AND ANGLO-SAXONS; AND MUSLIM TERRORISTS!) INTO THE COMMUNITY AND FORCE STANLEY TO SERVE THEIR PROSPECTIVE SENTENCES FOR FIRST DEGREE MURDER OF 10-25 YEARS TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT 40 TIMES OVER 40 YEARS: WHICH WAS A MOCKERY OF THEIR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM: A MOCKERY OF ALL JUSTICE: A CONTEMPT FOR ALL LAW!!! EVERY KIND OF TORTURE POSSIBLE, NERVE POISONS, CHEMICAL WEAPONS, POISON GAS WERE FORCED ON STANLEY: YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR: FOR WHICH THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYANS AND SATAN MUST BE DESTROYED AND EXTERMINATED FROM THE FACE OF THIS EARTH: FOR STANLEY IS IMMORTAL: BUT WHAT WOULD THIS WORLD BE IF WE ALLOW THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-SYSTEM AND SATAN: TO GET AWAY WITH THIS: THUS THEY MUST RECEIVE THE WORST PUNISHMENT POSSIBLE, AND MADE EFFECTIVE FOR ALL ETERNITY!!!
THE PROOF THAT STANLEY D'ALMEIDA IS THE KING OF CANADA AS WELL AS THE U.S.A.: IS WELL DOCUMENTED AND PROVEN: THE "REAL TIME" VETOING OF "SENATE REFORM" (AN ELECTED SENATE), THE DEFEAT OF THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD ON JULY 1st, 1990, THROUGH STANLEY'S PUBLICLY DECLARED VETO; AND THE DEFEAT OF THE HEAVILY RIGGED HILLARY CLINTON: BY KILLING AND KILLING COPS UNTIL THEY CHICKENED-OUT AND DROPPED RIGGING THE ELECTION FOR HILLARY: BOTH AT THE MIDTERMS, AND AT THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION --PRIOR TO THIS THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYAN U.S. GOV'T HAD BEEN RIGGING THE U.S. ELECTIONS FOR 200 YEARS: SINCE THE SECRET DEFEAT OF THE REVOLUTIONARY U.S. IN THE WAR OF 1812 AD, BY THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYAN BRITISH! WHICH PROVES THAT STANLEY IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SYSTEM: AND IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME UNTIL HE COMES INTO POWER!!! READ DOCUMENTS BELOW:
ADDENDUM_TO_FACTUM_C61860.wps
22.0 KB

BELOW IS AN "ADDENDUM" WRITTEN BY A RESPECTED DOCTOR, R.W. HILL, ATTESTING TO THE FACT THAT STANLEY D'ALMEIDA PUBLICLY DECLARED TWO YEARS IN ADVANCE, TO THE COURT, IN REAL TIME: THAT HE WOULD EFFECTIVELY De Facto VETO THE SYSTEM'S CONCERTED ATTEMPT AT "SENATE REFORM" (AN ELECTED SENATE IN CANADA!) AND THE U.S. ANGLO-SAXON-ARYAN-SYSTEM'S ATTEMPT TO RIG THE MIDTERM, AND THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION FOR HILLARY CLINTON AND THE DEMOCRATS. BY STANLEY GIVING THE ORDER TO KEEP KILLING COPS, UNTIL THE POLICE FINALLY CHICKENED-OUT AND DROPPED RIGGING THE ELECTION FOR HILLARY --PROVING STANLEY IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SYSTEM, AND THAT IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME UNTIL HE COMES INTO POWER AS KING!!!
Three Years Ago February 20, 2015; IN A HOSPITAL ADDENDUM, Dr. Hill Recorded Stanley's Royal AND Public Declaration In REAL TIME: Ordering The Killing Of Cops, To Stop Them Rigging The Election For Hillary Clinton And The Totally Delusional, Leftwing Democrats: Proving That Stanley Is The King Of America! As Well As The King Of Canada: His Declaration Of A Royal Veto Against Heavily Favored "Senate Reform" (An Elected Senate) Also Proves That Stanley Is The King Of Canada, With Total Power Over  Constitutional Law: The De Facto Veto Of Senate Reform Was Realized, On October 19, 2015 --With The Ascension Of Justin Trudeau To Prime Minister Of Canada --The Only major Politician Opposing Senate Reform; (And The Utter Political & Personal Destruction Of Traitor Stephen Harper, Preston Manning, Brian Mulroney & Thomas Mulcair, In Politics Forever More!) The Crushing Of Senate Reform, Establishes Forevermore That Canada Is A Monarchy, That All Power Comes From The King And That Stanley D'Almeida Is The Monarch Of Record! We Must Always Remember That Queen Elizabeth II, The Hysterical Media, The Polls, The Secret Police, And The Entire "Blondie" System: Supported Senate Reform --AND LOST: PROVING ONLY STANLEY IS THE KING OF CANADA!!! And Proof That Stanley Is Also The King Of North America Was Realized On Nov. 8th, 2016 --With The Defeat Of Hillary Clinton, In Spite Of Leading Massively In All The Rigged Polls And Media Hysterical Support Of Her; And Despite The "Blondie" Or Anglo-Saxon-Aryan System's Desperate, Futile And Failed Attempts To Oppose The King's Royal Will!!! Yet The Poisoning By The Hospital Didn't Stop!!!
Click On PDF Files Below=>
Addendum_of_Dr._Hill___Dental___Letter_CCF_000006.pdf
2.0 MB

Dr._Hill_s_Statement_Proving_Stanley_Is_King._CCF_000008.pdf      The_Destruction_Of_Hillary_Clinton.rtf
40.3 KB

3.9 MB   

Dr. R.W. Hill's Statement: Proving That Stanley Is The King Of Canada And North America:

Addendum To The Administrator's Report:  re: Stanley Almeida. By Dr. R.W. Hill.

Dated: February 20, 2015.

      Continuation of Annual ORB Hearing adjourned November 24, 2014.

Mr Almeida has recently prepared a “Notice of Constitutional Question” .This asks for monetary compensation for gross violations of his constitutional rights.Mr Almeida asserts that the ORB has the authority-it is a court of competent jurisdiction- to grant a remedy by referral of his claims to the Minister of Justice.

 His arguments include the following:

1)Mr Almeida states he was never mentally ill and the forced medications were not only criminally illegal, but unconstitutional as well.

The hospital first used the diagnosis of Schizophrenia for 17 years. Now they use the diagnosis Delusional Disorder: Grandiose type. This means they were wrong about the first diagnosis. Dr Hill confirms he does not feel Almeida is schizophrenic. Mr Almeida asserts they are also wrong about the second diagnosis. He says he is not delusional when he says he is the King of Canada. He enlarges upon this by presenting proof, he says, of publicly vetoing the Meech Lake Accord, the Charlottetown Accord, and “Senate Reform”

He has shown Dr Hill a letter he wrote to the Globe and Mail on June 8th, 1990, "proclaiming himself the King of Canada and that he vetoes Meech Lake".  This accord was killed July 1, 1990.

He has shown Dr Hill a letter he wrote to Stephen Harper upon his election in 2008. In that letter, he reminds Harper that his about face from saying he was not the leader of the Conservative Party  - they all ruled by consensus – to his asserting his power as leader of the Conservative Party, was an appeasement to Mr. Almeida, who has in fact chosen the Canadian PM since 1984.

Mr Almeida then warned Mr Harper not to pursue Senate Reform, but Harper eventually defied Mr. Almeida (“due to the satanic influence of the secret police”) and attempted to force an elected Senate. Then Harper suddenly announced the death of senate reform in March 2014 after the SoC ruling. [But Harper and Mulcair Re-intensified their Efforts After Learning Of The Content Of This ORB Hearing.]  This was in keeping with Mr. Almeida’s de facto power over the Constitution.

2) A second demonstration of Almeida’s power was seen in the recent USA mid-term elections. The “Blonde English Aryan” System (with their secret  police) have been rigging the electoral system in the US for 200 years. In the recent election, the Democrats, favoured by the System,  put $300 million into their campaigns, with ads to get the vote out, and favouring Hillary Clinton.

Almeida had telepathically ordered the killing of cops and on his blog site had supported the killing of cops. This was instrumental in forcing the System to “cry uncle” and back off. The result was the lowest voter turnout in over 80 years, the cessation of stuffing ballot boxes for Democrats, and a GOP victory . (With time, Almeida says, more people will listen to him, revolt against the System, and acknowledge him as King)

3) The secret police are isolating Almeida in the community, by telling everyone he meets that he is crazy They try to turn everyone against Almeida, which is a painful form of torture.

They have caused the restaurants and grocery stores in Almeida’s area to use mass poisoning of him. The secret police have also forced poison gas into his apartment in an attempt to murder him.

4) Mr Almeida is also vehement about the issue of torture during the times he has been incarcerated. The Hospital Reports which document “code whites” being called to violently restrain and seclude him were part of a deliberate scheme of torture; the sole purpose was to break Almeida into docility or death. They used this torture especially to stop Almeida’s verbal abuse which he asserts is not a crime, but rather a means to  assert his rights. Almeida asserts he was repeatedly and violently assaulted every few weeks for the first five years in Ontario shores.

5) Almeida raises the issue of racial discrimination against him. The “Blonde English Aryan” race are possessed by devils and try to portray him as East Indian. Almeida is in fact of  Portuguese descent, coming from a 500 year old Portuguese colony in India, called Goa. They thus try to isolate him and cut him off from his own race and support, which is an extreme form of torture

It is a historical fact, Almeida states, that the Portuguese were the first Europeans to settle in Canada. It is only logical that a Portuguese man would be the first King of Canada, and that is what Almeida has come to reclaim after a 200 year exile.

6) Almeida asserts a strong case for compensation has been made. He has shown his power to veto and to force the System to listen to him.

He has kept Quebec out of the Constitution, and strengthened his hand to eventually overthrow the system, with military recruits from Quebec.

By defeating Senate reform, he has established that Canada is a monarchy and that he is the monarch of record.

By killing cops, and stopping the 200 years of rigging elections, he has proven he is more powerful than the system, and it is only a matter of time until he ascends his rightful throne.

 He has shown that a gross miscarriage of justice has occurred and he has been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment.

He asks the ORB to support his claims by referring his matter to the Justice Minister.

R W Hill , MD

February 20, 2015.



Subsequently To Stanley's Publicly Declared Veto Of Senate Reform In Canada: The Only Other Man Opposing Senate Reform (PM Justin Trudeau), Wins A Majority Gov't In Canada, On October 19th, 2015; The Satanically Crazy: Stephen Harper And Thomas Mulcair; Who Obsessed Over Senate Reform, Are Finished In Canadian Politics: And Senate Reform Is Dead In Canada, Forever! Which Establishes That Canada Is A Monarchy, And That Stanley Is The Monarch Of Record --Queen Elizabeth II, And The "Blondie" System Have Been Totally Discredited As "Losers"!!! The U.S. Election Year November, 2016: Was A Record Year For The Killing Of And Severely Injuring Cops Deliberately: Suddenly Cops Were Being Deliberately Ambushed And Shot: While In Previous Years Most Cops Died From Traffic Accidents. About 40,000 Police Officers Were Shot Or Assaulted, Receiving Serious Injuries; The Peak For Cops Being Shot Was On November 2016: The Month Of The Rigged Election. Stanley Ordered The Killing Of Cops To Force Them To Stop Rigging The Election For Hillary Clinton And The Democrats: BY POINTING A GUN TO THE COPS' HEADS AND SAYING, "GO AHEAD MAKE MY DAY": THEN PULLING AND PULLING THE TRIGGER DISCHARGING BULLETS INTO THE COPS' HEADS, UNTIL THEY CRIED "UNCLE", AND STOPPED RIGGING THE ELECTION FOR THE DEMOCRATS: AND TAKING NORTH AMERICA ON A RIGHTWING COURSE: FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 200 YEARS!!! PRIOR TO THIS, THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYAN-SYSTEM HAD BEEN RIGGING ALL U.S. ELECTIONS FOR 200 YEARS: STARTING WITH THE YEAR ~1816 AD, AFTER THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-BRITISH-ARYANS SECRETLY WON THE "WAR OF 1812 AD", AND THE "BATTLE OF WATERLOO" --DEFEATING NAPOLEON BONAPARTE IN FRANCE IN 1815 AD: CRAZY MADISON THEN DISBANDED THE PRIVATE, CITIZENS, REVOLUTIONARY ARMY OF "MINUTEMEN" MILITIAS: GIVING THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYANS A MONOPOLY OF OUR MILITARY AND SECURITY FORCES!!! THE REVERSAL OF A 200 YEAR MILITARY VICTORY BY SATAN AND THE "BLONDIE" ARYANS, PROVES THAT STANLEY IS THE KING OF NORTH AMERICA, AND THAT HE IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SYSTEM: AND IT IS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME UNTIL HE COMES INTO POWER! CLICK=>Chemical_weapons_in_World_War_I_-_Wikipedia__the_3_free_encyclopedia.pdf
187.4 KB
  Crimes_of_War___Poisonous_Weapons.pdf
129.7 KB
  Statement_of_Stanley_Almeida_to_Police_Poison_Gas_2..wps
40.0 KB
  2016-Election-Year-A_mbushes_and_fatal_shootings_fuel_increase_in_police_death_toll_this_year_Due_To_Stanley_Ord.docx
798.7 KB


Note: The "Blondie" Aryan-System Tried To Murder Stanley With Poison Gas For The Whole Three Years They Tried To Rig The Election For Hillary, And Pass Senate Reform, In Canada. Stanley Almost Died --But He Is Immortal, The King Is Always Immortal, Long Live The King! The Use Of Poison Gas Or Chemical Weapons Is A "WAR CRIME" Under The Geneva Protocol (1925), Under Which The U.S. Invaded Iraq And Sentenced Saddam Hussein To Death! The Blonde-Anglo-Saxon System Must Die For Trying To Murder Stanley And His Family!!! But The Most Satanic And Evil Thing The Anglo-Saxon System Did, Was Try To Murder Stanley's 82 Year-Old Mother And 93 Year Old Father: By Poisoning Their Food: It Was Shocking To See His Mother: All Bloated Up, With Hands Trembling From Induced "Parkinsonism" From The Poison: This Christmas (2016 & 2017!) Stanley Loves His Mother & Father: "Blondie" Must Pay For This: The Anglo-Saxon-Aryan System Must Die And Be Exterminated From Canada, For This Attempt At Stanley's Mother's & Father's Life!!! THEY TRIED TO MURDER HIS POOR MOTHER SIMPLY BECAUSE SHE KEPT PHONING Dr. Hill, And Dr. DeFreitas, To Inquire About The Poison Gas!!! Note: "Ontario Shores" CMHS. Is A Psychiatric Hospital, (Dr. R. W. Hill, Lisa March, Dr. Karen DeFreitas, Sheila Gallagher, Sean Senecal & Karim Mamdani); Are The Hospital Culprits (By Their Own Tacit Admission) Implicated In Poisoning Stanley's And His Mother's & Father's Food, Along With The CSIS Secret Police Or Parties Yet Unknown! Poison Gas Is A War Crime! The Basis Of Mr. D'Almeida's Claim For Compensation: Is That The Satanic, Devil-Possessed Anglo-Saxon System Incessantly Tortured, Crucified And Tried To Murder Him Each And Every One Of The 39+ Years He Was In Custody! By "Crucified" He Means: They Deliberately Released From Custody Every Year Black & Jewish Murderers (Like Barabbas!): A Murderer, A Child-Rapist, A Multiple-Murderer And Serial-Child-Rapist: And Transferred The Prospective Sentences From Those ~40 Murderers Onto Mr. D'Almeida To Serve (Like With Jesus Christ, Pilate Releasing Barabbas: But Thousands Of Times Worse! Jesus Suffered Crucifixion For A Total Of Six Hours: STANLEY HAS BEEN CRUCIFIED FOR 39+ RELENTLESS YEARS!!!) Thus Keeping Stanley In Murderous Custody In Prison Or Psychiatric Hospitals To Serve The Sentences Of Murderers: While Trying To Murder Him! All The While Attempting To Force Highly Toxic Anti-psychotic Medications On Him Via "Forced Treatment Orders", Or By Relentlessly Poisoning His Food, And In The Last Five Years They Have Pumped "Clozapine", Then "ABILIFY" POISON GAS On A Daily Basis Into His Condominium --Starting In June Of 2013!!! The Toxic Poisons Inflicted On Mr. D'Almeida Have Caused Long-Term Damage To Mr. D'Almeida's Health In Terms Of: Severe Weakness, Muscle Fatigue, Tooth Loss Due To Nerve Damage, Blurred Vision Due To Optic Nerve Damage, Loss Of Hair, Alopecia, Kidney Failure, Urinary Retention,  Parkinsonism, Loss Of Memory, Immunosuppression, Bone-Marrow Cell Depression, Aplastic Anemia, Agranulocytosis, Scoliosis, Curvature Of The Spine, Erythema, induration/skin induration, pruritus, rash, Acne, alopecia, eczema, folliculitis, fungal skin infection, rosacea, Acarodermatitis, blister, cellulitis, dry skin, excoriation, face edema, furuncle, herpes zoster, hyperhidrosis, hyperkeratosis, impetigo, infestation, photosensitivity reaction, pilonidal cyst, psoriasis, rash macula, skin laceration, skin lesion, skin striae, subcutaneous abscess, tinea pedis, urticaria, varicella; Graying Of Hair, Loss Of Enjoyment Of Life, Estrangement From Friends And Family Who Fear Persecution & Poisoning By The System For Associating With Stanley, Lung Damage, Nerve And Nerve-Tissue Damage, Splitting Headaches, Dry-Cracked Bleeding Skin, Cessation Of Cell Division, Cracked Nails, Muscular Weakness, Stupor, Almost Total Shutdown Of The Body, Constant Pain, A Fate Worse Than Death!!! CLICK=>POISON_GAS_WEAPONS_IN_WAR.pdf
4.2 MB
<=CLICK POISON GAS WEAPONS IN WAR!!! The Secret Police Have Ostracized Stanley From All Society By Persecuting All Those Who Befriend Him, Telling Them He's  "Crazy", And Counseling Them To Harm Him By Misrepresenting His Website: Certain "Black, Chinese, Muslim & Japanese Dentists Have Deliberately Damaged Mr. D'Almeida's Teeth Due To The Immunity From Prosecution The Devil-Possessed System Has Given Them! See Complaints To "The Royal College Of Dentistry", That Were Dismissed Without Investigation. Continuous Mental And Physical Torture Inflicted In Such An Intense And Unrelenting Manner Over 39+ Years: CAN CAUSE DEATH FROM MENTAL PAIN ALONE AND IS A WAR CRIME AND A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY!!! Although Mr. D'Almeida Has Appealed To The Devil-Possessed Courts (The Court of Appeal For Ontario, The Supreme Court of Canada, The Ontario Review Board, The Privacy Commissioner, The Superior Court Of Justice (Civil); The Consent And Capacity Board, Many A Time: They Have Always Dismissed All Of His Appeals And His Arguments Without Even A Hearing --Resulting In Additional Torture-- Not Relief (See Below)!!! 

      Court_Of_Appeal_for_Ontario_ORB_Court_File_No._C61860.pdf
313.1 KB
Crimes_of_War___Poisonous_Weapons.pdf
129.7 KB
ADDENDUM_TO_FACTUM_C61860.wps
22.0 KB
   REPLY_TO_RALPH_STEINBERG_S_REPORT.pdf
4.6 MB

                  REPLY TO THE MOTHERFUCKING RALPH  STEINBERG’S “REPORT”:

Stanley Was Never Ever Mentally-Ill, Yet was Incarcerated for 39+ Years and Forcefully Murdered With Some Of The Most Toxic “NERVE AGENTS” In The History OF MANKIND. Stanley Has Also Never Committed A Crime In His Life, Yet Was Put In Prison For A Total Of Nine Years: Including About 29 Breach Of Probation Convictions: WHICH IS THE WORST MOST TORTUROUS WAY OF IMPRISONMENT!!! The System Did Not Just Imprison Stanley: THEY CRUCIFIED HIM: BY MAKING HIM SERVE THE SENTENCES OF THE MOST HEINOUS MURDERERS IN CANADA: WHILE FREEING SAID MURDERERS INTO THE COMMUNITY: AND TRYING TO REPEATEDLY MURDER STANLEY AND FAILING, ONLY BECAUSE STANLEY WAS MORE POWERFUL THAN THEM!!! In Each Of Those 39+ Years In Custody The SYSTEM TRIED TO MURDER HIM: STANLEY NEVER GOT TO SERVE TIME: HE WAS ALWAYS FIGHTING FOR HIS LIFE!!! THE WORST KIND OF TORTURE WAS THE OSTRACISM BY ALL CANADIANS: THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-ARYAN-SYSTEM USED THE WHOLE COUNTRY TO CONSPIRE WITH THEM TO TORTURE STANLEY TO DEATH!  TORTURE OVER A PROLONGED PERIOD CAN CAUSE DEATH BY ITSELF! THE GREATEST CRIME IN THIS LAND IS HIGH TREASON: FOR WHICH THE MAXIMUM PUNISHMENT MUST BE INVOKED. STANLEY HAS PROVEN THAT HE IS THE KING OF CANADA BY PUBLICLY VETOING: THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD AND SENATE REFORM IN REAL TIME! STANLEY ALSO HAS PROVEN HE IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SYSTEM, BY DEFEATING HILLARY CLINTON, BY KILLING AND KILLING COPS, UNTIL THEY CRIED “UNCLE” AND STOPPED RIGGING THE ELECTIONS FOR HILLARY!!! WHICH PROVES THAT STANLEY IS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SYSTEM. THE FALLOUT FROM HIS DEMONSTRATION OF POWER, IS THAT THE ORB, HOSPITAL AND POLICE WILL HENCEFORTH RECEIVE AUTOMATIC DEATH SENTENCES FOR HIGH TREASON: BECAUSE THEY HAVE ZERO DEFENSE AGAINST HIGH TREASON, HENCEFORTH!!! [SEE ADDENDUM OF DR. HILL DATED FEBRUARY 20th, 2015.]

3) THE OTHER ISSUE THE FUCKING STEINBERG LIED ABOUT WERE THE REASONS STANLEY WOULD NEVER AGREE TO AN ABSOLUTE DISCHARGE: (a) HE IS STILL BEING MURDERED BY POISON GAS IN HIS CONDOMINIUM, CALLED "ABILIFY", WHICH IS A WAR CRIME, AND UNIVERSALLY CONDEMNED AS DESERVING A DEATH OR LIFE SENTENCE FOR THE ORB! (b) STANLEY'S FOOD IS STILL BEING POISONED IN HIS GROCERIES AND RESTAURANTS; (c) THE HOSPITAL IS COUNSELING HIS PARENTS TO POISON HIM FOR TEN YEARS NOW, RUINING HIS VISITS WITH THEM! (d) THE HOSPITAL IS ALSO SATANICALLY ENGAGED IN POISONING HIS PARENTS, BASED ON STANLEY'S VAST KNOWLEDGE OF THE SIDE-EFFECTS OF ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUGS!!! (e) THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON SYSTEM IS STILL DELIBERATELY COUNSELING ALL DENTISTS TO DELIBERATELY DAMAGE STANLEY'S TEETH! (f) Currently Stanley Has No Support Worker In The Community, And he has had absolutely zero DISCHARGE PLANNING: Were he to be discharged he would land right back to the Hospital in no time at all. Stanley is too upset and angry at the years of attempted murder, On His Life; He is not a candidate for discharge at this time. (g) THE POST OFFICE IS DELIBERATELY REFUSING TO ACCEPT STANLEY'S ID OF HIS "CITIZENSHIP CARD" LEAVING HIM UNABLE TO SIGN FOR HIS OWN MAIL! AFTER USING SAME FOR TEN PREVIOUS YEARS: THE SYSTEM HAS TURNED HIS CONDO AND NEIGHBORHOOD, INTO A WORSE PRISON THAN THE HOSPITAL: SO A DISCHARGE IS NOT A REAL DISCHARGE, BUT IS SATANIC HYPOCRISY!!!

4) Stanley Has Made It Clear That He Intends To "JUDICIALLY EXECUTE" ALL THOSE INVOLVED IN POISONING & CRUCIFYING STANLEY, WHEN HE COMES INTO POWER! STANLEY WILL EXECUTE THE ORB, THE HOSPITAL STAFF, THE CSIS, THE POLICE, THE BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-RACE, THEIR ANIMALS, THEIR CHILDREN, EVERYONE WHO IS CONNECTED TO THEM BY BLOOD:  FOR THE SUPREME CRIME OF HIGH TREASON!!! HE THUS CANNOT BE ABSOLUTELY DISCHARGED, BECAUSE JUSTICE HAS NOT YET BEEN DONE!

5) SERIAL MURDERER BRUCE McArthur, HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH 8 FIRST DEGREE MURDERS: PROBLEM IS THAT MCARTHUR WAS GIVEN A CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE OF TWO YEARS IN 2003, BY JUDGE WILLIAM BASSEL, FOR ALMOST MURDERING A HOMOSEXUAL PROSTITUTE IN 2001, BY BASHING HIS HEAD WITH A STEEL PIPE!! ! THE CROWN’S AND BASSEL’S SENTENCE FOR THIS ATTEMPTED MURDER, WAS FOR McARTHUR “TO STAY AWAY FROM HOMOSEXUAL SEX-WORKERS” WHICH RESULTED IN EIGHT MORE MURDERS OF HOMOSEXUAL SEX WORKERS!!! THIS SAME JUDGE BASSEL, FALSELY FOUND STANLEY NCR ON A FALSE CHARGE OF UTTERING DEATH THREATS IN 1998, WHERE THE FUCKING ORB AND HOSPITAL HAVE TRIED TO MURDER STANLEY FOR EVERY ONE OF THOSE TWENTY FUCKING YEARS: IN OTHER WORDS HE GAVE STANLEY THE SENTENCE HE SHOULD HAVE GIVEN MCARTHUR! THIS IS A CRUCIFIXION, WHERE STANLEY IS RECEIVING THE DEATH SENTENCES OF SERIAL MURDERERS! WHILE THEY TRY TO CRUCIFY STANLEY TO DEATH --:LIKE JESUS GOT BARABBAS' SENTENCE, WHILE BARABBAS WAS FREED!!!

Dated: March 10th, 2018.

Stanley Almeida 


                                                                                                                     Court File No. C61860

Court of Appeal for Ontario

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

DESCRIPTION                                                                                  DATE    PAGE

1.      THE FACTUM OF STANLEY D'ALMEIDA    

Court of Appeal for Ontario

IN THE MATTER OF an Appeal of a Decision by the ORB, on February 26th, 2016; and received on Feb. 29th, 2016.

BETWEEN:

                     STANLEY.  A. ALMEIDA

                                                      ----Appellant

                  -and-

Ontario Shores CMHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Karen DeFreitas, Mr. Mark Rice, The ORB Hon. G.Y. Goulard.

  ----Respondents

Appeal is under s.672.72(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada.

NOTICE OF APPEAL

THE APPELLANT STANLEY ALMEIDA APPEALS to a Panel of Judges from the Demonic decision of the ORB on Feb. 26th, 2016, but received on Feb. 29th, 2016; To Dismiss His CA; And Appeals His Oct. 29th, 2015; Disposition Order as well (for the limited purpose of determining jurisdictional issues arising from the Board hearing; But wishes to appeal his annual disposition (if at all) review, separately from his appeal of his Charter Application dismissal.).

THIS APPEAL WILL BE HEARD on a date to be fixed by the Registrar of the Courthouse, 130 Queen St. West, Toronto, ON, M5H 2N5.

PART 1: THE APPELLANT REQUESTS:

1.        That the decision of the ORB (Ontario Review Board) dismissing the Appellant’s Constitutional Application (CA) be quashed and that, in its place, this Honorable Court find that the Appellant is entitled to $35 Million Dollars in compensation for Charter Violations Against His Life, And Order Same, Or In The Alternative Recommend To The Justice Minister That Mr. Almeida receive the $35 Million In Compensation; Or Recommend To The Justice Minister That a Constitutional HEARING be awarded to Mr. Almeida on the awarding of Compensation and Damages for his Charter Breaches;

2.      In the alternative, that this Honorable Court make an order remitting the matter, in part or in whole, back to the ORB, for a Hearing of his CA, That He was Entitled To, in accordance with such directions as this Honorable Court considers proper;

3.       His Costs of this Appeal; and his Damages for Pain and Suffering; and

4.       Such further and other relief as the Appellant may advise and this Honorable Court may permit

PART 2: THE FACTS IN THIS CASE:

These are the FACTS in Mr. Almeida's Case RE: The Appeal of the dismissal of his Constitutional Application (CA) --without a Hearing:

1.  Mr. Almeida has never ever received a Hearing on his Constitutional Application (CA); It was a tremendous endeavour to produce a 300+ page CA, encompassing 35+ years of Murderous Torture and Attempted Murder: YEAR AFTER YEAR AFTER YEAR FOR 36 YEARS! Incidentally Mr. Almeida was 56 years, not 65 years old --contrary to the Goulard Charter Ruling.

2.  In June 26th, of 2013: The Hospital had recommended an "Absolute Discharge" at its annual Hearing for their Disposition Order, for Mr. Almeida. He had requested that he wanted Compensation for the attempted Murder on His life and Torture to death: That he endured for over 33 Years in Custody! The Chairwoman, Ms. Yaskiel advised him to file a "Notice of Constitutional Question" (NOCQ) and file it with the Provincial & Federal AGs, within one week. Since Stanley was pressed for time, he had no time to write-up a detailed constitutional arguments, so he informally copied his Supreme Court "Capacity Hearing" arguments to the "NoticeOCQ", expecting to argue the real issues Orally. At this time the Hospital & the Crown had "No Objection" to Mr. Almeida filing the Application (CA) And Getting A HEARING.

3. In July 8th, & 11th, 2013: The ORB convened two teleconference hearings, but failed to give Mr. Almeida any Notice of the Hearings. At those teleconferences: the Hospital & Crown suddenly objected to the CA And A HEARING On It; And Ms. Yaskiel dismissed the CA at the Teleconferences: claiming she had no jurisdiction to rule on capacity issues, capping provisions, etc. under R. vs. Conway.

4.  Two weeks Later, On July 24th, 2013; Stanley was ambushed with a fait accompli, Ms. Yaskiel shocked Mr. Almeida by telling him his Notice of CQ had already been dismissed, without his presence! in July 11th, of 2013: Ms. Yaskiel was advised that Mr. Almeida was not given Notice of the Teleconference; and had no reason to believe the Crown & Hospital would object to even having a Hearing! She was further told that Mr. Almeida was not asking her to Rule on the Capacity or Capping Issues, in his ORAL Application: But he wanted to give Oral Arguments on the constitutional Issues, because there was insufficient time to prepare a detailed Application. Ms. Yaskiel refused every request and dismissed the CA.

5. In her reasons she lied that Mr. Almeida "must have been" given Notice of the teleconference, and that under R. v. Conway  she lacked jurisdiction to rule on capacity issues, or capping provisions, etc. At this Hearing Ms. Yaskiel Made A Cryptic Statement Out Loud: She said, "I hear you all are using a new delivery system to administer Clozapine, and you intend to use it on Mr. Almeida!" It turned out later, that she was referring to the Hospital attempting to Illegally poison Mr. Almeida with Clozapine: administered via POISON GAS being pumped into Mr. Almeida's Condominium --This Was Attempted Murder On The Life Of Stanley: That Would Go Off and On For Three Years To The Present. (See letter on symptoms of poison gas Stanley suffered!)!!!

6.  A year later on Nov. 24th, 2014; The Hospital had again recommended an Absolute Discharge: a new Chairwoman Ms. K. Chalmers heard that Mr. Almeida had given Notice that he needed a Two Hour Hearing, which she didn't receive; Nor did he receive the notice of teleconference last year for his NOCQ hearing; Mr. Almeida also told her that he wanted to File a Constitutional Application! The Hospital And Crown Objected claiming it was Res Judicata, and that Mr. Almeida's only avenue was to Appeal the July 24th, 2013 ruling by Ms. Yaskiel to the OCA! Ms. Chalmer's Board held a "Meeting", and decided that the Res Judicata argument was dismissed; and that Mr. Almeida could file a new Application To The ORB: She advised Stanley to provide Notices to both AGs, and bring Evidence and witnesses for his Hearing! She also ordered a Teleconference to set a date for the C. Application to be Heard --The Date Set Was Feb. 26th, 2015! See Letters indicating That Mr. Almeida was again not given any notice of the teleconference; and a date was set for Feb. 26th, 2015; without his input!!

7.  At The February 26th, 2015: Hearing, the Hospital had again recommended an Absolute Discharge; the new Chairman Mr. Goulard: ruled that although Mr. Almeida had properly filed a new 300+ Page CA, On Feb. 20th, 2015; he was not going to hear it: instead he was going to have a Disposition Hearing on Significant Risk instead: But he promised: "You will get a full Hearing on the CA issue at a later date"! Mr. Goulard would repeatedly promise that Stanley would get a Hearing on his CA; But he eventually never gave Stanley a Hearing ever! At This Hearing The Hospital Lawyer Mr. Gibson, Did Not Make Any Objection To The CA Hearing Promised For Today --Nor Did He Contest The Right To Compensation!

8.  At the end of this Feb. 26th, 2015; Hearing Mr. Goulard also ruled that, "this Board is not seized, and that is why he will not set a date for your CA, Hearing; which will be set at a teleconference; and heard by another Board", He added "You do not want this Board to Hear your CA". Because Stanley had called Ms. Lightfoot a "Fucking Bitch" for calling Stanley delusional, for complaining of "Poison Gas" being pumped into his Condo! Again The Hospital Lawyer did not object to the CA Hearing.

9. On June 23rd, 2015: Mr. Almeida told the ORB, that he was withdrawing his request for an Absolute Discharge, because the Hospital was putting Poison Gas into his Condo., and he was now requesting a Conditional Discharge. Mr. Goulard lied about making the ruling: That He would not Hear the CA; and that he was not seized; and now lied by claiming suddenly that he was seized, and had to hear the CA himself, and his obviously BIASED BOARD (Biased By Goulard's Own Admission, Because he had said, "you don't want this Board to hear your CA"; he should have recused himself and Ms. Lightfoot) would now hear Stanley's CA. Mr. Goulard made a statement, "Your Constitutional Issues will have to be addressed in October, Tuesday The 6th, 2015; I need more time do some research, which will take a few weeks. I am adjourning to Oct. 6th, I am blocking off a whole Day to HEAR YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION, starting at 10:00 AM!!! He then asked for a teleconference to appoint an independent assessor to do an independent assessment! Both Dr. Hill and amicus curiae Mr. Paas, can confirm these words! Again The Hospital Lawyer Made No Objection To A Hearing Of The 300+ Page CA.

10. At the Oct. 6th 2015; Hearing: After Poisoning Stanley Excessively With POISON GAS FOR TEN Straight Days In His Condo: The Satanic Hospital Lawyer, Mr. Gibson, Suddenly Filed An Addendum To The Administrators Report: On The Morning Of The Hearing: Asking For A Detention Order for Mr. Almeida!!! [Note: The Hospital Was Deathly Afraid Of Setting A Precedent For Huge Settlements By Accused Or Patients: And so they set-up an elaborate scheme to obstruct Stanleys CA, from ever being heard! Because They Are In The Business Of Potentially Violating A Lot Of Constitutional Rights: By The Very Fact Their So Called Treatment With Toxic Drugs Methods Cause A Lot Of Patients To DIE! But Stanleys Lawsuit Was Very Different: He Was Seeking Compensation For Far, Far Worse Constitutional Violations Than The Normal Patient; He Could Not, And Should Not Be Denied A Hearing!] Mr. Goulard Then broke his promise to hold a CA hearing, and instead held another Disposition Hearing instead: To Impose a Detention Order, from the current Conditional Discharge! Both Dr. Hill and Mr. Paas recalled that Mr. Goulard had promised to hold a Full Day Hearing of Mr. Almeida's CA --but were ignored. The Chair Goulard, Should have ruled the Addendum, out of order, as it was clearly, an illegal attempt to deny Stanley A Hearing of his CA! [Note: The Hearing is described in Mr. Almeidas Written Submissions Dated: Jan 11th, & Feb. 25th, 2016: Mr Goulard Was Possessed By A Devil, And Kept Interrupting Mr. Almeida, And Simply Refused To Let Mr. Almeida Speak, (He Couldnt Shut-up, Even For Five Seconds!) And Finally When Stanley Called Him Out As A Devil-Possessed Mother-Fucker: The Satanic Ms. Banks Whispered in his ear to call Security;! HE WAS BEING COACHED (By Ms. Banks WAS WHISPERING IN HIS EAR For The Whole Hearing!!!) ON HIS SATANIC BEHAVIOR BY A DEVIL-POSSESSED Ms. Banks, Another Board Member!] At the end of a raucous Hearing Mr. Goulard shook Stanley's hand and promised him a Full CA Hearing!

11. Instead two weeks later, On ~Oct. 29th, 2015 Or On ~Nov. 8th, 2015; he gave Mr. Almeida a Detention Order And Began Using POISON GAS on Mr. Almeida in earnest, In Stanleys Condo, and asked for written submissions, after which he would set a date for the CA Hearing. Mr. Almeida had to go away for Christmas to visit his parents, so couldn't make any submissions until January 11th, 2016. He copied these submissions to Joe Wright ORB Counsel, The Hospitals New Counsel Ms. Walker-Renshaw, The Crown, Mr. Paas The amicus curiae, to Dr. Hill, etc.(See Email Proof That Mr. Goulard Is Lying When He Says, Mr. Almeida did not file any submissions! These Counsels, including Stanley, were part of a chain whereby all communications via Email, were automatically copied to each other! Even if we believe Joe Wrights lie that he had a filter, he would have realized Stanley had filed a submission: due to feedback from the Crown, Hospital Counsel, Dr. Hill, Mr. Paas, etc. 

11b.  On Dec. 30th, 2015; Stanley sends an Email (below) To Mr. Goulard, through his lawyer Joe Wright (which he did receive): Objecting to a new Hospital Lawyer Ms. Walker-Renshaw, Who would not have heard the ORAL ARGUMENTS Mr. Almeida Had Already made at the various Disposition Hearings Regarding His Constitutional Application --making him have to start from scratch!!!

<Email>Stanley Almeida <stanley_xvidalmeida@yahoo.com>

To Walker-Renshaw, Barbara J. MacDonald, Nancy (MAG) Wright, Joe R. (MOHLTC) Tony Paas

CC schraderw@ontarioshores.ca bowermanr@ontarioshores.ca Smith, Tina (MAG) DiGiacomo, Nadia Reid, Edward (MOHLTC) Dr. Karen DeFreitas

12/30/15 at 6:31 PM

Dear Mr. Paas et al: My phone-number in Ottawa, Where I am Visiting my Parents is: (613) 271-8591. Yes I concur with Mr Paas, that Mr. Almeida has already filed substantial amount of material: both as a 300 Page Constitutional Application Proper; Plus Blood Test Results, Letter from Mrs. Adelaide Almeida, Letters from Ms. Marie-France Lalancette, Plus Mr. Almeida relies on his extensive ORAL submissions made to the ORB, To Dr. Wood Hill, And The Testimonies of Mr. Semion Dashevsky, & Ms. Lalancette! The chairman of the ORB spoke confidentially to Mr. Almeida at the end of the ORB Hearing, and told him amiably that he will not hold the Constitutional Application Hearing, right after the ORB hearing (as He Had Threatened), and Mr. Goulard, also made it clear: He would not impose a detention order as the Hospital was seeking!!! And that he was going to set a new Hearing date for the Constitutional Application, But suddenly, after a two week delay for a decision: The Satanically influenced ORB suddenly changed its mind: It suddenly imposed a detention Order, On Oct. 29th, 2015; and refused to set a date for a new CA Hearing; and instead was relying on written submissions, after which it would set a Hearing date; for Mr. Almeida to reply to! In light of the fact the verbal friendliness and shaking of Mr. Almeida's hand, indicated a total WIN by Stanley --something had drastically been overruled by "Secret Police?" or Satanic Forces (Hospital), other than the ORB --Dr. DeFreitas, Mark Rice?--Mr. Goulard Was A PUPPET!!! Stanley Had Been Given No Indication That The Hospital Was Going To Contest Jurisdiction For A Hearing; Nor That The Compensation Jurisdiction Was In Question!!! The Hospital Had A Whole Year, Where Numerous Hearing Had Been Set, And Then Reneged Upon: To Indicate These Objections: So That Mr. Almeida Could Reply To Them: At This Late Stage: The CA Should Have Been Heard On Its Merits!!!

         In light of the fact Ms. Walker-Renshaw was not present at the Hearings, and has zero oral or written input from Mr. Gibson, her representative; We cannot expect Ms. Walker-Renshaw to be able to have a fair comprehension of all the facts --and cannot be expected to be able to respond properly to the Constitutional Application: That was extensively ADDRESSED ORALLY!!!

        Therefore Mr. Almeida asks for less weight be given to Ms. Walker-Renshaws input; and more weight be given to Mr. Almeida's Submissions. The Compensation he is seeking of $$35 Million Dollars for each year he was Murderously Incarcerated: and attempts were repeatedly made to MURDER poor Stanley: (Who was never mentally-ill or committed a crime) be granted fully!

 

Stanley Almeida

<End of Dec. 30, 2015; Email> At This Time It Was Accepted By All Parties That: The Hospital File Their Submissions First; Then The Applicant File His Response; And Then The Hospital Files Their Response. Stanley Filed His Submissions FIRST, On Jan. 11th, 2016: But Never Received A Response From Ms. Walker-Renshaw: So It Was Grossly Unfair For Goulard To Dismiss His Appeal: When Walker-Renshaw Was The One To Fail To Respond To Stanley --and she does admit receiving the Jan. 11th, 2016; Email, unlike Joe Wrights Lies!!!

11c.  Feb. 25th, 2016: Stanley Sends Mr. Goulard The "FINAL WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS PART 1" Indicating there would be a Part 2. But Mr. Goulard Lies that he didn't receive this Feb. 25th, 2016, Submission Either: And Dismisses Stanley's CA Application, based on Fallacious Submissions from the New Hospital Lawyer. Ms. Walker-Renshaw: Who Filed A Submission Asking Goulard To Dismiss Stanleys CA based on Res Judicata, On Jan. 18th, 2016: But Fails To Respond To Mr. Almeidas Jan. 11th, 2016; Submissions!!! And Who hadnt bothered to reply to Mr. Almeidas Submissions Entirely! The Hospital had a FULL YEAR TO OBJECT TO THE CA BEING HEARD --AND DID NOT: IT WAS TOTALLY UNFAIR TO STANLEY, FOR THE HOSPITAL TO SUDDENLY OBJECT BASED ON JURISDICTION AND SUCCEED! THE CA WAS A VERY COMPLEX HEARING, ENCOMPASING 35 YEARS OF STANLEYs TORTURED, PERSECUTED, & CRUCIFIED LIFE: IT SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN OBSTRUCTED BY LIES, NUISANCE ARGUMENTS, & DOUBLE-JEOPARDY RULINGS!!

12.  Yet In His "Charter Ruling" (Without ever hearing arguments; Mr. Goulard lies that he never received any submissions from Mr. Almeida! Mr. Almeida has the Emails (Jan. 11th, & Feb. 25th, 2016) he sent to Dr. Hill, Ms. Walker-Renshaw, And To Mr. Paas; as proof that Goulard is lying! Stanley Also Has Emails From Hospital Lawyer Ms. Walker-Renshaw Proving She Too, Received The Jan. 11th, 2016; Email --And yet In Her Jan. 18th, 2015; Garbage Email She Refuses To Answer To Stanley's Submission! She Totally Ignores It, In Total Disrespect for Legal Etiquette! Stanley later on February 25th, 2016: sends Counsel for the ORB, Joe Wright another Email titled "Constitutional Application: Final Submissions Part 1": Which Mr. Goulard lies again, That he also did not receive this second Email, Dated February 25th, 2016. Yet by seeming coincidence he issues a judgement on the very next day Feb. 26th, 2016!!! Obviously he is lying: He did receive both Emails: But because they "call him out" for his abusive treatment of Stanley: He reacts by dismissing Stanley's CA --without a Hearing! On February 26th, 2016: Goulard Dismisses Mr. Almeida's CA, without ever giving him a Hearing on his 300+ page Constitutional Application!!! His Res Judicata argument is Totally False, because it would be "Double Jeopardy", as Chairwoman, Ms. K. Chalmers had already ruled on the Res Judicata argument by the Hospital on Nov. 28th, 2014; and dismissed them. Furthermore Mr. Goulard had repeatedly promised to set aside a whole day for the CA to be Heard AND Former Hospital Counsel Mr. Gibson Had Never Made Any Objection To The CA Hearing After Numerous Hearings When He Had A Chance To, Over A Full Year!!! Mr. Goulard simply adopts all the Fallacious arguments of the Hospital & Crown: But those issues had already been addressed in his CA, by the Appellant! IT TURNS OUT THERE WAS AN ONGOING CONSPIRACY BY THE SENIOR HOSPITAL STAFF, (Dr. DeFreitas, Mr. Rice, Dr. Hill, Ms. Walker-Renshaw, Ms. March. Mr. Senecal, Ms. Taylor) ALL ALONG: TO POISON MR. ALMEIDA WITH POISON-GAS: GET THE ORB TO DISMISS THE GAS AS A DELUSION; THEN GET THE ORB & THE OCA TO CONSPIRE WITH THE HOSPITAL, TO RENDER FALSE UNCONSTITUTIONAL RULINGS REMOVING: COSTS, DAMAGES & DECLARATORY RELIEF FRON ONLY NCR LITIGANTS: AND THEN GET THEIR ORB PUPPETS TO DISMISS STANLEYs CA ALTOGETHER --WITHOUT EVER HAVING A HEARING!!!

 

PART 3: THE GROUNDS OF THIS APPEAL:

THE GROUNDS FOR THE APPEAL are as follows:

1.       The ORB (Called The "Board") erred in fact and in law in dismissing the Appellant’s Constitutional Application (Called The "CA").

2.  In Its Ruling, The Board Aped The Hospital Counsel Ms. Walker-Renshaw; (Who was never present for any of the previous Hearings related to the Disposition Order, Nor Constitutional Application; Where Their previous Counsel (Mr. Gibson) And Mr. Goulard, Never raised this issue prior: Repeatedly Assuring Mr. Almeida: "A Full Day Will be set aside for The Material Arguments In His CA --Not For Vexatious Arguments Over Jurisdiction!!!) But after Mr. Almeida Emailed Goulards Counsel, Joe Wright, His Final Submissions Part 1; He accidentally Also Emailed Deputy Administrator of Psychiatry, Dr. Karen DeFreitas A Copy: Dr. DeFreitas, And Mr. Mark Rice Deputy Administrator In Charge Of Forensics: it seems Satanically freaked-out; and colluded with Mr. Goulard (Who it turns out was a Total PUPPET of The Hospitals DeFreitas & Rice, And Not Independently Authoritative at all): To Dismiss Stanleys CA as a Punitive measure! Goulard Lied that he never received The First Or second Submission of Mr. Almeida, And Dismissed The CA on The Hospitals & Dr. DeFreitas orders. A Total Puppet, Maybe Realizing He too Was Guilty Of Colluding In Attempted Murder (Using Poison Gas) And Constantly Interrupting Stanley) He Aped The Hospital's Counsel's Arguments And Found that:

1. Mr. Almeidas Charter Application is estopped on the grounds of Res Judicata;

2. There was no Charter breach established in Mr. Almeidas Application, and

3. The Board has no jurisdiction to award the remedies sought by Mr. Almeida.

Mr. Almeidas Charter Application is dismissed.

DATED this 26th day of February, 2016, at the City of Toronto, in the Toronto Region.

Hon. G.

3. Mr. Almeida Can legally defeat this nonsense by Goulard:

   Mr. Goulard is in error to use, as his sole basis to dismiss the Appellant's Appeal, The Reasons copied verbatim, from the Hospital Lawyer Walker-Renshaws Arguments: Showing his total Bias! Mr. Gibson, The Hospital's original Lawyer had left their employ, and their new lawyer was not privy to the facts in this case: and Mr. Almeida warned Mr. Goulard, that her arguments should be given lesser weight: But he adopted her misinformed opinions entirely!!! The Res Judicata argument was dismissed by The Hon. Ms. Chalmers on Nov. 24th, 2014: When she advised Stanley he could file another Constitutional Application: Giving Notice To The AGs of Ontario & Of Canada! She mentions orally that she is overruling the Hospital's contention The CA is Res Judicata or that Mr. Almeida needs to Appeal the Feb. 14th, 2014; Yaskiel Decision, to the Ontario Court of Appeal; in her 'Reasons For Decision'. Thus to bring forward the Res Judicata argument again one year later; after the Hospital had numerous occasions in which to bring it up would be grossly unfair to the Appellant and After The Hon. Ms. Chalmers Had Overruled it, Would be contrary to the constitutional principle of "Double Jeopardy"!!!

1b.     In Both The Feb. 26th, 2015; & June 23rd, 2015; And Oct. 6th, 2015; Hearings: Mr. Goulard mentions repeatedly that Mr. Almeida would get a Full Day for his CA hearing; The Hospital Lawyer at that time was Mr. Gibson: He made no objection to the Hearing at all these times. It was only after a year had passed, and Mr. Gibson left their employ: That The Hospital uses another Lawyer Ms. Walker-Renshaw, who was never present at all these previous Hearings, and was not privy to the Facts In This Case: That Mr. Goulard & The Hospital's New Lawyer Renshaw: Suddenly Reverse Themselves: And Renew Their Objections based on Res Judicata again! Stanley Had Been Given No Indication That The Hospital Was Going To Contest Jurisdiction For A Hearing; Nor That The Compensation Jurisdiction Was In Question!!! The Hospital Had A Whole Year, Where Numerous Hearing Had Been Set, And Then Reneged Upon: To Indicate These Objections: So That Mr. Almeida Could Reply To Them: At This Late Stage: The CA Should Have Been Heard On Its Merits!!! Secondly: The Issues In The Two Constitutional Notices of C. Question; are totally different: In The 2013 Notice, The Chair Ms. Yaskiel clearly claims that she has no jurisdiction to make rulings on Capacity Issues: Capping Provisions, Wrongful Imprisonment: The Problem With The Satanic Yaskiel Decision: Was It Was Made Without Mr. Almeidas Presence At The Teleconference Hearing, Because He Was Never given Notice of it, nor was he aware that the Crown & Hospital suddenly began opposing a Hearing of the CA; after not opposing it initially: And It Was Made Without Ever Giving Mr. Almeida A Full Hearing On The Evidence! Mr. Almeida's Current CA is based on Torture, Attempted Murder, Cruel And Unusual Punishment, Unequal Treatment under The Law, Unreasonable Detention, Fundamental Crimes Against Humanity, Strip-Searches As Fundamental Crime of Mass Sexual Assault, War Crimes As Stanley Is A Political Prisoner, Genocide, Forced Treatment contrary to the Principles of Fundamental Justice; Transfer of Prospective Sentences Of Child-Rapists & Murderers Onto Stanley Like In Jesus Crucifixion, Total Ostracism, Blackout Incommunicado, Poison Gas, Poisoning In The Community AND THE GREATEST CRIME OF ALL: HIGH TREASON: AS STANLEY HAD PROVED TO THE BOARD THAT HE HAD PUBLICLY VETOED THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD, THE CHARLOTTETOWN ACCORD, AND AN ELECTED SENATE: BECAUSE ALL POWER COMES FROM THE KING --Himself!!!

4.    Mr. Goulard, adopts the Renshaw-Walker Hospital position that there was no charter breach established; First of All: If A Man Has Never Committed A Crime Nor Ever Been Mentally-Ill; Yet Has Spent 35+ Years In Custody: Imprisoned, Forcefully Medicated With The Most Toxic Chemicals On Earth: Poisoned, Crucified And Attempts Made To Murder Him: It Is By Definition A Charter Breach! problem is that there was evidence that the Hospital tried to Torture Mr. Almeida To Death, Poison him with toxic chemicals And Attempt To Murder him with Poison Gas, transfer the prospective sentences of murderers onto Mr. Almeida, Commit High Treason on Mr. Almeida (Because he had proven he was the King of Canada by vetoing the Meech Lake Accord & Senate Reform), Incarcerate him and try to Murder him for 35+ Continuous Years For NEVER COMMITING A CRIME NOR EVER BEING MENTALLY ILL IS THE DEFINITION OF A CHARTER BREACH YOU MORON! etc, etc! (See His 300+ Page CA! Without even a Hearing such a decision should not even have been made, In Vacuo: and is Totally wrong in Law!

5.      The Hospital's Walker-Renshaw and The blind, dumb and deaf Mr. Goulard's following her arguments verbatim, that the ORB has no jurisdiction to award damages, even if a constitutional violation has been proven is beyond stupid! The Starz (Re), 2015 ONCA 318 (CanLII)  Case And the "Damages" sought in that case were totally different than Mr. Almeida's Case And the damages he is seeking! The Starz case is more in the category of vexatious and nonsensical claims of charter breaches; and cannot be applied to the System's attempted Murder and Crucifixion Of Stanley Almeida Over 35+ Years Of Repeated Torture Attempted Murder for Political Reasons: i.e. Stanley Is The True King Of Canada! The breach that Starz was alleging, was that his ORB Hearing was delayed beyond one year: inconveniencing him from drinking Alcohol --This is a preposterous waste of the Court's time! In The OCAs Reasons for Decision it says, Consequently, if costs orders were available, hearings would likely become more adversarial and less inquisitorial, with a shift in focus away from the twin goals of public safety and the fair treatment of NCR accused persons. The OCAs reasoning was totally Fallacious: The OCA was pretending to be trying to protect the Hospital from: financial jeopardy, Less emphasis on Significant Risk Inquiries, and adversarial animosity, from constant litigation: But The ORB & Hospitals Functions of Detaining Patients And Forcefully Medicating Them Is Always Adversarial: While Allowing accused to get charter relief would make them less adversarial --so the OCAs ruling was completely false and in Error. As for less Inquisitorial: What About A Patients Rights? What about if the Hospital Was Falsely Diagnosing An Accused And Forcefully Medicating Him: He Has A Right Against unusual treatment and/or punishment! What if he was not a significant risk, but was being held in custody for 35+ years simply for verbal abuse --he would have no remedy? Furthermore These Satanic Rulings: Are Denying Mr. Almeida Fundamental Justice By Denying All Remedies To The Horrific Charter Breaches He Has Suffered Over 35+ Years! The NATURE of Mr. Almeidas Constitutional Application is Deadly Serious: furthermore Mr. Almeida is not burdening the Hospital financially with this CA: The Federal Justice Minister will be liable for the Compensation!! Secondly the constitutional breach was of a much more SEVERE Nature than (loss of privileges for two weeks longer, spent in a more secure detention facility) as the Chaudry (Re), 2015 ONCA 317 (CanLII)  Case: These are basically FRIVOLOUS And VEXATIOUS Charter Breaches: USED BY THE SATANIC HOSPITAL, ORB, AMICUS and OCA TO MAKE VEXATIOUS AND FRIVOLOUS RULINGS: WHICH IS A MOCKERY OF THE LAW AND THE JUSTICE SYSTEM! Mr. Almeida has spent 36+ years in false custody where the System tried to Murder him every year for those 36+ years-- two weeks is nothing! Mr. Almeida was Subject To Attempted Murder, Torture To Death, Total Satanic CRUCIFIXIONS: FOR 36+ CONTINUOUS YEARS! The OCA is the most Satanic And Regressive Court In Canada and its decisions cannot be definitive in determining Case Law: So How Did These Frivolous Cases Ever Get To The Highest Court in Ontario? Stanley Believes The Hospital, The ORB, The OCA, And The Amicus Curiae Conspired With Each Other To Bring These Frivolous AND MOOT Cases To The OCA, In Order To Get Them To Make Fallacious and Frivolous Rulings: To Obstruct Mr. Almeidas Legitimate Constitutional Application!!! Legal-Aid Would Never Fund Such A Frivolous Appeal: To Circumvent The Legal-Aid vetting process: The Hospital, ORB, & AG (Crown): (Who Appoint And Fund The amicus curiae!) Got The Amicus Curiae To represent the accused and/or Appeal This Case To The OCA, and help the Hospital to resurrect Moot cases: The amicus Had To Get Funding From The ORB, And AG: And To Get The OCA To Make A Ruling Favourable To The Hospitals Pending CA, With Mr. Almeida: (The OCA then Denied Costs, Damages, & Declaratory Relief!) They Had To Have All Colluded With Each Other!!! There is an apprehension of bias re: the amicus curiae: (Who appealed or participated in both the Starz & Chaudry Cases) Because it gets its funding from the ORB, and the AG: The very same people that were openly hostile to Mr. Almeida, throughout the whole CA process! And it is quite clear, from the ORBs ruling to dismiss Stanleys CA, call the POISON GAS a Delusion and Impose a Detention Order,  that the ORB & AG are PUPPETS of the NCR Hospitals: Who desperately wanted Mr. Almeidas CA Application to be dismissed!!! FURTHER PROOF of This is that the Attorney For Two Of The Hospitals Involved (Starz, Chaudry, & Mr. Almeidas CA Dismissal) Was One: Barbara Walker-Renshaw for both The Chaudry Case & The Almeida Case, The Chaudry Decision [Chaudry (Re), 2015 ONCA 317 (CanLII)] --Does The Name Walker-Renshaw Sound Familiar??? & J. Blackburn, was For The Starz Case; The Starz Decision [Starz (Re), 2015 ONCA 318 (CanLII)] BOTH THESE SATANIC OCA DECISIONS CAME FROM ONE OCA PANEL: [Gillese and Lauwers JJ.A. and Speyer J. (ad hoc)] And Both Were probably Moot Cases whose Declaratory Judgements, Were Released On May 7th, 2015; although they were litigated at disparate times: proving Preplanning and Collusion; and Well After Stanley Had Been Given Permission To File His CA To The ORB on Nov. 25th, 2014; By The Hon. Ms. K. Chalmers; And His Filing of the CA On Feb. 20th, 2015 --This Cannot Be A Coincidence!!! Both These Cases (Starz & Chaudry) Seem To Have been filed over two years ago: and seem to be MOOT And/Or abandoned appeals: (Moot Because the Patients Were Long Since Discharged Into The Community, Or Abandoned Because The damages or costs, they were seeking was much, much less than the cost of litigating or fighting this appeal.) Thus The Hospitals Lawyers, and amicus curiae, colluded, and intentionally pursued these uncontested, moot, abandoned appeals, simply to get declaratory judgements: which is never ever given or done By The Honest Courts --Simply to adversely damage Mr. Almeidas CA! The Satanic Injustice Of This OCA Ruling Is That: The NCR Hospitals And The OCA: Removed Declaratory Relief For NCR Litigants: But The Hospitals Received, And Were Given Declaratory Relief  by the OCA, And The OCA, in addition, Made A Declaratory Judgement On Moot Cases! The Charter of Rights Has Been in Effect Since 1981: It Is Not By Coincidence, That Just Three Months (May 7th, 2015) After Stanley Filed His Constitutional Application (Feb. 20th, 2015): That The Satanic OCA Panel, Suddenly Decided To Remove The Remedies Of: Costs, Damages And Declaratory Relief From Just NCR Patients!!! Which seems to prove that the OCA Satanically Colluded with The Various NCR Hospitals, the amicus, And The ORB: To Arbitrarily Remove Most Charter Remedies From Charter Appeals emanating from the ORB --Which would affect only NCR patients: AND ESPECIALLY STANLEY ALMEIDAs PENDING CA! All Civil Litigations Allow The Winning Party To be awarded Costs, Damages & Some Declaratory Relief: To Deny only NCR Patients The Right To That Relief Is Contrary To The Equality Clause, s. 15 of the Charter of rights relating to a mental disability! Charter Breaches Should Be Treated As Materially More Serious, And Deserving Of Greater Relief Than Run-of-the-mill civil litigation: Thus to Satanically discriminate against only the labelled mentally-ill charter-litigants amounts to an evil inversion of fairness, Justice and the intent of the Charter Itself!!! It is also in diabolical opposition to The Supreme Court Decision Of: Supreme Court of Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23 , 2010); Which specifically states that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter Rights: the Court noted that section 24(1) of the Charter gives courts of competent jurisdiction a broad power to grant "appropriate and just" remedies for Charter breaches!!! You cant be half-pregnant: youre either are a court of competent jurisdiction, or youre not! Furthermore There Is Hierarchy In Determining Correct Legal Jurisprudence: The Definitive or Final Jurisprudence on Determining if the Board has Jurisdiction in awarding Charter Breach Compensation Has to Reside with The Supreme Court of Canada --up until the SCC overturns its own ruling in Vancouver City v. Ward (2010): the SCC decision must prevail over the OCAs!! Mr. Almeida Already Anticipated This False Argument By The Hospital & OCA, And Uses The Supreme Court Ruling To already Answer It in his Constitutional Application: "The Appellant respectfully requests damages of $35+ million dollars (Or one $$$Million Dollars For Every Year Of Unlawful Imprisonment, Unrelenting Torture, Attempted Murder) by so Ordering the Justice Minister. The authority for this remedy is the Supreme Court:

Supreme Court of Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23 , 2010) held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, even where public officials have not acted in bad faith and the individual has not suffered any monetary damages. In a unanimous decision, the Court noted that section 24(1) of the Charter gives courts of competent jurisdiction a broad power to grant "appropriate and just" remedies for Charter breaches. Prior jurisprudence should hold what the appropriate and just remedy should be. Supreme Court of Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23rd, 2010) held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, violation of charter rights, vindication for being right, and deterrence from future injustice; makes it imperative that he be awarded these damages. The pain and suffering the Appellant endured was unequalled in the annals of human history and has to be judged in that context; the fact that Mr. Stanley DAlmeida is still alive is not from the System's and Hospital's wont of trying to murder him; but due to his toughness. But 35+ years of incarceration and long-term side-effects of these toxic poisons has greatly affected his quality of life, past income earnings, ability to earn future income, and must be compensated. Stanley Has no money to support a family or the earnings potential --due to the poisoning and its debilitating effects. He has no pension plan like the Demonic liberal Politicians want relatively rich people to all have, Yet these same Politicians turned a Blind Eye, Or who tried to murder him with their deficit spending: which Stanley Has To Pay for with his taxes --while Stanley was trying to save mankind in prison & Psychiatric Murder Hospitals! Stanley is the poorest man on Earth: Where is the charity for him? Where is the compassion for: the most Persecuted, the most maligned, The Man The Satanic System has tried To Murder The Most? He must get compensation, to lead a normal life."

    Mr. Almeidas Case Is Totally Unlike The Starz or Chaudry, Cases, Mr. Almeida is not alleging Charter Breaches by the Hospital or the Board alone: He is claiming Charter Breaches By The Entire Blonde-Angle-Saxon-Aryan Government System, Over 35+ Years, of which only 18 Years have been at the indirect hands of the ORB! Again Mr. Almeida Already Answers Why The Board Has Jurisdiction To HEAR AND AWARD THE COMPENSATION HE IS OWED IN HIS CA: Again It Is From Another Ruling By The Supreme Court of Canada:  "[Note: The SCC has already laid the groundwork for the ORB to accept jurisdiction of this case: [In R. vs. Conway, 2010 SCC 22, (2010) 1 S.C.R.]; and has already given it the authority to grant him the remedy that he is seeking [In Vancouver City vs. Ward SCC, July 21, 2010]!!!] And although Mr. DAlmeida was not under the ORB for every single moment he was in custody (He Has Been 18 Years Under The ORB, for a total of 35+ murderous Years.); to give due justice to Mr. DAlmeidas legally entitled to, constitutional hearing: All the relevant evidence must be allowed to be presented for the full period of Mr. DAlmeidas Genocidal, Murderous, High Treasonous Crucifixion: From Sept. 4th, 1981 To The Present (The Facts In This Case)!!! There Is A Pattern of Persecution, that can best be elucidated from a full Hearing of the evidence! The SCC Ruled: First: That The ORB is a court of competent jurisdiction, (With the Same Powers To Grant Relief As The: SCJ, OCA or SCC!) under s.24 of the Constitution Act, 1982; to hear this application and Grant Mr. DAlmeida the relief he is seeking; or to recommend to the Justice Minister that said Compensation be awarded. In R. vs. Paul Conway, 2010 SCC 22,[2010] 1 S.C.R. 765; The SCC Ruled that an administrative Tribunal like the ORB is a court of competent jurisdiction to hear a case under s. 24(1) of the Charter: In this case, C seeks certain Charier remedies from the Board. The first inquiry, therefore. is whether the Board is a court of competent jurisdiction under s. 24(1). The answer to this question depends on whether the Board is authorized to decide questions of law. The Board is a quasi-judicial body with significant authority over a vulnerable population. It operates under Part XX.I of the Criminal Code as a specialized statutory tribunal with ongoing supervisory jurisdiction over the treatment, assessment, detention, and discharge of NCR patients: accused who have been found not criminally responsible by reason of a mental disorder. Part XX.I of the Criminal Code provides that any party to a review board hearing may appeal the board's disposition on a question of law, fact or mixed fact and law. The Code also authorizes appellate Courts to overturn a review board's disposition if it was based on a wrong decision on a question of law. This Statutory' language is indicative of the Board's authority to decide questions of law. Given this conclusion, and since Parliament has not excluded the Charier from the Board's mandate, it follows that the Board is a court of competent jurisdiction for the purpose of granting remedies Under s. 24( I) of the Charter." Thus The SCC, Has Already Ruled That The ORB Is A Court Of Competent Jurisdiction, To Not Only Hear Complex Charter Arguments: But To Remedy Those Charter Breaches As Well. The SCC was making new jurisprudence in ruling: that the administrative tribunal does not have to have actually made these constitutional decisions before; but have the ability to decide such complex questions of law! The OCA is trying to go back to the bad old days: when the ORB was restricted to only considering actions it has traditionally made: and not take on constitutional Applications! Because To Restrict the kinds of relief normally granted Charter Breaches: would be to nullify the worth of the ORB as a court of competent jurisdiction --and violate the intent of the above SCC rulings!!! But The OCA can protect the Hospital from frivolous litigation, in that even the SCC did not intend for Major Damages or Compensation be awarded to Obviously Minor, Frivolous or Vexatious Charter Breaches! But The REMEDY To This By The ORB, The Hospital, the amicus Or The OCA: is simply to RAISE THE THRESHOLD: as to what constitutes a Charter Breach, And When Damages Can Be Awarded: Not Deny Remedies Like: Damages Or Compensation Altogether --Which would Constitute A Gross Unconstitutional Denial Of Mr. Almeidas And Other NCR Patients Charter Rights! For The SCC Nor The OCA ever Intended That A Person Who Was Almost Murdered Due To A Gross Violation of Charter Rights: Be Denied Any Redress Whatsoever! These Frivolous Charter Breaches Should Not Be Compared to Life And Death Charter Breaches --THE RIGHT TO COMPENSATION, And THE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION, Awarded: is all in the NATURE of, and the SEVERITY of, the charter breach! Finally, The ORB and Hospitals Decision was so Satanic, that it cannot stand: For even if the ORB could not grant damages, costs & declaratory relief via an order for same: Mr. Almeida had as the alternative ruling: A recommendation for same to the Justice Minister Which does not require legal power or jurisdiction at all; but it does have the same legal effect through moral persuasiveness!!!

6.     Mr. Almeida REPLIES TO THE DISPOSITION ORDER IN HIS EMAIL: Dated Feb. 25th, 2016; Which Mr. Goulard lied, that he never received! Yet the other parties who were copied along with Goulard in the Email: all received their Emails! This written submission also addresses CA arguments: which was always the focus of Mr. Almeida --the Disposition Order was worthless to Stanley: After they tried to Murder him for 36+ years: He Needed Compensation, Not Simply Release from Custody! For example in Oct. 19th, 2016: Justin Trudeau won a Majority Federal Election: Stanley had told the Board, that he has already proved that he is the King of Canada: By publicly vetoing the Meech Lake & Charlottetown Accords; And now was in real time proving it again in their presence, by vetoing an elected Senate! (See letters to the PM, & Newspapers) Now, both the Harper and Mulcair Parties promised to support each other in supporting “Senate Reform” in the form of an “Elected Senate”: Stanley had told the Board that “All Power Comes From The King: STANLEY“: Thus He Vetoes Senate Reform! The complete defeat of both these parties (Who were leading in the polls throughout 2015) proves once again that Stanley is the King of Canada!

7. Here is a copy of the Written Submissions Dated Feb. 25th, 2016: Goulard lies, he didn’t receive:

<Email To ORBs Chair G.Y. Goulard; Dated Feb. 25th, 2016.>

TO The ORB Panel: Attention: Chairman G.Y. Goulard:

Mr. Almeida's FINAL WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS PART 1:

          To Recapitulate and Add to Mr. D'Almeida's Constitutional Application (CA):

(1) The Just concluded Canadian national election October 19th, 2015, just proves again that Stanley D'Almeida is the King of Canada: The Majority Victory of the only candidate opposing Senate Reform of The Constitution, (Justin Trudeau), has proven what Stanley had said at the ORB Hearing in February 26th, 2015; (That He Vetoes Senate Reform!) Stanley had said that he has already proven he is the King of Canada, by Publicly Vetoing The Meech Lake Accord, The Charlottetown Accord, And now "Senate Reform" of our Constitution!!! The Constitution Is The Fundamental Law Of The Land: Our Constitution Dictates That Canada Is A MONARCHY, Since The Blonde-Saxon-Aryan System And Queen Elizabeth II, Openly Favored Senate Reform To An Elected Senate, And LOST: AND ONLY STANLEY D'ALMEIDA OPPOSED SENATE REFORM (Because All Power Comes From The King), AND WON: STANLEY HAS PROVEN AGAIN Absolute Power over our Constitution for 26+ Years Now, Despite Desperate Attempts By The Blonde-Aryan System For Senate Reform; Thus Stanley Is The De Facto And Proven All-Powerful King of Canada!

(2)  From the above stems a total vindication of all Stanley was saying in his Constitutional Application: That Mr. D'Almeida never ever committed a crime nor was ever mentally-ill. Much of the mental-illness allegations were over claiming he was the King of Canada: With this demonstrated proof to the ORB, in a real time demonstration of his Constitutional Power: There is nothing the Hospital, The Psychiatric System, nor The Saxon-Aryan System can now counter with. Stanley D'Almeida now asks the ORB to Order The Full Compensation of $$$35 MILLION Dollars For his 35 Years Incarcerated in Prisons and Psychiatric Hospitals where the Blonde-Angle-Saxon-Aryans systematically tried to Murder and Torture Mr. D'Almeida to DEATH!!! To attempt to murder an ordinary man would itself justify such compensation: But To Attempt To Murder The King of A Nation For Such An Extended Period Of Time: Is Not Only Genocidal Murder, War Crimes, Torture, Cruel and Unusual Punishment: IT IS HIGH TREASON AGAINST CANADA'S ONLY MODERN LANDED-IN-CANADA ANCESTRALLY-NATIVE-CANADIAN-PORTUGUESE-EAST-INDIAN AND PAN-NATIONAL KING: AND THE COMPENSATORY DAMAGES MUST REFLECT THE SEVERITY OF THE OFFENSE!!!

 (3) The Hearings: At The November 24th, 2014 Hearing, Chairperson Ms. K. Chalmers Overrules The Hospital & Crown, who were desperately arguing Res Judicata, over the Constitutional Application (CA) Proposal of Mr. Almeida; Ms. Chalmers Then Advises Mr. D'Almeida To Prepare A Full "Constitutional Application", With Evidence And A List Of Witnesses, and properly File it with the appropriate Attorney Generals of Ontario & Canada! Mr. Almeida would not have filed such a massive undertaking, with evidentiary documents, if he was going to be denied a FULL SERIOUS HEARING Of His CA! At The Beginning of the February 26th, 2015 Hearing: Dr. Hill Introduces a three page ADDENDUM that finally corrects the totally false Record and absolute lies of the Satanic Hospital's "Annual Administrator's Reports", and summarizes a  "Meeting Of The Minds Between The Hospital And Mr. Almeida For The First Time" AND SHOULD BE REQUIRED READING FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION HEARING!!! [Note: This ADDENDUM was not on the RECORD of DOCUMENTS entered into evidence at the October 6th, 2015 Hearing; and Mr. Almeida asks the ORB counsel Joe Wright, to correct this omission!!!] The ORB Panel did not keep its word on certain decisions it made orally on February 26th, 2015: For example Mr. G.Y. Goulard The Chairman, had said at the end of the February Hearing, that his Panel was "NOT seized", and that another Panel would Hear the Constitutional Application; (Saying, "You do not want this panel to hear your application"! Because Mr. Almeida had called Ms. Dr. Lightfoot a "fucking bitch" for openly disrespecting Mr. Almeida, and showing open bias in calling him "delusional" for saying he was being subjected to "Poison Gas" being pumped into his Condominium Unit, by forces unknown --Stanley would later prove to the Panel by blood tests and eye-witness testimony, that he was being poisoned! The Fucking Bitch Dr. Lightfoot, Did Not Understand, That An ORB Member Is Supposed To Be Impartial In Adjudicating The Hearing: She Cannot Call Someone Delusional Or Mentally-ill, When That Issue Is In Dispute: The Issue Of Poison-Gas Was Never Before, Raised By Dr. Hill As A Delusion --Except Just Moments Before: Previously Dr. Hill Agreed With Dr. Gojer, The Initial Diagnoser In 1998, That Mr. Almeida Had No Other Thought Disorder Other Than 'Being King of Canada'; So The New Delusion Issue Was Clearly New Grounds Of Contention! The ORB Seems To Think They Can Abuse, Cut-Off, Interrupt, Insult And Assault Mr. Almeida With Security Staff And Get Away With It! Mr. Goulard Cut Stanley Off, at the Feb. 26th Hearing; Then Had The Satanic Audacity, To Write His Assumption, of what Stanley was going to say, In His July 9th, 2015, "Reasons for Adjournment & IA" --His presumptions were totally false-- [Stanley did not decline requesting an Absolute Discharge because he would be at risk of poisoning, nor because he wanted "support": It was because He wanted to explain that it was NOT because he believed he was a "significant risk" --as the Hospital was assuming-- He Did Not Believe He Was A Significant Risk!, it was because of the New Satanic Administration Of Poison Gas Into His Private Condo As Somehow OKAY; It was because the Hospital were Poisoning his food in the community And using dentists to damage his teeth; And By Cutting Stanley-Off From Talking About It, Or Them Dismissing It AS A Delusion It Would All Go Away --As Mr. Goulard Falsely Assumed!] Although Goulard Was Totally Wrong; Mr. Goulard didn't have the grace to apologize, For Cutting Mr. Almeida Off, From Making His Final Submissions --As Was His Right As Counsel!!! For Stanley was about to make a crucial point: That He Was Denying an Absolute Discharge, Not Because He Believed He Was A Significant Risk; But Because Of The Continued Lethal Poison Gas (Especially Just Before The Feb. 26th, ORB Hearing!), Dentists Damaging His Teeth, & Poisoning Of His Food In The Community, And Attempted Murder By The System! By The Satanic Board Dismissing The Poison Gas Issue: It would escalate into threats made against Dr. Hill, A Police Complaint, and an even Worse Disposition, than ever --And Stanley Almost dying!) Furthermore The Chairman Mr. Goulard, had also already Dismissed The Res Judicata argument, like Ms. Chalmers had; And had promised that Mr. D'Almeida WOULD GET A FULL-DAY HEARING FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL APPLICATION ON OCTOBER 6th! BOTH THESE PROMISES WOULD EVENTUALLY BE RENEGED ON. He also said, that there would be a Teleconference presided by another Chairman, on the issue of setting a date and a full day, for the Constitutional Hearings To Be Heard By Another Panel, and to settle the issue of appointing an Independent Assessor (IA) To Reassess Mr. Almeida's Risk Assessment. Mr. Almeida made it clear to both Chairmen: That he would not participate in any reassessment, (because it was disrespectful of his honor to subject him to questioning his sanity) and wanted the assessment to be done from the Record alone; But he also disagreed with the Crown And the Hospital's Mr. Gibson, and That The ORB Panel did have the Jurisdiction to Appoint an Independent Assessor (IA) from CAMH! At The June Teleconference Mr. D'Almeida Changed His Position on his disposition "Request", he now stated: "Because of the near lethal "Poison Gas" being pumped into his Condo, he no longer requests for an "Absolute Discharge", But is now forced to request to remain under a "Conditional Discharge"; Because this was not Mr. Almeida's concept of increasing freedom --IT WAS A QUESTION OF QUALITY OF LIFE-- STANLEY'S QUALITY OF LIFE WAS NEAR ZERO, IF HE WAS RELEASED, BUT POISONED TO DEATH! Stanley was near Death, at this time, and was in worse health than anytime in years --And the Board were wanting an IA to grant him an Absolute Discharge"; which was absurd under the dire circumstances --But He Did Want The Constitutional Application to proceed, To obtain some Compensatory Relief And Obtain a Transition Of Power To The New King!!!! At the Oct. 2014 Hearing: Mr. Goulard did not give Stanley the credit for concurring with him; and disagreeing with Gibson, who had said the Board had no jurisdiction to order the Hospital to enable an independent assessment. And Mr. Goulard attributed Stanley's comments to Mr. Gibson --as part of historic attempts by the ORB, to deliberately disrespect Mr. Almeida --to maintain the fiction that he was mentally-ill. The Board Chairman also deliberately repeatedly interrupted Mr. Almeida, and refused to allow him full ability to cross-examine witnesses and give evidence: Even though Mr. D'Almeida was representing Himself --with Amicus Curiae Anthony Paas, clearly, openly biased and hostile to Mr. D'Almeida!

(4) At the October 6th, 2015, Hearing: Even the biased Dr. Hill & Mr. Paas disagreed with the ORB's Mr. Goulard for falsely recollecting the facts, reneging on his promise to use this Hearing, to give a FULL DAY Hearing to the Constitutional Application, and to have another Panel adjudicate it. Instead the Same Board used the Hearing to renege on its Decision to grant Mr. Almeida the same Conditional Discharge, as the year before; (The IA was only to determine if Mr. Almeida should get an Absolute Discharge or not --A Conditional Discharge had already been Agreed-Upon in February!) and instead used the Hearing at the Hospital's sudden request: to Reopen the February Hearing, to go backwards and reassess for a Detention Order --Illegally. Totally Negating the February 2015 Hearing --which had gone well for Stanley!! Stanley Now Made It Clear To The ORB That He Reluctantly, No Longer Wished An Absolute Discharge; (Because He Was Being Poisoned By Poison Gas!)But Was Now Requesting A Conditional --Which Had Already Been Granted In February!

(5)  At The October Hearing Independent Blood-Test Evidence would prove that Mr. D'Almeida had been subjected to Much Greater Than Ten Million >>10,000,000 nanoMoles/Litre serum concentration of clozapine and metabolites, a LETHAL DOSE of this neuroleptic drug, which was never legally prescribed for Mr. Almeida, with the normal concentration for serum clozapine being 2,400 nM/L, Mr. ALMEIDA HAD BEEN SUBJECTED TO 1,000 TIMES THE NORMAL IN VITRO SERUM CONCENTRATION OF Clozapine BY VIRTUE OF THE UNTRIED POISON-GAS DELIVERY SYSTEM --WHICH ENTERS THE LUNGS, BLOOD & BRAIN MUCH QUICKER, AND DOES MORE DAMAGE!! --and former Medical Student Semion Dashevsky, AND DR. HILL Testified To These Scientific Facts --By backward exponential extrapolation to July 15th, 2015; from the LO <310 nmol/L blood-test results From ~57 Days Later, after the poison gas had stopped!! Stanley gave evidence of the side-effects of the Poison Gas: Parkinsonism, Severe Muscle Weakness,  Persistent Nasal Drip, Loss of Lung Function, Inability To Breathe, Constant Sneezing, Cracked Bleeding Dry Skin, Cessation of Cell Division In The Epidermis, Stupor or Knockout Sleep, Persistent Injuries Never Healing, Hair Loss Grey Hair, Premature Aging & Death, Severely Blurred Vision, Noxious Odor of Poison Gas Permeating His Unit, This was Attempted Murder! ACT Team Worker Marie-France Lalancette Testified In Writing And In Person: That she witnessed a propane-like odor emanating from Unit#1702 next door, and observed a "hole" in the "imitation-duct" (NOT AN AIR-DUCT!!!) alongside the ceiling, where the gas was coming from! In his "reasons" Mr. Goulard tries to dismiss Ms. Lalancette's testimony by lying about it! Mr. Semion Dashevsky also testified he witnessed the severe gas odor that caused him to feel "Toxic", and go nauseous --even though Semion regularly takes normal doses of clozapine! Semion also testifies that he too witnessed the hole in the wall where the gas was coming from and that "Security" had been called and witnessed this "Gas" too. Mr. Almeida filed an official criminal complaint against OntarioShoresCMHS, and was given an official "GO# 1519922" from The Toronto Police Dept., 54 Division, Toronto. The demonic Police refused to investigate the Hospital, nor obtain evidence! But Stanley has amassed substantial evidence, that a Crime of Attempted Murder did occur here!!! Furthermore Dr. Hill did tacitly admit to Stanley that it was indeed the OSCMHS Hospital that was poisoning him; and he assured Mr. Almeida that the poison Gas would now stop! And it did stop for many months from July - Sept. 2015. But when Stanley confirmed on his website that the Blonde-Saxon-Aryans would be exterminated from the Americas; the poison Gas resumed by Sept. of 2015 in anticipation for the Satanic Oct. 6th, 2015 ORB Hearing! It was clear at the Hearing that although Dr. Hill did not feel threatened by Mr. Almeida; He was overruled by the OSCMHS Team, and they overruled him on resuming the Poison Gas as well! The Fact That Historically Just before each ORB Hearings, The Poisonings Intensify: Proves That The ORB Is Complicit In These Crimes: And are using the Poison Gas & Poisoning Of Food, To "Violently Control" Mr. Almeida By Murderous Poison, during the Hearings --For Neuroleptic Drug Poisonings Are A Murderous Violent Act That WILL Be PUNISHED ACCORDINGLY!!!!

(6)  At The Hearing Mr. Almeida Introduces New Evidence Of The Satanic Modus Operandi Of The Blonde-Anglo-Saxon-Aryan System: Every year since 1981, The Aryan System has been releasing Vicious Murderers and (Child) Rapists into the community, and transferring their prospective sentences onto Stanley D'Almeida (Like in Jesus Christ's Crucifixion, Barabbas's Murder sentence was transferred onto Jesus and Barabbas set free; But For Forty Years!) Starting In 1981 When Stanley's Murderous Incarcerations began: a child rapist and murderer named Gregory Guerin (Most Franco-Ontarians: Are Products Of Interracial Sex-With-Blond-Aryans, Are Sex-Fiends, Child-Molesters, Lesbians, Homosexuals, Pedophiles And Murderers! That Is Why Ontario Is So Satanically Evil, There Is No Opposition By The French In Ontario To The Satanic-Blonde-Anglo-Saxon-Aryans Because They Are So Sexually Deviant: That Is Why Satan Was Totally Ruling In Ontario, Canada!) In 1980-1981 Franco-Ontarian Gregory Guerin Used A Reed, To impale His six year-old nude Blond Cousin, Lizzy Tomlinson, through her Genitals, letting her bleed to death, then superficially burying her in a Toronto Park, But was inexplicably acquitted, after a "legal-Aid-Paid" Defense By Jew-Lawyer Brian Greenspan Evil Tactics; and Then his Prospective life-sentence Was transferred onto Stanley: Beginning Stanley Almeida's Repeated 36+ Years, Yearly MURDEROUS CRUCIFIXIONS!!! Guerin admitted he had his cousin Lizzy's BLOOD smeared on his shirt in two places, reacted violently after being first questioned by Police, by punching the mailbox; tried to commit suicide, exactly matched the appearance of the "composite sketch" of a bearded man, that had led Lizzy into the Park; had his "Player's Light" cigarette Butts (The only Brand he smoked) found all around Lizzy's Body, was seen walking with Lizzy to the Toronto Park willingly, proving that she knew him, was The cousin of six year-old Lizzy, Was Mentally Handicapped; But was still Inexplicably Released, through Brian Greenspan's evil Satanic-defense-lawyer tactics! Note: The Jew Connection To Both Jesus' Crucifixion And Stanley's! (The Jews Had Screamed "Free Barabbas Crucify Jesus"!) Every Year Since Then Murderer after Murderer has been set free and Stanley has had to suffer for their sins: By Way Of Murder By Lethally Toxic Poisons, Torture, Incarcerations In Prison or Hospitals --That Would Have Easily Murdered An Ordinary Man! Today The Jews And Liberals Are Still Advocating Blacks Be Released From Prison, Through "Prison Reform", "Sentencing Reform", And The Satanic "Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted" Who Are Using High Priced Teams Of Lawyers To Release Guilty Black Murderers Onto The Streets And Transfer Their Sentences Upon Stanley The King --This Is The Epitome Of Liberal Satanic Delusion, And Reverse Racism!!! The Bleeding Heart Liberals Perpetrate These "Blacks Are Victims" Scams To Fleece Money Out Of The Taxpayer, Force Preferred Treatment For Blacks And Women: ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF WHITE MEN: WHO ARE SUFFERING THROUGH RECORD HIGH RATES OF SUICIDES, AND HISTORICALLY LOW LABOR PARTICIPATION RATES!!! THE Biggest Liberal, Democrat, Liar Is Donald Trump, Who Lied He Was A Republican! Via Democrat Trump And His Dirty-Evil-Jew Son-In-Law Jared Kushner, & Whore-Jew-Daughter Ivanka Trump: Trump Is Trying To Free Black Criminals Via "Prison Reform", "Sentencing Reform", "Affirmative Action", "Inner-City Bailouts" And "Handouts": Although 88% Of All Violent Crime Is Committed By Blacks, And 50% Of All Murders Are Committed By Blacks (Although Blacks Compose Only 13% Of The U.S. Population) --WHILE THE KING IS ROTTING IN "PSYCHIATRIC PRISON" AND BEING MURDERED AND CRUCIFIED YEAR AFTER YEAR! Here Are Just Some of the Other deliberately unsolved murders and prospective sentences transferred onto Stanley: Sharmini Anandavel 15, was murdered in 1999 by Stanley Tippett, A Mentally Handicapped And Disfigured Man; but the Satanic Police refused to lay charges or investigate, Tippett's Prospective sentence was transferred onto Mr. D'Almeida! Christine Jessop 9, Raped and murdered in Durham Region, in 1984 by Guy Paul Morin; Morin was found "wrongfully imprisoned" and his sentence transferred onto Stanley D'Almeida. Nicole Morin 8, murdered in 1985, her Murderer's sentence transferred to Stanley; Kristen French 15, Murdered by Karla Homolka 1992; Leslie Mahaffy 14, Tammy Homolka 11, both Murdered in 1991; Karla Homolka was acquitted --although Bernardo did serve some time --He Was Not The Murderer-- Karla was! A Jew named Robert Baltovich murdered Elizabeth Bain in 1990, got life in 1992, served just eight years, but was released on bail without any new evidence in 2000, by Satanic Jew-Judge Marc Rosenberg Of The Absolutely Satanic "Court Of Appeal For Ontario", and the evil, Satanic "Association in Defense of the Wrongly Convicted": and his life sentence transferred to Stanley! Even in 2014 Leighton Hay a Black Murderer & Evil Schizophrenic, Was deliberately released by the Supreme Court of Canada, without any new evidence: To spite Stanley: Who is Neither Schizophrenic nor Mentally-Ill --who Had said Blacks are an Inferior Race: So They Release Black And Jew Murderers Out Of Spite And Satanism!!! The Blonde-Anglo-Saxon-Aryan-System Runs the Justice System: They have chosen to abuse their power to CRUCIFY Stanley D'Almeida: Rather Than Prosecute Real Murderers: But Stanley has borne this suffering with forbearance: And He will ascend his throne and get Justice so long denied him by the Satanic-Evil-Devil-Possessed BLONDE-ANGLO-SAXON-Aryans!!!

(7)  The Chairman Mr. Goulard's LIES In His "Reasons For Disposition": of Nov. 27th, 2015!

      (a) Page2: Mr. Almeida only reluctantly declined requesting an absolute discharge, because he was in dire health, due to the "Poison Gas" being pumped into his condominium by the Hospital for Two-and-a-half Years now! And he repeatedly made this clear: Yet Mr. Goulard lies about this! Mr. Goulard has a fixation with continuously demonically interrupting Mr. Almeida from talking, while letting the other counsels rant on and on for hours and hours! Mr. Goulard has a Demonic Bias against mentioning the facts on the "Poison Gas"; which was proven on the Criminal Standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt" by the "Blood Tests" and the Eye-Witnesses' Testimony --and the fact that it so affected Mr. Almeida, that he was willing to decline getting an Absolute Discharge over this Poison Gas issue!!!

     (b) Page4 Mr. Goulard recklessly misrepresents the truth, when he lies that Mr. Almeida had eight admissions to WPH/WMHC as a result of assaultive behaviour. The reason this is so upsetting is that it is totally untrue: and done by a supposed impartial chairman --no less!! As most psychiatrists know: the committal criteria for psychiatric Hospitals are worded very strictly: there has to be significant danger of serious bodily harm to oneself or another person --thus reasons were usually exaggerated and falsified to obtain a committal-- (Otherwise the admitting Doctor would refuse admission!!!) and were recanted later! The Hospital's Admitting Doctor Would Deliberately Force Stanley's Parents To Make False Accusations, Or Else They Would Refuse To Admit Stanley To The Hospital!! Mrs Almeida Recants The False Accusations Later, Where Mrs Almeida states, "Stanley has never been a violent person" On Pages 30-36 of His Constitutional Record (CR) On His Notice of Constitutional Question Binder (NCQ). On Pages 262-283 (NCQ) Mr. Fenelon Almeida testifies in Court under fear of persecution from cops: That it was the Police Who Assaulted Stanley in 1981!!! Even though Stanley was falsely and absurdly convicted of assaulting six-foot-six 200 pound police officers!!! The lies are so upsetting, because even the two criminal common-assaults in 35 years, that Stanley was convicted of, were totally false!!! On Pages 39A-47 Stanley only weighs 75 lbs, due to fasting, from the continuous fear of being poisoned to death by forced medications --Which happened relentlessly, year after year: As They Attempted To Murder Stanley With Poison!!! In Prison or society who could a bone-thin skeleton weighing 75 lbs Assault??? The Record Will Show That Stanley Has Always Lived With His Parents: And He Has Always Been Welcome In Their Home: If he had ever genuinely assaulted them: This would not be true!!! His Parents have purchased a $120,000 Condominium for him; and furnished him with retirement income from their meagre resources. They have spent a great deal of their time and energy; looking after Stanley, In Prison & Psychiatric Hospitals: As The Blonde Aryan System tried to Murder him. Most Recently Stanley Enjoyed A Christmas Visit With His Parents And Siblings From Dec. 16th, 2015 To Jan. 5th, 2016.

     (c) On Page4 Goulard Parrots The Lies Of The Hospital's Clinical Reports That Stanley had stated were "ALL LIES 100% LIES"!!! It Was Stanley who was systematically assaulted, tortured, abused and attempts made to MURDER HIM!!! Systematic abuse and continuous TORTURE Over 35 Years, to a HIGH HONORABLE MAN CAN RESULT IN DEATH FROM THE TORTURE ALONE --As Dr. Hill Concurred That This Is Possible-- That Is Why The Geneva Convention Forbids Torture On Political Prisoners & Prisoners Of War!!!! Stanley Is The King Of Canada: A PARAGON OF VIRTUE: INCAPABLE OF ERROR: INCAPABLE OF SIN: PERFECT IN EVERY WAY: THESE STATEMENTS OF RIDICULE, INSULTS AND DISPARAGEMENT: ARE GROUNDS FOR CHARGES OF HIGH TREASON: AND DEATH! WHEN STANLEY COMES INTO POWER!!!

     (d)  On Pages 8-9 Mr. Goulard misstates the facts: And Shows Contempt For The Truth: There is no air-duct in Stanley's Condominium: Ms. Lalancette misstated the facts --Which She Is Now Willing To Correct!!! Mr. Goulard was told repeatedly: The Poison Gas is entering from a hole drilled from the adjacent Unit#1702's Wall, At A 45 Degree Angle: and through the eight-inch-solid Concrete Wall, and through a Solid Plaster Filled Structure That Imitates the shape of a duct --but is not an air duct!!! Ms. Lalancette was told this repeatedly by the Property Manager & By Stanley; but misunderstood --out of fear of persecution if she helps Stanley! There IS NO AIR-DUCT! There can be no possibility of odours entering from this structure because it is solid PLASTER!!! AND THE WALL IS SOLID 8" OF CONCRETE!!! Ms. Lalancette Now Knows This And Is Willing To Correct Her Testimony!

     (e)  On Page10 Goulard Dismisses all of Stanley's Extensive testimony, in a brief lying paragraph! The Lying Fucking Bastard! Stanley never ever said he influenced decisions regarding Meech Lake; Stanley never ever said that the reason he filed his notice of constitutional question, had anything to do with renovating his condominium! The Lying Fucking Bastard Goulard! STANLEY PUBLICLY VETOED THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD DEMONSTRATING HIS De Facto VETO POWER: AT A TIME WHEN EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN CANADA, BELIEVED MEECH WAS A DONE DEAL: On JUNE 8th, 1990!!! IN PUBLIC LETTERS TO THE GLOBE & MAIL, And THE TORONTO SUN! MULRONEY WAS STILL BOASTING IN AN INTERVIEW WITH GLOBAL TV THAT "HE HAD CHOSEN, WHEN TO ROLL ALL THE DICE!". AND EVERY SINGLE NEWSPAPER WAS CROWING "OH CANADA", AND WORDS LIKE: "CANADA IS SAVED"! IMMEDIATELY AFTER STANLEY'S PUBLIC ROYAL VETO: THE COUNTRY MADE AN ABOUT-TURN AND SUDDENLY ACCEPTED STANLEY'S DECREE THAT MEECH LAKE WAS DEAD!!! IN THIS VERY ORB HEARING STANLEY REPEATEDLY DECLARED THAT "SENATE REFORM" IS DEAD, BECAUSE ALL POWER COMES FROM THE KING (STANLEY): IT WOULD MAKE CANADA A DEMOCRACY: FROM ITS CURRENT MONARCHY (STANLEY AS KING!): AT A TIME WHEN HARPER & MULCAIR (WHO BOTH FAVORED SENATE REFORM) WERE LEADING IN THE POLLS! THIS DEMONSTRATION OF STANLEY'S POWER WAS DONE IN REAL TIME, UNDER THE VERY NOSES OF THE ORB: WHICH IS 100% PROOF THAT STANLEY IS THE KING OF CANADA!!!

     (f)  On Page12 Mr. Goulard repeats the lie from page2 that Mr. Almeida did not want an absolute discharge because of his constitutional damages! (This Is Partly True --Stanley Does Believe That The Only Way He Can Be Released Is If He Gets Compensation: Because Fundamentally: The Reason He Is Incarcerated: Is Because He Is The King Of Canada: Without That Admission By The System, He Cannot Be Released Until The System Is Destroyed!!!) But The Other reason Stanley RELUCTANTLY RECANTED HIS REQUEST FOR AN ABSOLUTE DISCHARGE: WAS BECAUSE OF LETHAL IMPAIRMENT OF HIS HEALTH, DUE TO ALMOST TWO-AND-A-HALF YEARS OF POISON GAS BEING PUMPED INTO HIS CONDOMINIUM THROUGH A HOLE DRILLED TROUGH HIS WALL BY Ontario Shores!

     (g)  On Page24 Mr. Goulard emits his biggest lie yet! Goulard talks out of both sides of his mouth: to say that Ms. Lalancette was not an expert on poison gas or Clozapine; yet Goulard uses Ms. Lalancette to dispute the INDISPUTABLE INDEPENDENT BLOOD TEST RESULTS --based simply on hearsay speculation from some biased Nurse & Dr. Lightfoot Bitch! Ms. Lallancette Is Now Willing To Revise Her Testimony To Now Verify: That She Has Since Spoken To A Nurse-Practitioner, Who Told Her That The Levels Of Clozapine In Stanley's Blood Were "Relatively LO Compared To Active Users Of Clozapine", But SIGNIFICANT --And Not Inconclusive! The Crucial Fact Here Is That: The Poison Gas Had Stopped 57 Days Prior To The Blood Test Results: Thus The Very Fact That Clozapine Was Still Being Detected: Proved That There Was A 10,000,000 nM/L Serum Concentration In His Blood On July 15, 2015; When The Poison Gas Had Ceased, Due To The Discovery Of The "HOLE"!!! The Biased Satanic Police refused to Investigate the "Attempted Murder Attempt" Using Poison Gas, Because Satan Does Not Want To Fight The Satanic "Ontario Shores" Version Of Satan. The System Was Guilty Of Murder In The First Degree! And Was Covering-Up Its Arse!!!

     (h) On Page25 Mr. Goulard Again Omits Most Of Mr. Almeida's & Semion Dashevsky's Testimony: Stanley had proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he had been poisoned by a lethal dose of clozapine! Extrapolating 57 Days Backward To July 15th, 2015: On A Logarithmic or Exponential Rate-Of-Excretion: Because serum-clozapine has a 36-72 Hour Half-Life In The Body: Semion Used The Most Conservative Estimate For The Half-Life at 72 Hours; And Then Could Prove That Mr. Almeida Had A Serum-Blood Concentration Of ~10,000,000 (Ten-Million) nM/L Of Clozapine: A LETHAL LEVEL, ON July 15th, 2015 --Enough to murder a person!!! And That Semion Dashevsky was "visibly shaken", "felt toxic mentally & physically", and had to immediately sit down; from the noxious odour of the poison gas he breathed and eye-witnessed! --even though he normally uses high doses of legally prescribed clozapine himself"

     (i)  On Pages27-29 Goulard makes his biggest lie of his 'Reasons'. Goulard Lied That Mr. Almeida Was Aggressive & Rude! The Fact Was That Mr. Goulard Was Contemptible, Abusive And Violent To Mr. Almeida: Goulard Like A Trained Seal: Rudely Interrupted And Cut-OFF Mr. Almeida --Who Was Acting As HIS OWN Counsel-- While Allowing Other Counsel To Ramble On-And-On For Hours! He Wouldn't Let Stanley Get A Word In Edgewise. Stanley Repeatedly Told Him To Stop Interrupting, He Said, "OK I'll Give You Five Minutes"; But Then Would Rudely Interrupt Again, After 5 Seconds! He Was Possessed By A Devil, And could not stop talking --while Stanley Was making argument-in-chief! The guy was whacked in the head! These rude interruptions by the ORB had been going on for years: as a deliberate demonic means to disrespect Mr. Almeida: And Try To Lie That He Was Mentally-Ill: By Making him seem incompetent as Counsel. Finally Stanley had had enough of Goulard's evident demonic-possession, and loss of control of his senses: And told him, "Just Shut-Up for One-Minute, Let Me Talk You Crazy Devil-Possessed Mother-Fucker"; And Goulard Was So CRAZY, He Literally Couldn't Keep His Mouth Shut For Even One Second!!! Since Stanley Was Showing Goulard-Up As CRAZY; To Save Face, He Called Security, To Violently Eject Stanley From The Hearing Room! The Fundamental Problem With The ORB: Is That They Are Trying To Maintain A Lie, That Stanley Is Mentally-ill When He Clearly Isn't: They Are Biased Against Stanley, When They Are Supposed To Be Impartial; They Want To Lie That Poison Gas Does Not Exist, When 100% Proof Was Presented To Them; Because They Are Colluding In The Attempted Murder Of Mr. Almeida --Instead Of Halting It! When The Tribunal Being Appealed To Is Worse And More Evil, Than The Hospital & Saxon-Aryan-System Who Is Trying To Murder You For 35 Years: You Are In Dire Straits. The ORB Is Not An Impartial Arbiter Of Justice, But Enthusiastic Gung-Ho Cheerleaders For More Horrific Poison Murder Attempts, And More Lethal & CRUEL TORTURE Of Mr. Almeida!!! Under s.672.55 (1) of THE CCC, "No Disposition made under s.672.54 shall direct that any psychiatric or other treatment of the accused be carried out or that the accused submit to such treatment." Yet The ORB Is Obsessed With Forced Anti-psychotic Drugs Ad Infinitum Be Imposed On NCR Accused: This Is Satanic And Contrary To The Criminal Code of Canada! The Only Reason The Satanic System Were Able To Incarcerate And Poison Mr. Almeida To Death, For The Last 18 Years, Was Due To The ORB Enabling Them To Murder Stanley. Stanley Lost His Rights Of Appeal Of A Forced Treatment Order, Only Because The ORB Detained Him For So Long, That Civilian Statutes' Protections Against Arbitrary Treatment, And Against The Fundamental Principles Of Justice; Because Statutory Protections Never Intended For Such Long Detention Periods, Simply Expired! The Courts Never Ruled On Stanley's Capacity Appeals, They Just Dismissed Them; And Stanley Was Almost Murdered By Default, A Crime Of Omission By The Courts, Governments & ORB! In Its Disposition The ORB Is Clearly Again Violating The Spirit Of The Law (s.672.55 (1) of the CCC) By Satanically Advocating Forced Treatment, And The Satanic Means To Carry It Out --Even Advising Replacing The SDM With The PGT! The ORB's Hearing Conduct In Continuously Interrupting Mr. Almeida, And Dismissing The Use Of Poison Gas For Attempted Murder, As A Delusion: Was Clearly Contrary To s.672.55 (1)! There Must Be Consequences For The ORB: When Their Illegal Conduct Is So Satanic And Evil, And Excessively Lengthy (18 Years!) Then They Must Face Punishment! The ORB's Conduct Against Stanley D'Almeida Was Egregious And Murderous: He Appealed To Them For Relief: They Tried To Murder Him Worse Than Ever Instead!

     (j)  Actually After The Hearing, Mr. Goulard Was Very Conciliatory, He came up to Stanley To Personally Shake his hand, withdrew his threat to hold the Constitutional Application Hearing Immediately after the 6:10 PM Disposition Hearing; And intimated that Mr. Almeida had won the Hearing 100% --And would receive a Hearing date for the CA later! He obviously changed his mind a week later, at the intervention of devil-possessed secret police or by other outside forces. Even Mr. Dashevsky & Ms. Lalancette believed Stanley had won on all fronts, at the time of the Hearing, On Oct. 6th, 2015; At ~6:10 PM! The Poison Gas Stopped Immediately After This Hearing; But Then A Week Later The Poison Gas Resumed And Two Weeks Later, A Satanic Disposition Order of a Detention Order, Was Imposed, Completely Discordant To What Goulard's Body-Language Had Intimated At The Hearing!

     (k) On October 19th, 2015; Senate Reform Was DEAD! As Harper & Mulcair were trounced by Justin Trudeau: The Only Candidate Renouncing Constitutional Changes To The Senate! A Total Victory & Vindication For Mr. Almeida!!! Yet The Poison Gas Continued Unabated, Obviously The Blonde-Saxon-Aryan System Wanted To Murder Mr. Almeida Whether He Was Proven The King of Canada, Or Not. They Only Seem To Understand Violence.

     (l)  On Dec. 16th, 2015 - Jan. 6th, 2016; Mr. Almeida visited with his Parents in Ottawa; Because the Hospital uses his parents to poison his food, while he is there: Mr. Almeida hadn't visited them in Three Years. The Hospital Is Cruel And Evil, to use family visits for opportunities to Murder Him By Poison! Stanley was heavily poisoned in his first few days: and lost a portion of his Tooth #16, as a side-effect of the poisonous drugs! (See Letter Of Dr. Hill, Requesting Additional Dental Insurance From ODSP) This was Stanley's Darkest Hour: On Dec. 24th, 2015!!! But The Hindu Christmas Arrived On Dec. 25th, 2015; Marking The Sun's Returning To The Northern Hemisphere (See Greatest Conspiracies On Stanley's Website: Dec. 25th is actually an ancient Hindu-Zoroastrian Celebration, marking the return of the Sun, And The God Mithra's Birthday! This Holiday was Stolen from the Hindus, By The Roman-Hittite-Aryans and falsely attributed to Jesus' Birth.) And Things Began Looking-Up!!! As Stanley has told The ORB: He has had his teeth deliberately damaged by Dentists in Toronto: Just as recently, on Nov. 12th, 2015; A Devil-Possessed Chinese Dentist Dr. Norman Mak & His Evil Black Dental Assistant, deliberately damaged the Enamel & Dentin of several of Stanley's teeth --causing enormous suffering! Stanley desperately asked Ms. Lalancette for help, but has yet to obtain a dentist who will assist, rather than damage his teeth from her. At The End of the visit to Ottawa, things finally began to look up, after Dec. 25th: His Parents were very pleased with the Visit: And the poisoning seemed to have stopped as well. Things are also looking-Up with the ORB and Mr. Almeida's Constitutional Application (CA). And Marie-France now says she believes she can finally obtain a Dentist who will help Stanley, rather than Murder Him By Torture, through damaging his teeth! There is a new issue where the Hospital had ENTERED his Condo while he was away and poisoned his food he had left in the Condo, as well as some "Spirulina" supplements he had there! The issue here is the cost of throwing away substantial amounts of food that has been poisoned at considerable COST! The System Must Place A LIMIT on their actions, and stop escalating: Poison Gas And ENTERING His Private Residence Is Unacceptable!!! Ms. Lallancette Is Now Willing To Correct Her Errors In Testimony: She Now Understands That There Is No "Air-Duct" In Stanley's Condo Kitchen, What She Thought Was A Duct, Is Filled With Solid Plaster, And That There Is No Possibility Of Odors Coming Through The Wall: As It Is 8 Inches Of Solid Concrete! The Only Way Odors Came Through The Wall: Was Because The Hospital Had Drilled A Hole Through The Wall (That Ms. Lallancette Witnessed And Felt) And She Smelled The Odor Of The Gas As Well!!! She Is Also Willing To Correct That The Clozapine Levels (After 57 Days Had Elapsed) Were "LO", In Comparision To Active Users; But not Inconclusive!

(8)     We now Return To The Constitutional Application: Which Was Always Mr. D'Almeida's Most Important Issue: For There To Be A Transition Of Power From The Satanic, Devil-Possessed Blonde-Aryan-World-Wide-System, To Stanley D'Almeida The King Of Canada: Stanley Must Obtain Full Compensation: At The Rate Of At Least $$$One Million Dollars For Each Year He Was Incarcerated And Crucified, And The System Attempted To MURDER HIM WITH RELENTLESS TORTURE, GENOCIDE, VIOLENCE, PROPAGANDA, LIES, POISON, POISON GAS, ISOLATION, PERSECUTION, TOTAL OSTRACISM, BLACKOUT INCOMMUNICADO For A Running Total Of $$$$35 Million Dollars And Counting!!!

****THUS ENDS PART 1 OF MR. ALMEIDA'S FINAL SUBMISSIONS

                                                         PART 1****

From: Stanley Almeida, 1701-5 Massey Square, Toronto, Ontario, M4C 5L6. Tel: (416) 699-6724.

Email: stanley_xvidalmeida@yahoo.com

DATED: February 25th, 2016.

<End of Email to Goulard>

8.         Such further and other Grounds the Appellant may adduce as the requested Transcript becomes available and He Perfects his Appeal.

March ___th, 2017.                     ___________________

                                                        STANLEY ALMEIDA

             

                           Email: stanley_xvidalmeida@yahoo.com

                                                --Appellant Acting in Person

TO: The Ontario Review Board, 151 Bloor St. West, 10th Floor, Toronto, ON. M5S 2T5. Tel: (416) 327-8866. FAX: (416) 327-8867.

AND TO: Barbara J. Walker-Renshaw, LLB., Scotia Plaza, 40 King St. West, Toronto ON. M5H 3Y4.Tel: (416) 367- 6744. FAX: (416) 682-2823.

AND TO: Ms. N. MacDonald, Crown Attorney's Office, 150 Bond St., 3rd Floor, Oshawa, ON. L1G OA2. Tel (905) 743-2700. FAX: (905) 743-2484.

AND TO: Mr. Anthony Paas Amicus Curiae, 27 Prince Arthur Ave.,

Toronto, ON. M5R 1B2. Tel: (416) 960-3066.

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch, 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1.Tel.: (416) 212-7244. Fax: (416) 326-4015.

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street West, Exchange Tower, Box 36, Toronto, ON M5X IK6.

Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.

 

PART 3: THIS IS THE EVIDENCE THAT MR. ALMEIDA WILL RELY UPON: Mr. Almeida asks the Court Registrar to transfer the Record, and Evidence files from the ORB to the OCA! Mr. Almeida will try to present all the Evidence as he perfects his appeal.

 

THE EVIDENCE IN THIS CASE

                                              TABLE OF CONTENTS:

DESCRIPTION                                                    DATE    PAGE                                  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Court File No. C61860             

Court of Appeal for Ontario

IN THE MATTER OF an Appeal under s.672.72(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada

BETWEEN:

                     STANLEY.  A. P. ALMEIDA

                                                      ----Appellant

                  -and-

Ontario Shores CMHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. DeFreitas, Mr. Mark Rice, The ORB Hon. G. Goulard.

  ----Respondents

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE:

I, Stanley Almeida, The King of Canada, of the city of Toronto, in the province of ON, MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.     That on the _____   day of March ___ 2016; I did personally serve Mr. Joe Wright or His Representative _______________________________  Counsel for the Respondents----- With The annexed DOCUMENT by delivering to the said person a copy thereof, while at the same time exhibiting the original.

Sworn before me in the     )

City of Toronto, in the        )_________________________

Province of Ontario, This   )       Stanley Almeida

___ Day of March 15th,  2016)

________________________________________________

A Commissioner for taking Affidavits





The Crucifixion of Stanley D'Almeida

  THE ONTARIO REVIEW BOARD
(On An Annual Review Of A Detention Order)
In The Matter Of A ORB Hearing in Whitby Shores CMHS.
BETWEEN:
STANLEY ANTONIO PANDURANGA XVI D'ALMEIDA --Applicant
- and-
Attorney General of Ontario, Dr. Wood Hill, Person In Charge Ms. Glenna Raymond Administrator of Whitby Shores CMHS; Ms Barbara Renshaw-Walker LLB. Counsel for the --Respondents

NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION(S)

APPLICATION: under sections 2,7,8,9,10,11,12,15,24,32 and 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982. (see note) AND under the Canadian Bill of Rights and Preamble 1960.
TO THE RESPONDENT:
A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS SEEN COMMENCED by the applicant. The claim made by the applicant appears below.

This application will be argued on February 26, 2015; At
1:00 PM AT Whitby Shores CMHS.

IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, you or your lawyer must forthwith prepare a Notice of Appearance in Form 38C prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the applicant's lawyer or where the applicant does not have a lawyer or is co-counsel, serve it on the applicant, and file it with proof of service in this court office, and you or your lawyer must appear at the hearing.
IF YOU WISH TO PRESENT AFFIDAVIT OR OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO THE COURT OR TO CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES ON THE APPLICATION, you must serve it on the applicant as soon as possible but no later than 2:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT THIS HEARING, A JUDGMENT MAYBE GIVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU.
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS                                  01-04
TAB     DESCRIPTION                           DATE                     PAGE
1.       NOTICE of CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION:                  1-39
          1. Affidavit of Service              January ___  2015        322
                       EVIDENCE OF APPELLANT:
         1.  10     33. APPELLANT‘S RECORD:                              40
                                                        January _____, 2015.  13-322           
          5. Complete Psychiatric Record    December 2nd, 2010         29   
                JUSTICE EBERHARDT FALSE NCR CHARGE     
          6. METFORS Report divulged illegally by
              Hy Bloom to the Toronto Star to vilify
              The Applicant                                 June 22nd, 1983   30-31         
          7. First Hospitalization in WPH, Proving
              King of Canada not basis of Mental Illness
              Or Incapacity. June 24th-July 6th; July 9th-Sept. 25th 1983  32-39
                      FALSE ASSAULT CHARGE #1
               MOTHER SAYS, STANLEY DID NOT ASSAULT POLICE!
 4.       7a. Mrs. Almeida states Stanley did not assault the
              Police officers in initial assault charge!
                                                                        July 12th, 1983       34
                               PRIOR CAPABLE WISHES:
 5.       7b. Prior Capable Wishes: Appellant makes his
                Wishes clear about medications, and was found
                 Capable.                                      August 11th, 1983        35          
          7c. Parents state “Stanley has never been violent”.
                                                                         Oct. 24th, 1983    36-38
          7d. Board refuses Treatment Order            Sept. 12th 1983        39   
 FALSE ASSAULT #2 ISSUE
          8. Admitted to Hospital for Fasting,           
               Weighing Only 75 lbs!!!                        Feb. 12th, 1988     40-41      
 6.      9. First time claims to be true King
              Of Canada under Natural Law. Yet was
              Found “Competent” and Discharged! March 15th, 1988    42-44  
        10. Admission 0f February 13th, 1988; “Extreme Emaciation”,   
“Self- Starvation”, Weight Only 75 lbs! How Could He Assault Anyone?
Weight was 135 lbs! Blood Dyscrasias                                          45-47  
Prison & Hospital Were Poisoning Him To Death!

                           TABLE OF CONTENTS:                               02
TAB     DESCRIPTION                                 DATE                 PAGE              
7.     11. Excerpt of Transcript of District Court
                Hearing Declaring Appellant Competent
                As Incapacity lapses on Discharge.
                Endorsed By Judge E.R. Lovekin.       July 22nd, 1988   47-60   
EVIDENCE FOR FALSE ASSAULT #2             
8.             BLOOD DYSCRASIAS: PROVING POISONING TOO WEAK
         12. Lethally Low White Blood Cells         August 28th, 1987     61         
         13. Neutropenia Potentially Lethal             March 4th,  1987     62           
         15. Thyroid gets worse!                                Feb. 24th, 1988      64         
         16. Vitamin B12 levels Normal                 Feb. 24-26, 1988    65-66         
         17. Alkaline Phosphatase Low                  August 9th, 1989      67
                Lymphopenia, Few Ovals,          September 13th, 1989      67A
                 Leukocytes In Urine                    September 19th, 1989  67B
         18.  Low Blood Cell Counts                  January 20th, 1990     68                 
         19. Lethally Low Red & White Blood Cell
               Counts While in Prison!                    February 9th, 1990      69             
         20. Lethally Low White & Red Blood Cells
               While In Whitby Hospital!                February 10th, 2000      70
         21. Ten Years Later The Hospital Is Still Trying To
                Murder Stanley With Poison   26/02/2008-27/04/2011  70A-72C
 9.                          AFFIDAVITS #5 & #6 ON SDMs & PCW:
         22. Power of Attorney Affidavit#6, Where SDM
                K. Fisher agrees to abide by Appellant’s
                competent wishes  to refuse treatment,
                Then is pressured to consent to treat
                  Ilegally                           !           February 7th, 2005   79-88           
         23.  Illegal Treatment Order                            Sept. 9th 2005      89
10.                   CSIS Tampering With Appellant’s Mail! Proof:     
         24. CSIS: Access to Personal Information
               Under the Privacy Act.                              Nov. 4th, 2010       90
        25. Letter of Apology from Canada Post        Nov. 8th, 2010        91      
        26. Tracking Information for packages
               Note two five day delays at two different
                Locations?                                         Nov. 8th, 2010     92-93           
        27.   Refund from Canada Post.                    Nov. 12th, 2010       94   
                                                                                                                                                                                        
          TABLE OF CONTENTS:                                       03
TAB     DESCRIPTION                          DATE               PAGE

1. The Appellant’s full criminal record and
committals to Whitby Psych. Hosp.       June 19th, 1998.                    207-209  

            THE JUSTICE EBERHARDT NCR FALSE CHARGE!
2.  Partial Transcript of Bail Hearing proving Bail
     Already denied; and that Appellant was being
     Assaulted at time of alleged threat!     Nov. 5th, 1997.                    210-232
  J., Eberhardt’s Endorsement: No Threat. Nov. 7th, 1997.                  233-240
3.  Statement from P.C. Jeffrey Bright, (who was
assaulting Appellant) eyewitness to the alleged
threat; indicating no direct threat made. Jan.23rd, 1998.                     241-243     
4.  Don Jail psychiatric nurse Cathy Brown
     Asking for Appellant be found NCR          Mar. 1998.                      245-246
5.  Warrant & “Information”: Appellant already
     CONVICTED of threats, thus he could not have been found
      NCR!                                                     April 24th, 1998                      247-250
6.  Form 8 Order for assessment proving it was for
     Two months, yet Appellant discharged 38 days early!
     Proving Doctor believed him capable. Apr. 24th, 1998.                         251
7.  Psychiatrist Hy Bloom illegally divulging Appellant’s
     Confidential Medical Records to the Toronto Star
     Who falsely defamatorily libelled the Appellant
     Calling him paranoid schizophrenic!   Feb. 10th, 1998.                    252-255
8. Letter from Crown Lisa Cameron: The Judge
     Violated s.672.19 of CCC.!               April 24th, 1998.                     256-257
9. Dr. Gojer’s Report to Judge Bassel,
     “Accused not a danger to public and not
     Certifiable”                                             May 15th, 1998.                      258-261
10.  Partial Transcript of First Assault Peace Officer
     Trial; Father testifies Appellant did not Assault
     Police, but was himself assaulted.     June 11th, 1982.                      262-282
DOUBLE JEOPARDY ISSUE!
11.  Judge’s Report Finding Appellant Fit To
     Stand Trial, and criminally “Responsible”
     Appellant spent Nine Years in Prison from
    Breach of Probations & “Dead Time”. Sept. 29th, 1989.             282(a)-282(c)
12.  In Ghana Mental Illness is considered Demon
       Possession; And They actually CURE patients! not Poison
       Them to death! Toronto Star article. Sept. 30th, 2010.                 282(d)-282(e)
*13.  Holistic Treatment - Alternative Treatment
      Report by Stanley D’Almeida        Sept. 30th, 2010.                      283-298

TABLE OF CONTENTS:                                                         04
TAB     DESCRIPTION                                 DATE                 PAGE
                       STANLEY FINALLY BEGINS TO RULE
 3. Stanley Tells The Court & The Police To Fuck Their
                Probation Orders, And He Would Never Obey Them
              Proving He Is The King Of Canada, Afraid Of No-one!
    The System were attemting to murder the King, in order to Coerce
     his decision-making. Stanley’s fearlessness made him all-powerful!
                                                                        April 30th, 1989;     299-302
3.       4. STANLEY VETOES THE MEECH LAKE ACCORD:
              PROVING HE IS THE KING OF CANADA  In A Public
               Declaration To The Globe & Mail;          June 8th, 1990       303-305

TABLE OF CONTENTS:                                                         04
TAB     DESCRIPTION                                 DATE                 PAGE

                STANLEY FINALLY PROVES ASSAULT TRIAL #2 FALSE!  
THEY WILL NEVER CHARGE HIM WITH ASSAULT EVER AGAIN   306                                                                   
THIS IS THE ONLY COURT CASE THAT STANLEY EVER WON!
______29.      Appellant’s COMPLETE Criminal Record
                                                                20th July, 1998            307
                     Notice These Charges: Assault, Threaten Death;       
                                                                  21st February, 1992   307
______30.    Justice Mike Talliano’s “Endorsement”, or Judge’s
                    Order; Giving Appellant Production of the
                   TRANSCRIPT TAPE ASAP: Proving The Prosecutor
                   Doctored the Transcript Tape: Forcing him to drop the
                   Charges: And never again falsely charge the Appellant
                  with Assaults. Because Stanley is the King of Canada
                  The Paragon of Virtue!        February 13th, 1992     308-309
______31.     The Doctored Transcript of the Preliminary Inquiry
                                                                 July 9th, 1991        310-320


34. Affidavit of Service           January _____2015.              322


                                               



                         OVERVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION:
This Application is for an Order, or Recommendation, to the Justice Minister, for damages of $39+ Million Dollars as Compensation for the Constitutionally Protected Denials suffered by Mr. D’Almeida for the last 39+ years due to being: unlawfully and falsely imprisoned, wrongfully convicted, maliciously prosecuted, deliberately misdiagnosed, (Stanley was never mentally ill) forcefully medicated, Surreptitiously poisoned with the most toxic substances on the face of this Earth, Poison Gassed, systematically tortured unto death, denied security of the person, subjected to strip-searches in prison, which is a Fundamental Crime Against Humanity! Concerted Attempts were made to murder Mr. D’Almeida every year for the last 39+ continuous years, He was denied dental care by the devil-possessed Dentists & Secret Police, ostracized by “Devil-Possession” conspiracy In The Community to poison his food, mocked and disrespected even though he is the legitimate and true King of Canada as proven by his publicly declared Veto of: The Meech Lake Accord (In 1990), The Charlottetown Accord (1991), and Senate Reform (In 2016); All were failed attempts to satanically change the Constitution! This “De Facto VETO POWER” is a Demonstration of Stanley’s Almighty-Like Power: This is Unprecedented, Historic, and Power Unequalled in the history of this Earth or in Canada --Proving that Stanley is The True King of Canada; and is more Powerful than the Blonde Anglo-Saxon-Aryan-Ape-Satanic Devil-Possessed System!!! The evil Dr. Hill, refused to even put this proven fact in their totally false ORB report --even after promising to do so. The ORB report is a bunch of total and deliberate lies: Dr. Hill was told repeatedly that Stanley is a paragon of virtue: incapable of wrong, incapable of committing a crime, Perfect. Yet The ORB report still lies that Stanley is homophobic, sexist and racist: Stanley is the King of Canada: The Supreme Arbiter Of Law In Canada: The Chief Justice: Incapable of being biased in any way: As Such He is obligated to Tell The Truth: Homosexuals are all Murderers, Rapists and Child-Molesters and must be “Treated”, or put in jail until they are cured, to prevent our women and children from being raped!! And Our Society from being destroyed! Homosexuality is simply a marker of deeper criminality! If Dangerous Mentally Ill Criminals were simply, suddenly declared “no longer dangerous”: as Homosexuals are suddenly being declared by Satanic Blonde Anglo-Saxon-Aryans: (After thousands of years of criminal sanction) There would be an Outcry!! But We have been lied-to and deceived about the evils of homosexuality by the Anglo-Saxon-Aryans who are all devil-Possessed homosexuals & Child-Molesters themselves! The Biggest Child-Molesters Are The Devil-Possessed Blonde English-Anglo-Saxon-Aryan-Ape-Race System who are elevating women and certain races who are naturally inferior (Jews & Blacks), to destroy mankind: not because they like women or those races! But to Destroy Mankind: Who will protect women and children against Rape? Who will protect those inferior races against Genocide and Murder? (Remember 6 Million Jews were murdered by this same Blonde Anglo-Saxon Race). By destroying the “White” Human-Race, Jews & Blacks will be murdered worse! Stanley must point out the lies, crimes and injustices towards “white” human-race men, who are the greatest victims of persecution by the System! The Blonde-Aryans are not a “White” race, they are Devil-Possessed Neanderthal APES Or Albino Gorilas! The ORB report has to lie about Stanley for this very reason: Because Stanley is so pure, if they didn’t lie about him, they would have No basis to incarcerate him, and thus be forced to release him: But the System is engaged in a systematic attempt to torture him to death; and to murder him: Because he is the true King of Canada! This last year 2013-2017 & 2018: The “Secret Police” & "Hospital" tried to murder him by putting Clozapine, Then ABILIFY Delivered Via Poison Gas into his private Condominium for over Ten Months: (trying to override his Veto of Senate Reform & His Ordering The Killing of Police Officers) by piping Gas through the Kitchen’s extractor duct, and intercom pipe: causing 24 hour unconsciousness, Stupor, parkinsonism, paralysis, constant pain, weakness, hair loss, Painful Headaches, obesity, blurred vision, loss of muscular control and almost death! The System tried to poison his food in the hospital, prison, and now (through the Secret Police) in the community, for a total of 39+ years, they got dentists to deliberately damage his teeth for 14 Years; they drilled holes in his condo to increase elevator noise, and denied him a sound-proof door to torture him! This is why Stanley Doesn’t simply Want To Be Released: If It Means The System Will Turn His condominium into another jail of abuse and torture by the Hospital Or "Secret Police", property manager & Condo Board; as they tried to do just last month; in preparation for the ORB! Freedom From The ORB: Must Mean “Real” Freedom from the 39+ Years of torture: That Is Why Stanley Needs Compensation To Insulate Himself From This Type of Torture: He Also Requests A Harsh Admonishment Of The Hospital Or "Secret Police’s" use of Poison Gas And deliberate Damage to Stanley’s Teeth by dentists From "secret Police" Interference --As Part of this ORB Ruling!!! The “Incidents” in the Hospital’s ORB Reports, lack context; The Doctor was told that the staff had imposed a Five-Year “personal care or treatment plan”, Of Torture: that entailed calling “code whites” for using “minor verbal abuse”, (which Stanley rightfully uses when abused unjustly: Unjust Repeated Institutional violence over five years is a serious crime of Torture!) The Hospital was using minor verbal abuse, as an excuse to systematically brutalize, assault and torture Stanley for Five straight Years of his ORB detention at Whitby Shores: in an attempt to systematically torture him to death and murder him! Systematic Torture can cause DEATH: Especially relentless Torture over 39+ Years! Torture is a thousand times worse than simple assault and simple violence! The Doctor was told this, but the arsehole refused to put this in his Report; They have lied and lied about Stanley in their attempt to murder him for the last 19 years he has been in their custody!!! Stanley is also claiming False Imprisonment, Wrongful Conviction And Unlawful Detention: To Prove These: We will also need to go over his totally false “criminal record” which consists of only two “indictable” “assault” incidents and a few summary offences, of “breach of probation --and nothing else in 39+ years: Yet Even Murderers don‘t spend 39+ Years In Prison, as Stanley has (Being Forcefully Poisoned In Psychiatric Facilities Is Actually Worse Than Prison: The ORB must seriously view these imprisonments as totally false charges, and the committals, meant to torture him to death and Murder him! Why would a man spend 39+ years incarcerated for two false assault charges and having never been mentally ill?)!!! Stanley has a transcript of his first “assault police” conviction in 1983, whereby his parents testify that the charge is totally false; but the police are trained to routinely lie and lie in court to get a false conviction! (witness the murder of Michael Brown in the U.S. in 2014; and the policeman‘s lies and “false witnesses”.) Just like the first conviction, the second conviction in 1989, is also false; (Stanley only weighed ~100 lbs at the time, Could someone who was starving himself to emaciation due to fear of hospitalization and forced medication: assault anyone? People need to realize that Stanley was relentlessly tortured with the fear of arbitrary incarceration and forced medications for 39+ continuous years!!! The assault charges of 1989, were simply a means to incarcerate him, as the hospitalization of the previous eight years, had failed to break him!) In both assault cases, it was Stanley who was viciously assaulted instead; these charges were “setups” demonically pre-planned to put Stanley in jail To Murder Him! (just like the false diagnoses were used to murder him in hospitals as well!) Stanley’s Elderly, third-world Parents were also threatened with persecution & TORTURE, to get them to cooperate with false charges & committals --during this period-- which was an abuse of their police power, and a vicious form of Torture, to get your loved ones to falsely lie and turn against you --the police didn‘t have the courage to falsely charge him themselves-- like they did the first time!!! The attempt to Ostracize Stanley from all friends & Family is an especially horrific form of Torture! There was a third and final false assault charge in 1991, which was dropped: This was the only Court Case that Stanley ever won: Stanley finally proved it false --And forced them to stop these false assault charges, (they used breaches of probation henceforth) because it was damaging Stanley’s honour & Royal Prerogative As A Paragon of Virtue! But this third assault charge’s Proven Falsity is Crucial, Because it Proves That The Other charges were similarly false as well, by implication! The Appellant Will Prove A “Pattern of Persecution” That proves all the convictions & Committals were false --with its attendant suffering! For Example: A Common Assault Charge May On first glance Seem reasonable; But when you look at the big picture, and realize that the Appellant spent 20 continuous years in incarcerated for it; you begin to question the charge itself! When you haven’t committed a crime, but were viciously assaulted by police; and it is you that gets ten years in prison; and forcefully medicated in psychiatric hospitals: It stretches credulity: that Stanley ever committed a crime in the first place: Because he subsequently did eight continuous years in psychiatric hospitals And nine continuous years in prison for doing nothing: Which begs the question: would they not have put him in jail no matter what? (And that the charge was incidental, simply a means to jail him, so as to murder him?) It is obvious that the “crime” was a fabrication, used to get Stanley into the “System”, where they could torture and murder him at will!!! Why would Stanley’s food be poisoned, or poison gas be put in his Condo, even while in the community? Or Why him spend 9 continuous years in prison, for  Breaches of probation, all in six month instalments (which is the worst type of prison sentence!) An inmate from the penitentiary once remarked: that Stanley did his “time”, in the worst way possible: “In a “bucket”, (Detention Centre), in segregation, “with ‘special needs’ Nutbars”, without any privileges! Why would psychiatrist Hy Bloom, illegally release your medical records to the Toronto Star who start publicly calling you paranoid schizophrenic, without fear of libel, on Feb. 10th, 1998?? (Stanley was found Not schizophrenic by Dr. Gojer on April 24th, 1998!) And Why have that same Star publicly calling for you to be forcefully medicated with the most toxic chemicals known to mankind! Because they claimed, “Stanley is getting away with murder, and non-treatment“, by being found ‘fit’ to stand trial; and that the criteria for fitness must be removed!!! (Which they eventually were, and Stanley was forcefully treated, completely unjustly!) The Star should have been covering Stanley‘s modern day crucifixion and claim of Kingship: But they tried to vilify & Murder him instead! (Most mentally-ill, take their drugs voluntarily, and admit they need them --they do not brilliantly advocate for themselves to the Supreme Court as Stanley twice did --and still be forcefully drugged!) They forcefully poisoned Mr. D’Almeida for all of those 39+ Years! The Courts arbitrarily dismissed all his legally “air-tight”, incapacity defence cases: without even bothering to rule on his arguments: and callously forced the most toxic poisons on Earth on Stanley: Even though he was never mentally-ill and had spent thousands of hours and dollars on his cases! The Greatest TORTURE, and one that will never be able to be duplicated in History, is the Total Isolation and Ostracism the Blonde-Aryan System was able to achieve against Stanley: Nobody helped him as he was being cruelly tortured for 39+ Years! Stanley is of the “white” Portuguese race, but of East-Indian  ancestry as well: The Racist System were able to Racistly lie that East-Indians are not racially related to Europeans at all! (Even though Stanley as King of the Europeans, is living-proof that they are!) Thus they were able to isolate Stanley to a Persecuted Minority- (East-Indian) -within-a-Minority (White-Portuguese-East-Indian Or Goan), While lying that what they did to Stanley was isolated only to him, and a racial minority --and not to all Europeans! The truth is that the Portuguese were the First Europeans to Settle In Canada: Thus not only is Stanley the King of Canada: His Ancestry and Nationality is More Canadian than any other European-person in Canada!!! By teaching delusion, propaganda, Revisionist and false history: The Blonde-Anglo-Saxon-Aryan-APE-race were able to isolate Stanley in his own Country, among his own majority White-Race-People: And Murder Him At Will: Which was the greatest form of Torture: While Exalting The Inferior Races: Aryans, Blacks & Jews As Gods, Over The Human Race!!!! Stanley has suffered more than anyone in the History of this Earth; there is no doubt that he is deserving of the maximum compensation for these constitutional violations, SYSTEMATIC PROTRACTED TORTURE, Racial-Minority Targeting & Discrimination, Attempted Murder, High Treason, War Crimes and Genocide! The Reason Stanley Is Asking For Very High Damages Of $$39+ Million Is That He Has Been Subjected To Unprecedented Abuse, Torture, False Charges, False Diagnoses, Repeated Attempted Murders: Causing Suffering Unequalled In The History Of This Earth --requiring compensation commensurate with the injustice!!! And the current index offence against Justice Eberhardt is also totally false. Justice Eberhardt made a statement to police In 1997, stating she “did not hear any threats made by the accused, did not want to lay charges and did not want to testify in court”; and has refused to make any “victim impact statement“ in 17 years, after repeated requests by the ORB --because she never was the victim; there was no victim, because there was no crime. There simply is no legal justification for keeping Stanley murderously incarcerated and attempting to murder him for 39+ continuous Years: This is a case crying out for redress and compensation for wrongful incarceration and violations of the constitution!!! Remember Barabbas? The System have each year released a convicted, guilty, murderer: while Crucifying and keeping a totally innocent Mr. D’Almeida, in custody, and continuing the attempts to murder him via poison in his food, and torture in his unit, and in the community. For Example: This year 2014, they have released a guilty Black murderer named Leighton Hay, after 12 years in custody: First the supreme court, allowed him to test his “hair clippings“; and then for the flimsy excuse, that some of the clippings “may be facial hair”: Hay was given a new trial by the a Satanic SCJ In Ontario: the case was dropped immediately by the Satanic Prosecutor!!! Hay is a schizophrenic, (Stanley was never mentally ill! The Blonde Anglo-Saxon-Aryan Devil-Possessed System Treat Real ‘Nutbars’ Much Better Than Stanley!) and Hay was chosen to be released for this very reason --that he is mentally-ill-- not because he is innocent! In previous years they have similarly falsely released murderers like the guilty Robert Baltovich, Michael Bryant, etc. while continuing to torture and try to Murder Stanley. But The Blonde Anglo-Saxon-Aryans Will Be Punished For Their Crimes: Total Extermination Or Deportation From The Americas! The Highest Crime in the land is High Treason: For which the punishment is Death: Death, Death and Death: In Stanley’s “Synopsis of the Case Against The System” he concludes I find you all GUILTY:
'Je Vous Condamn Tous A La Mort Et La Mort Eternelle'
"I Condemn You All To Death: of The Body, The Mind, And To The Eternal Death of The Soul". 
IT IS VERY IMPORTANT, AND A LEGAL IMPERATIVE, FOR STANLEY AS THE KING TO GIVE THE ANGLO-SAXON-ARYAN SYSTEM NOTICE: HE HAS FOUND THEM ALL GUILTY: AND GIVES NOTICE OF A DEATH SENTENCE ON THEM (WHEN HE ATTAINS POWER!) AND DEATH TO ALL OF THEIR RACE, ANIMALS (COWS!), CO-CONSPIRATORS AND ALLIES: FOR THE CRIME OF HIGH TREASON! IS THE GREATEST CRIME IN THE LAND: PUNISHABLE BY THE GREATEST PUNISHMENT DEATH, DEATH AND ETERNAL DEATH!!! 




PREAMBLE: SOME BACKGROUND ON FORCED ANTI-PSYCHOTIC DRUGS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WHY STANLEY IS THE TRUE KING OF CANADA: To Better Understand This Case:
Stanley. Antonio. Panduranga XVI. D' Almeida, has been continuously incarcerated in psychiatric hospitals (25+ yrs.) and prisons (9 yrs.) for a total of 33+ years! For committing no crime nor being mentally ill. The Hospital and Board still refuse to address the cause of this incarceration; and they have tried medicate or poison Stanley to death; (Stanley was not just merely incarcerated, the Institutions of the System Singled Him Out, to actively murder and torture him to death for 34+ years -- unlike their treatment of other inmates who are really mentally ill, or criminal, and voluntarily take Rx for their symptoms!) The reason for this 34+ year murderous persecution is fundamental to understanding this case and must be answered (below): [[[ The correct name for the Hindu Religion is Sanatana Dama -which means The Eternal Law of Dama- The Dama is the Supreme Natural Law that operates the Universe. This Universe is based on This Supreme Power and Law regardless of what This Evil System wishes. Stanley contends that The System that rules Canada and most of the world, is: Satanic, devil-possessed, Demonic, Angle-Saxon-Aryan-Ape-race run, female-dominated, anti-Dama, Lawless (except for Unjust laws and Satanic jurisprudence), Anarchical, Chaotic, Disorderly and Evil; and must be destroyed. After the first eight years of the constant torture, abuse and attempted murder on his life, Stanley gained a genius insight!!: that the reason the Aryan-Saxon-Ape Satanic System were persecuting him so severely was because under This Natural Law Stanley had been ordained to be The True King of Canada; And as such had the De Facto Power to telepathically Veto and By Force of Will Alone, make all laws in the Land called Canada, (The 'natural' executor in chief of the will of the "Nation"); In order for The System to continue to rule on their Satanic agenda, (again under Natural Law) they had to use murderous physical force on Stanley to override his natural Veto Powers; at the permanent expense of their souls and spiritual power --which Stanley absorbs through the practice of yoga-- until they are totally destroyed. The idea that a evil-doer loses his soul energy (proportionally) when committing an unjust and evil act, to the victim; is a well known principle in Hinduism and is the strategy Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi used to rid India of the British -he called it Satyagraha. It is the Permanent Power gained from sacrifice and suffering at the hands of evildoers somewhat like Jesus on the cross. But unlike Jesus and Gandhi, Stanley and his dynasty will severely punish And Or Kill all those who transgressed against him; Because The Punishment For High Treason Is Death Of The Body And The Soul!!! And he will eventually rule Canada and this Earth with a rod of steel. [NOTE: Stanley Ordered The 2014 Killings of Police and Military In The U.S. Because the System was refusing to Relinquish Power to him: and a slew of policemen started getting slaughtered: including on Parliament Hill Canada; until the Angle-Saxon-Aryan System Capitulated and stopped rigging the Mid-Term elections in the U.S., and let The GOP win! This (Power to kill cops at will) proves that Stanley is more Powerful than the System; and that it is only a matter of time before he comes into power!!!] There exists a Dama limit, a maximum of ~36+years, after which The System must release him from custody And Torture; And He Will Begin To Rule. The reason for this above natural law on kingship is to ensure that all acts in the land and this Earth are accountable to one man: The King]]] Understanding this above concept lies at the crux of this matter! and explains why Stanley has been incarcerated for 34+ murderous years --while being totally innocent! The Doctor and ORB failed to address the rationale of this above issue --There has never been a meeting of the minds-- The Hospital & ORB were simply closed minded, possessed By Devils, bent on murdering him with poison. The System and The D'Almeida Dynasty are locked in a death struggle, they cannot truly release Stanley, or he will automatically begin to rule; while he is getting stronger and more powerful by absorbing their energy while in custody. (Note: In preparation for Stanley’s release: they are trying to turn his condominium, into another jail with daily torture by the staff due to noise torture & noise renovation refusals; harassments & Torture; so that it will not be real release from murderous custody --without proper compensation!!!) But Stanley Is Already Partially Ruling Canada: Even While In Custody: Stanley successfully exercised his Veto Power on Constitutional Law: the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords, and On An Attempt At “Senate Reform“; Proving He Is The King Of Canada; Because The Constitution Is The Fundamental Law of the land: It is only a matter of time before he gains absolute power over all the laws of the land!!! On Lesser laws his vetoes have been temporarily, murderously overridden (like on same-sex marriage and nuclear power) But even here Stanley has successfully Destroyed The PC party in Ontario (who wanted to build 13 new nuclear plants) effectively killing nuclear power in Canada: and saving generations of Canadians from birth-defects, cancers, heart-attacks, diabetes and deaths!!!
            In particular Stanley D’Almeida’s Constitutional Rights and Freedoms were Murderously Violated under s. 2,3,7,8,9,10,12 & 15 of the Charter Rights especially as neuroleptic drugs are potentially the most toxic chemicals known to Mankind! The Psychiatric System has given society a false delusional understanding of anti-psychotic drugs: they are NOT medications: they are Lethal Poisons! That Murder People every Day!!! Just last month a fellow patient of Dr. Hill, named Dennis Montforton, who was taking Clozapine, was rushed to hospital, where his intestines were cut out, he was left with a colostomy bag; and then his kidneys failed; and he had to go on dialysis! He was diagnosed with Ischemic Intestinal Disorder: whereby all blood flow to the intestines are cut off! This was a known side-effect of clozapine! The Hospital’s and psychiatrist’s response was to callously shift his Rx medication from clozapine to a more highly toxic Risperidone --to murder him faster, and discharged him back to Whitby Shores; because they didn‘t want the expense of caring for him in his last days!!! The evidence is significant that neuroleptic drugs cause horrific diseases like cancer, life-threatening sideeffects and death; these are not acceptable risks; these chemicals are akin to the banned pesticide DDT; they are deliberately formulated to be poisons. The newer atypical neuroleptics which Mr. D'Almeida was on, (Olanzapine) are known to cause Heart-Attacks, Obesity, Type-2 Diabetes and Cancer; but the devastating side-effects are significant even in the smallest but cumulative doses. Flemming vs. Reid (1992)(OCA) pgs.84-89. Only ionizing radiation from nuclear fission atomic by-products (Stanley also vetoes nuclear power) can cause more damage to biological tissue than Neuroleptics/ Antipsychotics/Major Tranquilizers: Polycyclic-Polyphenyl-SuIphide-AIkaloid-Organic-Halogens: potentially (depending on the number of halogen atoms attached to it) The most toxic molecules on Earth. Neuroleptics are specifically designed to attack Brain and Nerve Tissue; which destroys the body from the inside out. Stanley has personally suffered almost all the Horrific side effects of these drugs. The fact that he is still alive is that he is tough in nature --although they tried to murder him and failed. But this does not mean he does not experience excruciating pain and suffering -all so the world may be free. [The following is an excerpt from Mr. D' Almeida's Court of Appeal submission and is still relevant today. Notice the emphasis Stanley places on the side-effects of the medications -most of which he has himself suffered.]
8a)  The forceful imposition of a neuroleptic treatment program does meet the definition of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment under s.12 of the charter --Especially When The Applicant Was Never Mentally Ill In The First Place!! The Appellant has personally suffered the effects of The Most Toxic Chemicals Known To Mankind over 34+ years of murderous torture; There Must Be Compensation. The ORB or Court has an obligation to Society, to Humanity, and to Victims of Neuroleptic Drugs (Poisons!) Globally, to very seriously “Make A Statement” On this question and rule that s.12 is invoked. To properly consider this question the Court must consider The Big Picture: The proliferation of very Toxic Halogens: Fluorine F, Chlorine CI, Bromine Br, and Iodine I; into almost every facet of our lives without any alarm being raised. There are other chemical halogens beside neuroleptics that are harmful to Mankind: CFCs chlorofluorocarbons in our refrigerants (damages the ozone layer) the true cause of legionnaire's disease covered up by Dupont Inc., chlorine bleaches in our pulp and paper industry, organic-bromines used as a mandatory fire retardant but which is showing up in the breast milk of mothers in ever higher concentrations causing cancers and birth defects -also being covered up by Dupont Inc.; chloro-fluoro-chemicals used to process photographic film, pesticides or polychlorinated-aromatic chemicals that kill not only insects but humans as well; PCBs; chlorinated water that can kill: witness Walkerton; Sarin gas, VX Nerve agents, agent orange, herbicides, polyvinyl-chlorides, Dioxins given off by incineration of garbage and sewage, etcetera. But the most toxic chemicals on Earth are none other than Neuroleptic Drugs given to Human Beings! Organic-Aromatic-Phenyl-Sulphide-Alkaloid-Halogens (S.E. Exhibit 25 on the structure of common neuroleptics) These chemicals have been formulated to cross the blood-brain barrier, and enter the brain causing death from the inside out. They are Lipophilic and highly protein-bound: they bind to proteins in the blood causing anaemia & leucopenia; and deposit into fatty tissue. They are also anti-emetic, to prevent regurgitation if swallowed, by high HCI hydrochloric acid content. By being specifically formulated to be a poison with the latest advances in technology, they are deadly! even if given in small doses over a long period of time. How did a poison come to be considered treatment for a mental disorder? Because Society and The System turned a blind eye, And allowed psychiatry to murder an undesirable, ethnic, “an inconvenient truth of encouraged child molestation in our Society”, “products of interracial marriage with Aryans, which often produce dysfunctional children:, “a non-conforming” element in Society: Are being targeted for death by poison: This is a deliberate conspiracy, to allow for the mass poisoning to death of individuals selected by the System for: Persecution, Torture and Death. There is a cause to Mental Illness: All Mentally Ill Have One of These Causations: They have been sexually abused as children, they are drug, alcohol or sex addicts, they have engaged in interracial sex (especially with Aryans), they are homosexuals, they are possessed by demons, they are throw-backs to an ancient lifestyle or Religion: not being allowed to be practiced by this Genocidal System! Modern Psychiatry began with the intention of covering-up sexual molestation of children: Caused By Genocidal Interracial sex and Forced Lifestyle changes by the System! The problem is these people cannot ever be rehabilitated to a state of wellness with these methods. The legacy of The System's approach to Mental illness and Delusion is Mass Murder on a Global Scale. [see Holistic Treatment]. The Appellant has suffered the worst injustice because he was never delusional, or mentally ill and they singled him out for torture and death! The imposition of Treatment: must entail a goal of wellness: To produce rehabilitated, trustworthy, intelligent, upstanding, selfsufficient, decent, honourable, productive, contributing, reformed members of society --NOT To SIMPLY MURDER! The System is Guilty of Murder because it does not even try to cure or rehabilitate [the medication only covers the symptoms], and in fact treats the truly evil (murderers) with better treatment and earlier release! To take advantage of the weak and delusional simply to prey on them and kill them is Evil --For these people are part of the Human Collective Soul! And for this The System must be Destroyed. The Proof for the case against neuroleptics, has been gathered by Stanley over the years he was incarcerated in Whitby Mental Health Centre, Prisons, The Old Whitby Psychiatric Hospital, from the Toronto Star Newspaper, from Journals and Text Books, from direct Observation, From Personal Experience of Suffering 34+ years of murderous Torture unto Death at The hands of The System. Supporting Evidence Exhibits 16-25 document a death toll from neuroleptics only from cases reported in the Toronto Star; There are thousands, millions perhaps billions of such deaths on all types of organisms, gone unreported. There is a puzzling phenomenon in these reports: some persons die from one dose of neuroleptic poisoning others survive longer; it is true that properly diagnosed Schizophrenics have a higher Tolerance & resistance to these drugs; (Because they are possessed by Demons: which is the cause of their illness: and the Demon helps them fight these neuroleptic anti-psychotic drugs in their body --But schizophrenics still have a very high death rate. The Medical Profession deliberately refuses to accept any existence of Demons, the spirit, God, Devils or the soul: that is why it is 100% Quackery! That is why there were able to misdiagnose Stanley as mentally ill! The delusions schizophrenics have, are obvious delusions, from voices in their heads. By denying demon-possession: Psychiatry has deliberately “Mystified” the diagnosis of schizophrenia, so as to misdiagnose political prisoners like Stanley and Murder Them! To label a Genius like Stanley delusional is the epitomy of propaganda, Lies and Quackery!!! Schizophrenics Have A 600% Higher Death Rate Than Normal, And A 13% Suicide Rate; Schizophrenics Have A Reduced Lifespan Of More Than 25+ Years --All due to the toxic medications Rx! Demon Possession Also Explains Why Schizophrenics Are Linked To Mass School Shootings: The Methodology Is This: The Demons Absorb The Murderous, Painful, Toxic Medications And Then Leave that body, And Possess A U.S. Gunman; And Murder The General Public In Revenge for them being murdered by psychiatry! Psychiatry Is The Cause Of These Mass Public Shootings! Psychiatry’s denial of demons or the reality of demon possession, makes them the most mentally ill of all!) Non-schizophrenic people given the same Rx drop dead much more quickly from: 'sudden death', "Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome", induced Heart Attacks, Brain Cancer, Flesh eating disease, non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Anaemia, Agranulocytosis, induced Diabetes, lung cancer, induced liver jaundice, tardive dyskinesia, immune suppression, gastric haemorrhage, kidney infection, ischemia, other cancers. The Appellant is in the category of people highly sensitive to neuroleptics; and suffered excruciating pain and a fate worse than death when treatment was forced on him: as it was! S.E. Exhibit 25: has some of the symptoms of neuroleptics: akathasia -restlessness and pacing due to exorbitant continuous pain, akinesis -stiffness and rigidity due to paralysis of muscles, blurred vision -due to optic nerve damage--, slurred speech, obesity, loss of muscle mass and control, induced Parkinsonism, loss of brain and nerve tissue, tremors, obesity, drooling, 'giving tongue', gangrene, ischemia, necrotizing fascitis, urticaria, liver jaundice, excruciatingly painful pre-cancerous sores, excruciating tooth pain, tooth loss, lymph node & ear infection, poikilothermic effect, rigidity, restlessness, paralysis, death comes horribly. This indeed would be cruel and unusual treatment and punishment! This would also be an act of murder in the first degree and Genocide, But since Stanley claims Kingship, it is an act of High Treason, and a Crucifixion as prophesized. (see 'The Early Writings' Affidavit Exhibit 15: where Stanley points out The System's use of a Satanic Scheme to release Murderers into the Community [Baltovich, et cetera] and Crucify Stanley The King). The current Psychiatric System has never helped anybody; only if they used that opportunity to help themselves. The legacy of prison and mental health survivors is evident on the streets of Toronto: S.E. Exhibit 24: Street Nurse Kathy Hardill documents the deaths of former patients on the streets of Toronto: Somebody is killing homeless people in Toronto .. and they must be made to pay for their crimes", Yes the 'secret police' never really stop poisoning them even when out of hospital; thus the death statistics of Prisons and Psychiatric Facilities hide the cruel truth: Neuroleptics do Kill, but no-one is keeping meaningful statistics or doing epidemiological studies on: the poor, unemployable, homeless people, former mental health patients or prison inmates anymore. THE FINAL SOLUTION: In The Worst Hell Hole On Earth: CANADA: The Heart Of Darkness: "The Horror The Horror The Horror"!
S.E.Exhibit 16: The Marc Bastien murder is demonstrative of methods employed by security police (CSIS, RCMP, police) the world over, they secretly poison people to death even here in Canada. Politicians like Stan Waters the Reform Senato~-died of brain cancer for delusionally believing Senators can be elected under our Constitution---, Richard Hatfield who died of brain cancer after run ins with the RCMP for being homosexual and using marijuana--, Robert Bourassa died of cancer after Meech Lake where CSIS or RCMP poisoned the Premiers food to get them to agree to the deal, Lucien Bouchard lost his leg to flesh eating disease -for not unilaterally declaring independence--, media reporters --for spreading delusion (Exhibit 23), whole populations in Iraq, N. Korea and Afghanistan in the aftermath of the Gulf War (Exhibits 20,22), suspected terrorists (ex. 20) -for believing in a garbage religion, the list goes on and on. The System cannot kill the Good and non-delusional: thus the liberals, PCs and socialists (NDP) are the most delusional and get the most poisoned to death although they totally worship and obey the System and Satan. Prison Inmates also receive massive doses of neuroleptics while in custody -usually from the poisoning of their food-- (exs. 17,21) they die from infections that never heal because neuroleptics suppress the immune system. Psychiatric Hospitals murder on a daily basis (Exhibits 18,19) even their own staff are not immune: just last May 2004 Stanley witnessed the death of Vera Cates age 56, a Rights Advisor -something anathema to a bureaucracy hell bent on medicating people. Stanley lost his own female cousin at age 34, to breast cancer; her litigious mother worked for WPH; and exposed her daughter to a poisoning milieu, because she sued the hospital for wrongful dismissal for over six years! There is mass murder taking place in nursing homes today, where the elderly are medicated secretly by massive doses of neuroleptics till they die! The System does not allow unproductive, obnoxious, wilful, incontinent seniors to live on tax-payer's money; the Appellant had an aunt who recently (sept '04) died this way (by poison). The delusion of the left-wing worship of 'Medicare' is that they get the worst treatment and poison in hospitals anyway, because they are delusional. Athletes: Mario Lemieux got non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma because he was French and a Star who wouldn't play for Canada; Perdita Felicien: Poison caused her crash in the Olympics because she was Black & Barbadian to a racist System. This is indeed a Horror Story unparalleled in Human History. It is conversely the final solution to DELUSIONAL liberals and left wingers as well. We need to stop the cradle to grave welfare system espoused by the NDP, for the price is death: for such a delusion. Zero Taxes, Zero Government, Privatization, Anti-trust legislation, and Competition will help create the discipline to get off the dependency on government that only increases the delusion of the people and the power of the System to murder them. (See Economic Reform: The King Of Canada's Royal Edict: A New Royal Mandate: To Implement On Pain Of Death! Stanley is The Great Man, A Genius, He learnt the lesson the System was Demonically trying to teach and is in turn Royally teaching the People. But he will teach Truth, Discipline, Austerity and hard-work: Justly, Truthfully, and with a view to promote greater Freedom and Happiness for The People. [Note: Stanley is not asking the ORB to rule on whether Neuroleptics in general violate s.7 of The Charter; But whether its forceful infliction on Stanley; violated his Charter Rights: Security of the Person, Equality under the Law, Cruelty! Especially since he was never mentally ill!]
PART II: THE FACTS IN THIS CASE:
1.     Stanley D’Almeida had the first attempt on his life made on September 4th-8th, 1981; when the Police Assaulted him and charged him with 14 false charges. They were attempting to cover-up their assault on Stanley by pre-empting him with charges of their own. Stanley’s parents who were eye-witnesses confirmed that the Police brutally assaulted Stanley, and Stanley never assaulted them. But because the Police packed the Court with Police Officers who intimidated the Judge to find him guilty, and lied and lied in Court: he was convicted on assault peace officer x2; and given $500 fines and 2 years probation --after an arduous two year trial ending on Jan. 10th, 1983. The amount of excessive violent force used, and the abuse would have killed an average man; but because Stanley was tough he survived. The System thought that if they brutally assaulted Stanley via police, jail-guards and felons, they would scare Stanley from asserting himself. Stanley had fasted the full five days he was in custody; and this would be the pattern of his 30 years in prison. Immediately after release, Stanley made a vow to destroy the System repeating these words, “Nobody crosses me and gets away with it, I am going to destroy the System”; over and over again. To fight The System: Stanley took a vow of Celibacy (which was very painful); Stanley also decided to become a strict Vegan (also painful) and become a Hindu!!! Stanley would later learn that the reason they tried to Murder him for doing nothing: was The Devil-Possessed System were trying to override his “Veto“: of the repatriation of the Constitution! Every Constitution change Issue would result in an attempted murder of Stanley: as he is the true King of Canada! The Angle-Saxon-Aryan Devil-Possessed System would now try to MURDER Stanley in earnest! [Appellant’s (A.) Record (Below) Exhibits#1 & #10, Below]
2a.   The police threatened and forced Stanley’s parents to cooperate with them to henceforth commit Stanley to psychiatric hospitals or send him to prison Repeatedly over the next 25 years. The Coerced use of Stanley’s Elderly Parents (Stanley’s Parent’s were threatened with persecution & Torture, if they didn’t cooperate!) to falsely charge and commit him: was an especially cruel and satanic modus operandi: for which the System must be made to pay with their lives! Thus Stanley lost all his family supports and friends, and would be fighting the whole System single-handedly for 34+ years. The police were vary of charging Stanley again because he defended himself brilliantly and made them look evil and guilty. Thus in May 1982 Stanley was committed to Northwestern General Hospital for Five days. The medication he was forced to take Chlorpromazine & haldol: caused blurred vision; and nausea and vomiting for weeks after he stopped taking them. Knowing these medications were poisons; to save his life Stanley would never voluntarily take neuroleptics again. [A. Record Ex#1]
2b.   April 23rd, 1983: Stanley refused to accept probation, because he was innocent; so they put him in prison again and attempted to beat him to death there; they then sent him to METFORS for assessment, Out of Satanic racism and hatred: they falsely diagnosed him with “Paranoid Schizophrenia” which was a totally false diagnosis; Stanley was never ever mentally ill!!! [In 1998 Dr. Gojer would conclude that Mr. D’Almeida is not schizophrenic! Proving the falsity of all their diagnoses against Mr. D’Almeida; as well as the current diagnosis!] then they sent him to Whitby Psychiatric Hospital (WPH) because he was fasting. WPH sent him back to prison where he was beaten on the Judge & guards instructions to make him fear prisons and be docile. The prison sent him back to WPH where they broke their promise not to force medication on him if he broke his 41 day fast!  They immediately began seeking a forced treatment order, and although he won the capacity Board hearing; he had received a huge dose of highly poisonous medications that would have killed the average man.  He was coerced into taking modecate, which caused severe parkinsonism, stiffness, rigidity, akathasia, akinesis, muscle weakness, paralysis and constant pain. The side effects of the highly toxic medication would last three years: cuts would fail to heal for years. Stanley would only later realize that the attempt on his life was because he had consciously “de facto Vetoed” the repatriation of the Constitution by PM Trudeau and Bill Davis; in order to override this “veto”, the System had to murder him --but failed. NOTE: Stanley is not claiming that the Police consciously knew he was the King and were trying to kill him; No No No. The Police etc. were possessed by devils and it was the devils that were directing them to torture Stanley!!! [B. Record Ex#30-31]
3.     December 28th, 1984- January 20th, 1985 1984: Stanley again refused to pay the fine of his previous assault conviction which had been deferred: So they grabbed him from his home and committed him to a psychiatric hospital in Whitby: where they forced huge doses of extremely toxic drugs, (haldol) that would have killed a normal man, on him. The medication caused: severe poikilothermic effect, ichthyosis, cracked skin, excruciating pain and feelings of horror. The System assumed Stanley would now docilely tow the line and not “veto” anything or fight the System; But since Stanley was unbowed they began to persecute him in earnest. Stanley set a precedent: He became the first patient to be discharged while refusing to take any medication!!! The more they tortured Stanley the tougher he became and the stronger his resolve to destroy the System. [Ex#30-38]
4.     April 6th-June 6th,1986: They began to hound Stanley to death, seeking to commit him to a psychiatric hospital relentlessly; Stanley was like a hunted deer, sleeping in the forest, running for his life --literally. He tried to live in an apartment, but they kept pressuring him not to take welfare; yet when he slept in the park the police took him home. Stanley fasted in expectation of another committal; and on April 1986 they put him in North York General for no reason; again forcing medication on him, that would have killed the average person. The cumulative torture and poison would definitely have killed an average man. The relentless torture over thirty-four years is certainly unequalled in the history of this Earth.
5a.    In October 1986 and again in June 1987; Stanley was again committed to WPH for no reason; But this time he was unafraid, he had gained expertise in the practice of Yoga, and the Hospital did not force medication on him.  They would not force medication on him till September 4th, 2005: 20 years later; which is the basis of this current Appeal. Stanley also forced the Hospital to allow him to Appeal the Biased “Rubber Stamp” Board’s Decision to an “Arbitration Board”. This forced the then Liberal Government to Act, To allow the right of appeal to the General Division Court for all Board Decisions. They then allowed him to take his own non-toxic neuroleptic Promazine (which has long since been discontinued because it doesn’t murder people --the System only uses neuroleptics that are poisons!). But even though he had not been medicated, the hospital started poisoning his food with very toxic drugs. And even in the community his food was poisoned; causing him to fast, which they used as an excuse to commit him again. It was about this time that Stanley came under surveillance of CSIS and “security” elements of the police; they would question all persons he came in contact with and turn them against and ostracizing Stanley: this type of constant surveillance is Torture, especially since Stanley is a home grown revolutionary.
5b.      February 4th, 1988: Stanley was at last gaining insight in to why the System was trying to murder him (For such torture would have long killed any other man on Earth!) That he was the King of Canada under Natural Law, and in order to rule Canada the System had to try to murder him at the very real expense of their soul energy: One of us had to die. Stanley openly proclaimed this belief to the doctors; and it was never deemed a mental illness then; but a statement of opinion. His diagnosis remained schizophrenia. Stanley was discharged before his case reached General Division Court: And Justice Lovekin ruled that the case was “MOOT” because a finding of incompetence lapses on discharge from a psychiatric hospital. Almeida v. Musisi (1988) was the seminal case for this jurisprudence; yet it is not being adhered to by the current courts up to now! At this time Stanley was suffering from lethal side-effects of: Agranulocytosis, Aplastic Anemia, leucopenia, Blood Dyscrasias; yet the doctors treating him never stopped poisoning him; the CPS states that treatment of neuroleptics should be discontinued when such lethal side-effects exist. The whole psychiatric attitude to lethal side-effects is to ignore them and relentlessly medicate to death. Even when Medical doctors expressed alarm at his low blood levels, there was no way of stopping the relentless poisoning since it was being done surreptitiously for 20 years! For the next 25 years Stanley would continue to suffer from these horrific symptoms and be in constant pain and weakness; yet the System mercilessly kept poisoning him. [B. Record Ex#30-38]
6.     April 23rd, 1989: Since Stanley had mastered the psychiatric system, they no longer wished to force medication on him; but since the System still wanted to murder him they “set him up” on a false assault charge so they could attempt to murder him in prison. They got some people to assault him and when he defended himself he was charged with assault. They tried to assault him while in prison and they poisoned his food every day that he was in prison. But Stanley had become battle hardened: He told the Courts he would never accept their bail or probation conditions: because he had committed no crime: Do your worst you cowardly bastards: “Give me liberty or give me death”.  Stanley did nine continuous years in prison all on breach of probation charges and “dead time”; in the worst most torturous possible way: in six to eight month stretches; and then be rearrested immediately on release, all on breach of probations! The judge’s thought they could cower Stanley with prison; but he was too tough. Stanley became the toughest guy in the prison system: fighting the jail guards every single day. Stanley would never stand-up for the judges in their courtrooms, he would arrogantly proclaim himself the true king of Canada; and use abusive language on them to show them who was boss. The worst thing in prison were the strip-searches; In Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23rd, 2010) The SCC held that: “Strip searches are inherently humiliating and degrading regardless of the manner in which they are carried out and thus constitute significant injury to an individual’s intangible interests …” The Appellant considered the strip-searches a Satanic Devil possessed fundamental crime against Humanity and needed to be substantially reformed! They poisoned Stanley’s food everyday he was in there; and he served most of his nine years in maximum security segregation!!! In Prison Stanley suffered hundreds of lethal side-effects from the extremely toxic medications the prison poisoned him with: gangrene, necrotizing fascitis, tooth loss, ear infections, and thousands of excruciatingly painful precancerous skin lesions. Stanley would serve almost nine continuous years in prison, until it was the police and prisons that cried “uncle”. (A. Record Exhibit#1, Below)
7.     November 4th, 1997: Stanley had already been assessed for s.16, not criminally responsible for his initial assault charge in 1989; and was found “responsible”. Stanley also was assessed for fitness to stand trial many times and was always found fit. [A.Record Ex#11] But in order to get just Stanley, the Criminal Code was changed in 1997, to eliminate “Lieutenant Governor’s Warrants” and the new criteria for NCR designation was much more lax in meeting. Whereas before Hospital policy was to designate NCR only to “violent” and “dangerous” mentally ill and sent to Maximum Security Penetanguishene; Now everyone was being found “NCR“ in minimum security hospitals. Hospitals that were being shutdown for lack of patients, suddenly found a bonanza and started opening “Forensic” Units. Judge Eberhardt was parachuted in from Barrie just to “get” Stanley and put him in the psychiatric system, as the prison system had had no effect on him. Stanley was hauled into court in Newmarket for no reason, and J., Eberhardt suddenly appoints an amicus curiae to find ways of transferring Stanley to the psychiatric system. Just as Eberhardt was leaving the courtroom, the Police in the Courtroom started assaulting Stanley (who was in handcuffs) for calling Eberhardt a “fucking bitch” , To protect Stanley’s honour and pride, Stanley had to escalate, he called the police officers goofs, and told them as an aside that “the bitch was dead” --to show they had not cowed him by their assault. The Judge was out of the courtroom when this was said; but because they wanted to set Stanley up for an NCR finding the Prosecutor R, Scott, charged him with uttering death threats. The Judge gave a statement to the Police stating: “she did not hear any threat, she did not want to lay charges and that she did not want to testify in court,”. The jurisprudence states that for a conviction: “the accused must have present means to carry out the threat; that the victim must receive the threat and feel the threat was real.” None of the criteria were met. Stanley was in the prison system; where macho toughness is a must, in order to defend yourself: death threats are said everyday, and nobody is ever charged. Had Stanley remained in the prison system he would get no conviction and zero time for this bullshit charge. But because the System intended on murdering Stanley all along: they escalated this to a federal case.  Ironically because of Stanley’s outburst the Court gave up their plan to find him NCR --temporarily-- because in the Prison System toughness & Aggression gets you your way! J., Eberhardt recused herself from the case and it seemed the worst was over; [A. Record Exs# 2 & 3] but after his sentence for Breach of probation in January 1998; the Don Jail prison didn‘t want him back, and transferred him to the metro-west detention centre: where they kept him in segregation and poisoned his food severely. Then began a massive conspiracy to transfer him to a mental hospital. The psychiatric nurse at the Don Jail Cathy Brown, sent a letter to the Crown asking them to seek an NCR finding on Stanley. Then on February 10th, 1998, The Toronto Star did a malicious Libel article on Stanley: “calling him paranoid schizophrenic, and asking that he be found unfit for trial and forcefully medicated“. The Star was illegally given “protected“ clinical records from Metfors psychiatrist Hy Bloom to defame Stanley! [Exhibit#2,3,4 & 7, Below]
8.     April 23rd, 1998: TRIAL: A hit-man Judge Bassel was brought in from Toronto just to “get” Stanley. Stanley defended himself brilliantly at trial; and emphasized that even restraint and assault on the person of the king is High Treason and the punishment is “the pains of Death”. But really the main argument was that the Police were assaulting a man in handcuffs; and Stanley had a verbal right to defend himself. The prosecutor at the Bail Hearing, Robert Scott, lied and even had the transcript doctored, where he lied that Stanley waived his Bail Hearing. This was crucial because Stanley already had had a bail hearing; and the Crown had no reason to drag him into Court; except to try and transfer him to a mental hospital. The fact that Judge Eberhardt refused to testify or lay charges was not considered; nor the fact that Stanley had no means to carry out the threat nor did Eberhardt receive the threat or feel it real.  Stanley was found Guilty of “uttering death threats”; and a CONVICTION and GUILTY verdict was entered in his warrant and the “information”.  [A. Record Ex#3,5 & 6] But since Bassel wanted blood; he was not satisfied with 18 months and three years probation; because Stanley had already done 8 months of “dead time” (pre-trial custody); and already had three years of probation added. The Amicus Curiae appointed by J., Eberhardt, Mr. Jeff Honey, suggested that he be transferred to Whitby WPH. Thus J., Bassel ordered Lisa Cameron the Crown, to arrange with Whitby Mental Health Centre to do a two month assessment for sentencing purposes on a Form 8. But he performed an evil act contrary to the Criminal Code s.672.19, when he instructed her to fax a letter to WMHC to “find Mr. Almeida “incompetent” and treat him”.  This was illegal; as was the NCR finding that Dr. Gojer subsequently made!!!
9.   April 27th-May 22nd, 1998: Within two minutes of arriving in WMHC Dr. Gojer finds him mentally ill with “delusions of Grandeur” and “incompetent” to make treatment decisions. Stanley was shocked; it was difficult to prove you have a credible claim to the throne of Canada in two minutes. Stanley had told all the Courts & Prisons he was the King of Canada for nine years now; the Hospital didn’t know him so it was highly unfair to dump him in this system without context and with a letter urging treatment. Stanley had undergone numerous assessments for fitness and “responsibility” but the letter prejudiced the outcome. On May 9th, 1998; the Board confirmed incapacity; and Stanley had to scramble to appeal it alone. At this Board the Doctor made some damning concessions: he said, “Stanley was not schizophrenic”, “that outside of Stanley’s belief in Kingship, he had no other thought disorder”. Thus it proved that all the previous diagnoses were wrong!! And by focusing the illness only on the Kingship it raises doubt about the current diagnosis as well. On May 22nd, 1998; after the Appellant had successfully appealed his incapacity to the Superior Court of Justice: Dr, Gojer called him into his office and conceded, saying: “I have been a psychiatrist for thirty years, I’ve had thousands of patients pass through here; you are the only patient to successfully appeal your case to the courts; I am going to discharge you from this hospital.” The doctor had told the Board he would keep Stanley in WMHC until his Form 8 expires on June 27th, 1998; The doctor had thus conceded that Stanley was competent at this time; for under s.34 of The MHAct it is mandatory for a physician: not to discharge an incapable person in need of treatment! But the Dr. had written a report to the Court stating the Appellant was “not certifiable” and could only be kept in hospital under an NCR finding. Although He had already been found guilty!
10.   June 18th, 1998: The doctor was inundated with letters from the court and amicus curiae Jeff Honey, pressuring him to take the appellant back and treat him. Thus he appeared in Court unexpectedly and the Judge decided to have an NCR hearing instead. The Judge abused the Appellant’s rights by cancelling the “Guilty Verdict” and the “CONVICTION” and finding him NCR in violation of due process. But the doctor conceded that the previous finding had lapsed on discharge and he would have to make a new finding --that the appellant could appeal-- to treat the appellant. In the end even Stanley relented to going to a hospital because the strip-searches were a constant battle with the prison system: and we mutually agreed to part. Stanley was at first pleased with coming to a minimum security hospital from maximum security prison; But he knew that things would be much worse than prison, if he was ever forcefully treated!!! The new finding was made on July 21st, 1998, [supra] but the Board refused to hear the appeal. Then the Coordinator of Clinical Records Sylvia Wilkins and Ministry Counsel Diana Schell, ruled that the appellant could still be treated by the old finding; and that’s where this case stands. For the rest of the chronology see The Affidavits of Stanley D’Almeida: “April 28th, ‘98 to May 18th, ‘01; Facts In This Case”, “The chronology of Events”, and the “Early & Later Writings”. [Below]
10b.     1998-2006: For the next five years the Hospital would brutally assault him by placing him in “seclusion” about once a month, all for harmless verbal abuse. Even the other patients were appalled at the Satanic Devil Possession that made the Staff torture Stanley so severely. Stanley was being systematically tortured and abused all his stay in Whitby Shores.
11.     Sept.4th TO Dec. 3rd, 2005: After the SCC rejected his leave to appeal July 14th, 2005: On Sept 4th, Stanley was forcefully treated with Risperidone, this was one of the most horrendous times of his life; as it was a shocker as he had a “power of Attorney” that was pressured into consenting to treat. The Doctor refused to wait for the Board, and the Board refused to hear the case. The Doctor and SCJ Court indicated his s.18 protections would return on January 14th, 2006; yet the Board refused to grant them. He suffered horrific symptoms: “tremors, weight gain, restlessness, visible shaking, akathasia, akinesis, stupor, torpidity, extended drugged sleep, hair loss, greying, severe depression, nausea, vomiting, fever, fainting, gastro-intestinal pain & suicidal thoughts.” By the end (Dec, 2005) Stanley couldn’t eat, he had a constant nausea & fever he was almost dead; (The Staff dismissed these side-effects as the “flu”, The evil psychiatrists always minimize the toxicity of neuroleptics and dismiss even lethal symptoms of impending death!) when on Dec. 3rd, 2005; Semion Dashevsky (a fellow patient) agreed to act as his SDM, and immediately stopped the medication and put him on a very low 7.5mg dose of less toxic oral Olanzapine. But Semion wouldn‘t stop the Rx entirely for five years: until Stanley simply stopped taking the Rx himself five tears later in 2010! And Dr. Hill agreed to stop the Rx as well! But Dr. Hill Is still Falsely & Satanically claiming that Mr. D‘Almeida is still “incapable” under a 17 year old “Finding“. [Affidavit#1]
14.  Stanley was continuously poisoned even while in the community, (2006-2014) by the Secret Police influencing restaurants and stores to poison him. In 2013-2015 he was poisoned by Poison Gas being piped into his room in his private Condominium for ten months --due to his declared Veto of Senate Reform & killing cops!! Whereby he almost died from the poison Gas! And the torture never stopped! His teeth were deliberately damaged by dentists; The Condo Board and Property Manager denied him a sound-proof door; due to excessive elevator noise: All Due To Persecution By The Secret Police Or Devil-Possession In The Community! Thus being released by the ORB alone, is not going to alleviate Stanley’s Suffering: He needs relief on the monetary front to protect him from the Property Manager! The ORB must take the blame for allowing the Hospital to incarcerate him for so long; that all his civil protections against forced Rx expired. The ORB adopted a strategy to Pass onto Stanley (and other patients incarcerated for minor crimes) the prospective custodial sentences for those accused of Murder and Rape! Stanley appealed to then PM S. Harper to proclaim the “capping provision” passed by Alan Rock (which would protect us from the Satanic ORB: imposing the sentences of murderers on minor criminals.): but Harper callously repealed that law instead! The ORB was more fixated with forcing Rx on Mr. D’Almeida (Even though they have no jurisdiction over Rx. Anti-psychotic Rx on a man not mentally ill could kill him!) that they conspired with the hospital to poison him. Evil ORB Chairwoman Ms. Frieska obsessed over Rx in the 2013 hearing: and (not by coincidence) 2014 was the worst year for being secretly poisoned in the community for Stanley!!!
PART III
THE GROUNDS FOR THIS APPLICATION:
a) [Note: The SCC has already laid the groundwork for the ORB to accept jurisdiction of this case: [In R. vs. Conway, 2010 SCC 22, (2010) 1 S.C.R.]; and has already given it the authority to grant him the remedy that he is seeking [In Vancouver City vs. Ward SCC, July 21, 2010]!!!] And although Mr. D’Almeida was not under the ORB for every single moment he was in custody (He Has Been 17 Years Under The ORB, for a total of 34+ murderous Years.); to give due justice to Mr. D’Almeida’s legally entitled to, constitutional hearing: All the relevant evidence must be allowed presented for the full period of Mr. D’Almeida’s Genocidal, Murderous, High Treasonous Crucifixion: From Sept. 4th, 1981 To The Present (“The Facts In This Case”)!!! There Is A “Pattern of Persecution”, that can best be elucidated from a full Hearing of the evidence! The SCC Ruled: First: That The ORB is a “court of competent jurisdiction“, (With the Same Powers As A: SCJ, OCA or SCC!) under s.24 of the Constitution Act, 1982; to hear this application and Grant Mr. D’Almeida the relief he is seeking; or to recommend to the Justice Minister that said Compensation be awarded. In R. vs. Paul Conway, 2010 SCC 22,[2010] 1 S.C.R. 765; The SCC Ruled that an “administrative Tribunal” like the ORB is a “court of competent jurisdiction” to hear a case under s. 24(1) of the Charter: “In this case, C seeks certain Charier remedies from the Board. The first inquiry, therefore. is whether the Board is a court of competent jurisdiction under s. 24(1). The answer to this question depends on whether the Board is authorized to decide questions of law. The Board is a quasi-judicial body with significant authority over a vulnerable population. It operates under Part XX.I of the Criminal Code as a specialized statutory tribunal with ongoing supervisory jurisdiction over the treatment, assessment, detention, and discharge of NCR patients: accused who have been found not criminally responsible by reason of a mental disorder. Part XX.I of the Criminal Code provides that any party to a review board hearing may appeal the board's disposition on a question of law, fact or mixed fact and law. The Code also authorizes appellate Courts to overturn a review board's disposition if it was based on a wrong decision on a question of law. This Statutory' language is indicative of the Board's authority to decide questions of law. Given this conclusion, and since Parliament has not excluded the Charier from the Board's mandate, it follows that the Board is a “court of competent jurisdiction” for the purpose of granting remedies Under s. 24( I) of the Charter. SECOND: In Vancouver (City) v. Ward SCC (Julv 21st, 2010); The SCC has also ruled that any Court of Competent Jurisdiction has Equal authority to grant Mr. D’Almeida the Remedy he is seeking! It held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, even where public officials have not acted in bad faith and the individual has not suffered any monetary damages. In a unanimous decision, the Court noted that section 24(1) of the Charter gives courts of competent jurisdiction a broad power to grant "appropriate and just" remedies for Charter breaches.
b)  In the alternative this tribunal can refer this matter to the Justice Minister for a formal Hearing on the massive constitutional infringements and egregious constitutional violations suffered by Mr. D’Almeida.
c)  Stanley D’Almeida has proven he is the King of Canada by publicly Vetoing the Meech Lake & Charlottetown Accords as well as “Senate Reform”! Yet The System Continued to try to Murder him! Mr. D’Almeida was never mentally ill, incompetent or ever committed a criminal act: yet was put in prison, abused, beaten, assaulted, tortured relentlessly for 35 years, forcefully medicated with the most toxic substances on the face of this Earth, lied about, denigrated, libelled, defamed and attempts were made on his life every year for the last 35 years. This was an act of protracted High Treason for which the only punishment is Death, Death, Death! In “Synopsis of the case against the system” Mr. D’Almeida formally outlines the legal basis for an “Indictment” of the Angle-Saxon-Aryan-Ape System for crimes against Humanity, War Crimes, Genocide, Fundamental Crimes against this: Universe, This Earth, and this Biosphere; And The Greatest of these is A-Dama And High Treason for which they must pay with their lives and souls!
 d) That the denials described in the above paragraphs cannot be justified by the application of s.1 of the Charter (s.1 is to be used only in exceptional circumstances).
 e) That the treatment of Mr. D’Almeida violate the Charter and Bill of Rights against "any cruel and unusual treatment and or punishment” contrary to s.12 of the Charter and 2. 2(b) of the Bill of Rights:
i)  Mr. D’Almeida was forced to take some of the most toxic chemicals on earth: fluorine-chlorine-halogen-suIphide-alkaloid-aromatic-polycycIicorganic: molecules, into his body against his will and expressed wishes. The (mental) health legislation is taken lightly by the: hospital, Board and Ministry; to run roughshod over patient's rights in practice: See the Litany of intrigues and abuse in Mr. D'Almeida's "Facts in this Case" "affidavit". The Mental Health Acts are deliberately filled with unnecessary loopholes to take advantage of and murder by poison: “labelled mentally iII” and “labelled incapable” patients. Murder done "legally" is institutional murder and must be condemned and punished, and should not be sanctioned by this ORB, Court and System. There is a huge societal risk (which is already happening) of secret police, security agencies, "system" operatives of using these same poisons to secretly poison: poor people, political dissenters, judges, media, politicians, athletes, ethnics, non-Aryan-Saxons, Muslims, enemies of the State, "terrorists" and the homeless; in a form of mass murder and genocide unparalleled in human history! Even if Stanley were released his suffering wouldn’t end if the Secret Police were allowed to Torture And Poison him on the Street, or in his Condominium (as they did these past few years)
ii) Mr. D’Almeida has personally experienced and documented the horror suffering, pain and death of psychiatric inmates in prison and in hospitals in his various reports to the Ministry, courts and governments. This is the implementation of the final solution on: mentally-iII, poor, homeless, ethnic groups, incapable of working, refusal to work as slaves, forced slavery, genocided people in Canada: the worst hell hole, the heart of darkness on this earth. "The horror, the horror". (see "supporting evidence" affidavit.)
    iii)     A list of the symptoms of neuroleptic poisoning most of which that Stanley has personally suffered are: agranulocytosis, aplastic anaemia, immune suppression, flesheating disease, necrotizing: myelitis & fascitis, tenosynovitus, septicaemia, gastro-intestinal haemorrhage, ischemic intestinal disorder, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, obesity, induced diabetes, liver cancer, pre-cancerous skin lesions, painful acne, facial tics, bloody diarrhoea, secondary E. Coli 0157:h7 infection of the kidneys, induced liver jaundice, lymph node and ear infection, tooth loss and infection, hair loss and greying, blurred vision, hearing loss, dry skin, breast cancer, brain and muscle damage, back pain, haemorrhoids, gangrene, ischemia, brain cancer, induced heart-attacks, lung cancer from smoking caused by poison alleviation, poikilothermic-effect, cancers, brain and muscle degeneration and finally death: by a thousand cuts. (see his 1988 factum and various personal letters).
    iv)     That murder by poison is also contrary to the
Criminal Code of Canada; and no other jurisdiction except for the police and prisons (which also go about murdering people with poison) can legally commit murder! REMEDY: Forced treatment of Stanley D’Almeida with neuroleptics or anti-psychotics --that cause death and permanent side-effects--Solely on the basis that he is, and he believes he is the King of Canada should be found unconstitutional under s.12, 15 & 7 of the Charter of rights.
  f)    that the Hospital’s and the Board's arbitrary, vindictive and capricious findings of mental illness solely on the basis of Mr. D'Almeida's belief that he is the King of Canada is contrary to sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Charter and sections 2(c) and 2(d) of the Bill of Rights. And is political persecution, not justice, and unconstitutional!
    i)     The Hospital is Guilty of violating the constitutional principle of Double Jeopardy Contrary To s, 11 of The Charter. Stanley was before this same hospital in 1988, 1989, 1990 declaring himself King for all to hear and was found competent in 1988 and found not "criminally insane", NOT NCR, by doctors Nakul Maharaj and Dr. Louis Chan in an 1989 "voir dire" hearing in Newmarket court. In the interim Mr. D'Aimeida has expanded on this statement and had a substantial body of work to back his claim to being The King of Canada. Yet in two minutes of assessment Dr. Gojer and the Board ignored the history of this patient to find him suddenly incompetent and NCR; Unfairly Detained For 17 Years By The ORB and forcefully medicated! The second instance of “double jeopardy” was when the Hospital used the same incapacity “finding” of April 1998; (after deeming him competent & discharging Mr. D’Almeida in May 1998) to treat him in 2005! The Fact is that Stanley had had numerous Fitness and incapacity Hearings by the Court: He was found “Fit” and Capable For Nine Straight Years: It was grossly unfair of the Prosecutor and the Court: To attack his vulnerability: Of proving he is The King of Canada in two Minutes: To finally find him NCR and forcibly treat him!
     g)     That the Hospital cannot shoulder all the blame: The Police, Secret Police & Prosecutors who laid false charges on Mr. D’Almeida contrary to s. 7,8,9,10,11,12 of the charter. The ORB who fixated on forcing Rx medications on Mr. Almeida by keeping him in custody, allowing the Hospital to force treatment on him! The Courts (including the supreme court) for dismissing all his appeals arbitrarily, The Canadian press for lying, libelling, defaming and covering up the murder of Stanley D’Almeida going on under their very eyes! The Politicians & people of Canada refusing to help Stanley, and by voting for liberal delusional Satanic, devil-possessed governments! The people in the community who obeyed the Secret Police to Poison, Abuse & Disrespect Stanley; The Dentists who deliberately damaged Stanley’s teeth, The Devil-Possessed People who tortured him through the property manager & Condo Board; Everybody piled on and tried to Murder Stanley the King for fear of the Satanic System! Stanley stood alone against Satan And The Devil-Possessed Angle-Saxon-Aryan-Ape System! The ORB Has jurisdiction to hear this Constitutional Rights and Remedy case, and is best suited to hear it: because 17 of those 34+ Years His constitutional rights were violated, were while under the jurisdiction of the ORB.
PART IV:
NATURE OF ORDER SOUGHT:
The Appellant will also be seeking Constitutional Infringement Damages for the Horrific, Unprecedented, Murderous Torture Over 34+ Years: Unequalled In Human History: The System And Satan Singled Just Stanley Out For This Torture, Crucifixion, And Attempted Murder: That Is Why Compensation Should Also Be High: To Justly Reflect The Enormous Evil, The Historical Uniqueness Of The Torture, That Was Done To Stanley’s Person! In Total violation of his constitutional rights under: s. 2,7,8,9,10,11,12,15,24 & 32 of the charter; to the tune of $34+ million dollars. The Appellant respectfully requests damages of $34+ million dollars (Or one $$$Million Dollars For Every Year Of Unlawful Imprisonment, Unrelenting Torture, Attempted Murder) by so Ordering the Justice Minister. The authority for this remedy is the Supreme Court:
Supreme Court of Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (Julv 2:td, 2010) held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, even where public officials have not acted in bad faith and the individual has not suffered any monetary damages. In a unanimous decision, the Court noted that section 24(1) of the Charter gives courts of competent jurisdiction a broad power to grant "appropriate and just" remedies for Charter breaches. Prior jurisprudence held that an appropriate and just remedy will:
(1) meaningfully vindicate the rights and freedoms of the claimants;
(2) employ means that are legitimate within the framework of Canada's constitutional democracy;
(3) be a judicial remedy which vindicates the right while invoking the function and powers of a court; and
(4) be fair to the party against whom the order is made.
The Court concluded that damages for breach of a claimant's Charter rights may meet these conditions:
They may meaningfully vindicate the claimant's rights and freedoms. They employ a means well-recognized within our legal framework. They are appropriate to the function and powers of a court. And, depending on the circumstances and the amount awarded, they can be fair not only to the claimant whose rights were breached, but to the state which is required to pay them. I therefore conclude that s. 24(1) is broad enough to include the remedy of damages for Charter breach. That said, granting damages under the Charter is a new endeavour, and an approach to when damages are appropriate and just should develop incrementally. Charter damages are only one remedy amongst others available under s. 24(1), and often other s. 24(1) remedies will be more responsive to the breach.
The Court held that, where a Charter breach has been established, a functional approach must be taken to determining whether a remedy of damages would be appropriate. That is, for damages to be awarded, they must further the general objects of the Charter as reflected in three interrelated functions that damages may serve:
The function of compensation, usually the most prominent function, recognizes that breach of an individual's Charter rights may cause personal loss which should be remedied. The function of vindication recognizes that Charter rights must be maintained, and cannot be allowed to be whittled away by attrition. Finally, the function of deterrence recognizes that damages may serve to deter future breaches by state actors.
If it is determined that an award of damages would fulfill one or more of the related functions of compensation, vindication of the right, and/or deterrence of future breaches, the state will have an opportunity to convince the court that countervailing factors, such as the existence of alternative remedies or concerns for good governance, would render an order of damages inappropriate or unjust in the particular circumstances of a case.
Finally, where it has been determined that damages should be awarded, the quantum of damages must also be appropriate and just having regard to the principles of compensation, vindication and deterrence. In some cases, the Court noted, the c1aimant's losses will be non-pecuniary. While harder to measure, such losses are not by that reason to be rejected. "Pain and suffering are compensable. Absent exceptional circumstances, compensation is fixed at a fairly modest conventional rate, subject to variation for the degree of suffering in the particular case." The Court concluded:
... [To be "appropriate and just", an award of damages must represent a meaningful response to the seriousness of the breach and the objectives of compensation, upholding Charter values, and deterring future breaches. The private law measure of damages for similar wrongs will often be a useful guide. However, as Lord Nicholls warns in Ramaroop ... "this measure is no more than a guide because ... the violation of the constitutional right will not always be coterminous with the cause of action at law"
Applying these principles to the facts In this case, the Court held that the $5000 in damages ordered for the strip search was appropriate:
In this case, the need for compensation bulks large. Mr. Ward's injury was serious. He had a constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, which was violated in an egregious fashion. Strip searches are inherently humiliating and degrading regardless of the manner in which th ey are carried out and thus constitute significant injury to an individual's intangible interests ... The corrections officers' conduct which caused the breach of Mr. Ward's Charter rights was also serious. Minimum sensitivity to Charter concerns within the
Supreme Court o(Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (Julv 23rd, 2010) held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, violation of charter rights, vindication for being right, and deterrence from future injustice; makes it imperative that he be awarded these damages. The pain and suffering the Appellant endured was unequalled in the annals of human history and has to be judged in that context; the fact that Mr. Stanley D’Almeida is still alive is not from the System's and Hospital's wont of trying to murder him; but due to his toughness. But 34+ years of incarceration and long-term side-effects of these toxic poisons has greatly affected his quality of life, past income earnings, ability to earn future income, and must be compensated. Stanley Has no money to support a family or the earnings potential --due to the poisoning and its debilitating effects. He has no “pension plan” like the Demonic “liberal” Politicians want “relatively rich” people to all have, Yet these same Politicians turned a Blind Eye, Or who tried to murder him with their deficit spending: which Stanley Has To Pay for with his taxes --while Stanley was trying to save mankind in prison & Psychiatric Murder Hospitals! Stanley is the poorest man on Earth: Where is the charity for him? Where is the compassion for: the most Persecuted, the most maligned, The Man The Satanic System has tried To Murder The Most? He must get compensation, to lead a normal life.
    FINALLY,     THE APPLICANT-APPELLANT makes application for an order, or recommendation, to the Justice Minister:
    a)     Declaring that The Appellant should receive damages of $34+ million dollars (Or one $$$Million Dollars For Every Year Of Continuous Constitutional Violations Suffered, Cruel & Unusual Punishment, Attempted Murder, Unlawful Imprisonment, Torture and Poisoning) by so Ordering the Justice Minister. The authority for this order is the Supreme Court. There is precedent for this in the wrongful imprisonment of David Milgaard, Donald Marshall, who each got ~One $Million for each year of wrongful imprisonment! David Milgaard Spent 21 Years Falsely Imprisoned and Got $$10 Million in compensation In 1999. Donald Marshall Spent 11 Years Wrongfully Imprisoned And Got $$250,000 in compensation In 1989! The SCC has already ruled that such monetary remedies for constitutional violations is appropriate; and that the ORB is a “court of competent jurisdiction” under s. 24(1) of the Charter. In Stanley’s case not only has he been wrongfully convicted, imprisoned, DIAGNOSED, and forcefully medicated: He Had Been Deliberately Targeted, Ostracized, Isolated, Conspired Against, Racially-Discriminated Against, Singled-Out For Torture, Genocided And Persecuted For 34+ Continuous Years with Intent by The System to Murder him --Simply For Being The True King of Canada, Under Natural Law! The System did not treat Stanley like other inmates or patients (Milgaard & Marshall never claimed torture): In Stanley’s Case The System Singled Him Out For Torture: They tried to brutally, systematically & endlessly Torture him to death --As In Actually Try To Murder Him-- The Fact That They Failed To Murder Him, Is Not From Wont Of Trying: But Because Stanley Was Too Tough For Them! TORTURE over 34+ years supersedes any other form of constitutional compensation awardable: The methods of torture were Isolation of Suffering from all society for 34+ Years; Ostracism: from all Society, Family & Friends. Isolation From Forming Or Contacting Like-Minded Groups or Organizations, Under Stanley’s Leadership: Because of Their Fear Of Persecution And Censorship Of Most Incoming E-Mail Internet, And All Mainstream Media by The System! The Conspiratorial, Secret Collusion of All Canadians and Institutions To Poison, Torture and Murder Stanley --not a single Canadian divulged the poisoning of his food to Stanley; Or of the Secret Police contacting them about him: Even Jesus Had Followers; Nobody Tried To Contact Him Or Communicate With Him: That Is Extreme Torture To Be So Alone For So Long! The Deliberate Torture To Refuse To Have A “Meeting of the Minds”, Discuss, or Factually Address That Stanley Has Proven He Is The King of Canada, By Vetoing Meech Lake, Charlottetown,  & Senate Reform! To keep Stanley In Total Blackout, Isolation From All Society, Family & Friends For 34+ Years, And Lie About Him Being Mentally-Ill! And Try To Persecute Him Relentlessly: Is The Greatest Torture of All! The length of Isolation, The Total Blackout Severity Of The Isolation, (For 34+ Continuous Years!) and lethality (Most Toxic Poisons Known To Mankind, Poison Gas) of this TORTURE raises this level of TORTURE, as so severe, as to be non-duplicable ever in The History of This Earth!!!

THE APPELLANT RESTS
1) The applicant relies on Rule 14.05 (3)(h); sections 2,11,7,8,9,10,12,15,24,32 and 52 of the (1982) Constitution Act and the Bill of Rights.
2. The following documentary evidence will be used at the hearing of this application:
a) the 'Factum' of his 2004 incompetency appeal, in the
Court of Appeal, which will also constitute a further grounds for this application;
b) the affidavit#21 compiled by Mr. D’Almeida April 28th, 1998 - May 22nd, 2001.
e) The 'Affidavit#3' called Supporting Evidence Exhibits & Affidavit. Indicating Mass Poisonings.
d) This is IN THE 2004 SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Application for Leave to Appeal.
e) The 1998 Factum, for his probation order appeal: indicating his substantial ease that he is the King of Canada and this earth. His thetruekingofcanada.com website.
f) "The Early Writings" and "Latter Writings" "affidavit#4", setting out a valid reasonable, rational, and credible basis for his claim that he is the King of Canada, and has de facto veto powers over all laws in Canada which the system is attempting to override by torturing him unto death for the last 34+ years.
g) The Excerpt of Mr D' Almeida's 2011 Supreme Court of Canada Appeal: Including the history of Mr D'Almeida's persecution over these last 34+ Years in custody: in the prison system, psychiatric hospital system and under the ORB! Especially PART I: "FACTS IN THIS CASE". The "Preferred Indictment" Titled "A Synopsis Of The Case Against The System".



Signed: STANLEY D’ALMEIDA

_________________________________________________
Dated: January 9th, 2015.
STANLEY A.P. D'ALMEIDA --Self-Counsel
1701-5 Massey Square, East York, Ontario. M4C 5L6.
Tel: (416) 699-6724. Applicant (Appellant)


TO: The Ontario Review Board, 151 Bloor St. West, 10th Floor, Toronto, ON. M5S 2T5. Tel: (416) 327-8866. FAX: (416) 327-8867.
AND TO: Barbara J. Walker-Renshaw, LLB., Scotia Plaza, 40 King St. West, Toronto ON. M5H 3Y4.Tel: (416) 367- 6744. FAX: (416) 682-2823.
AND TO: Mr. Connolly, Crown Attorney's Office, 150 Bond St., 3rd Floor, Oshawa, ON. L1G OA2. Tel (905) 743-2700. FAX: (905) 743-2484.
AND TO: Mr. Anthony Paas Amicus Curiae, 27 Prince Arthur Ave.,
Toronto, ON. M5R 1B2. Tel: (416) 960-3066.
AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch, 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1.Tel.: (416) 212-7244. Fax: (416) 326-4015.
AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street West, Exchange Tower, Box 36, Toronto, ON M5X IK6.
Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.
ONTARIO REVIEW BOARD:
IN THE MATTER OF A Notice of Constitutional Question.

BETWEEN:
STANLEY ANTONIO PANDURANGA XVI D'ALMEIDA --Applicant (Accused)
- and-
Attorney General of Ontario, Dr. Wood Hill, Person In Charge Ms. Glenna Raymond Administrator of Whitby Shores CMHS;
Ms Barbara Renshaw-Walker LLB. Counsel for the respondents.

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE:

I, Stanley D’Almeida, The King of Canada, of the city of Toronto, in the province of ON, MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.     That on the _____   day of January, A.D. 2015; I did personally serve (or did mail to) Ms. Walker-Renshaw or Her Representative ____________________________  Counsel for the Respondents----- With The annexed DOCUMENT by delivering to the said person a copy thereof, while at the same time exhibiting the original.

Sworn before me in the     )
City of Toronto, in the        )_________________________
Province of Ontario, This   )       Stanley D’Almeida
_____Day of January, 2015)

________________________________________________
A Commissioner for taking Affidavits



THE ONTARIO EVIEW BOARD
(On An Annual Review Of A Detention Order)
In The Matter Of A ORB Hearing in Whitby Shores CMHS.
BETWEEN:
STANLEY ANTONIO PANDURANGA XVI D'ALMEIDA --Applicant
- and-
Attorney General of Ontario, Dr. Wood Hill, Person In Charge Ms. Glenna Raymond Administrator of Whitby Shores CMHS; Ms Barbara Renshaw-Walker LLB. Counsel for the --Respondents

RECORD OF THE APPLICANT

1. Evidence Proving First Assault#1 Conviction
    Was False!
    (RECORD Pages: 262-282; 34. Father‘s
    Testimony! Mother‘s Statement To Hospital!)
2. Evidence Proving Second Assault#2 False
    (Pages: 39A-47; 61-70. Stanley‘s Severe  
    Weakness & Blood Dyscrasias, Emaciation
    And Starvation, Horrendous Weight-Loss!)
3. Evidence Proving Third Assault##3 Charge
    Was False
    (It Was Dropped, Because Stanley Caught
      Prosecutor Doctoring Evidence!)
      [Pages: 306-320!]
4. Evidence Proving Index Offence False! RE:
    NCR: Justice Eberhardt  (Pages: 210-261)
5.  EVIDENCE PROVING STANLEY IS THE KING
     OF CANADA!
     (PAGES: 303-305. The Vetoing of The Meech
      Lake Accord!)






IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
  STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
-and-
Whitby Mental Health Centre, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
  ----Respondents
________________________________________________
 APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
    Pursuant to section 40(1) of The Supreme Court Act
________________________________________________
Stanley P. A. D’Almeida --Lead Counsel for Appellant,
119-9 Crescent Place, East York, Ontario, M4C 5L8.
Tel: (416) 699-6724.
Email: Stanley_xvidalmeida@yahoo.com

Heather McKay --Respondent’s Counsel, ATTORNEY GENERAL of ONTARIO, Crown Law Office - Civil, 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2A1.
Tel.: (416) 326-4129 Fax: (416) 326-4181.
 
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, Constitutional Law Branch, 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1. Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015.      Sean Hanley 

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street West Exchange Tower, Box 36, Toronto, ON M5X lK6. Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter of a Consent and Capacity case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
 STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
-and-
Whitby Mental Health Centre, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
     ----Respondents
________________________________________________
 APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
    Pursuant to section 40(1) of The Supreme Court Act
________________________________________________
Stanley P. A. D’Almeida --Lead Counsel for Appellant,
119-9 Crescent Place, East York, Ontario, M4C 5L8.
Tel: (416) 699-6724.
Email: Stanley_xvidalmeida@yahoo.com

Heather McKay --Respondent’s Counsel, ATTORNEY GENERAL of ONTARIO, Crown Law Office - Civil, 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2A1.
Tel.: (416) 326-4129 Fax: (416) 326-4181.
 
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, Constitutional Law Branch, 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1. Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015.      Sean Hanley 

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street West Exchange Tower, Box 36, Toronto, ON M5X lK6. Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.


TABLE OF CONTENTS:  
TAB     DESCRIPTION                        DATE                        PAGE

       0.  Application for Leave to Appeal     October 28th, 2010           0
INX 1.  TABLE OF CONTENTS                    October 28th, 2008.        1-3 
1      2. NOTICE of Application                    October 28th, 2010         4-12
        3 Grounds of Application                    October 28th, 2010         6-12
        4. Notice of Motion for Extension
             of Time & Support Affidavit            October 28th, 2010      13-15
        5. Notice of Motion To Adduce New
            Evidence                                           October 28th, 2010         16
        6. Notice of Motion To File A Lengthy
            Memorandum.                                   October 28th, 2010         17                    
        7.Certificate re: Publication Ban                Oct. 28th, 2010          18
        8.Certificate re: Previous SCC Judges      Oct. 28th, 2010          19           
2                  LOWER COURT DECISIONS:                                       21-89
        9.Decision of The Court of Appeal for Ontario
         J.As. Marc Rosenberg, Kathryn           
         Feldman, S.T. Goudge                             August 30th, 2010   22-34
       10.Ruling of Superior Court of Justice
            MJ., J. Mesbur in Toronto                        July 25th, 2010    35-46           
       11.Decision of Consent & Capacity Board, LLB.
            Karen Lindsay-Skynner, Dr. Shugar    February 6th, 2006. 47-62
       12.Endorsement: Superior CJ --Whitby
            J., J.E. Ferguson on s.18                November 25th, 2005   63-65       
       13.Decision of Consent & Capacity Board
            Michael Newman --Lawyer             September 30th, 2005.    66
       14.Supreme Court of Canada Ruling
            JJ’s. Major, Fish & Abella                           July 14th, 2005.    67.
       15.Endorsement of Court of Appeal for
            Ontario; CJO Roy McMurtry, David
            Doherty, J.A. Jean MacFarland.         February 7th, 2005.   68-69             
      16.Endorsement: Superior Court of Justice
           J., Alf Stong on Power of Attorney issue.  May 22nd, 2001.     70
      17.Decision of Superior Court of Justice
          J., Dan Ferguson “Reasons for Decision” Aug. 10th, 1999.  71-74       
      18.Decision of C. & C. Board Denying
            Appellant appointment of Representative.  .               
TAB     DESCRIPTION                        DATE                        PAGE
             Dr. G. DaCosta, W. Hogle, H. Shuster.   Oct. 29th, 1998.    75-76
       19.Decision of Ministry Counsel Diana Schell
            Authorizing Treatment of Mr. D’Almeida   Oct. 5th, 1998.    77-78
       20.Decision of C.& C. Board Refusing to Hear
            Appeal of new ‘Finding’, Mr. D. Hiltz.       July 25th, 1998.   79-80
       21.New ‘Finding’ of incapacity after readmission
            As promised by Dr. Gojer.                        July 21st, 1998.      81
       22.“Reasons for Decision” Consent &
             Capacity Board, Mr. Darcy Hiltz.               May 9th, 1998.   82-87
      23.“Finding” of Incapacity which is
          Currently being Appealed, 13 years ago! April 29th, 1998.      88.                        

3      24. NOTICE of CONSTITUTIONAL
             QUESTIONS                                  OCTOBER 28TH, 2010  90-106     
4       25. MEMORANDUM OF ARGUMENT  October 28th, 2010  107-140             
             Part I: Statement of Facts                                                 108-114              
             Part II: Overview: Points In Issue                                    114-117                                       
             Part III: Argument                                                             117-128             
             Part IV: Order Sought As To Costs                                     130               
5           Part V: Nature of Order Sought                                       130-132              
             Part VI:  Table of Authorities                                                                 
         
       26. Schedule “A” List of Authorities    October 28th, 2010. 132-133
       27. Schedule  “B” The Statutes relied on:  Oct. 28th, 2010. 133-140
       28. Certificate of  Completeness of the
              Appellant                                         October 28th, 2010.     141. 
          THE EVIDENCE: AFFIDAVITS & RECORD                         142-297
         THE AFFIDAVITS of Stanley D'Almeida:                    143-205
6       29. Affidavit#1 “Chronology of Events”    June 25, 2006. 143-146
7        30. Affidavit#2: “The Facts in This Case”              
               April 24th, 1998 to Aug. 8th, '06.            Oct. 21st, 2004. 147-168
8        31. Affidavit #3: “Supporting Evidence Exhibits Affidavit”
               The exhibits will be provided if Needed).
               On Poisoning & Genocide
               By The System.                                   Oct. 24th, 2004.  167-187
9       32. Affidavit#4: “The Early Writings and               
             Latter Writings” Affidavit.       October 28th, 2010   188-204                                                                                      
10     33. APPELLANT‘S RECORD: October 28th, 2010.  205-297
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
EXHIBITS:                                                       PAGE NO:
1. The Appellant’s full criminal record and
committals to Whitby Psych. Hosp.       June 19th, 1998.                    207-209                                  
2.  Partial Transcript of Bail Hearing proving Bail
     Already denied; and that Appellant was being
     Assaulted at time of alleged threat!     Nov. 5th, 1997.                    210-232
  J., Eberhardt’s Endorsement: No Threat. Nov. 7th, 1997.                  233-240
3.  Statement from P.C. Jeffrey Bright, (who was
assaulting Appellant) eyewitness to the alleged
threat; indicating no direct threat made. Jan.23rd, 1998.                     241-243    
4.  Don Jail psychiatric nurse Cathy Brown
     Asking for Appellant be found NCR          Mar. 1998.                      245-246
5.  Warrant & “Information”: Appellant already
     CONVICTED of threats, thus couldn’t be found
      NCR                                                     April 24th, 1998                      247-250
6.  Form 8 Order for assessment proving it was for
     Two months, yet Appellant discharged 38 days early!
     Proving Doctor believed him capable. Apr. 24th, 1998.                         251
7.  Psychiatrist Hy Bloom illegally divulging Appellant’s
     Confidential Medical Records to the Toronto Star
     Who falsely defamatorily libelled the Appellant
     Calling him paranoid schizophrenic!   Feb. 10th, 1998.                    252-255
8. Letter from Crown Lisa Cameron: The Judge
     Violated s.672.19 of CCC.!                   April 24th, 1998.                     256-257
9. Dr. Gojer’s Report to Judge Bassel,
     “Accused not a danger to public and not
     Certifiable”                                             May 15th, 1998.                      258-261
10.  Partial Transcript of First Assault Peace Officer
     Trial; Father testifies Appellant did not Assault
     Police, but was himself assaulted.     June 11th, 1982.                      262-282
11.  Judge’s Report Finding Appellant Fit To
     Stand Trial, and criminally “Responsible”
     Appellant spent Nine Years in Prison from
    Breach of Probations & “Dead Time”. Sept. 29th, 1989.                    282(a)-282(c)
12.  In Ghana Mental Illness is considered Demo
       Possession; And They CURE patients! not Poison
       Them to death! Toronto Star article. Sept. 30th, 2010.                   282(d)-282(e)
*13.  Holistic Treatment - Alternative Treatment
      Report by Stanley D’Almeida              Sept. 30th, 2010.                      283-297

34. Affidavit of Service           October 28th, 2010.         298
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
BETWEEN:
  STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
-and-
Whitby Mental Health Centre, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
  ----Respondents

NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

     TAKE NOTICE that the Appellant will apply for leave to this Court pursuant to section 40(1) of the Supreme Court Act, and amendments thereto, for an order granting leave to appeal from a demonic decision by the Court of Appeal for Ontario, rendered on August 30th, 2010; by M. Rosenberg J.A, S.T. Goudge J.A., & K. Feldman J.A.; in case number C49297 of that Court; or such further or other order this said Court may deem appropriate.

          AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE That the following documents will be referred to in support of such application for leave, namely the Notice of Application herein and the Application for Leave, Multiple Affidavit(s) of Stanley D’Almeida, The Board “Record” & “B. Transcript”, The “Early Writings of Stanley D’Almeida, The Facts In This Case, Book of Authorities of The Appellant. The Exhibits for these Affidavits have been omitted for now, but will be produced on request.
          AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that the said Application for leave shall be made on the following Grounds:

0.     Although The Supreme Court did rule on Mental Health Jurisprudence in the Starson v. Swayze case in 2003; There are a myriad of issues that remain unresolved. This case is a perfect means to do so; as it is so complex that it encompasses almost every issue in Mental Health Jurisprudence and thus deserving a second look by this honorable Court.

1.  The First Issue of National Importance: That The Appellant’s treatment by the Courts, the Boards, Psychiatric Hospital (Whitby Shores CMHS), The Police, The Prisons, The Secret Police, for the last 30 years constitute A Massive Miscarriage of Justice, Attempted Murder Against the Person of Stanley D’Almeida, Unlawful Imprisonment, Persecution, Cruel and Unusual Treatment and Punishment, Unequal Treatment under the law, denial of security of the person under the fundamental principles of Justice; That must be rectified by this Court; and an award of “commensurate” and “reasonable” damages for this violation of Charter Rights over 30 years. 

2.   The Second Issue of National Importance: The unjust treatment of NCR and Criminal Code patients by the hospitals and the ORB to force psychiatric treatment on them for years and years on the same incapacity ‘finding’ violates the equality, security of the person and cruel and unusual treatment provisions of the Charter. The Hospitals and The ORB are unlawfully exploiting their custodial powers to make it easy to force treatment on such patients; without having them meet the criteria of committal --as civilian patients must meet. When the s.16 of the Criminal Code was changed to eliminate “Lieutenant Governor’s Warrants” for “NCR” designation: It resulted in hospitals filling their empty wings with inmates accused of very minor offences (Whereas before s.16 was reserved for “dangerous” and “violent” mentally ill offenders) Thus NCR patients who would be freed in less than six moths, --if they had received a prison sentence-- were now serving a five to ten year custodial sentence in a psychiatric facility; all the while being forced to take some of the most toxic poisons on Earth. The Mental Health Statutes did not envision that there would be two tiers of patients with unequal rights. Had this Appellant been a civilian or incarcerated in a Prison he would have been released untreated by poison twelve years ago!!! Thus not only are the NCR patients being unjustly medicated they are being unjustly detained.

3.     The Third Issue of National Importance: That the Mental Health statutes deny patients fundamental justice by being so “vague” that virtually anyone can be found “incapable” and forcefully treated with toxic poisons on the whim of the physician and Board. The definition of “understand”, “appreciate” and “consequences” in the definition of incapacity are deliberately vague; and invite multiple “hidden” interpretations by various arbiters, making it impossible to prove capacity --even if perfectly capable. There needs to be an empirical, quantifiable and “scientific” means to determine psychiatric capacity; and since security of the person, life, liberty and long-term health are being jeopardized otherwise; These statutes must be found to be unconstitutional. In the Starson v. Swayze(2003)SCC case even your own Supreme Court Justices Were widely divergent in their ruling on the capacity of the patient! In fact Justice Major did propose an impartial test for capacity: “Mental Capacity” to choose from alternative consequences.  If this mental capacity can then be quantified via an IQ test, it would solve this problem.

4.     The Fourth Issue of National Importance: The fact that psychiatric patients can still have their prior competent wishes ignored; and have the wishes of their SDM overruled is a violation of the Equality provisions in the Charter. Under s.35,36 & 37 of the HCCAct (1996) an SDM can be hauled before the Board and the Courts and removed by force if they don’t comply with the physician’s version of “best interests” of the patient. Whereas medical patients and their SDMs have the absolute right to refuse treatment! This inequality also makes it difficult to obtain an SDM willing to ACT for a psychiatric patient because they are wary of being hauled before the Board or Court and having to explain themselves; and then being forced to abide by the doctor’s wishes or be removed as SDM. This Appellant has had great difficulty obtaining anyone to act as his “Power of Attorney” for this reason.

5.     The Fifth Issue of National Importance: Does psychiatric Treatment constitute Cruel and Unusual Treatment and Punishment? Yes it is the definition of it!!! These “medications” are the most toxic poisons on Earth; the CIA has used it to murder and Genocide millions of Iraqi, Afghan and North Korean children and civilians by poisoning their food supply! This Appellant has documented the cases of vast segments of Canadian Society being murdered by these poisons; and Stanley has suffered virtually all the side-effects of these psychiatric “medications” himself --thus he is an expert on them. The SYSTEM TRIED TO MURDER Stanley and failed; and now they must be brought to Justice!

6.     The Sixth Issue of National Importance: Can a man be found to be mentally ill simply for claiming to be the true King of Canada? Not if it is a rational claim. Under the charter a person has the right to freedom of thought, belief and expression and freedom of religion. This Appellant was arbitrarily diagnosed with a mental illness, without any rational discussion with him as to why he claims to be King. The Hospital refused to debate Stanley because they knew they would lose and thus reinforce Stanley’s belief in his Kingship. The Doctor only superficially examined the claim and assumed it was an illness; denying the Appellant due process under Law. The use of psychiatry to torture a Political Prisoner for seeking to destroy the System is illegal under our charter and constitution and must be brought to a halt.

7.     The Seventh Issue of National Importance: What is the correct test(s) for capacity?  Unfortunately although Justice Major tried to explain his reasoning on this issue, it still seems too vague for the lower Courts. Every judge, Board & Doctor seems to have a different test for capacity. Even if they play lip service to the correct jurisprudence, they are in fact stubbornly using their own false test for capacity; and then pretending to comply. The test for Capacity has to be formulated to overcome subjective bias, and persecution of an individual. The consequences of loss of security of the person simply cannot allow for our fate to lie in the capricious hands of a Doctor or Board. The Board in the Appellant’s case used “best interests” as their test for capacity; and the doctor used a “disbelief in an illness” as his determiner of capacity: BOTH ARE THE WRONG TESTS! Yet the Appellant didn’t prevail in court because of institutional bias.

8.      The Eighth Issue of National Importance: Does an incapacity finding lapse on discharge? This seems obvious that it does; but the lower courts have consistently failed to uphold this jurisprudence. The statutes clearly require a physician to detain a patient until he is no longer in need of observation, care and treatment: thus when the Appellant was discharged he was deemed competent under the common law “presumption of competence”. Yet this Appellant is still being deemed incapable by a “finding” made before he was discharged.  The only reason the doctor discharged him was he felt the Appellant was competent at that time! Because Dr. Gojer was impressed that the Appellant was able to file an Appeal of his incapacity to the Superior Court of Justice, on May 22nd, 1998; Dr. Gojer exclaimed “in all my 30 years of experience as psychiatrist, you are the only patient to successfully appeal your incapacity finding”; and promptly discharged the Appellant.

9.      The Ninth Issue  of National Importance: Can a person be forcefully treated using a 13 year old finding of incapacity? And wouldn’t the Hospital have to prove him continuously incapable for the 13 tears in order to use that finding? The statutes state that capacity is dependent on time; and that capacity is not related to mental illness. Yet the Hospital is using a 13 year old finding to forcefully treat the Appellant. The Statutes never intended for forced treatment to last such a long time. Is this not abuse of process and the abrogation of his charter rights?

10.      The Tenth Issue of National Importance: Can the Court use forced psychiatric medication as a punitive measure as part of its criminal sentence after an offender is convicted of a crime? This happened in this case because the Appellant had already been sentenced to the maximum sentence under law for a summary offence, on a previous “Breach of Probation” offence. Thus after Mr. D’Almeida was convicted on the current offence of “uttering death threats” on April 23rd, 1998; there was no additional sentence he could be given; thus he was vindictively sent to Whitby Shores Hospital with specific instructions to the hospital “to find him incompetent and treat him”.  This not only breaches his s.7 charter rights; it is contrary to s.672.19 of the criminal code of Canada. Whereby the Court cannot direct on an assessment order that psychiatric treatment be given. This so violated Mr. D’Almeida’s charter rights that this Court must offer him redress, to the appropriate tune of $Millions for pain, suffering and punitive damages.

11.     The Eleventh Issue of National Importance: What is the Standard of Proof for determining capacity? Because of the serious denial of security of the person and life and liberty; surely the standard should be the highest available in law? MJ., Molloy concurred in her Judgement Starson v. Swayze (1999) stating, “the case must be proved on a somewhat enhanced balance of probabilities. In order for the Board to find in favor of the physician, it must hear cogent and compelling evidence in support of the physician’s case. In L.C. v. Pinhas [2002] MJ., Kiteley also supports this Standard; and no higher Court has opposed this Standard; But the Supreme Court Must weigh in; and it is time the Supreme Court took Mental Health Jurisprudence as seriously as it warrants. She labelled the Standard as “Enhanced Civil Standard”, almost equivalent to “beyond a reasonable doubt” in the criminal courts. Psychiatry is a very arbitrary and inexact science; as much protections as is possible should be built in, to prevent what happened to Mr. D’Almeida from happening to anyone else.   

12.     The twelfth  Issue of National Importance: Is a patient protected against forced psychiatric treatment while appealing his incapacity finding to the Board? S.18 of the HCCAct (1996) clearly states so, and that was the understanding of Dr. Barron and MJ., Ferguson; But this Appellant was never afforded such relief, by the Hospital, the Board nor the Courts.

13.     The thirteenth Issue of National Importance: Can the Courts or Respondent’s Counsel correct the errors the physician makes in his test for capacity or diagnosis. The burden of PROOF for a finding of incapacity is clearly on the physician; but the Courts and his counsel have taken it on themselves to look for evidence not presented by the Doctor, and make their own “finding” of incapacity using the correct test, whereas the physician used the incorrect test. The Courts ignored the Appellant’s argument and the physician’s, and ruled based on their own biases against the Appellant. Since the whole incapacity process is so one-sided against the patient, surely the counsel and Courts should not be able to “make the case for the doctor” as well!

14.     The fourteenth Issue of National Importance: Should CSIS have the right to target lawful Canadian Citizens who may dissent locally against the System; by their constant surveillance, bugging of phones, questioning all who come in contact with Mr. D’Almeida and turning them against him; thus ostracizing and torturing him while in the Community?    

            Dated in the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario, this _______ day of ______________________.


____________________________________________________
October 28th, 2010.      STANLEY D’ALMEIDA
                                119-9 Crescent Place, East York, ON.
                                 M4C 5L8.Tel: (416) 699-6724.
                                Tel [Cell] (416) 270-0394
                                --Appellant Acting in Person
TO: The Registrar of This Court,
        Supreme Court of Canada,
        Attention: Registry Branch,
        301 Wellington street, Ottawa, Ontario.
        K1A 0J1. Tel: (613) 995-4330. Fax: (613) 996-9138.

AND TO: Ministry of the Attorney General
               Crown Law Office---Civil
                8th floor, 720 Bay St.,
                Toronto, Ontario,
                M5G 2A1.
               Heather MacKay
               Tel: (416) 326-4129; Fax: 416-326-4181

NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENTS: A respondent may serve and file a memorandum in response to
this application for leave to appeal within 30 days after service of the application. If no response is filed
within that time, the Registrar will submit this application for leave to appeal to the Court for
consideration pursuant to section 43 of the Supreme Court Act.






IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In the Matter of: An Appeal of a Consent and Capacity For Treatment Matter (From Toronto Region).
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PANDURANGA XVI. ANTONIO D'ALMEIDA.
                                                            ---APPELLANT
AND
Whitby Shores Centre MHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron & Dr. Julian  Gojer.
                                                     ---RESPONDENTS
______________________________________________
 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
(IF NECESSARY)
____________________________________________________

TAKE NOTICE that Stanley D’Almeida hereby applies to a Judge pursuant to section 47 of The Rules of The Supreme Court of Canada for an order extending the time within which the Applicant may serve and file his Application for Leave to Appeal or any other order that the Judge may deem appropriate.

AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that the Motion shall be made on the following GROUNDS:

1.      That the Appellant is unrepresented, and though he is competent in every way, this application for leave is not his sole occupation in life --like lawyers. Thus he has other things to do than to file applications. The reason he was forced to file such: is that his security of person, his life, liberty and future well being are at stake. 

2.     The Appellant had been blindsided by the Court of Appeal for Ontario, He had argued brilliantly, and expected to win his case outright: The System interfered into the case somehow and he lost. Thus he was ill prepared to prepare what is a monumental amount of work, at such short notice.

Dated in the City of Toronto, this _____ Day of
______________, 2010.

_________________________________________
                     Stanley D’Almeida
TO: The Parties (See Pages 12-15 of This Application)
NOTICE TO RESPONDENTS TO MOTIONS BEFORE A JUDGE OR REGISTRAR; A responding party may serve or file a Response to the Motions within seven clear days after service of the Motion(s). If no response is filed in that time the motion will be submitted for consideration to a judge or registrar, as the case may be.











IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
  STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
-and-
Whitby Mental Health Centre, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
  ----Respondents
____________________________________________________________________________________
AFFIDAVIT
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
____________________________________________________

I, Stanley D’Almeida, The King of Canada, of the city of Toronto, in the province of ON, MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.     That the above “Grounds” for extension of time are true; and that the Appellant did diligently attempt to file his appeal to the Supreme Court on time, and in legible form. But may have the need for an extension of time to perfect his appeal.

Sworn before me in the     )
City of Toronto, in the        )_________________________
Province of Ontario, This   )       Stanley D’Almeida
______Day of Oct., 2010     )


________________________________________________
A Commissioner for taking Affidavits
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In the Matter of: An Appeal of a Consent and Capacity For Treatment Matter (From Toronto Region).
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PANDURANGA XVI. ANTONIO D'ALMEIDA.
                                                            ---APPELLANT
 AND
Whitby Shores Centre MHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron & Dr. Julian  Gojer.
                                                     ---RESPONDENTS
____________________________________________________
 NOTICE OF MOTION TO ADDUCE NEW EVIDENCE
(If Necessary)
____________________________________________________

TAKE NOTICE that Stanley D’Almeida hereby applies to a Judge pursuant to section 47 of The Rules of The Supreme Court of Canada for an order allowing the Appellant to adduce new evidence or any other order that the Judge may deem appropriate.

AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that the Motion shall be made on the following GROUNDS: That this appeal encompasses almost 30 years, and the argument at the Supreme Court level focuses more on law than fact; but the facts must be established. The complexity of this case warrants latitude.
 Dated in the City of Toronto, this _____ Day of
______________, 2010.
_________________________________________
                     Stanley D’Almeida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In the Matter of: An Appeal of a Consent and Capacity For Treatment Matter (From Toronto Region).
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PANDURANGA XVI. ANTONIO D'ALMEIDA.
                                                            ---APPELLANT
AND
Whitby Shores Centre MHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron & Dr. Julian  Gojer.
                                                     ---RESPONDENTS
______________________________________________
 NOTICE OF MOTION TO ACCEPT A LENGTHY MEMORANDUM
(If Necessary)
____________________________________________________

TAKE NOTICE that Stanley D’Almeida hereby applies to a Judge pursuant to section 47 of The Rules of The Supreme Court of Canada for an order allowing the Appellant to file a lengthy memorandum or any other order that the Judge may deem appropriate.

AND FURTHER TAKE NOTICE that the Motion shall be made on the following GROUNDS: That this appeal encompasses almost 30 years,  To ensure a full argument is made. The complexity of this case warrants latitude.
 Dated in the City of Toronto, this _____ Day of
______________, 2010.

_________________________________________
                     Stanley D’Almeida
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
  STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
-and-
Whitby Mental Health Centre, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
  ----Respondents
___________________________________________________________
CERTIFICATE Of Stanley D’Almeida re: ban on publication of evidence
____________________________________________________________________________________

I, Stanley D’Almeida, hereby certify that:
1. This file was sealed in the lower courts, on the Order of a Court of Appeal Judge.
2. There is no ban on the publication of evidence or the names or identity of a party or a witness in The Supreme Court.
3. There is confidential information on the file that should not be accessible to the public by virtue of sensitive and confidential information in Clinical Records, under the Health Statutes of Ontario And Canada

SIGNED:                                   DATED: October 28th, 2010.

_____________________________________


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
  STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
-and-
Whitby Mental Health Centre, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
  ----Respondents

CERTIFICATE OF Stanley D’Almeida re: Judges


I, Stanley D’Almeida, hereby certify that:
The following Supreme Court of Canada Judges JJ’s Major, Fish and Abella have been previously involved or connected with this case.
On July 14th, 2005; they rendered a decision to deny leave to appeal this very same “finding” of incapacity, being appealed currently to the Supreme Court of Canada; Leaving Stanley at the mercy of Devil Possessed fiends, who forced treatment on him. His case was just the type of case the Supreme Court should have taken on, so it was unjust and remiss of them to deny relief to Stanley.  As a court of last resort, denial of security of the person cases, must be taken more seriously by this Court.

SIGNED:                                                   DATED: Oct 28th, 2010.

____________________________________________________

























LOWER COURT JUDGEMENTS:










NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL
QUESTIONS


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
STANLEY ANTONIO PANDURANGA XVI D' ALMEIDA
Applicant (Appellant)
- and-
DR. Barron, Dr. JULIAN ABEL CONSTANTINE GOJER, Ms. Glenna Raymond & Whitby Shores CMHS.
Respondents  in appeal

NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS OF THE APPELLANT

APPLICATION: under sections 12, 7, 15,24,32 and 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982. (see note) AND under the Canadian Bill of Rights and Preamble 1960.

TO THE RESPONDENT:
A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED by the applicant. The claim made by the applicant appears below.
This application will be argued on a date to be fixed by the registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada, 301 Wellington street, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0J1.

IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, you or your lawyer must forthwith prepare a Notice of Appearance in Form 38C prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the applicant's lawyer or where the applicant does not have a lawyer or is co-counsel, serve it on the applicant, and file it with proof of service in this court office, and you or your lawyer must appear at the hearing.
IF YOU WISH TO PRESENT AFFIDAVIT OR OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE TO THE COURT OR TO CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES ON THE APPLICATION, you must serve it on the applicant as soon as possible but no later than 2:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.
IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT THIS HEARING, A JUDGMENT MAYBE GIVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU.

1.     THE APPLICANT-APPELLANT makes application for an order:
    a)     declaring that the Mental Health care statutes of Ontario are unconstitutional, invalid, and of no force or effect; and in particular sections 35, 36, and 37 of
the Health Care Consent Act, For treating psychiatric patients unequally from medical patients; and s.25 of the Mental Health Act’s  omission from clarifying the involuntary status of, and treating of Criminal Code remands, and NCR patients, as involuntary patients without the Acts so stating, Treats Criminal Code patients unequally from civilian patients; and the failure of the Various Acts to ensure that a substitute decision-maker adheres to a patient's prior competent wishes via a strong patient advocate legislation (falsely repealed in 1996) to protect these rights of an incompetent patient (IP.). And Further: s.4 of the HCC Act’s failure to properly define the words “understand”, “appreciate” and “consequences”, making it easy for the physician to arbitrarily impose treatment in a capricious manner. And that the mental health statutes after all these years, still do not have an empirical, scientific, objective means to diagnose mental illness and determine incapacity, under the fundamental principles of justice; and deny patients fundamental human rights by forcing toxic drugs on them in an arbitrary unjust unconstitutional manner. Furthermore the Criminal Code of Canada s.672.64 not being proclaimed, is contrary to s.9 of the charter in that it allows indefinite detention of all Part XX.1 Mental Disorder accused in psychiatric facilities; also violating s.15,12 & 7 of the charter in that neither civilian patients nor prison detainees are subject to indefinite detention; unless designated a dangerous offender or sentenced to life.

           b)       Awarding the applicant herein his costs, time, and punitive and pecuniary damages against the respondents.

2.     THE GROUNDS FOR THE APPLICATION ARE:

a)     that the Mental Health Act (2000) as amended; the Health Care Consent Act, (1996); and the Substitute Decisions Act (1992) and The Criminal Code of Canada: is properly within the application of the Constitution Act, 1982.

b)     That these above mental health "Acts" violate the Constitution Act by denying the applicant security of the person and right not to be deprived thereof except
in accordance to the principles of fundamental justice, guaranteed under s. 7 of the Charter, in that:

     i) these "Acts" provide no empirical or factual procedure in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice by which the applicant may be properly determined to be mentally competent to consent to treatment; and still relies on mumbo-jumbo false theories and gobbledygook, inappropriate in a court of law and justice;

     ii) the terms Mental Disorder(s), “understand” and "appreciate" are too loosely bandied about, making a genuinely sane, perfect in mind, person unable to defend himself; and the term 'able to appreciate' lacks clear definition allowing Boards and Physicians to subjectively label genuinely competent persons as incompetent. The fact that the Appellant was labelled as mentally ill falsely for 30 years is proof of this inadequacy in law. This vagueness in statutes also allows the State to persecute Political Prisoners --like the Appellant-- using Psychiatry --which fits the definition of Torture: and constitute a Fundamental Crime Against Humanity: Subject to Genocide and War Crimes Trials!!!

c) that these "Acts" violate the Charter and Bill of Rights by denying the applicant equal protection under the law as guaranteed by s.15 of the Charter and s.1 (b) of the Bill of Rights.

      i) it provides that, should the applicant be deemed incapable with respect to treatment and even should his SDM refuse consent, that refusal may be overridden by an order of the Consent and Capacity Board; and

       ii) there are in Ontario law in practice, no such provisions respecting the administering of treatment without consent for medical conditions of persons over 16 years of age other than psychiatric disorder;

       iii) it discriminates against Criminal Code remands and "not criminally responsible" (NCR) patients by foregoing the requirement that all incapable patients first be made involuntary; in that any other civil patient, not involuntary, could not be treated: if found incapable and cannot by law, be treated against their wishes. s.14. And s.25 of the MHA omit to clarify how criminal code patients are to be treated vis-à-vis involuntary status. Yet Hospital policy is to deem them the same as involuntary patients without them meeting the criteria of an involuntary patient. In particular this applicant was specifically found to be "not certifiable" by the doctor at his hearing and subsequent. And his NCR status is being exploited by the respondents to make in easier to forcefully treat him. NCR status and detention orders by the Court or the ORB, should not be allowed to make it easier to “treat” a person simply on the basis he was a criminal code mental disorder, versus a civilian mental disordered person.
    (iii)(b) The failure of the Federal Government to proclaim the “capping” (s.672.64 of CCC.) provision for NCR patients violates s.9 of the charter against arbitrary detention; and s.15 inequality provision by allowing the Hospitals and the ORB to indefinitely detain NCR patients for committing very minor crimes; while releasing “accused” murderers into the community after very short detentions --using a “significant risk“ rather than danger to the community standard. The ORB has thus deliberately shifted the prospective custodial sentences of very dangerous criminals onto mentally ill NCR patients. In light of the tremendous recidivism rate for inmates in correctional centres; this is highly unequal treatment. The Appellant spent 13 years detained as an NCR patient on a very minor charge he would have got zero time in prison for; Furthermore the ORB and Hospital based their decision partly on the fact that the Appellant was unmedicated, violating s.672.55 of the CCC. And s.7 of the charter.
        iv) That s.35 of the H.C.C. Act denies the applicant the presumption of competency contrary to s.4(2) and is therefore inconsistent with itself.

        v) Sections 36 and 37 of the H.C.C. Act allow for the Board, doctor and SDM to override the patient's prior competent wishes contrary to the basic purpose of the H.C.C.Act sections 1 (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e). These s.36 &37, provisions were put in as a loop-hole to avoid the government taking proper responsibility to bring (mental) health legislation into accordance to human decency everywhere and to the constitution of Canada and should be declared unconstitutional. The patient’s prior competent wishes (PCW) can be overridden where it is not in the patient’s “best interests”; and even allows the Board to override an SDM’s treatment decision if they don’t like it. The so called ‘expert’ Board is usually a rubberstamp of the doctor. The fundamental issue here remains the fact that these sections are in practice not used to override a patient or his SDM’s wishes in medical situations; but only used against psychiatric patients: contrary to s.15 equality provisions of the charter. In Flemming v. Reid (1991), 4O.R. (3d) 74(O.C.A.) states, “under common law a Patient or his SDM have the absolute right to refuse medical treatment”; it goes on to say that prior competent wishes are constitutionally protected by s.7 of the charter. Yet these above statutes allow for P.Competent Wishes to be overridden; only for psychiatric patients. Because of these clauses the Appellant has had great difficulty obtaining an SDM --under “power of attorney” or “representative”-- to act on his or their wishes, because they are afraid of being hauled into court or to the Board and having to explain themselves; then forced to act under “best Interests”, and then being overridden anyway. These sections have already been declared unconstitutional in 1991 in Flemming v. Reid O.C.A.; but the Province diabolically, simply moved the impugned sections from The Mental Health Act, to the health care consent Act, 1996; where it now applies to all types of incapacities and all types of treatments. The problem is these sections are  still being used only against psychiatric patients --so nothing has changed. REMEDY: s. 35,36 & 37 must again be declared unconstitutional!

       vi) The intent of the criteria for committal were meant to be necessary preconditions for forced treatment; for to deny a person his constitutional rights of life, liberty, security of person should only be done under principles of fundamental justice. REMEDY: All Patients --civilian and criminal code detainees-- Must Henceforth Be Certified before involuntary treatment can begin.

d. that the repealing by Mike Harris of the Patient Advocates Act, 1996 was unconstitutional because it made it impossible to comply with the H. C. C. Act, s.1(c)(iii) regarding patient's prior capable wishes be adhered to. In particular SDMs routinely are ignorant of this law and are manipulated by the Board and doctor to blindly sign away consent to treat orders. Furthermore there is no enforcement mechanism for an advocate of the patient to ensure: independent of a biased: doctor, Board, or SDM; that the patient's wishes are documented and carried out. The mental health statutes as existed under Bob Rae's NDP were not perfect; but represented a complementary set; by repealing one act the P.C.'s Mike Harris has fatally destroyed the capacity of these (mental) health statutes to be constitutional.

e. That the denials described in the above paragraphs 1, 2(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (g) cannot be justified by the application of s.1 of the Charter (this s.1 was to be used only in exceptional circumstances).

f. That the current statutes or "acts" violate the Charter and Bill of Rights against "any cruel and unusual treatment and or punishment contrary to s.12 of the Charter and 2. 2(b) of the Bill of Rights:
    i)       it allows - with enforced (mental) health statutes - for the forced infliction of some of the most toxic chemicals on earth: fluorine-chlorine-halogen-sulphide-alkaloid-aromatic-polycyclic-organic: molecules, into the bodies of patients against their will and expressed wishes. The (mental) health legislation is taken lightly by the: hospital, Board and Ministry; to run roughshod over patient's rights in practice: See the litany of intrigues and abuse in Mr. D' Almeida's “Facts in this Case” "affidavit" (1998-2001). The Acts are deliberately filled with unnecessary loopholes to take advantage of and murder by poison: mentally-ill and incapable patients. Most of the reforms have been on paper not yet fully in practice. Murder done "legally" is institutional murder and must be condemned and punished, and should not be sanctioned by this Court and System. There is a huge societal risk (which is already happening) of secret police, security agencies, "system" operatives of using these same poisons to secretly poison: poor people, political dissenters, judges, media, politicians, athletes, ethnics, non-Aryan-Saxons, Muslims,  enemies of the State, “terrorists” and the homeless; in a form of mass murder and genocide unparalleled in human history!

    ii)     Mr. Almeida has personally experienced and documented the horror suffering, pain and death of psychiatric inmates in prison and in hospitals in his various reports to the Ministry, courts and governments. This is the implementation of the final solution on: mentally-ill, poor, homeless, ethnic groups, incapable of working, refusal to work as slaves, forced slavery, genocided people in Canada: the worst hell hole, the heart of darkness on this earth. "The horror, the horror". (see “supporting evidence” affidavit.)

      iii)     A list of the symptoms of neuroleptic poisoning are: agranulocytosis, aplastic anaemia, immune suppression, flesh-eating disease, necrotizing: myelitis & fascitis, tenosynovitus, septicaemia, gastro-intestinal haemorrhage, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, obesity,
induced diabetes, liver cancer, pre-cancerous skin lesions, painful acne, facial tics, bloody diarrhoea, secondary E. Coli 0157:h7 infection of the kidneys, induced liver jaundice, lymph node and ear infection, tooth loss and infection, hair loss and greying, blurred vision, hearing loss, dry skin, breast cancer, brain and muscle damage, back pain, hemorrhoids, gangrene, brain cancer, induced heart-attacks, lung cancer from smoking caused by poison alleviation, poikilothermic-effect, cancers, brain and muscle degeneration and finally death: by a thousand cuts. (see his 1988 factum and various personal letters).

    iv)     That murder by poison is also contrary to the Criminal Code of Canada; and no other jurisdiction except for the police and prisons (which also go about murdering people with poison) can legally commit murder! REMEDY: Forced treatment of patients with neuroleptics or antipsychotics --that cause death and permanent side-effects-- should be found unconstitutional under s.12, 15 & 7 of the charter of rights.

g) that Dr. Gojer's and the Board's arbitrary, vindictive and capricious finding solely on the basis of Mr. D'Almeida's belief that he is the King of Canada is contrary to sections 2(a) and 2(b) of the Charter and sections 2(c) and 2(d) of the Bill of Rights. And is political persecution, not justice, and unconstitutional!
    i)     Stanley was before this same hospital in 1988, 1989, 1990 declaring himself King for all to hear and was found competent in 1988 and found not "criminally insane" by doctors Nakul Maharaj and Dr. Louis Chan in an 1989 "voir dire" hearing in Newmarket court. In the interim Mr. D' Almeida has expanded on this statement and has a substantial body of work to back it up. Yet in two minutes of assessment Dr. Gojer and the Board ignored the history of this patient to find him suddenly incompetent and NCR.

             h) The applicant relies on Rule 14.05 (3)(h); sections 7,15, 24 and 32 and 52 of the (1982) Constitution Act and the Bill of Rights.

3.     The following documentary evidence will be used at the hearing of this application:
a) the 'Factum' of his 2004 incompetency appeal, in the Court of Appeal, which will also constitute a further grounds for this application;

       b) the 'affidavit#2' compiled by Mr. D' Almeida April 28th, 1998 - May 22nd, 2001.

       c) The ‘Affidavit#3’ called Supporting Evidence Exhibits & Affidavit. Indicating Mass Poisonings.

        d) This IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA Application for Leave to Appeal.

        e) The 1998 'factum' for his probation order appeal: indicating his substantial case that he is the King of Canada and this earth. His www.thetruekingofcanada.com website.

f) "The Early Writings" and "Latter Writings" “affidavit#4“, setting out a valid reasonable, rational, and credible basis for his claim that he is the King of Canada, and has de facto veto powers over all laws in Canada which the system is attempting to override by torturing him unto death for the last 30 years.


Dated: October 28th, 2010.           ____________________

STANLEY A.P. D'ALMEIDA Senior Counsel
119-9 Crescent Place, East York, Ontario. M4C 5L8. Tel: (416) 699-6724.  Applicant (Appellant)
TO: Heather McKay --Respondent’s Counsel
       ATTORNEY GENERAL ONTARIO, Crown Law Office - 
       Civil 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2A1
        Tel.: (416) 326-4129 Fax: (416) 326-4181
AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch, 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1. Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015
AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street West Exchange Tower, Box 36
Toronto, ON M5X lK6
Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.















IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
STANLEY ANTONIO PANDURANGA XVI D' ALMEIDA
Applicant (Appellant)
- and-
DR. Barron, Dr. JULIAN ABEL CONSTANTINE GOJER, Ms. Glenna Raymond & Whitby Shores CMHS.
Respondents  in appeal

NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF THE APPELLANT CONTINUED:

APPLICATION: under the Canadian Bill of Rights and Preamble, 1960 AND under sections 7,
15, 12,24,32, and 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982. (see note on page 03)

THIS APPLICATION will be heard on a date to be fixed by the registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada, 301 Wellington street, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0J1.

The applicant Stanley Antonio Panduranga XVI D'Almeida, intends to question the constitutional validity of s. 35,36, and 37 of the Health Care Consent Act, R.S.O.  H.C.C.A.(1996) in an application for a declaratory order to be heard on a date to be fixed by the registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada, 301 Wellington street, Ottawa, Ontario. K1A 0J1.
FACTS: as outlined in his 'affidavit' exhibits in his factum.
LA W: The following is the material basis for the constitutional question:
1.     the act is properly within the application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

2.     That section 37 of the HCCA. authorizes the treatment of an involuntary, NCR, or Criminal Code remand patient: under the authority of an order of a Regional Review Board, made upon application by the treating physician and in accordance with criteria specified in the Act,: s.37(1) of the HCCA(1996) "if consent to a treatment is given or refused on an I.P.'s behalf by his SDM., and if the health practitioner is of the opinion that the SDM did not comply with s.21, the H.P. may apply to the Board to determine compliance." s.37(3) "the Board may substitute its decision for that of the SDM." s.37(6) "if the SDM does not comply with the Board's directions within time specified by the Board, the SDM is deemed not to meet requirements of an SDM".

3.    a) by virtue of the common law and Reg. 865 under the Public Hospitals Act, R.S.O. 1980, a physician may not in practice provide medical treatment other than psychiatric treatment, to a patient without the informed consent of the patient or his SDM.

       b)     the authority of a C. & C.B. under s.37 of the HCCA. to order psychiatric treatment notwithstanding the refusal by his SDM, is a denial of equal protection and  equal benefit of the law, to medical patients, contrary to Part I, s.1(b) of the Bill of Rights and s.15 of the Charter.

4.     s.37 of the H.C.C. Act is also contradictory to the purpose of the H.C.C. Act in the first place: violating sections: 1(a), 1(c)(ii), 1(c)(iii) and 1(e). s.1(c)(ii) states: "the purpose of this act are: to enhance the autonomy of persons by: allowing I.P.s to request that a
representative of their choice be appointed by the tribunal for the purpose of making decisions on their behalf“. Furthermore sections 35 and 36 also allow a SDM to ignore a I.P.s prior competent wishes defeating the purpose of the Act.

5.     A determination that a Criminal Code remand NCR patient, can be found incompetent vis-a-vis treatment decisions without being certifiable is a deprivation of life, liberty, and the security of the person. s.1(a) of the Bill of Rights and s.7 of the Charter require that any such deprivation of rights must be carried out under the principles of fundamental justice and according to law. And denies the right of a criminal remand or NCR patient, to equality before, and protection of the law. In that civil patients are required to be certified before forced treatment. The criteria for certification are more rigorous in meeting, and this certificate must be renewed every three months. In particular this
appellant was specifically found not certifiable by Dr. Gojer and would not have been able to be forcibly treated as a civilian patient. The criteria for certification: (the physician must determine whether the person is suffering from a mental disorder that will
likely result in (i) serious bodily harm to self; ii) serious bodily harm to others; or iii) substantial mental or physical deterioration of the person or serious physical impairment of the person) see Brian's Law Bill 68. s.20(1.1) (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f).

6.     The lack of accordance with the principles of fundamental justice, of the various mental health statutes; cannot be justified by application of s.1 of the Charter.

7.     sections 35, 36 and 37 of the H C CA. is therefore of no force and effect pursuant to sections 7, 12, 15,24,26,32 and 52 of the C A. 1982 and sections 1(a), 1(b), 2(b), 2(e), 3(1),5(1),5(3) and preamble of the Canadian Bill of Rights.

8.     The same basis in law can be used to find that the use of SDMs by a treating physician without informing them of their obligation to adhere to the prior wishes of the patient while competent is unconstitutional.
The appellant acknowledges the derivation of many parts of this application from Carla McKague's 1986 application to the Supreme Court of Ontario.

Note: In Stanley's 1998 factum to Newmarket General Division Court he states that the 1982 repatriation of the Constitution was unconstitutional and therefore invalid. Yet the Canadian Bill of Rights is valid and mirrors the Charter in many respects so he is invoking only the Bill of Rights (CBR.) and not the Charter in this appeal. By using the de facto acceptance by the provinces of mirror provisions in the Charter to obtain the same protections under law as would be obtained by a pure Charter argument. He still does not accept the actual Charter; but is only using it where it coincides with the (C.B.R.). Any allusions to the Charter arguments in this appeal must be read in this light.


Dated: October 28th, 2010.           ____________________

STANLEY A.P. D'ALMEIDA Senior Counsel
119-9 Crescent Place,
East York, Ontario,
M4C 5L8. Tel: (416) 699-6724.
Applicant (Appellant)

TO:      Heather McKay --Respondent’s Counsel
            ATTORNEY GENERAL ONTARIO
          Crown Law Office - Civil 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor
         Toronto, ON M5G 2K1
         Tel.: (416) 326-4129 Fax: (416) 326-4181.
 
AND TO:    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch
720 Bay Street, 4th Floor
Toronto, ON M5G 2K1. Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015.      Sean Hanley 

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street West Exchange Tower, Box 36
Toronto, ON M5X lK6
Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.













MEMORANDUM OF ARGUMENT:

PART I: FACTS IN THIS CASE:
1.     Stanley D’Almeida had the first attempt on his life made on September 4th-8th, 1981; when the Police Assaulted him and charged him with 14 false charges. They were attempting to cover-up their assault on Stanley by pre-empting him with charges of their own. Stanley’s parents who were eye-witnesses confirmed that the Police brutally assaulted Stanley, and Stanley never assaulted them. But because the Police packed the Court with Police Officers who intimidated the Judge to find him guilty, and lied and lied in Court: he was convicted on assault peace officer x2; and given $500 fines and 2 years probation --after an arduous two year trial ending on Jan. 10th, 1983. The amount of excessive violent force used, and the abuse would have killed an average man; but because Stanley was tough he survived. The System thought that if they brutally assaulted Stanley via police, jail-guards and felons, they would scare Stanley from asserting himself. Stanley had fasted the full five days he was in custody; and this would be the pattern of his 30 years in prison. Immediately after release, Stanley made a vow to destroy the System repeating these words, “Nobody crosses me and gets away with it, I am going to destroy the System”; over and over again. To fight The System: Stanley took a vow of Celibacy (which was very painful); Stanley also decided to become a strict Vegan (also painful) and become a Hindu!!! [Appellant’s (A.) Record (Below) Exhibits#1 & #10, Below]
2a.   The police threatened and forced Stanley’s parents to cooperate with them to henceforth commit Stanley to psychiatric hospitals or send him to prison Repeatedly over the next 25 years. Thus Stanley lost all his family supports and friends, and would be fighting the whole System single-handedly for 30 years. The police were vary of charging Stanley again because he defended himself brilliantly and made them look evil and guilty. Thus in May 1982 Stanley was committed to Northwestern General Hospital for Five days. The medication he was forced to take Chlorpromazine & haldol: caused blurred vision; and nausea and vomiting for weeks after he stopped taking them. Knowing these medications were poisons; to save his life Stanley would never voluntarily take neuroleptics again. [A. Record Ex#1]
2b.   April 23rd, 1983: Stanley refused to accept probation, because he was innocent; so they put him in prison again and attempted to beat him to death there; they then sent him to METFORS for assessment, They falsely diagnosed him with “Schizophrenia” which was a totally false diagnosis; Stanley was never ever mentally ill!!! then they sent him to Whitby Psychiatric Hospital (WPH) because he was fasting. WPH sent him back to prison where he was beaten on the Judge & guards instructions to make him fear prisons and be docile. The prison sent him back to WPH where they broke their promise not to force medication on him if he broke his 41 day fast!  They immediately began seeking a forced treatment order, and although he won the capacity Board hearing; he had received a huge dose of highly poisonous medications that would have killed the average man.  He was coerced into taking modecate, which caused severe parkinsonism, stiffness, rigidity, akathasia, akinesis, muscle weakness, paralysis and constant pain. The side effects of the highly toxic medication would last three years: cuts would fail to heal for years. Stanley would only later realize that the attempt on his life was because he had consciously “de facto Vetoed” the repatriation of the Constitution by PM Trudeau and Bill Davis; in order to override this “veto”, the System had to murder him --but failed. NOTE: Stanley is not claiming that the Police consciously knew he was the King and were trying to kill him; No No No. The Police etc. were possessed by devils and it was the devils that were directing them to torture Stanley!!! [B. Record Ex#30-31]
3.     December 28th, 1984- January 20th, 1985 1984: Stanley again refused to pay the fine of his previous assault conviction which had been deferred: So they grabbed him from his home and committed him to a psychiatric hospital in Whitby: where they forced huge doses of extremely toxic drugs, (haldol) that would have killed a normal man, on him. The medication caused: severe poikilothermic effect, ichthyosis, cracked skin, excruciating pain and feelings of horror. The System assumed Stanley would now docilely tow the line and not “veto” anything or fight the System; But since Stanley was unbowed they began to persecute him in earnest. The more they tortured Stanley the tougher he became and the stronger his resolve to destroy the System. [B.Record Ex#30-38]
4.     April 6th-June 6th,1986: They began to hound Stanley to death, seeking to commit him to a psychiatric hospital relentlessly; Stanley was like a hunted deer, sleeping in the forest, running for his life --literally. He tried to live in an apartment, but they kept pressuring him not to take welfare; yet when he slept in the park the police took him home. Stanley fasted in expectation of another committal; and on April 1986 they put him in North York General for no reason; again forcing medication on him, that would have killed the average person. The cumulative torture and poison would definitely have killed an average man. The relentless torture over thirty years is certainly unequalled in the history of this Earth.
5a.    In October 1986 and again in June 1987; Stanley was again committed to WPH for no reason; But this time he was unafraid, he had gained expertise in the practice of Yoga, and the Hospital did not force medication on him.  They would not force medication on him till September 4th, 2005: 20 years later; which is the basis of this current Appeal. Stanley also forced the Hospital to allow him to Appeal the Biased “Rubber Stamp” Board’s Decision to an “Arbitration Board”. This forced the then Liberal Government to Act, To allow the right of appeal to the General Division Court for all Board Decisions. They then allowed him to take a his own non-toxic neuroleptic Promazine (which has long since been discontinued because it doesn’t murder people --the System only uses neuroleptics that are poisons!). But even though he had not been medicated, the hospital started poisoning his food with very toxic drugs. And even in the community his food was poisoned; causing him to fast, which they used as an excuse to commit him again. It was about this time that Stanley came under surveillance of CSIS and “security” elements of the police; they would question all persons he came in contact with and turn them against and ostracizing Stanley: this type of constant surveillance is Torture, especially since Stanley is a home grown revolutionary.
5b.      February 4th, 1988: Stanley was at last gaining insight in to why the System was trying to murder him (For such torture would have long killed any other man on Earth!) That he was the King of Canada under Natural Law, and in order to rule Canada the System had to try to murder him at the very real expense of their soul energy: One of us had to die. Stanley openly proclaimed this belief to the doctors; and it was never deemed a mental illness; but a statement of opinion. His diagnosis remained schizophrenia. Stanley was discharged before his case reached General Division Court: And Justice Lovekin ruled that the case was “MOOT” because a finding of incompetence lapses on discharge from a psychiatric hospital. Almeida v. Musisi (1988) was the seminal case for this jurisprudence; yet it is not being adhered to by the current courts up to now! At this time Stanley was suffering from lethal side-effects of: Agranulocytosis, Aplastic Anemia, leucopenia, Blood Dyscrasias; yet the doctors treating him never stopped poisoning him; the CPS states that treatment of neuroleptics should be discontinued when such lethal side-effects exist. The whole psychiatric attitude to lethal side-effects is to ignore them and relentlessly medicate to death. Even when Medical doctors expressed alarm at his low blood levels, there was no way of stopping the relentless poisoning since it was being done surreptitiously for 20 years! For the next 25 years Stanley would continue to suffer from these horrific symptoms and be in constant pain and weakness; yet the System mercilessly kept poisoning him. [B. Record Ex#30-38]
6.     April 23rd, 1989: Since Stanley had mastered the psychiatric system, they no longer wished to force medication on him; but since the System still wanted to murder him they “set him up” on a false assault charge so they could attempt to murder him in prison. They got some people to assault him and when he defended himself he was charged with assault. They tried to assault him while in prison and they poisoned his food every day that he was in prison. But Stanley had become battle hardened: He told the Courts he would never accept their bail or probation conditions: because he had committed no crime: Do your worst you cowardly bastards: “Give me liberty or give me death”.  Stanley did nine continuous years in prison all on breach of probation charges and “dead time”; in the worst most torturous possible way: in six to eight month stretches; and then be rearrested immediately on release, all on breach of probations! The judge’s thought they could cower Stanley with prison; but he was too tough. Stanley became the toughest guy in the prison system: fighting the jail guards every single day. Stanley would never stand-up for the judges in their courtrooms, he would arrogantly proclaim himself the true king of Canada; and use abusive language on them to show them who was boss. The worst thing in prison were the strip-searches; In Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23rd, 2010) The SCC held that: “Strip searches are inherently humiliating and degrading regardless of the manner in which they are carried out and thus constitute significant injury to an individual’s intangible interests …” The Appellant considered the strip-searches a Satanic Devil possessed fundamental crime against Humanity and needed to be substantially reformed! They poisoned Stanley’s food everyday he was in there; and he served most of his nine years in maximum security segregation!!! In Prison Stanley suffered hundreds of lethal side-effects from the extremely toxic medications the prison poisoned him with: gangrene, necrotizing fascitis, tooth loss, ear infections, and thousands of excruciatingly painful precancerous skin lesions. Stanley would serve almost nine continuous years in prison, until it was the police and prisons that cried “uncle”. (A. Record Exhibit#1, Below)
7.     November 4th, 1997: Stanley had already been assessed for s.16, not criminally responsible for his initial assault charge in 1989; and was found “responsible”. Stanley also was assessed for fitness to stand trial many times and was always found fit. [A.Record Ex#11] But in order to get just Stanley, the Criminal Code was changed in 1997, to eliminate “Lieutenant Governor’s Warrants” and the new criteria for NCR designation was much more lax in meeting. Whereas before Hospital policy was to designate NCR only to “violent” and “dangerous” mentally ill and sent to Maximum Security Penetanguishene; Now everyone was being found “NCR“ in minimum security hospitals. Hospitals that were being shutdown for lack of patients, suddenly found a bonanza and started opening “Forensic” Units. Judge Eberhardt was parachuted in from Barrie just to “get” Stanley and put him in the psychiatric system, as the prison system had had no effect on him. Stanley was hauled into court in Newmarket for no reason, and J., Eberhardt suddenly appoints an amicus curiae to find ways of transferring Stanley to the psychiatric system. Just as Eberhardt was leaving the courtroom, the Police in the Courtroom started assaulting Stanley (who was in handcuffs) for calling Eberhardt a “fucking bitch” , To protect Stanley’s honour and pride, Stanley had to escalate, he called the police officers goofs, and told them as an aside that “the bitch was dead” --to show they had not cowed him by their assault. The Judge was out of the courtroom when this was said; but because they wanted to set Stanley up for an NCR finding the Prosecutor R, Scott, charged him with uttering death threats. The Judge gave a statement to the Police stating: “she did not hear any threat, she did not want to lay charges and that she did not want to testify in court,”. The jurisprudence states that for a conviction: “the accused must have present means to carry out the threat; that the victim must receive the threat and feel the threat was real.” None of the criteria were met. Stanley was in the prison system; where macho toughness is a must, in order to defend yourself: death threats are said everyday, and nobody is ever charged. Had Stanley remained in the prison system he would get no conviction and zero time for this bullshit charge. But because the System intended on murdering Stanley all along: they escalated this to a federal case.  Ironically because of Stanley’s outburst the Court gave up their plan to find him NCR --temporarily-- because in the Prison System toughness & Aggression gets you your way! J., Eberhardt recused herself from the case and it seemed the worst was over; [A. Record Exs# 2 & 3] but after his sentence for Breach of probation in January 1998; the Don Jail prison didn‘t want him back, and transferred him to the metro-west detention centre: where they kept him in segregation and poisoned his food severely. Then began a massive conspiracy to transfer him to a mental hospital. The psychiatric nurse at the Don Jail Cathy Brown, sent a letter to the Crown asking them to seek an NCR finding on Stanley. Then on February 10th, 1998, The Toronto Star did a malicious Libel article on Stanley: “calling him paranoid schizophrenic, and asking that he be found unfit for trial and forcefully medicated“. [Exhibit#2,3,4 & 7, Below]
8.     April 23rd, 1998: TRIAL: A hit-man Judge Bassel was brought in from Toronto just to “get” Stanley. Stanley defended himself brilliantly at trial; and emphasized that even restraint and assault on the person of the king is High Treason and the punishment is “the pains of Death”. But really the main argument was that the Police were assaulting a man in handcuffs; and Stanley had a verbal right to defend himself. The prosecutor at the Bail Hearing, Robert Scott, lied and even had the transcript doctored, where he lied that Stanley waived his Bail Hearing. This was crucial because Stanley already had had a bail hearing; and the Crown had no reason to drag him into Court; except to try and transfer him to a mental hospital,  The fact that Judge Eberhardt refused to testify or lay charges was not considered; nor the fact that Stanley had no means to carry out the threat nor did Eberhardt receive the threat or feel it real.  Stanley was found Guilty of “uttering death threats”; and a CONVICTION and GUILTY verdict was entered in his warrant and the “information”.  [A. Record Ex#3,5 & 6] But since Bassel wanted blood; he was not satisfied with 18 months and three years probation; because Stanley had already done 8 months of “dead time” (pre-trial custody); and already had three years of probation added. The Amicus Curiae appointed by J., Eberhardt, Mr. Jeff Honey, suggested that he be transferred to Whitby WPH. Thus J., Bassel ordered Lisa Cameron the Crown, to arrange with Whitby Mental Health Centre to do a two month assessment for sentencing purposes on a Form 8. But he performed an evil act contrary to the Criminal Code s.672.19, when he instructed her to fax a letter to WMHC to “find Mr. Almeida “incompetent” and treat him”.  This was illegal; as was the NCR finding that Dr. Gojer subsequently made!!! [A. Record Exhibits#5,6 & 8 Below]
9.   April 27th-May 22nd, 1998: Within two minutes of arriving in WMHC Dr. Gojer finds him mentally ill with “delusions of Grandeur” and “incompetent” to make treatment decisions. Stanley was shocked; it was difficult to prove you have a credible claim to the throne of Canada in two minutes. Stanley had told all the Courts & Prisons he was the King of Canada for nine years now; the Hospital didn’t know him so it was highly unfair to dump him in this system without context and with a letter urging treatment. Stanley had undergone numerous assessments for fitness and “responsibility” but the letter prejudiced the outcome. On May 9th, 1998; the Board confirmed incapacity; and Stanley had to scramble to appeal it alone. At this Board the Doctor made some damning concessions: he said, “Stanley was not schizophrenic”, “that outside of Stanley’s belief in Kingship, he had no other thought disorder”. Thus it proved that all the previous diagnoses were wrong!! And by focusing the illness only on the Kingship it raises doubt about the current diagnosis as well. On May 22nd, 1998; after the Appellant had successfully appealed his incapacity to the Superior Court of Justice: Dr, Gojer called him into his office and conceded, saying: “I have been a psychiatrist for thirty years, I’ve had thousands of patients pass through here; you are the only patient to successfully appeal your case to the courts; I am going to discharge you from this hospital.” The doctor had told the Board he would keep Stanley in WMHC until his Form 8 expires on June 27th, 1998; The doctor had thus conceded that Stanley was competent at this time; for under s.34 of The MHAct it is mandatory for a physician: not to discharge an incapable person in need of treatment! But the Dr. had written a report to the Court stating the Appellant was “not certifiable” and could only be kept in hospital under an NCR finding. He had already been found guilty! [Ex#5 & 9]
10.   June 18th, 1998: The doctor was inundated with letters from the court and amicus curiae Jeff Honey, pressuring him to take the appellant back and treat him. Thus he appeared in Court unexpectedly and the Judge decided to have an NCR hearing instead. The Judge abused the Appellant’s rights by cancelling the “Guilty Verdict” and the “CONVICTION” and finding him NCR in violation of due process. But the doctor conceded that the previous finding had lapsed on discharge and he would have to make a new finding --that the appellant could appeal-- to treat the appellant. In the end even Stanley relented to going to a hospital because the strip-searches were a constant battle with the prison system: and we mutually agreed to part. Stanley was at first pleased with coming to a minimum security hospital from maximum security prison; But he knew that things would be much worse than prison, if he was ever forcefully treated!!! The new finding was made on July 21st, 1998, [supra] but the Board refused to hear the appeal. Then the Coordinator of Clinical Records Sylvia Wilkins and Ministry Counsel Diana Schell, ruled that the appellant could still be treated by the old finding; and that’s where this case stands. For the rest of the chronology see The Affidavits of Stanley D’Almeida: “April 28th, ‘98 to may 18th, ‘01; Facts In This Case”, “The chronology of Events”, and the “Early & Later Writings”. [Below]
10b.     1998-2006: For the next five years the Hospital would brutally assault him by placing him in “seclusion” about once a month, all for harmless verbal abuse. Even the other patients were appalled at the Satanic Devil Possession that made the Staff torture Stanley so severely. Stanley was being systematically tortured and abused all his stay in Whitby Shores.
11.     Sept.4th TO Dec. 3rd, 2005: After the SCC rejected his leave to appeal July 14th, 2005: On Sept 4th, Stanley was forcefully treated with Risperidone, this was one of the most horrendous times of his life; as it was a shocker as he had a “power of Attorney” that was pressured into consenting to treat. The Doctor refused to wait for the Board, and the Board refused to hear the case. The Doctor and SCJ Court indicated his s.18 protections would return on January 14th, 2006; yet the Board refused to grant them. He suffered horrific symptoms: “tremors, weight gain, restlessness, visible shaking, akathasia, akinesis, stupor, torpidity, extended drugged sleep, hair loss, greying, severe depression, nausea, vomiting, fever, fainting, gastro-intestinal pain & suicidal thoughts.” By the end (Dec, 2005) Stanley couldn’t eat, he had a constant nausea & fever he was almost dead; (The Staff dismissed these side-effects as the “flu”, The evil psychiatrists always minimize the toxicity of neuroleptics and dismiss even lethal symptoms of impending death!) when on Dec. 3rd, 2005; Semion Dashevsky (a fellow patient) agreed to act as his SDM, and immediately stopped the medication and put him on a very low 7.5mg dose of less toxic oral Olanzapine. [Affidavit#1]
PART II: OVERVIEW
12.     LAW:s.4(1) of The Health Care Consent Act (1996) defines Capacity: "A person is capable with respect to a treatment ... if the person is able to understand the information that is relevant to making a decision about the treatment, ... and able to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision". [This is so vague as to be meaningless].
Powers of Court: (1) Exercise all the current powers of the Court; (2) exercise all the powers of the Board; (3) substitute its decision for that of the physician, or the Board; (4) refer the matter back to the Board with directions.
JURISPRUDENCE: The burden of proof lies on the physician making the diagnosis of mental illness and the 'finding' of incapacity. The standard of proof is an enhanced civil standard (balance of probabilities). The standard for review of the Board's decision: on matters of fact is reasonableness (respectful attention but not submission; an unreasonable decision is one that is not supported by any reasons that can stand up to a somewhat probing examination); on the interpretation of the legal standard for capacity is a question of law and is correctness (No deference is owed to the Board on this issue, the broad statutory right of appeal militate against deference) . The test for capacity: The test relates to ability to appreciate not actual appreciation; a person cannot be found to lack capacity because he holds contrary views to a prescribed diagnosis; A patient has a right to disagree with medical experts even if it is in his best interests; the physician is required to show (with evidence) that a person's choice to take medication is directly based on the delusional belief (or mental illness) and not on rational grounds; and that his non-belief in an illness is based on the delusion and not on rational grounds. (Starson v. Swayze(2003) SCC 722 Major J.; Starson vs. Swayze(1999) 22Admin.R.(3d)211 O.S.C. Molloy J.; L.C. v. Pinhas (2002) O.J. No.5309(S.C.J.,Kiteley J.; Flemming vs. Reid (1992)(OCA)][Roy vs. Furst (1999)O.J. No.1490 (Gen.Div.); Thomson v. Chan,Gen.Div.,July21, 1999,Sedgwick J.; D'A/meida v. Gojer, S.C.J., Aug.10th, 1999, Ferguson J.]
13.     OVERVIEW I: (1) This case is unique in that the Appellant is challenging the Diagnosis itself; under Thomson v. Chan (1999) it is mandatory for the Court to confirm a “mental disorder” exists before dealing with incapacity. The Appellant will show that he is simply making a rational credible claim to the throne of Canada; he doesn’t believe he is on the throne or has any fanciful notions of his position at present. He intends to achieve power by overthrowing the Satanic Aryan System using Satyagraha, civil disobedience and military means. Stanley has a website: www.thetruekingofcanada.com where he more fully explains his position. The Appellant has the right to claim he is the true King of Canada; The onus was on the Doctor to prove why that is an illness. (2) What is the correct Test for incapacity, and did the doctor and Board use the correct test for capacity? The Appellant will show that the Board deliberately and diabolically used “Best Interests” as defined in s.21 of The HCCAct(1996), to determine incapacity; which is the wrong test as determined by Justice Major in Starson v. Swayze (2003) SCC, and no deference is owed to the Board on this; and the Appellant should prevail. Ms Lindsay-Skynner deliberately did this to ignore JJ., Major and adopt the discredited views of CJ., McLachlin --to fool this honorable court. CJ., McLachlin had used the “actual appreciation” model instead of mental ability to appreciate consequences. (3) The Appellant intends to show that the Doctor Barron also used the wrong test for incapacity, in that he based it on the fact that the Appellant “does not believe he has an illness”. The Doctor tries to camouflage his test because in an unprecedented move: he was “coached” by the Ministry Lawyer Heather McKay on what to say --regardless of truth! He gets tripped-up when asked sudden questions on cross-examination into revealing his true derivation. (4) The Appellant will show that the Board’s  callous dismissal of the Appellant’s reason for refusing medication because of his experience of past side-effects, as unreasonable on the facts! She bases her decision again, on best interests. If the Appellant would rather stay incarcerated than take medication, that is a choice he ought to have. Although Stanley believes his quality of life would be better without medication, and he would have to be released eventually anyway. (5)  Does an incapacity finding lapse on discharge? The Appellant will show that it does: This is not rocket science, this has long been the jurisprudence. But because of the Courts’ bias against the Appellant they have refused to rule in his favor on this obvious point. (6) What are manifestations of an illness? And was the Appellant confronted with any such manifestations? The Appellant will show that there were no manifestations of an illness, and he certainly was never shown any. (7) Does the Appellant have the right to a fair, independent and impartial assessment for capacity? Did the letter from the Court asking specifically for the Appellant to be found incapable and treated also violate s.672.19 of the criminal code? The Court has a powerful influence over the Hospital, because it supplies clients to them; obviously their letter adversely influenced the Doctor to make a finding against the Appellant in all of two minutes. (8) Do highly toxic antipsychotic drugs forcefully given, meet the definition of cruel an unusual punishment? The Appellant’s personal experience and the “supporting evidence” affidavit will show that it is cruel! Almost all of the side-effects listed were personally suffered by Stanley and must be given more weight by that reason. It is hard for the Courts to appreciate how poisonous these drugs are unless they experience it themselves; over time. Did the Appellant have prior competent wishes (PCP) which would protect him from future forced treatment? The Clinical Record will clearly show that Stanley has been found competent many times and at all such times he avowed that he would never take such medications. (10) Is the Appellant competent to make psychiatric decisions under the test laid out by JJ., Major? The answer is obviously “Yes”! If he was capable of composing such a well argued FACTUM surely he has the mental capacity to choose between alternative consequences?
14.      ABSTRACT: The fundamental issue before this court is not about just the Appellant being found capable or incapable; it is rather the injustice of toxic poisons being forced into a person who is not mentally ill nor incapable. The length of time the Courts allowed this Appellant to be tortured and abused in this manner is also of concern. Thus this appeal is to ensure that this type legally sanctioned murder of a human being is never allowed to happen again; as well as a significant compensation should be awarded to the appellant for being wrongfully convicted and treated for 30 years --violating charter rights. The problem with the System, this Court and the Court of Appeal, is that they are preoccupied with proactive promotion of homosexual rights; and releasing obviously guilty of murder, murderers like Robert Baltovich, Michael Bryant onto the streets while keeping Stanley D’Almeida locked up and attempting to murder him for 30+ continuous years. Had the Courts granted psychiatric patients the same rights afforded Medical patients; this horrific suffering could have been prevented or much reduced. S.15 of the charter is obviously being breeched when only mentally ill patients are not allowed to have their constitutionally protected rights upheld and enforced. Even after Flemming v. Reid (1991) OCA, found prior competent wishes to be constitutionally protected, nothing was changed: since the government simply moved the statute to the HCCAct (1996) from the MHAct (2000), but practically nothing was changed --because these clauses (s.35,36 & 37) are only used against Psychiatric patients. This had significant effects on the Appellant because he could not get a “representative” or ‘power of attorney’ to stop treatment on him because of their fear of being persecuted themselves, or being dragged into the Board or Court, and questioned over their decision; and then be compelled to treat the Appellant or be removed as SDM anyway. The other reason the Hospital and System were able to forcefully treat the appellant was because of the injustice of the NCR provisions: By being able to ‘detain’ the Appellant for 13 years on the most minor charge in the criminal code; they were able to avoid the certification of him they would need to treat him if he were a civilian patient. The ‘Capping Provision’ of NCR detainees has already been passed; but not yet proclaimed: with this Court’s impetus (finding this detention unconstitutional) it will be proclaimed into Law. The Satanic conspiracy to blindly accept psychiatric theories of mental illness; has made it virtually impossible for laypersons to make informed opinions about these treatments. The theory of a chemical imbalance in the brain has never been scientifically proven and is absurdly false!!! This Appellant has suffered from Induced Parkinsonism from these medications affecting dopamine transmission in the nervous system. These medications are simply brain poisons! The most toxic chemicals known to Mankind: worse than the lobotomies, electro-convulsive therapy that has been banned. It is time these anti-psychotics were also banned and viewed with the same approbation. The Appellant has a Holistic Treatment Alternative to toxic drugs at the back of this Factum prepared for the Whitby Shores CMHS; thus this Court must not feel that without Poisons they would be no treatment for the MI. Neuroleptics do not attempt to cure the MI person, it physically and mentally so incapacitates the person that they are not able to cause trouble; it requires the endless consumption of these drugs to remain symptom free. Being forced to exist in a zombiefied state, without any rights or respect in the community; with no prospects of ever being cured or being treated equally with others is a fate worse than death! This results in the significantly early deaths of most MI persons. Schizophrenics have a 600% higher death rate than others due to the poisons they are forced to take; plus they have a 13% suicide rate. This must stop. In Ghana mental illness is widely recognized as ‘demon possession’ and their ‘witch-doctor healers’ are able to fully cure their patients in about five days --without harm!!! [see A. Record Exhibits# 12 & 13, below].
PART III: ISSUES AND ARGUMENT:
15.  The First Issue of National Importance: That The Appellant’s treatment by the Courts, the Boards, Psychiatric Hospital (Whitby Shores CMHS), The Police, The Prisons, The Secret Police, for the last 30 years constitute A Massive Miscarriage of Justice, Attempted Murder Against the Person of Stanley D’Almeida, Unlawful Imprisonment, Persecution, Cruel and Unusual Treatment and Punishment, Unequal Treatment under the law, denial of security of the person under the fundamental principles of Justice; That must be rectified by this Court; and an award of “commensurate” and “reasonable” damages for this violation of Charter Rights over 30 years is in order. Supreme Court of Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23rd, 2010) held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, even where public officials have not acted in bad faith and the individual has not suffered any monetary damages. In a unanimous decision, the Court noted that section 24(1) of the Charter gives courts of competent jurisdiction a broad power to grant “appropriate and just” remedies for Charter breaches.
Stanley has to have a life, he has never had sex, he has never earned any income, he has no pension plan, his earning potential is limited, he suffers constant pain due to the permanent side-effects of the poisons he was forcefully given over 30 years, all because of the horrific persecution, torture and attempted murder the System subjected him with, simply for being the True king of Canada under Natural Law. This injustice must be corrected so he can lead a life commensurate with his worth and full potential --and $20 $Million Dollars will be the appropriate compensation --for now.
16.   The Second Issue of National Importance: The unjust treatment of NCR and Criminal Code patients by the hospitals and the ORB to force psychiatric treatment on them for years and years, on the same incapacity ‘finding’ violates the equality, security of the person and cruel and unusual treatment provisions of the Charter. The Hospitals and The ORB are unlawfully exploiting their custodial powers to make it easy to force treatment on such patients; without having them meet the criteria of committal --as civilian patients must meet. When the s.16 of the Criminal Code was changed to eliminate “Lieutenant Governor’s Warrants” for the “NCR” designation: It resulted in ‘minimum security’ hospitals filling their empty wings with inmates accused of very minor offences (Whereas before s.16 was reserved for “dangerous” and “violent” mentally ill offenders in maximum security Penetanguishene.) Thus NCR patients who would be freed in less than six months, --if they had received a prison sentence-- were now serving a five to ten year custodial sentence in a psychiatric facility; all the while being forced to take some of the most toxic poisons on Earth. The Mental Health Statutes did not envision that there would be two tiers of patients with unequal rights. Had this Appellant been a civilian or incarcerated in a Prison he would have been released untreated by poison twelve years ago!!! Thus not only are the NCR patients being unjustly medicated they are being unjustly detained. There are two necessary elements to treatment: (a) incapacity and (b) detention. The detention portion for those found NCR is unconstitutional in two ways: (a) it fails to have a “capping” provision on length of custody and (b) it treats criminal code XX.1 patients unequally by not requiring them to meet the criteria of certification for treatment to occur.
16(a)     The federal government already apprehended the unconstitutionality of the NCR custodial provisions, and has already passed a “capping” provision s.672.64; but it failed to proclaim it into law. The reason for this is mentally ill patients are the most persecuted lot anyway, and don’t get much respect and sympathy in the public realm; thus they have been getting away with murder. For example the Appellant was falsely charged (see above) with uttering death threats --a most minor charge in the criminal code-- a crime for which he would have gotten zero time in the prison system; got him 13+ years in murderous custody under an NCR designation in hospital. Violating his s.9 charter right against arbitrary custody. The Satanic unfairness of this is that the ORB is letting real murderers off who were ‘lieutenant governor’s warrants’ and shifting their prospective sentences onto the new NCR patients, --there for minor crimes. They have shifted the burden off real criminals to harmless mentally ill. In particular Jewish Judge J.A. Marc Rosenberg of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, unprecedentedly released a convicted Jewish Murderer Robert Baltovich on bail (without any new evidence, and no new evidence was ever obtained) and then Baltovich was permanently released without a new trial. (J.A., Rosenberg also dismissed this appeal). The problem with this is that Stanley was given Baltovich’s sentence and the sentences of many other Murderers in the ORB  Justice system for the last 13+ Years! Stanley learnt this from bitter experience.  (Like Jesus got Barabbas’s sentence) The Satanic ORB deliberately fails to take into account the crime, the circumstances of the crime nor the victim impact statement, in reviewing detention. In the Appellant’s Case there was no victim, as J., Eberhardt refused to testify or press charges! And Stanley was the victim, as he was the one being assaulted by the Police! [A. Record Ex#2&3] The ORB also violates s.15 of the charter by forcing & coercing compliance with psychiatric medication by --in practice-- making it a hidden condition for release from hospital. This violates s.672.55 of the CCC which forbids the ORB from making treatment a condition in their disposition orders --this was why the Appellant was kept locked up for 13 years! (because he had successfully appealed his incapacity) There is no connection between “significant risk” to re-offend and psychiatric drugs. This inequality vis-à-vis civilian patients is contrary to s.15 in that civilians do not have a biased ORB Board locking them up for tens of years, till they comply with treatment. Furthermore, The ORB fails to make a distinction between “a significant risk” to commit a major crime, and a minor one. One is a danger to society, the other is a mere nuisance. This violates s.9 & s.15 of the charter whereby recidivism is rampant in the criminal justice system; Why should only NCR patients be detained so harshly for minor offences? With a favourable ruling by this Court the Federal Government will have the impetus to proclaim the s.672.64 “Capping Provision”.
16(b)      The second inequality suffered by NCR patients is that the strict criteria for “certification” do not have to be met for treatment to occur. S.25 of The MHAct(2000) does not state whether criminal code patients are to be considered “involuntary”, as previous statutes did; they are deliberately vague, because the Government too feels this provision is unconstitutional. In the Appellant’s case he was found to be “not a danger to the public and not certifiable” by the doctor; Yet this counted for nothing when it came to treatment! (or detention!) This violates s.15 of the charter in that civilian patients need to be certified before treatment can begin; and this certificate must be renewed every three months; and each writ can be appealed to the Board. Thus there is only a small window of opportunity to treat; as the Statutes meant this to be. Yet the Hospital circumvented the intent of these statutes and constitutional fairness by extending that “window” to 13 years.
17.     The Third Issue of National Importance: That the Mental Health statutes deny patients fundamental justice by being so “vague” that virtually anyone can be found “incapable” and forcefully treated with toxic poisons on the whim of the physician and Board. The definition of “understand”, “appreciate” and “consequences” in the definition of incapacity are deliberately vague; and invite multiple “hidden” interpretations by various arbiters, making it impossible to prove capacity with a biased Board, Court or Physician --even if perfectly capable. There needs to be an empirical, quantifiable and “scientific” means to determine psychiatric capacity; and since security of the person, life, liberty and long-term health are being jeopardized otherwise; These statutes must be found to be unconstitutional. In the Starson v. Swayze(2003)SCC case even your own Supreme Court Justices Were widely divergent in their ruling on the capacity of the patient! In fact Justice Major did propose an impartial test for capacity: “Mental Capacity” to choose from alternative consequences.  If this mental capacity can then be quantified via an IQ test, it would solve this problem. Starson v. Swayze [2003] pg. 22, para.91-92; Justice Major for the Majority: “The Board’s reasons … appear to be overly influenced by its conviction that medication was in Professor Starson’s best interest. The Board arrived at this conclusion by failing to focus on the overriding consideration in this appeal, that is, whether that adult patient had the mental capacity to choose whether to accept or reject the medication prescribed. The enforced injection of mind altering drugs against a person’s will is highly offensive to his dignity and autonomy, and is to be avoided … Although the Board found that he failed to appreciate the possibility that his condition could worsen; the respondent was never asked about this. …it was unreasonable without further inquiry that he was unable to appreciate that possibility.” The fact that this Appellant is a University of Toronto Graduate with a 4 Year BSc. With a Double Specialization in Computer Science and Zoology; makes it obvious that he has the Mental Capacity to choose between consequences. The fact that the Appellant was self represented and successfully appealed his incapacity all the way to the Supreme Court Twice! Makes it proof positive that he has the mental capacity to choose between consequences of treatment. The fact that Dr. Barron claimed the Appellant couldn’t even “understand” the information required to make a decision makes him obviously biased; but yet the Board refused to overturn any of his “findings”. The fundamental basis for the Doctor and Board finding the Appellant incapable was he disagreed with them: They claim an exalted God-like status: and have deliberately mystified the understanding of mental illness; using bafflegab, gobbledygook and voodoo terminology; that cannot be penetrated without the Courts simplifying the test for capacity to a science. Disagreeing with a math question is provable false; but since psychiatry is a pseudoscience; disagreement must be tolerated. Thus the Board used “actual appreciation of consequences” and the doctor used “disbelief in an illness” (which indicates disagreement with them) as proof of incapacity! Furthermore, the fact that he was discharged after the finding was made in April 29th, 1998 and yet the Hospital is still using that “lapsed” 13 year old finding to treat the Appellant, makes it obvious that the parties and Courts were biased against the Appellant. Had there been a scientific test for capacity like an IQ test this could have all been prevented.
18.     The Fourth Issue of National Importance: The fact that psychiatric patients can still have their prior competent wishes ignored; and have the wishes of their SDM overruled is a violation of the Equality provisions in the Charter. Under s.35,36 & 37 of the HCCAct (1996) an SDM can be hauled before the Board and the Courts and removed by force if they don’t comply with the physician’s version of “best interests” of the patient. Whereas medical patients and their SDMs have the absolute right to refuse treatment! This inequality also makes it difficult to obtain an SDM willing to ACT for a psychiatric patient because they are wary of being hauled before the Board or Court and having to explain themselves; and then being forced to abide by the doctor’s wishes or be removed as SDM. This Appellant has had great difficulty obtaining anyone to act as his “Representative“ or his “Power of Attorney” for this reason. In fact all his “powers of Attorneys” complained to Stanley that they were persecuted and pressured into complying with treatment or removing themselves from the role. (See Affidavit#2 “The Facts in this Case“) When the Appellant tried to appoint a “representative” in September 1998 the Board and Doctor vigorously rejected the appointment based on “best interests”. Then Mr. Poulakis was threatened by Ms. Diana Schell (the Ministry Lawyer) that “he is “in conflict of interest” in acting as Mr. D’Almeida’s SDM and he will lose his licence if he continues to act”. All his SDM’s eventually quit or were coerced into consenting to treatment because of persecution by the authorities. This is a glaring inequality and must be corrected by this Court!
19.     The Fifth Issue of National Importance: Does forced psychiatric Treatment constitute Cruel and Unusual Treatment and Punishment? Yes it is the definition of it!!! These “medications” are the most toxic poisons on Earth; the CIA has used it to murder and Genocide millions of Iraqi, Afghan and North Korean children and civilians by poisoning their food supply! [Affidavit#3 “Supporting Evidence”] This Appellant has documented the cases of vast segments of Canadian Society being murdered by these poisons; and Stanley has suffered virtually all the side-effects of these psychiatric “medications” himself --thus he is an expert on them. Stanley has been forcefully treated with the most toxic chemicals known to Mankind for 30 years now, surely his suffering makes him an expert on the side-effects of the medications? In Flemming v. Reid (1991) JJ.A. Robins, Grange & Carthy pg84: “the efficacy of the drugs is complicated by serious side-effects: muscular side-effects or extra-pyramidal reactions, dystonia, protrusion of the tongue; akathasia (internal restlessness or agitation) ; akinesis (physical immobility); and Parkinsonism drooling, muscle stiffness, tremors). The drugs also cause blurred vision, dry mouth, weight gain, dizziness, fainting, depression, low blood pressure, cardiovascular changes and sudden death! … and Tardive Dyskinesia … these drugs carry risks of short and long term harmful side-effects.”  Stanley is not a complainer he suffers in silence, yet the Sept. 2005, clinical Record showed horrendous symptoms and side-effects: “tremors, weight gain, restlessness, visible shaking, akathasia, nausea, vomiting, fever, fainting, gastro-intestinal pain & suicidal thoughts.” (pages 122-128 of B. Transcript) But this was from a short period before the Hearing; In the Appellant’s 30 years he has suffered massive death-like side-effects (see below). The Proof for the case against neuroleptics, has been gathered by Stanley over the years he was incarcerated in Whitby Mental Health Centre, Prisons, The Old Whitby Psychiatric Hospital, from the Toronto Star Newspaper, from Journals and Text Books, from direct Observation, From Personal Experience of Suffering 30 years of murderous Torture unto Death at The hands of The System. “Aff.#3 Supporting Evidence” Exhibits 16-25 document a death toll from neuroleptics only from cases reported in the Toronto Star; There are thousands, millions perhaps billions of such deaths on all types of organisms, gone unreported. There is a puzzling phenomenon in these reports: some persons die from one dose of neuroleptic poisoning others survive longer; it is true that properly diagnosed schizophrenics have a higher resistance to these drugs (because they are possessed by demons); others given same drop dead quickly from: 'sudden death', "Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome", induced Heart Attacks, Brain Cancer, Flesh eating disease, non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Anemia, Agranulocytosis, induced Diabetes, induced heart-attacks and strokes, prostrate cancer, mysterious cancers, aneurisms, lung cancer, induced liver jaundice, tardive dyskinesia, immune suppression, gastric hemorrhage, kidney infection, other cancers. The Appellant is in the category of people highly sensitive to neuroleptics; and would suffer excruciating pain and a fate worse than death if a treatment order is approved. S.E. Exhibit 25: has some of the symptoms of neuroleptics: akathasia -restlessness and pacing due to exorbitant continuous pain, akinesis -stiffness and rigidity due to paralysis of muscles--, blurred vision -due to optic nerve damage--, slurred speech, obesity, (In Notice of Constitutional Question above more symptoms: agranulocytosis, aplastic anaemia, immune suppression, flesh-eating disease, necrotizing: myelitis & fascitis, tenosynovitus, septicaemia, gastro-intestinal haemorrhage, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, obesity, induced diabetes, liver cancer, pre-cancerous skin lesions, painful acne, facial tics, bloody diarrhoea, secondary E. Coli 0157:h7 infection of the kidneys, induced liver jaundice, lymph node and ear infection, tooth loss and infection, hair loss and greying, blurred vision, hearing loss, dry skin, breast cancer, brain and muscle damage, back pain, hemorrhoids, gangrene, brain cancer, induced heart-attacks, lung cancer from smoking caused by poison alleviation, poikilothermic-effect, cancers, brain and muscle degeneration and finally death: by a thousand cuts.) loss of muscle mass and control, induced Parkinsonism, loss of brain and nerve tissue, tremors, obesity, drooling, 'giving tongue', gangrene, necrotizing fascitis, urticaria, liver jaundice, excruciatingly painful pre-cancerous sores, excruciating tooth pain, tooth loss, lymph node & ear infection, poikilothermic effect, rigidity, restlessness, paralysis, death comes horribly. This indeed would be cruel and unusual treatment and punishment! This would also be an act of murder in the first degree and Genocide, But since Stanley claims Kingship, it is an act of High Treason, and a Crucifixion as prophesized.The SYSTEM TRIED TO MURDER Stanley and failed; and now they must be brought to Justice! The Court should not feel that without forced medication the world will collapse: This Appellant has a carefully constructed alternative treatment plan in place for the mentally ill (See Report to Whitby Shores Exhibit#13) Do not feel psychiatric illness is mystical, it is simply demon possession in most cases: and harsh somatic treatments (that cause no harm) can drive out the demons in a systematically applied program of treatment. Murdering mentally ill people by poison is not the answer; as they will start to murder all of us next: What they did to Stanley the Appellant must not be allowed to happen again.
20.     The Sixth Issue of National Importance: Can a man be found to be mentally ill simply for claiming to be the true King of Canada? Not if it is a rational claim. Under the charter a person has the right to freedom of thought, belief and expression and freedom of religion. This Appellant was arbitrarily diagnosed with a mental illness, without any rational discussion with him as to why he claims to be King. The Hospital refused to debate Stanley because they knew they would lose and thus reinforce Stanley’s belief in his Kingship. The Doctor only superficially examined the claim and assumed it was an illness; denying the Appellant due process under Law. This is part of the Appellant’s Factum presented here: ISSUE: (a) Did the Doctor prove that Mr. D'Almeida's claim to be The True King of Canada under Natural Law is a Delusion, as required under law? (b) Did the Doctor prove that the Appellant's concomitant non-belief in the illness is not based on rational grounds, as required to meet the test?
The onus was always on the doctor to prove his diagnosis, and also to prove ‘manifestations of an illness’; The Appellant does not need to explain himself or prove he is The King. Under the charter one has the right to freedom of thought, belief and expression; this is a fundamental right. The fatal flaw in the doctor’s case is that he never bothered to engage the Appellant in a debate on this claim; but rather claimed “it was obviously a delusion”. This error was repeated by the Courts and Board; To assume as true what is yet to be proven is called “begging the question”. The reason the Hospital refused to debate the Appellant, is because he is a brilliant debater, and were afraid of losing the argument and reinforcing the ’delusion’. Stanley’s opinions and beliefs are his right; to use them to find him mentally ill and incapable is legally wrong --especially without proof. There is a difference between claiming a legitimate right to the throne of Canada, and believing one is already the King. The Doctor nor the Courts could appreciate this difference. The basis for Stanley’s claim to kingship was long in developing: After suffering repeated and relentless death inducing attacks on his person by the System over eight years, The Appellant gradually acquired a Genius Insight a “Eureka moment“: That the reason the System were murderously torturing him to death was because he was the King of Canada under “Natural Law” called the Dama. But again the onus was never on the Appellant to justify himself; it was on the doctor to prove otherwise. Obviously the doctor cannot ever prove that Stanley is not the “Natural” King; which was required. Stanley’s website www.thetruekingofcanada.com more fully explains his basis for kingship. Before continuing this argument, the Appellant will briefly explain the basis for his claim to Kingship: it is a very complex explanation; and remember, he doesn’t have to prove anything. [[ Basis for Kingship of Canada: The Hindus believe that the Dama is the supreme Natural Law and Power that operates this Universe. After eight years of bitter suffering where the System was torturing him to death; Stanley discovered why: Because he was the King of Canada under Natural Law. The proper name for Hinduism is Sanatana Dama, meaning The Eternal Law of Dama. That the System: is Aryan-race-dominated, is controlled by Satan through Devil Possession; and is Anti-Dama, Unjust, Lawless (except for Satanic jurisprudence)) and must be Destroyed! He later discovered that his suffering was not a one-way street: He had de facto veto powers over all the laws of the land in Canada; but this power could be temporarily overridden by use of murderous force against his person, at the expensive loss of the souls or spiritual power of the System. This is also the principal behind Satyagraha; there is a Dama maximum for attempting murder on the King provision of ~31 years. Thus eventually Stanley will become King.]] Understanding this lies at the crux of this case; to prove a mental illness the doctor would have to show this concept irrational --he never attempted to. This Natural Law is nothing new to Canada: we just know it as British Common Law Principles which is still the fundamental law of Canada: It states that the King is the Head of State, with Prerogatives: personally sovereign, supreme, perfect, immortal, cannot be tried, head of parliament, commander in chief, supreme justice, executor in chief. Thus Stanley has just expanded common law not invented it. It is treason to imagine or intend the death, bodily harm, maiming, imprisonment, restraint, of the King; The Punishment for Treason is Death! Or the maximum penalty! That is the Law of Britain & Canada. Elizabeth II is Satan’s King, she rules Canada by the Power of Satan: she needs to constantly: persecute, imprison, poison, crucify, or murder Stanley the true King in order to Rule --while Stanley was totally innocent and never mentally ill. By expanding the common law prerogatives of kings: Stanley is showing the people forever more how to determine the King: He is the one on the throne; or a Satanic Usurper is ruling and the True King is being tortured and murdered in the dungeon! NOTE NB: Stanley is not claiming that the System consciously knew he was The King and tried to Murder him: NO, No; The operatives of the System are possessed by Devils and it was these Devils that were directing them to torture and Murder the Appellant!!! This Court may disagree about The Appellant’s above claim to Kingship; But they must respect the rationality of it and see it from his point of view. In Thomson v. Chan SCJ, [1999] Sedgwick J., pg. 8; The Court rules that a Mental Disorder must be proven for incapacity: “The Board did not make an express finding that Thomson suffers from a mental disorder. In my view, however, such a finding is implicit in their decision and in their reasons.” Thus J. Sedgwick concurs that a Board or Court must Find the patient suffers from the disorder, in all such incapacity cases. In Starson v. Swayze SCC [2003] The issue of a “condition” is not in dispute as both the Supreme Court and the patient (Starson) accepted its existence; In the D’Almeida case there is a total lack of corroborating evidence to prove an illness exists. Thus to prove the mental illness the doctor had to prove the above explanation irrational: The Doctor arrogantly refused to engage Stanley in a rational discussion on why he is claiming the Kingship of Canada, or on why this claim is a delusion, to base a valid decision on. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA in Starson v. Swayze [2003] pg. 22, para.91-92; Justice Major for the Majority: “The Board’s reasons … appear to be overly influenced by its conviction that medication was in Professor Starson’s best interest. The Board arrived at this conclusion by failing to focus on the overriding consideration in this appeal, that is, whether that adult patient had the mental capacity to choose whether to accept or reject the medication prescribed. The enforced injection of mind altering drugs against a person’s will is highly offensive to his dignity and autonomy, and is to be avoided … Although the Board found that he failed to appreciate the possibility that his condition could worsen; the respondent was never asked about this. …it was unreasonable without further inquiry that he was unable to appreciate that possibility.” The Court admonishes the Board for not asking the question and making assumptions about a person’s mental illness and capacity; which is exactly what the Doctor and Board did here. At the Hearing The Doctor never even attempts to prove with evidence how or why this belief is false or irrational; which is fatal to his whole incapacity case. Not only did the Doctor not refute any of this perspective logically; he made statements that cast his whole diagnosis and past diagnoses in doubt: he says, “I see no evidence of schizophrenia at this time”; [B. Record Exhibit#27, pgs. 22; Ex. 30-38] the problem with this is The Appellant had been incarcerated and forcibly medicated for that false schizophrenia diagnosis for eight years in WPH, plus nine years imprisonment --which puts the current diagnosis “delusions of grandeur” and psychiatry in doubt as well. What about ‘manifestations of an illness’? Dr. Gojer further states, “with a single central delusion, which Mr. Almeida coherently tries to explain in a logical manner --but for the false nature of the belief that he is king of Canada-- outside of this delusion he has no significant thought disorder”; [B. Record Ex. 27, pgs. 21-22.] weakening his case; and which precludes the Appellant from having any manifestations of an illness. For a real thought disorder would manifest itself in a myriad of ways. For this argument it is vital to define ‘manifestations of an illness': It is Certain bizarre 'incidents' and behaviors, somatic symptoms, hallucinations, hearing voices, independent evidence from the diagnosis that can clearly demonstrate a mental illness or 'condition of the mind' is present. The Appellant has to be afforded the right to accept that he is affected by a "condition" even though he does not have to characterize it as an "illness". [Starson v. Swayze(2003) see 722 Major J.;] In Starson v. Swayze [2003] SCC, pg 20, para. 79; Justice Major: “a patient need not agree with the diagnosis of the attending physician, in order to apply the relevant information to his own circumstances. Psychiatry is not an exact science, [an understatement!] and “capable but dissident interpretations of information” are to be expected: see Weisstub Report. While a patient need not agree with a particular diagnosis, if it is demonstrated that he has a mental “condition”, the patient must be able to recognize the possibility that he is affected by that condition: Condition refers to the broader manifestations of the illness rather than the existence of  a discrete diagnosable pathology. The word condition allows the requirement for understanding to focus on the objectively discernable manifestations of the illness rather than the interpretation that is made of these manifestations.“
 In the original supreme court case Mr. Starson is confronted with 'incidents' from his past that were clearly indicative of mentally ill behavior; and he was given an opportunity to rationally explain his behavior or accept that he could suffer from a "condition". Unfortunately Mr. D'Almeida was never given this same opportunity; the reason for this is very informative to this court: there did not exist any 'manifestations of an illness' in Mr. D'Almeida, who is a totally rational sane man!!! Again the onus of proof was on the doctor to show objective discernable manifestations. Here it should be noted that the respondent’s counsel (who without precedent coached the doctor on what evidence to give and to lie!) is trying to adduce belated evidence from the clinical record for manifestations; but the Court or lawyer cannot prove the case for the physician: thus the Appellant need not debate her. By focusing the Appellant’s illness so narrowly on the claim to Kingship the doctor made it impossible to prove manifestations --thus all he is left with is the claim. In fact at the Board hearing the doctor offers to drop the incapacity if the Appellant recants his claim; Proving this was political persecution rather than a genuine diagnosis. If the claim to Kingship is Rational, legitimate, reasonable, legally allowed and based on logical grounds; then Mr. D'Almeida cannot be diagnosed with a mental disorder nor incapable. Stanley has devoted his whole life to seriously establish his claim to the future throne of Canada; with well documented Laws and rational principles he will govern this Country by; it is no delusion nor is it irrational! And so The Appellant cannot be found incapable! The Appellant asks this honorable court to rule that disengaging in argument is unreasonable conduct by the doctor and a loss for the respondents; and that Mr. D'Almeida is capable of consenting to psychiatric treatment! The use of psychiatry to torture a Political Prisoner claiming Kingship of Canada and for seeking to destroy the System is illegal under our constitution and must be brought to a halt.
21.     The Seventh Issue of National Importance: What is the correct test(s) for capacity?  Unfortunately although Justice Major tried to explain his reasoning on this issue, it still seems too vague for the lower Courts. Every judge, Board & Doctor seems to have a different test for capacity. Even if they play lip service to the correct jurisprudence, they are in fact stubbornly using their own false test for capacity; and then pretending to comply. The test for Capacity has to be formulated to overcome subjective bias, and persecution of an individual. The consequences of loss of security of the person simply cannot allow for our fate to lie in the capricious hands of a Doctor or Board. The Board in the Appellant’s case used “best interests” as their test for capacity; and the doctor used a “disbelief in an illness” as his determiner of capacity: BOTH ARE THE WRONG TESTS! Yet the Appellant didn’t prevail in court because of institutional bias.
22.      The Eighth Issue of National Importance: Does an incapacity finding lapse on discharge? This seems obvious that it does; but the lower courts have consistently failed to uphold this jurisprudence. The statutes clearly require a physician to detain a patient until he is no longer in need of observation, care and treatment: thus when the Appellant was discharged he was deemed competent under the common law “presumption of competence”. Yet this Appellant is still being deemed incapable by a “finding” made before he was discharged.  The only reason the doctor discharged him was he felt the Appellant was competent at that time! Because Dr. Gojer was impressed that the Appellant was able to file an Appeal of his incapacity to the Superior Court of Justice, on May 22nd, 1998; Dr. Gojer exclaimed “in all my 30 years of experience as psychiatrist, you are the only patient to successfully appeal your incapacity finding”; and promptly discharged the Appellant. Failure of the lower courts to uphold the jurisprudence on “mootness” law makes this error and omission a reviewable matter for this Court.
23.      The Ninth Issue  of National Importance: Can a person be forcefully treated using a 13 year old finding of incapacity? And wouldn’t the Hospital have to prove him continuously incapable for the 13 tears in order to use that finding? The statutes state that capacity is dependent on time; and that capacity is not related to mental illness. Yet the Hospital is using a 13 year old finding to forcefully treat the Appellant. The Statutes never intended for forced treatment to last such a long time. Is this not abuse of the fundamental principles of justice and the abrogation of his charter rights? There must be a statute of limitations on an incapacity finding.
24.      The Tenth Issue of National Importance: Can the Court use forced psychiatric medication as a punitive measure as part of its criminal sentence after an offender is convicted of a crime? This happened in this case because the Appellant had already been sentenced to the maximum sentence under law for a summary offence, on a previous “Breach of Probation” offence. Thus after Mr. D’Almeida was convicted on the current offence of “uttering death threats” on April 23rd, 1998; there was no additional sentence he could be given; thus he was vindictively sent to Whitby Shores Hospital with specific instructions to the hospital “found guilty… find him incompetent and treat him”.  [A. Record Ex# 1,5,8] This not only breaches his s.7 charter rights; it is contrary to s.672.19 of the criminal code of Canada. Whereby the Court cannot direct on an assessment order that psychiatric treatment be given. This so violated Mr. D’Almeida’s charter rights that this Court must offer him redress, to the appropriate tune of $Millions for pain, suffering and punitive damages.
25.     The Eleventh Issue of National Importance: What is the Standard of Proof for determining capacity? Because of the serious denial of security of the person and life and liberty; surely the standard should be the highest available in law? MJ., Molloy concurred in her Judgement Starson v. Swayze (1999) stating, “the case must be proved on a somewhat enhanced balance of probabilities. In order for the Board to find in favor of the physician, it must hear cogent and compelling evidence in support of the physician’s case. In L.C. v. Pinhas [2002] MJ., Kiteley also supports this Standard; and no higher Court has opposed this Standard; But the Supreme Court Must weigh in; and it is time the Supreme Court took Mental Health Jurisprudence as seriously as it warrants. She labelled the Standard as “Enhanced Civil Standard”, almost equivalent to “beyond a reasonable doubt” in the criminal courts. Psychiatry is a very arbitrary and inexact science; as much protections as is possible should be built in, to prevent what happened to Mr. D’Almeida from happening to anyone else.   
26.     The twelfth  Issue of National Importance: Is a patient protected against forced psychiatric treatment while appealing his incapacity finding to the Board? S.18 of the HCCAct (1996) clearly states so, and that was the understanding of Dr. Barron and MJ., Ferguson; But this Appellant was never afforded such relief, by the Hospital, the Board nor the Courts.
28.     The thirteenth Issue of National Importance: Can the Courts or Respondent’s Counsel correct the errors the physician makes in his test for capacity or diagnosis. The burden of PROOF for the diagnosis and a finding of incapacity is clearly on the physician; but the Courts and Resp’s counsel have taken it on themselves to look for evidence not presented by the Doctor, and in effect make their own “finding” of incapacity using the correct test, whereas the physician used the incorrect test; and did not offer any evidence or proof. The Courts ignored the Appellant’s argument and the physician’s, and ruled based on their own biases against the Appellant. Since the whole incapacity process is so one-sided against the patient, surely the counsel and Courts should not be able to “make the case for the doctor” as well! For example: if the physician has not provided proof that the Appellant has a mental disorder as diagnosed, then the Court, Board or Respondent’s Lawyer cannot make the case for him; nor can they say, Ì believe you have a mental disorder”. This would indicate bias and be utterly unfair to the Appellant.     
29.     The fourteenth Issue of National Importance: Should CSIS have the right to target lawful Canadian Citizens who may dissent locally in Canada against the Canadian System; by their constant surveillance, bugging of phones, questioning all who come in contact with Mr. D’Almeida and turning them against him; thus ostracizing and torturing him while in the Community? CSIS should be restricted to investigating foreign influences and spying; not targeting Canadians. Stanley Has Suffered 24 Years Of CSIS and Police Torture, this must be declared unlawful. This issue is becoming more and more prevalent, with the hysteria over security brought on by 9/11; with thousands of lawful Canadians being harassed and persecuted by CSIS and local ‘investigative’ branches of the Police for political reasons. The Appellant asks this Court for an Order for CSIS to disclose his file to the Court and himself; the problem is that CSIS does not respond to “access to information” requests; and must be forced to release information compiled on the subject, to the subject himself. The Appellant’s “enemies” have used the fact that he is unpopular with the System to “pile on” and feel free to persecute him as well; thus this surveillance must stop.

[***29(b)  Factum To Come:    Addendum: Factum snip-bit: The Court of Appeal made a major factual error on pg. 11, when it erroneously states that “the Appellant was discharged because “his remand for assessment had expired”; this is patently false (the Respondent’s counsel also agrees with the Appellant on this). The fact is clear on his “Form 8” [A. Record Ex# 6] that his assessment order was for two months; while he was discharged 38 days earlier; after the Doctor specifically stated he would “keep the Appellant in Hospital until his Form 8 expires”. [B. Record Ex#27 pg.25] This is a Major Grounds of Appeal in that it may have materially changed the outcome of the Court’s decision. Thus the only reason the Doctor would discharge him is that he believed the Appellant was capable at the time. The Court also makes this and other fundamental legal errors in its ruling, which will be argued in the Appellant’s Factum instead. Factum to come if Leave is granted. ]













  PART IV:
STATEMENT OF ORDER SOUGHT AS TO COSTS:
30.   COSTS: The Appellant seeks $100,000.00 in costs; this case was a very complex one. It was foisted on the Appellant by the Respondent’s refusal to be fair and reasonable to him. For example they sought to treat on a finding that the Doctor himself conceded had lapsed after discharge. This 13 year finding took a heavy toll on the Appellant in both time, labour, photocopying, mailing, notarizing, binding, faxing, printing and suffering.
     TIME AND LABOUR: This took up many 24/7 months and months of hard work; a lawyer of the Appellant’s calibre would easily charge over a $million; thus $100,000 is appropriate.
The Appellant will also be seeking damages for the violation of his constitutional rights: s.7,15,8,12,1,2 & 3 of the charter of $20 million dollars.
PART V:
NATURE OF ORDER SOUGHT:
31.   (a) The Appellant respectfully requests damages of $20 million dollars. As this Court itself ruled: Supreme Court of Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23rd, 2010) held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, violation of charter rights, vindication for being right, and deterrence from future injustice; makes it imperative that he be awarded these damages. The pain and suffering the Appellant endured was unequalled in the annals of human history and has to be judged in that context; the fact that Mr. Stanley D’Almeida is still alive is not from the System’s and Hospital’s wont of trying to kill him; but due to his toughness. But 30 years of incarceration and long-term side-effects of these toxic poisons has greatly affected his quality of life, past income ability to earn income, and must be compensated.
(b)  The Appellant also respectfully asks this Court for a Judgement granting him and all mental health patients relief by ruling the following did indeed breach the charter of rights and freedoms, and cannot be saved by s.1 the notwithstanding clause:
  (i)  that s.25 of the Mental Health Act (2000) violates the charter by treating Criminal Code Part XX.1 Detainees unequally by not requiring them to meet the criteria for certification for treatment, as civilian patients are.
   (ii)  that the failure of the Federal Government to proclaim the “capping” provision, s. 672.64 already passed, breaches several charter rights: s.7,12,15 & 9, in that NCR patients are being held indefinitely in custody, all out of proportion to the crimes they may have committed. (supra) Both inmates in correctional centres and civilian patients are not treated this way; furthermore this extended custody makes it easier to force psychiatric treatment on these NCR patients.
  (iii)  That the continued lack of the mental health statutes to provide for a concise, logical, rational, objective, scientific, empirical, fair and just means to determine incapacity of a psychiatric person, violates s.7,12 & 15 of the charter; since the consequences of being found incapable (even when not so) are a fate worse than death!
  (iv)  that the imposition of forced psychiatric treatment on a person found incapable constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and treatment contrary to s.12 of the charter; the list of side-effects and the high rate of suicides and early death for those given the worst of the anti-psychotics (schizophrenics) and the deaths of street people, prison inmates, civilians at war with the System, political prisoners make this, a ruling whose time has come. How many more deaths will it take to declare forced infliction of neuroleptics unconstitutional?
    (v) that s.35,36 &37 of the Health Care Consent Act (1996) violate s.15 of the charter in that only psychiatric patients can have their prior competent wishes or the wishes of their SDM overruled by the Board or Courts based on a subjective determination of “best interests”; whereas medical patients or their SDM’s have the absolute right to refuse treatment. This makes it difficult to obtain an SDM willing to act on an incapable patients wishes for fear of persecution or of being hauled into court and being interrogated and/or removed.

32.   The Appellant also respectfully requests that this Court grant him his appeal of the Court of Appeal for Ontario’s decision to dismiss his appeal of a finding of incapacity to make psychiatric decisions, made on April 29th, 1998; 13 long years ago! Surely nobody can possibly remain incapable for 13 continuous years.


THE APPELLANT RESTS


SCHEDULE “A”
List of Authorities:

Starson v. Swayze, [2003] SCC. 120.
L.C v. Pinhas, [2002] O.J. N05309(S.C.J.).
Flemming v. Reid(1991),40.R.(3d)74(O.C.A.)
Starson v. Swayze[1999]22Admin.L.R.(3d)211 (O.S.C.)
A.M. v. Benes(1999), 460.R.(3d)271 (O.C.A.)
Almeida v. Musisi(1988)(O.D.C.)(unre.)E.R.Lovekin J.
L.L. v. LT. (1998)O.J.No,4205.(S.C.J.) Sutherland J.
Roy v. Furst[1999] O.J.No.1490 (Gen. Div.).
9.    Thomson v. Chan(Unrep.,Gen.Div.,July 21, 1999,
       Sedgwick J.
10.   D'Almeida v. Gojer (1999) (S.C.J.)
        Ferguson J.
11.      R. v. Lenart,(1998),O.J. No.1105,(O.C.A.)
           [May 22nd, 1998].
12.      Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23rd, 2010) Supreme
           Court of Canada

SCHEDULE “B”:
Statutes, Law relied on:

The British Criminal Code (1949); The Health Care Consent Act (1996); The Mental Health Act (2000); The Substitute Decisions Act (1992); The Mental Hospitals Act (1990); The Public Hospitals Act (1990); The Statutory Powers Procedure Act (1990); The Rules of Civil Procedure (1999); The Courts of Justice Act (1990).

AND UNDER: The Criminal Code of Canada; The Canadian Bill of Rights (1960); The Constitution Act (1982); The Geneva Convention on Prisoners of War (1949). The Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

SCHEDULE “B”
LIST OF RELEVANT STATUTES:

Health Care Consent Act (1996):
Many Types of Capacity: s.4(1) of The Health Care Consent Act (1996) defines Capacity: "A person is capable with respect to a treatment , admission to a care facility or personal assistance service, if the person is able to understand the information that is relevant to making a decision about the treatment, admission or personal assistance service as the case may be, and able to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision".
Presumption of Capacity:  s.4(2) A person is presumed to be capable with respect to treatment, admission to a care facility and personal assistance service.
Many Types of Treatment: “Treatment”: Means anything that is done for a therapeutic, preventive, palliative, diagnostic, cosmetic or other health related purpose, and includes a course of treatment or plan of treatment.
Substitute Decision Maker (SDM): s.9 means a person who is authorized under section 29 to give or refuse consent to a treatment on behalf of a person who is incapable with respect to the treatment.
Capacity dependent on Time: s.15(2) A person may be incapable with respect to a treatment at one time and capable at another.
Treatment must not begin: s.18(3)(d)(ii) In the circumstances described in subsections (1) and (2), the health practitioner shall not begin treatment, and shall take reasonable steps to ensure treatment is not begun,
(d) if a party to the application before the Board has informed the health practitioner that he intends to appeal the Board’s decision.
(ii) until the appeal of the Board’s decision has been finally disposed of.
Best Interests: s.21(2)(c) In deciding what the incapable person’s best interests are, the person who gives or refuses consent on his behalf shall take into consideration. (c) the following factors:
    1. Whether the treatment is likely to,
         (i) improve the incapable person’s condition or
             well-being,
         (ii) prevent the incapable person’s condition or
             well-being from deteriorating, or
         (iii) reduce the extent to which, or the rate at which,
              the incapable person’s condition or well-being is
              likely to deteriorate.
    2. Whether the incapable person’s condition or well-being is likely to improve, remain the same or deteriorate without the treatment.
    3. Whether the benefit the incapable person is expected to obtain from the treatment outweighs the risk of harm to him or her.
Different Types of Incapacity: Objection, psychiatric facility: s.24(2)(b) If the incapable person is 16 years old or older and objects to being admitted to a psychiatric facility for treatment of a mental disorder, consent to his admission may be given only by,
               (b) his attorney for personal care, if the power of attorney contains a provision authorizing the attorney to use force that is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances to admit the incapable person to the psychiatric facility and the provision is effective under subsection 50(1) of the Substitute Decisions Act(1992).

Substitute Decisions Act(1992):
Incapacity fo Personal Care: s.45 A person is incapable of personal care if the person is not able to understand information that is relevant in making a decision concerning his or her own health care, nutrition, shelter, clothing, hygiene or safety, or is not able to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of a decision or lack of decision.
Capacity to give Power of Attorney for Personal Care: s.47(1) A person is capable of giving a powerof attorney for personal care if the person,    (a) has the ability to understand whether the proposed attorney has a genuine concern for the person’s welfare, and (b) appreciates that a the person may need to have the proposed attorney make decisions for the person.
Special Provisions Granted or Revoked by Capable Consent: s.50(1) A power of attorney for personal care may contain one or more provisions described in subsection (2), but a provision is not effective unless both of the following circumstances exist:
      1. At the time the power of attorney was executed or within 30 days … the grantor made a statement in the prescribed form indicating that he or she understood the effect of the provision and of subsection (4).
      2. Within 30 days after the power of attorney was executed an assessor made a statement in the prescribed form,  (ii) stating the assessor’e opinion that, at the time of the assessment, the grantor was capable of personal care and was capable of understanding the effect of the provision
and of subsection (4), and
(2) The provisions referred to in subsection (1) are
        2. A provision that authorizes the attorney and other persons under the direction of the attorney to use force that is necessary and reasonable in the circumstances to take the grantor to any place for carre or treatment, to admit the grantor to that place and to detain and restrain the grantor in that place during the care or treatment.

Mental Health Act(2000):
Detention under the criminal code (Canada): s.25 Any person who is detained in a psychiatric facility under Part XX.1 of the Criminal Code (Canada) may be restrained , observed and examined under the Act and provided with treatment under the Health Care Consent Act; 1996.
Duty of attending physician Involuntary Committal: s.20(1)(c) The attending physician, after observing and examining a person who is the subject of an application for assessment under section 15 or an order under section 32,     Shall admit the person as an involuntary patient by completing and filing with the officer in charge a certificate of involuntary admission if the attending physician is of the opinion both that the person is suffering from a mental disorder of a nature or quality that will likely result in,
      (i)  serious bodily harm to the person,
      (ii)  serious bodily harm to another person, or
      (iii)  serious physical impairment of the person
Unless the person remains in the custody of a psychiatric facility and that the person is not suitable for admission as an informal or voluntary patient.
s.20(4)(b)(iii)  An involuntary patient may be detained, observed, restrained  and examined in a psychiatric facility,    (iii) three additional months under a third or subsequent certificate of renewal.
“Informal Patient”: means a person who is a patient in a psychiatric facility, having been admitted with the consent of another person under s.24 of the health care consent Act, (1996).
“Involuntary Patient”: means a person who is detained in a psychiatric facility under a certificate of involuntary admission or a certificate of renewal.
 “Mental Disorder”: means any disease or disorder of the mind.
Application of MHAct: s.7 This Act applies to every psychiatric facility.
Supremacy of MHA over Treatment: s.8 … where the provisions of any Act conflict with the provisions of this Act or the regulation, the provisions of this Act and the regulations prevail.  
Cannot Treat Involuntary Patient: s.14 Nothing in this Act authorizes a psychiatric facility to detain or to restrain an informal or involuntary patient.
Judge’s Order for Admission: s.22(1) Where a judge has reason to believe that a person in custody who appears before him or her charged with an offence suffers from a mental disorder, the judge may, by order, remand that person for admission as a patient to a psychiatric facility for a period of not more than two months.
Discharge of Patients: s.34(1) A patient shall be discharged from a psychiatric facility when he or she is no longer in need of the observation, care and treatment provided therein.
(community treatment orders) CTO: were added to the MHA in 2000, but its use is very cumbersome and unnecessary in most cases. It would need the informed consent of the incapable person or his SDM, and need to be renewed every six months; and the I.P. has the right to appeal it to the C & C Board at any time; further it needs community support programs in place to handle the person --it is rarely used as an NCR designation is far more punitive and abusive of rights.   

CRIMINAL CODE of CANADA:
No Treatment Order on Assessment: s. 672.19 No assessment order may direct that psychiatric or any other treatment of the accused be carried out, or direct the accused to submit to such treatment.
Treatment not a condition in Disposition: s.672.55(1) No disposition made under section 672.54 shall direct that any psychiatric or other treatment of the accused be carried out or that the accused submit to such treatment.   
When the Court may order assessment: 672.12(1) The court may make an assessment order at any stage of proceedings against the accused of its own motion, on application of the accused or subject to subsections (2) and (3) , on application of the prosecutor.
(3) Where the prosecutor applies for an assessment in order to determine whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the offence so as to be exempt from criminal responsibility, the court may only order the assessment if
The Capping Provision on NCR Custody (unproclaimed): s.672.64: “Cap” means the maximum period during which an accused is subject to one or more dispositions in respect of an offence, beginning at the time when the verdict is rendered.
s.672.64(3) Where a verdict of not criminally responsible on account of a mental disorder or unfit to stand trial is rendered in respect of an accused; the cap is
(c) two years, or the maximum period during which during which the accused is liable to imprisonment in respect of the offence, whichever is shorter, where the offence is an offence under this act…
s.672.65: Dangerous Mentally Disordered Accused for serious personal injury offences: The court may increase the duration of disposition to a maximum of life.
 COMMON LAW PRINCIPLES:
 1. Absolute Right To Refuse Treatment: Under Common Law no medical treatment can be given a patient without the informed consent of the patient or his SDM.
2. Presumption of Competence: A person is presumed to be competent at all times; the onus of proof is on the person making a finding of incompetence.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
The Appellant will be relying on the following evidence:
1. The RECORD of the Board Hearing and the Transcript.
2.  The Affidavits of Stanley D’Almeida: (a) “The Facts in this Case” Affidavit covering April 28th, 1998 to May 18th, 2001. (b) “The supporting evidence” Affidavit on the deaths caused by anti-psychotics. (c) “The Early Writings” Affidavit on the evolving ideas of Mr. D’Almeida. (d) “The Chronology of Events” Affidavit, Covering April 25th, 1998 To February 8th, 2006.
3.  The RECORD of Stanley D’Almeida as presented in this Notice For Leave
4.   The personal suffering of Stanley D’Almeida on the death causing side-effects of anti-psychotic drugs.
5.  The Holistic Treatment Model, an alternative to murder by poison of mentally ill persons; Written by Stanley D’Almeida for Patient Council in Whitby Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences.


END OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
 
Date: October _____ 2010.

_____________________Stanley D’Almeida Bsc.
 Stanley D’Almeida                     119-9 Crescent Place
                                                      East York, Ontario. M4C 5L8.
                                                          Tel: (416) 699-6724.
                            Email: Stanley_xvidalmeida@yahoo.com
Dated October 28th, 2010.  

_________________________

Stanley D'Almeida Bsc.,
119-9 Crescent Place,
East York, Ontario.
M4C 5L8. Tel: (416) 699-6724.
   
TO: The Registrar of This Court,
        Supreme Court of Canada,
        Attention: Registry Branch,
        301 Wellington street, Ottawa, Ontario.
        K1A 0J1. Tel: (613) 995-4330. Fax: (613) 996-9138.

AND TO: Ms. Heather Mackay,
Ministry of the Attorney General,
Crown Law Office -Civil,
720 Bay St, 8th Floor,
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2A1.
Tel: (416) 326-4129; FAX: (416) 326-4181.

AND TO:    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch
720 Bay Street, 4th Floor
Toronto, ON M5G 2K1. Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015.      Sean Hanley 

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, Suite 3400,
130 King Street West, Exchange Tower, Box 36,
Toronto, ON. M5X 1K6.
Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PANDURANGA XVI. ANTONIO D'ALMEIDA.
                                                            ---APPELLANT
                                      AND
Whitby Shores Centre MHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron & Dr. Gojer.
                                                     ---RESPONDENTS APPEAL UNDER s.80 of The Health Care Consent Act (1996) R.S.O. and s.6(1)(b) of The Courts of Justice Act.

Certificate of Completeness of Appeal Books

I, Stanley D’Almeida, solicitor for the Appellant, certify that that the appeal books in this appeal are complete and legible.

October 28th, 2010.                      ______________________

Stanley D’Almeida, Bsc.,
119-9 Crescent Place,
East York, Ontario,
M4C 5L8.
Tel: (416) 699-6724.


   











THE EVIDENCE:
1. Affidavit#1 “Chronology of Events”
2. Affidavit#2 “Facts in this Case”
3. Affidavit#3 “Supporting Evidence”
4. Affidavit#4 “Early Writings”

5. APPELLANT’S RECORD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
  STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
-and-
Whitby Mental Health Centre, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
  ----Respondents
________________________________________________
 APPELLANT’S RECORD
    Pursuant to section 40(1) of The Supreme Court Act
________________________________________________
Stanley P. A. D’Almeida --Lead Counsel for Appellant,
119-9 Crescent Place, East York, Ontario, M4C 5L8.
Tel: (416) 699-6724.
Email: Stanley_xvidalmeida@yahoo.com

Heather McKay --Respondent’s Counsel, ATTORNEY GENERAL of ONTARIO, Crown Law Office - Civil, 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2A1.
Tel.: (416) 326-4129 Fax: (416) 326-4181.
 
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO, Constitutional Law Branch, 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1. Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015.      Sean Hanley 

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street West Exchange Tower, Box 36, Toronto, ON M5X lK6. Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.

TABLE OF CONTENTS:
EXHIBITS:                                                       PAGE NO:
1. The Appellant’s full criminal record and
committals to Whitby Psych. Hosp.       June 19th, 1998.                    207-209                                  
2.  Partial Transcript of Bail Hearing proving Bail
     Already denied; and that Appellant was being
     Assaulted at time of alleged threat!     Nov. 5th, 1997.                    210-232
  J., Eberhardt’s Endorsement: No Threat. Nov. 7th, 1997.                  233-240
3.  Statement from P.C. Jeffrey Bright, (who was
assaulting Appellant) eyewitness to the alleged
threat; indicating no direct threat made. Jan.23rd, 1998.                     241-243    
4.  Don Jail psychiatric nurse Cathy Brown
     Asking for Appellant be found NCR          Mar. 1998.                      245-246
5.  Warrant & “Information”: Appellant already
     CONVICTED of threats, thus couldn’t be found
      NCR                                                     April 24th, 1998                      247-250
6.  Form 8 Order for assessment proving it was for
     Two months, yet Appellant discharged 38 days early!
     Proving Doctor believed him capable. Apr. 24th, 1998.                         251
7.  Psychiatrist Hy Bloom illegally divulging Appellant’s
     Confidential Medical Records to the Toronto Star
     Who falsely defamatorily libelled the Appellant
     Calling him paranoid schizophrenic!   Feb. 10th, 1998.                    252-255
8. Letter from Crown Lisa Cameron: The Judge
     Violated s.672.19 of CCC.!                   April 24th, 1998.                     256-257
9. Dr. Gojer’s Report to Judge Bassel,
     “Accused not a danger to public and not
     Certifiable”                                             May 15th, 1998.                      258-261
10.  Partial Transcript of First Assault Peace Officer
     Trial; Father testifies Appellant did not Assault
     Police, but was himself assaulted.     June 11th, 1982.                      262-282
11.  Judge’s Report Finding Appellant Fit To
     Stand Trial, and criminally “Responsible”
     Appellant spent Nine Years in Prison from
    Breach of Probations & “Dead Time”. Sept. 29th, 1989.                    282(a)-282(c)
12.  In Ghana Mental Illness is considered Demo
       Possession; And They CURE patients! not Poison
       Them to death! Toronto Star article. Sept. 30th, 2010.                   282(d)-282(e)
*13.  Holistic Treatment - Alternative Treatment
      Report by Stanley D’Almeida              Sept. 30th, 2010.                      283-297



IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
                     STANLEY.  A. P. D’ALMEIDA
                                                      ----Appellant
                  -and-
Whitby Shores CMHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron, Dr. Gojer.
  ----Respondents

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE:

I, Stanley D’Almeida, The King of Canada, of the city of Toronto, in the province of ON, MAKE OATH AND SAY:

1.     That on the _____   day of October, A.D. 2010; I did  serve The Respondent, The Attorney General of Ontario & of Canada or Their Representative _________________        for the Party----- With The Notice of Constitutional Question by delivering by mail, to the said person a copy thereof, while at the same time exhibiting the original.

Sworn before me in the     )
City of Toronto, in the        )_________________________
Province of Ontario, This   )       Stanley D’Almeida
______Day of Oct., 2010     )

________________________________________________
A Commissioner for taking Affidavits























IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PANDURANGA XVI. ANTONIO D'ALMEIDA.
                                                            ---APPELLANT
                                      AND
Whitby Shores Centre MHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron & Dr. Gojer.
                                                     ---RESPONDENTS APPEAL UNDER s.80 of The Health Care Consent Act (1996) R.S.O. and s.6(1)(b) of The Courts of Justice Act.

APPELLANT’S CERTIFICATE

  The Appellant certifies that: 
(i) an order under subrule 61.09(2) has been obtained; and
(ii)   Appellant estimates 3 hours will be required for his oral argument.

Dated March 28th, 2010.       _________________________

Stanley D'Almeida Bsc.,
119-9 Crescent Place,
East York, Ontario.
M4C 5L8. Tel: (416) 699-6724.

TO:      Heather McKay --Respondent’s Counsel
            ATTORNEY GENERAL ONTARIO
            Crown Law Office - Civil 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor,
            Toronto, ON M5G 2K1
            Tel.: (416) 326-4129 Fax: (416) 326-4181


AND TO:    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO,
                  Constitutional Law Branch,
                 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor
                 Toronto, ON M5G 2Kl
                 Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015
                 Sean Hanley

AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400,
               130 King Street West Exchange Tower, Box 36,
                Toronto, ON M5X 1K6.
               Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.












IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
(On Appeal From The Court of Appeal for Ontario)
In The Matter Of A Consent and Capacity Case arising in Whitby.
BETWEEN:
STANLEY PANDURANGA XVI. ANTONIO        D'ALMEIDA.         ---APPELLANT
                                      AND
Whitby Shores Centre MHS, Ms. Glenna Raymond, Dr. Stanley Barron & Dr. Gojer.
                                                     ---RESPONDENTS APPEAL UNDER s.80 of The Health Care Consent Act (1996) R.S.O. and s.6(1)(b) of The Courts of Justice Act.

APPELLANT’S BOOK OF
AUTHORITIES

Stanley D’Almeida --Counsel for Appellant, 119-9 Crescent Place, East York, Ontario, M4C 5L8. Tel: (416) 699-6724.

Heather MacKay --Respondent’s Counsel, Crown Law --Civil, 8th, Floor, 720 Bay St., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2K1. Tel: (416) 326

Mercedes Perez --amicus curiae, SWADRON ASSOCIATES, 115 Berkeley Street, Toronto, Ontario. M5A2W8. Tel.: (416) 326-1234. Fax: (416) 362-1232

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO Constitutional Law Branch, 720 Bay Street, 4th Floor, Toronto, ON M5G 2K1. Sean Hanley
Tel.: (416) 212-7244 Fax: (416) 326-4015
AND TO: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Suite 3400, 130 King Street W. Exchange Tower, Box 36, Toronto, ON M5X 1K6.
Tel.: (416) 973-9241 Fax: (416) 973-3004.










Tolerance For Homos: Homosexuals should be outlawed by The Criminal Code and Mental Health Act: So That They Come Out Cured Or Come Out Dead! CJO. Roy McMurtry embarrassed Stanley by making Ontario the Homo Capital of N. America on Stanley's watch, and so should be removed from the bench. "As Long As Stanley Is The King Of Canada Homosexuals Will Never Be “Permanently” Legally Recognized as Equal (In Marriage) Or Legal under The Criminal Code" --The Battle Is Not Over! To spite Stanley, Mike Harris even appointed 'Pink' Floyd Laugren To The Hydro Board, Who allowed Toronto to sell off its local utilities to Teachers Pension Fund at huge potential price increases for users, as it is a Monopoly. Stanley attacks J., D. Ferguson as sympathetic to child molesters, which caused him to rule Stanley Financially incompetent and wreck his small-claims court Appeal. Stanley also Admonishes JJA. Dennis O'Connor for the biggest waste of tax-payer's money in history: He got it totally wrong: E. coli was not directly responsible for the deaths (see Letter): it was acute chlorine poisoning from the water!!! That Is Why Stanley Is The Chief Justice Of Canada, The Final Arbiter Of Justice In The Land.
Mouth Of The White Horseman; and the Vultures, Cannibals, Wild-Animals, Predators, Decomposers, Plagues, Pestilences, Viruses Were Filled With Their Flesh ... AMEN AUUUUUUUUUUUUUM.




Sworn before me In the City)
Of Toronto, in the Province )_________________
Of Ontario;                            ) Stanley D’Almeida                              
This_____day of October     )
    2010.     )



_________________________________________
A Commissioner for taking Affidavits



























The Board chose not to confirm the first part of the test (thus overruling the Doctor); so it need not be contested here; but evidence on pages 152-154 of the Transcript would prove clearly that Mr. D'Almeida does indeed pass the first part of the test that deals with
"able to understand the relevant information in making a decision". In this Factum Mr. D'Almeida will focus on contesting and proving that the Doctor and Board erred in confirming the second part of the test: "able to appreciate the foreseeable consequences of a decision". The Appellant will argue that both the Doctor and the Board repeatedly use the wrong test for capacity; while only paying lip service to Supreme Court Jurisprudence and the proper test for capacity. The Board's test for Capacity: remains the simplistic dinosaur notion that if a patient does not believe he has an illness, he cannot see himself as getting better with medication, thus he cannot appreciate the consequences of treatment with medication, and therefore he is incapable. The Board betrays their false test for capacity by falsely stating that it is Mr. D'Almeida that bases his decision on medication on the fact he doesn't believe he has an illness; when in fact this is their own basis for confirming incapacity all along. The Board also used an evil ploy: they used a minority ruling of CJ., B. McLachlin to use “Best Interests” to find the Appellant incapable! The Board and the Doctor (with improper legal advice) have gained a superficial knowledge of how to couch their words in the test for capacity; thus they have cunningly attempted to camouflage the fact that they have used the wrong test. The Court should not be fooled by mere hollow assertions of correctness in the test for capacity; but should examine critically whether it is backed by evidence. The Appellant is claiming that none of the Doctor's or Board's case is supported by any facts and real evidence. The Appellant asks this honorable court to watch for three things: (1) Did the physician prove that the Appellant's decision on treatment is based on the delusion and not on rational grounds? [Points 3, 6 and Conclusion] (2) Did he prove that the Appellant's non-belief in an illness is not based on rational
.grounds? [Point 1 & Preamble] (2b) Was the Appellant
afforded the right to be confronted with certain indisputable 'manifestations of an illness' and given a chance to accept that he could suffer from a "condition" or explain his behavior rationally? [Point 5] (3) Did the physician prove an inability to appreciate the consequences of his decision on treatment? [Pts.1 & 12]. Did the Board use ‘best interests’ to find the appellant incapable? [Point 2]. The Appellant urges this court to read this whole Factum before the hearing; as it is the accumulation of many hours of hard work; and judge wisely.




0)    The J., Mesbur ruling was a biased Satanic Racist mockery of justice; where she does not rule on any of the Appellant’s oral (Court Transcript) or written (SCJ Factum) legal arguments. Thus it would be an exercise in futility to give her any credence in wasting time on her ruling; Dated July 25th, 2008; she never even bothered sending the Appellant a copy until weeks later. She simply repeats the Board’s false assertions of incapacity without any reference to the facts in the case. For example she quotes the Board verbatim in her ruling, “that the Appellant is not able to appreciate that he is affected by the manifestations of a mental illness”; without indicating what those manifestations were. This was the Appellant’s repeated argument to her, [C. Transcript pages 9-30] that the doctor had failed to show any “objective” manifestations of an illness. Stanley impressed upon her that this was a unique case because it was the diagnosis itself that was being challenged; yet this bitch totally ignores the argument! Without giving any reasons or analysis. The bitch does mention The Appellant’s claim to have veto powers over certain laws of the land as a manifestation; but this is garbage! First of all the onus was on the physician making the diagnosis to make that case, not her; secondly it is part of the main diagnosis based on claiming kingship --manifestations have to be independent and objective evidence-- not something contentious. The evil Judge apparently disregarded Stanley’s lengthy explanation, that the Powers and Role of the King stem from Natural Law or British Common Law --which is defined as natural law. Canada is still governed by British Common Law, that is why the Queen is still our Head of State. In the C. Transcript pages 22-28, Stanley equates Hindu Natural Law (The Dama) with British Common Law; Common Law defines the role of the King and his powers: The King is personally sovereign, he is the head of state, he is the head of the armed forces, he is the fountain of all justice, he conducts foreign affairs between nations, he is immortal; and High Treason: to even compass or think about harming the King in any way is punishable by DEATH! Stanley was expanding common law principles to show that the King has natural de facto veto powers over the laws of the land; as demonstrated by Stanley’s veto over the Meech Lake Accord. This is a fact; the bitch has a right to disagree, but she cannot use it to disparage the Appellant as mentally ill for it. This veto power is so fundamental a power that it forces the Satanic Aryan System to expend ever greater violent force on the Appellant --at the high expense of their souls-- just in order to rule! (see Preamble) This was to rationally explain why the System have tried to murder Stanley for 29 years and counting. In fact the Dr. Gojer who made the diagnosis claimed, “With a single central delusion, which Mr. Almeida coherently tries to explain in a logical manner --but for the false nature of the belief he is the king of Canada-- it does not appear that he has any significant disorder outside this delusion”; [Exhibit#27 of RECORD pgs. 21-22] Thus this precludes the Appellant from having any manifestations of an illness, which is essential in proving a mental illness. The Doctor & Judge Mesbur fail to grasp the subtle difference in claiming to be the true King of Canada and seeking to seize the throne; and believing one is already on the throne of Canada. (Stanley asserts that Elizabeth II is not the legitimate Queen of Canada, --under Natural Law-- While Stanley is!) One is clearly a delusion the other is a perfectly rational assertion. She again quotes the Board’s insane false statements that Mr. Almeida’s decision to not want medication was because he was not mentally ill; Such Satanic misleading statements cannot be allowed to prevail by this Court. Because Stanley repeatedly told J., J. Mesbur and the Board that the reason he would suffer any consequence of not taking medication (including loss of freedom) was because of the death causing side-effects of the toxic “medications”. Yet none of this perspective was reflected in her or the Board’s analysis, except to callously dismiss it arbitrarily. see point 10. The main argument the Appellant made to Mesbur was that both the Board and the respondent used CJ., B. McLachlin’s false minority ruling to base their incapacity confirmation on the Appellant’s “best interests” as determined by them. See Court Transcript pgs. 31-48. Yet she totally ignores in her ruling, what was the main thrust of the Appellant’s case. She also ignores the issue of discharge; whereby the Appellant was discharged from hospital for over a month; yet the same finding was used to treat him from his previous admission. The proof of her Satanism and bias against the Appellant is when she blatantly lies: “Notwithstanding Mr. D’Almeida’s forceful argument to the contrary, this case is readily distinguishable from Starson v. Swayze. In that case the, the Appellant recognized that he suffered from a mental illness …” This is a Damned Lie! On page 9, of the Transcript: in beginning his submissions, the Appellant emphasized that “this was a unique case that you are not used to hearing, because the facts in this case are completely different than anything you have heard before.”; C. Transcript page 13-14, the Appellant states: “In Starson v. Swayze the Supreme Court is very specific to go into the diagnosis in question and to confirm the diagnosis before going into any kind of test for capacity. … the nature of the illness, which is a  manic depressive type of illness. And the difference between the Starson case and my case, is that Starson at some level does accept that he has -- has some sort of ‘condition’. … Mr. Starson believed he could design flying saucers that could defy gravity.  He had episodes of threatening death to his co-workers… so the question in his case never arose as to his diagnosis, because it was quite clear … that Mr. Starson was indeed mentally ill. So in that respect the cases are different … the difference is that in this case the diagnosis revolves around the Appellant’s claim he is the true King of Canada.”.  C. Transcript pg. 81, The Appellant again states: “this is where my case differed with Mr. Starson’s case. Mr. Starson is clearly a mentally ill person, he is clearly accepting of that fact in some way ... There is clear evidence that there is a tremendous amount of bizarre behaviour associated with him, and so that is where we part ways. Where the Supreme Court arguments is cogent for my case I do use it”. By catching her in this blatant LIE the Appellant has proved her bias, Stanley repeatedly states that Starson was accepting he had a “condition“, he had a long history of manic illness, he believed in flying saucers and gravity defying theories. Mathew Cohen thought the Judges in Whitby were biased against Stanley, so he moved the hearing to Toronto; it seems the Toronto Judges are as Devil Possessed and Satanic as Whitby’s. It seems it is J., Mesbur who needs to be tested for competence to remain on the Bench!

Basis for Kingship, In Brief (Preamble): Stanley. Antonio. Panduranga XVI. D'Almeida, has been continuously incarcerated in psychiatric hospitals (~21 yrs.) and prisons(9 yrs.) for a total of ~30 years And counting! For committing no crime nor being mentally ill. The Doctor and Board refused to address the cause of this incarceration but focused narrowly on the reality of it, and their solution is to medicate Stanley to death; (Stanley was not just merely incarcerated, the Institutions of the System tried to actively murder and torture him to death -- unlike their treatment of other inmates & patients!) The reason for this 30 year murderous persecution is fundamental to understanding this case and must be answered (below):
[[[ The correct name for the Hindu Religion is Sanatana DAma --which means The Eternal Law of Dama: The Dama is the Supreme Natural Law that operates the Universe. This Universe is based on This Supreme Power and Law regardless of what This Demonic System wishes. Stanley contends that The System that rules Canada and most of the world, is: Satanic, Devil-possessed, Demonic, Aryan-race dominated, anti-Dama, Lawless (except for Unjust laws and Satanic jurisprudence), Anarchical, Chaotic, Disorderly and evil; and must be destroyed. After the first eight years of the constant torture, abuse and attempted murder on his life, Stanley gained a genius insight!!: that the reason the Aryan-Saxon Satanic System were persecuting him so severely was because under This Natural Law Stanley had been ordained to be The True King of Canada; And as such had the De facto Power to telepathically veto and make all laws in the Land called Canada, (as 'natural' executor in chief of the will of the "Nation"); In order for The System to continue to rule on their Satanic agenda, (again under Natural Law) they had to use murderous physical force on Stanley to override his natural veto Powers; at the permanent expense of their souls and spiritual power --which Stanley absorbs through the practice of yoga-- until they are totally destroyed. In other words The System is Self-Destructing even as it rules, because it is a Satanic Illegitimate Power. (Note: This is no delusion, Stanley is not claiming absolute power at present; he provides for the temporary override of his veto power; The Courts and Doctor would have to prove this is a delusion --Which cannot be done. Yet the fact is the Meech Lake Accord remains the one law the System desperately wanted and was inexplicably denied; --Because of Stanley!!!) The idea that an oppressor loses his soul energy (proportionally) when committing an unjust and evil act, to the victim; is a well known principle in Hinduism and is the strategy Mohandas (Mahatma) Gandhi used to rid India of the British --he called it Satyagraha. It is the Permanent Power gained from sacrifice and suffering at the hands of evildoers --somewhat like Jesus on the cross. But unlike Jesus and Gandhi, Stanley and his dynasty are vengeful Kings, They will severely punish all those who transgressed against him; And will eventually rule Canada and this Earth with a rod of steel. There exists a Dama limit, a maximum of ~31 years, after which The System must release him from custody. The reason for this above natural law on kingship is to ensure that all acts in the land and this Earth are accountable to one man: The King]]]
Understanding this above concept lies at the crux of this case! and explains why Stanley has been incarcerated for 30 murderous years! The Doctor and Board [and Courts] failed to address the rationale of this above issue which is fatal to their case. The System and The D'Almeida Dynasty are locked in a death struggle, they cannot release Stanley, or he will automatically begin to rule; while he is getting stronger and more powerful by absorbing their energy while in custody. For example: Stanley did successfully exercise his veto Power on the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords; but his vetoes have been (temporarily) murderously overridden at other times (like on same-sex marriage and nuclear power). All Mr. D'Almeida is reasonably claiming to be is The True King of Canada under Natural Law --called The Dama-- there are no mental health grounds for labelling this a delusion nor is it grounds for lawful arrest or detention; The System is using the institutions of psychiatry and prisons in a Satanic scheme to cling to power and persecute the true King of Canada. Stanley does recognize that The Evil Aryan-Saxon Satanic System is in Power in Canada; and that Queen Elizabeth II is the legally and formally enthroned monarch of Canada --by the System; he does not dispute that most people may not know of his claim to Kingship, nor of the Dama (Dharma is an Brahman-Aryan bastardization of the word) or of Natural Law; Stanley is a sane sober individual simply stating the truth and making a serious rational and reasonable claim to the Throne. Why even mention being the King of Canada if it brings so much persecution? The reason is that they were persecuting him for eight years anyway, prior to his stating his claim to the future throne of Canada; he also wants people to envisage his kingship coming to pass, and so a proper transition of power can occur; rather than tumultuous anarchy; Stanley is laying out the groundwork for his future ascension to the throne. This above is an important point, the Doctors are now using Stanley's claim of Kingship to murderously incarcerate him for the last thirteen years; but this is not the cause of incarceration, it is an excuse! the System were incarcerating him repeatedly for 17 years prior, on false charges and false diagnoses, even before the issue of Kingship. The understanding and the evolution of Law in Canada is still in flux; Stanley has already greatly contributed to the Jurisprudence, understanding and the aetiology of Constitutional Law in Canada today and its future evolution. Ultimately it is he who makes all permanent law and final decisions pertaining to Canada. This Natural Law (The Dama) is nothing new to Canadians, we just know it as British Common Law Principles! The fact that Canada is a Monarchy and always will be one, is because there exists this law in nature. We are not a democracy, that is a delusion that our Satanic school system has indoctrinated us with. Stanley is simply expanding our understanding of common law principles, as some ancient King handed down British Common Law Thousands of years ago. Even from the earliest times common law principles had already established the position of the King as Head of State, with PREROGATIVES: He is personally Sovereign, He has supremacy over all others in his realm, He can do no wrong --Perfection, He can never die --immortality, He cannot be tried, He represents the state in foreign relations with nations, He is the Supreme part of the Legislature, the Head of the Army, the fountain of all justice, he is omnipresent in his courts, he is the fountain of honour, he is the arbiter of commerce, he is the head of the church, He is the Executor in Chief of our Modern Nation-State; To this Stanley has expanded common law to include: He has de facto Veto powers to: make, veto and proclaim, all laws in the land; He is the embodiment of the Law, the Son of the Dama, He is infallible, The new Christ, the white horseman of the apocalypse, the protector of the weak, the keeper of the true Human faith. He learned these from personal experience in vetoing the Meech Lake Accord. The notion of Kingship is universal, and is based on an intrinsic, all pervading, omnipresent, all powerful Natural Law Called the Dama. Above all this The British Treason Laws (1949): which are designed to protect the safety of the King’s person as Head of State. It is Treason to: (1) Levy war against the sovereign in his realm, (2) compasses or imagines the death of the sovereign, (3) compasses imagines or intends the death, or bodily harm, maiming, imprisonment or restraint of the sovereign, his heirs and successors; or expresses such compassing in printing or writing or by any overt act or deed. THE PUNISHMENT FOR TREASON IS DEATH!!! The problem with British Common Law is that it does not delineate who is the King, what happens with conflicting claims. They have allowed might to make right; No! Right makes Right! The Dama determines who is ordained to be King, and Stanley is the true King. Stanley states that Queen Elizabeth II, is an usurper of Stanley’s Divine Right To Rule! She is empowered by SATAN, the devil-possessed Aryan race, and an evil conspiracy; and not the legitimate Queen of Canada --Stanley is! Hell, she doesn’t even live in Canada --Stanley does! Because of this Dama Veto/Override Law: We can forever know who the true King is, by the need for the tyrant Queen to override the true King’s wishes by: persecuting, imprisoning, poisoning, placing him in her dungeons, crucifying him (like Christ) or trying to murder him: all while being Totally Innocent and Blameless! Stanley! The System may seem to be winning by murderously overriding Stanley's wishes; but it is a temporary victory borne at the expensive cost of their souls. He is an Honourable Man who should not be treated as a 'nutbar' and forcefully medicated unto death. The above is not new evidence, Stanley said much the same at the Board & Court Hearings, but some of it was butchered by the court reporter, so he is restating it here. The Appellant tried to explain the above position to the Board; [B. Transcript pgs:172174,199-200] and to the SCJ Court [Court Transcript pages 9-28] but they completely failed to grasp any of it; then they misquoted and misrepresented his position in their 'reasons for decision'; ['B. Reasons' pages: 4para.3, 5p.2, 6p.3, 7p.2, 11p.3] making their decision biased, one-sided, demonic, devil-possessed, suspect and weak. Both the Doctor and the Board failed to rationally communicate (have a meeting of the minds) with Mr. D'Almeida and treat him with the impartiality, fairness and justness he deserved. Stanley also has the charter fundamental right to freedom of thought, expression, belief and religion; thus he has a right to claim Kingship without being persecuted for it. For example a person has a right to want to be the prime minister of Canada without it being considered a delusion; so too Stanley wants to be The King of Canada and has a rational well planned strategy of attaining his goals, in the absence of a legal process for attaining kingship, it shows an intelligence level exceeding genius to overcome all the obstacles to becoming King. [See the Appellant’s website: www.thetruekingofcanada.com] In fact it is the majority of Canadians that are delusional for not comprehending or accepting that it is the Queen that is the Head of State with absolute Powers should she wish to exercise same. Real power is not to be gained from becoming prime minister but by becoming King! Can this be the strategy of a delusional man? This above preamble gives rise to two fundamental Issues which shatters the Board's case for confirming incapacity: ISSUES: Did the physician prove that the above claim to Kingship is a delusion? Did he prove that the concomitant disbelief in the illness, or the basis for the above claim to Kingship is not based on rational grounds? ARGUMENT CONTINUED BELOW:



14.)     ARGUEMENT: The onus is on the physician making the diagnosis to prove the mental illness; the court cannot assume the appellant is mentally ill simply for claiming kingship. On page 31 & 111-113 of the Transcript the Doctor defines the illness as a 'delusional disorder grandiose type', based on the fact Mr. D'Almeida claims to be the true King of Canada; The Doctor defines a delusional disorder "wherein an individual continues to harbour a fixed false belief not generally shared by other members of the community.“ The Appellant contends that This is a false and insufficient test for a delusional disorder because it is too general and is not specific to Mr. D'Almeida's circumstances; the 'community' have had no information on Stanley in particular, his basis for claiming kingship, his personal experiences, his religion, or on real politik and the True nature of The Satanic Aryan System, to make an informed belief one way or the other. The onus was on the Doctor to prove the illness not the public. For example the belief in reincarnation could be considered a fixed false belief under the Doctor's test. The Doctor should have broken down The Appellant's above claim to Kingship and made a case for why it is a delusion and or why it is not based on rational grounds. In the “preamble” above, this Appellant does give a rational basis for his claim to kingship; that had to have been addressed for an incapacity finding, and it was not. The real test for a delusion is that it can be proven so by particular evidence, scientific facts, reasonableness, 'manifestations of an illness', rationality, or logical argument; none of which the Doctor has done. A "condition of the mind" is relatively easy to prove as it has many 'manifestations'. Yet Dr. Gojer states, “With a single central delusion, which Mr. Almeida coherently tries to explain in a logical manner --but for the false nature of the belief he is the king of Canada-- it does not appear that he has any significant disorder outside this delusion”; [Exhibit#27 of B. RECORD pgs. 21-22] Thus there are no manifestations of an illness which is a requirement in Law to prove a mental “condition” exists. Stanley contends that the onus is on the Doctor to make a prima facie case on why the Appellant claiming to be the true King of Canada is a delusion or a mental illness, which he adamantly refused to do! He refused even to discuss it! Stanley was very much willing to debate the Doctor that his claim to being The True King of Canada was based on sound rational principles that attained the peak of intellectual understanding exceeding the Genius Level. The Appellant even has a website called www.thetruekingofcanada.com, where he rationally expounds on his plan to destroy the system and make himself King. The Doctor arrogantly refused to engage Stanley in a rational discussion on why he is claiming the Kingship of Canada, or on why this claim is a delusion, to base a valid decision on. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA in Starson v. Swayze [2003] pg. 22, para.91-92; Justice Major for the Majority: “The Board’s reasons … appear to be overly influenced by its conviction that medication was in Professor Starson’s best interest. The Board arrived at this conclusion by failing to focus on the overriding consideration in this appeal, that is, whether that adult patient had the mental capacity to choose whether to accept or reject the medication prescribed. The enforced injection of mind altering drugs against a person’s will is highly offensive to his dignity and autonomy, and is to be avoided … Although the Board found that he failed to appreciate the possibility that his condition could worsen; the respondent was never asked about this. …it was unreasonable without further inquiry that he was unable to appreciate that possibility.” The Court admonishes the Board for not asking the question and making assumptions about a person’s mental illness and capacity; which is exactly what the Doctor and Board did here. At the Hearing The Doctor never even attempts to prove with evidence how or why this belief is false or irrational; which is fatal to his whole incapacity case. The reason the hospital never engaged the Appellant in a rational discussion of his Kingship claim in all of his 13 years in custody, was because Stanley would prove his case! and they felt this would only reinforce his stance. But the Hospital cannot be allowed to win by disengaging in rational debate --it must be a loss. For all Courts must be guided by reason and not arbitrariness; judgements have to make sense to a reasonable man; making subjective findings while ignoring the point of view of the patient is unjust --and it must be seen to be so by all reasonable men. In Thomson v. Chan SCJ, [1999] Sedgwick J., pg. 8; The Counsel for Dr. Chan argued that the Board failed to consider whether Thomson does in fact suffer from a mental disorder. “The Board did not make an express finding that Thomson suffers from a mental disorder. In my view, however, such a finding is implicit in their decision and in their reasons.” Thus J. Sedgwick concurs that a Board or Court must Find the patient suffers from the disorder, in all such incapacity cases. In Starson v. Swayze SCC [2003] The issue of a “condition” is not in dispute as both the Supreme Court and the patient (Starson) accepted its existence; In the D’Almeida case there is a total lack of corroborating evidence to prove an illness exists. Dr. Gojer’s, who made the original diagnosis, claims “he sees no evidence of schizophrenia at this time”; [ Exhibit#27, pgs. 22] yet that was the diagnosis previous doctors had used to  incarcerate, murder and torture the Appellant for years [Exhibits 30-38]. Thus that diagnosis was now shown to be a false one; since the Appellant had never before been diagnosed with such a disorder (delusions of grandeur) in previous hospitalizations: it casts the whole diagnoses --past and present-- in doubt. This Court must not fail to see that there is a pattern of persecution here; with arbitrary ever changing diagnoses to keep the victim detained, tortured and murdered. The arrogance of the Doctor in refusing to debate, cannot be rewarded by this honorable court. For if what the Doctor claims as his central diagnosis the 'delusion of grandeur' has not been proven; the incapacity issue becomes null and void and need not be defended by the Appellant! There can be no incapacity without a proven mental illness. The Case law generally states that for incapacity to be proven the decision to take medication must be directly affected by the delusion; or similarly the non-belief in an illness must be shown to be not based on Rational Grounds, but on the delusion. [D'Almeida vs. Gojer(1999) S.C.J. August 14th, 1999, Ferguson J.; Starson v. Swayze(2003) SCC 722 Major J.;] Ferguson J., states: "it would not be sufficient to say the person lacked capacity solely because they denied any illness. The evidence would have to establish that the denial was caused by the illness and was not based on some rational ground." The onus is on the physician to also show certain 'manifestations of an illness' that are clearly indicative of an underlying mental condition or ‘disease of the mind‘, which he failed to do. Dr. Gojer further states, “outside of this delusion he has no significant thought disorder”; weakening his case; and which precludes the Appellant from having any manifestations of an illness. For a real thought disorder would manifest itself in a myriad of ways. Similarly, if the claim to Kingship is Rational, legitimate, reasonable, legally allowed and based on logical grounds; then Mr. D'Almeida cannot be found incapable.


5)    ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: Did the Board deceptively use and grossly misapply case law from The IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA's minority and majority ruling by failing to present any evidence or question Mr. D'Almeida about any so called 'manifestations of an illness'; and by further by failing to show an inability to recognize that he might be affected by the manifestations of an illness???
5)     For this argument it is vital to define
'manifestations of an illness': It is Certain bizarre 'incidents' and behaviors, somatic symptoms, hallucinations, hearing voices, independent evidence from the diagnosis that can clearly demonstrate a mental illness or 'condition of the mind' is present. The Appellant has to be afforded the right to accept that he is affected by a "condition" even though he does not have to characterize it as an "illness". (Starson v. Swayze(2003) see 722 Major J.;] In Starson v. Swayze [2003] SCC, pg 20, para. 79; Justice Major: “a patient need not agree with the diagnosis of the attending physician, in order to apply the relevant information to his own circumstances. Psychiatry is not an exact science, [an understatement!] and “capable but dissident interpretations of information” are to be expected: see Weisstub Report. While a patient need not agree with a particular diagnosis, if it is demonstrated that he has a mental “condition”, the patient must be able to recognize the possibility that he is affected by that condition:
          Condition refers to the broader manifestations of the illness rather than the existence of  a discrete diagnosable pathology. The word condition allows the requirement for understanding to focus on the objectively discernable manifestations of the illness rather than the interpretation that is made of these manifestations.“
 In the original supreme court case Mr. Starson is confronted with 'incidents' from his past that were clearly indicative of mentally ill behavior; and he was given an opportunity to rationally explain his behavior or accept that he could suffer from a "condition". Unfortunately Mr. D'Almeida was never given this same opportunity; the reason for this is very informative to this court: there did not exist any 'manifestations of an illness' in Mr. D'Almeida, who is a totally rational sane man!!! The Board is being deliberately deceptive in quoting from the supreme court ruling in a false manner; because all along their test for competency was this: They asked Stanley if he believed he had an illness, when he said "no"; they then concluded he could not appreciate that he could get better with medication therefore he is incapable! [see overview] Their whole 'analysis' is verbiage to camouflage this fundamental truth. The Board's 'analysis' is woefully lacking in facts, understanding and fairness: The Board is falsely quoting and relating a 'Supreme Court Minority Ruling' to Mr. D'Almeida's situation; on page 10 para. 1, in their 'analysis' the Board uses the excerpt from Starson v. Swayze [2003] 1 S.C.R. 722, in a biased manner -and without evidence to support this contention-that "Mr. A's illness has stolen his ability to process the information that he might be affected by a mental illness or any other manifestation of a mental illness". How so??? Even The Doctor did not make such a contention or give evidence of such a leap of logic; note here the Board does make a distinction between the mental illness (claim to Kingship) and manifestations of an illness. The Supreme Court Minority ruling being referred to: "a patient is not required to describe his mental condition as an 'illness' ... nor to agree with the attending physician's opinion regarding the cause of the condition. Nonetheless, if the patient's condition results in him being unable to recognize that he is affected by its manifestations, ... "; For the above to apply to the Appellant, the onus is on the physician and Board to first show that there were manifestations of an 'illness', give him. a chance to explain them or recognize them as a 'condition' affecting him, and also show the patient's inability to recognize them --which they did not do!!! Mr. D'Almeida was never specifically asked if he recognized any 'manifestations' of an illness affecting him. This is crucial for this whole case: The reason the honorable Supreme Court mentioned this clause is that a truly mentally ill person has a 'disease of the mind' that will manifest itself in many independent ways; and thus it is relatively easy to prove there exists an illness; it is grossly unfair to Mr. D'Almeida to label him mentally ill when he exhibits no proven manifestations of illness. The claim to Kingship is the basis for the diagnosis in question it is not a manifestation of the illness; and the supreme court had already ruled that the person does not have to accept the primary diagnosis as an illness, to be capable. The Doctor was already using this claim of Kingship to prove an illness, an NCR finding, as well as incapacity; which was already grossly unfair to the appellant --he cannot also use it to prove 'manifestations of an illness' as well. The jurisprudence on this is that 'manifestations of an illness' must be independent of the diagnosis and be clearly evident of mental illness or 'condition of the mind'; a rational claim to kingship is not in that category. The underlying argument that the Appellant is making is that the Doctor and Board were making vacuous assertions and not relating it to actual evidence and to the mental illness and primary diagnosis in question which was the claim of being the King of Canada. The unique concept of the psychiatrist's characterization of Stanley's illness is that it is based solely on his claim that he is the true King of Canada; unlike the usual diagnosis done on most other patients where their illness causes them to behave in a criminal, irrational, clearly mentally ill, or vexatious manner, i.e. they exhibit manifestations of the illness as well. The Doctor is basically persecuting Stanley for this one legitimate claim rather than for any abnormal, illogical or criminal behavior from a genuine mental illness. A mental illness should exhibit bizarre behavior, somatic (auditory or visual hallucinations, hearing voices) or physical characteristics and irrational beliefs that can be provable as irrational; (the honorable court would call these 'manifestations' of an illness) and not be solely based on a person's contrary views to one's own. Stanley is open to debate upon these issues but the Doctor nor the Board engaged him seriously in a rational discussion. Mr. D'Almeida has two volumes of writings which he can present to court, in which he can rationally explain why he claims he is the King of Canada, or more correctly a legitimate contender to becoming the future King of Canada. The bottom line is that the Supreme Court states that a patient does not have to believe he has an illness to be capable; the onus was on the Doctor to refute with rational argument why a person cannot make a claim to the Kingship of Canada without being labelled mentally ill or incapable and persecuted for this claim; And he should show with evidence certain 'manifestations of the illness'. The standard for review of the Board's decision has been met because The Board misapplied the law, the Doctor made no contention that Mr. D'Almeida suffered from 'manifestations of an illness', nor did he present evidence of such, let alone an inability to recognize same. Mere assertions by the Board without facts do not meet the test for correctness or reasonableness, and Mr Almeida should be found competent to consent to psychiatric treatment. [see Transcript pages:172-174,177-178]


On page 207 of the Transcript Stanley states, " I'm suffering tremendously and going to a group home is all he [Dr. Baron] has to offer me with medication. That's not acceptable to me. I'd rather stay here and wait until I'm given an absolute discharge than to get out under a conditional discharge into a group home. I do appreciate what he is saying, I understand that, but I'm willing to accept those consequences. I do understand it ... But my decision is that not being on medication is much more important to me. It's a question of quality of life."

4)      ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: The Appellant contends that in order to use the April 29th, 1998, Finding to treat Mr. D'Almeida; The Doctor and the Board should have to demonstrate that he was continuously incapable for the past eight years. Did the Doctor prove Mr. D'Almeida incapable for eight years, since April 29th, 1998?
4) On Page72 of the B. Transcript the Board chairwoman seems to think that incapacity need only be proven for 2006; yet to cover her arse, she, in 'reasons for decision' page 6 pp3, and The Doctor on page 151 of the transcript attempt to claim --without proof-- that Mr. D'Almeida was probably continuously incapable 'since he knew him' --from December 2004. In this above, they again used the wrong test for capacity by equating the Appellant's claim to Kingship and disbelief in an illness with incapacity. The Appellant takes the position that in order to use the original finding the Doctor must prove continuous incapacity since April 1998 --which he did not do. If Mr. D'Almeida did regain capacity --however briefly-- the long appeal of the April 1998 finding would become moot; he legally would regain his right to make treatment decisions; and the Hospital would have to make a new finding in order to treat him, if he lost capacity at a later date. To be fair, The reason February 2006 incapacity is insufficient, is because Mr. D'Almeida lost his s.18(3) (HCCAct) protection against forced treatment pending an appeal, only because the incapacity appeal cycled to the supreme court back to the Board after eight long years; The loss of a statutory protection must have a quid pro quo which would require continuity by the Doctor(s) making the finding. Further, Since Mr. D'Almeida was discharged from May 22nd, 1998 - June 18th, 1998; there is no way to prove this; as The Common Law and s.4(2) of The Health Care Consent Act(1996) 'Presumption of competence' makes Stanley competent during this time. s.15(2) of The HCCAct states that "capacity is dependent on time"; The statutes clearly provide for a fluid notion of capacity. The Appellant should at the least be given a new finding and a de novo application to the Board. The Doctor became the treating physician only since December of 2004; [Transcript pg. 150] he was hardly able to give continuity to a treatment regimen or assessment done eight years prior. Dr. Barron should have consulted previous physicians caring for Mr. D'Almeida, there is no indication or evidence that he did. Since Dr. Gojer in 1998, Stanley has had Doctors: Dr. Rehaluk, Dr. Leslie Wright, Dr. Byers and Dr. Barron who all should have been consulted. If Mr. D'Almeida did regain capacity or if there is any doubt --the benefit of the doubt goes to the patient-- the finding is voided; and the February 6th, 2006, Decision by the Board must be overturned by this Court. Mr. Cohen had also made argument that the long passage of time made the Finding a very weak one; yet it was being used to force treatment on Mr. D'Almeida in abject disregard of Statutes, Justice and fairness. The Appellant asks that the April 29th, finding be thrown out with a new finding ordered, where s.18 protections would apply. [See Exhibits #11 & #8]

The FACTS and LAW for the DISCHARGE ISSUE:
A) In Almeida vs. Musisi, J., E.R. Lovekin; July 22nd, 1988; (The Appellant has the Court Transcript, and the whole Transcript in his Superior Court Factum) Janice Blackburn states "there is a presumption of competence in the act, competency is dependent on time and place, competency is a fluid concept, it comes and goes; were the appellant to be hospitalized an hour after discharge the hospital could not use the previous finding to determine how Mr. Almeida should be treated in future; that would be totally unfair and in my view totally abusive" .
B) The HCCAct, (1996)5.4(2) states, "A person is presumed to be competent with respect to a treatment, admission to a care facility and personal assistance services."
C) The HCCAct 5.15(2) states, "A person may be incapable with respect to a treatment at one time and capable at another. "
D) Under The Hospital's own 'Policies and Procedures' a new assessment for capacity must be done on each new admission. 
E) Section 34 of The Mental Health Act, (1990) states, "A patient shall be discharged from a psychiatric facility when he is no longer in need of the observation, care and treatment provided therein. 
F) Sections 6,7, & 8, of The M.H.A, (1990) states, "this Act retains primacy over all other acts pertaining to psychiatric facilities and treatment."
G) The Appellant was discharged on May 22nd, 1988; after less than 30 days of a 60 day remand inclusive of the next court date.
H) In the Transcript of the Board Hearing of May 8th, 1998; Dr. Gojer states:
"Q. So without treatment, he would just continue on in this ward.
He will continue on in this ward until the expiry of his form 8.
Expiry of Form 8. A. That's right."  [Exhibit#27, pg.25]       
(His form 8 would expire on June 27th, 1998; yet the Appellant was suddenly discharged on May 22nd, 1998! Why??? Because The Dr. Had Found Him Competent!!!)
I)     On May 21st -22nd the Appellant had
filed a brilliant, incisive, hard-hitting "Notice of Appeal" to Whitby Superior Court of Justice, (In The Court Record) that called the Dr.'s whole finding into question; He and the staff concluded that Mr. D’Almeida was not so mentally-ill and incompetent as at first appearance; and decided he was competent at this time.
J) Under s.34 of The MHA. It is mandatory not to release a patient in need of treatment, that is not competent nor taking treatment via an SDM, from the hospital; unless against medical advice.
K)     'Supporting Evidence' Exhibits# 31-38:
prove that on every discharge the Doctor in question concludes that the patient was "competent and no longer a danger, or certifiable" --this is standard procedure.
L)     In A.M. v. Benes, [1998] O.J. No.4333,
DRS 98-19171, (SCJ): J., Sutherland; “the patient discharged from the psychiatric facility. The issue therefore became moot, within the meaning given to that term in Borowski v. Canada [1989] 1 SCR 342." --this jurisprudence is current.
               In A.M. v. Benes, [1999] 46O.R. (3d)271 O.J.4236 (O.C.A.) JJA. Abella, Laskin & Moldaver pg 3: “had the administration law issues not been rendered moot by the discharge of the patient …
               In L.L. v. I.T. [1998] O.J. No.4205 Sutherland J., pg. 3: (regarding a patient found incapable, whose SDM was refusing consent to treatment) `patient … recovered sufficiently to be discharged from the psychiatric facility. The issue therefore became moot within the meaning in Borowski v. Canada (1989).
M)     Most Important: there is a common
law presumption of competence; that is binding on all Courts of Law.
N)     The Fundamental Fact For This Issue
Is: There Are No Provisions in The MHAct, (2000); For forced psychiatric treatment of an incapable person -with the use of an SDM to give consent--outside of a
psychiatric facility as defined by The MHAct.

ARGUMENT ON DISCHARGE ISSUE:
In J., Ferguson's 'Reasons for Judgment' he makes a preposterous argument: 'under The HCCA. 1996; all Jurisprudence has changed and that a finding of incompetence remains in effect forever until there is a subsequent order of the Board finding capacity'. He also states falsely that "The HCCA. alone determines when treatment may be given"; and he justifies this absurdity by saying, "section 24 of The HCCA. makes this clear." He does admit that the learned Doctor "gave testimony about his understanding of the law on this issue and holds a different view, and that he thinks he is wrong." The Appellant will refute this nonsense forthwith: s. 6,7,&8, of The MHAct 2000, clearly claims supremacy to all other acts regarding psychiatric treatment; there exist no provisions under the act to forcefuly treat incapable patients --by the use of an SDM-- outside of a psychiatric facility; thus a finding of incapacity is legally meaningless outside of a hospital --unless it is followed up with a committal, admission and a new finding in the hospital. J., Ferguson fails to appreciate the difference between types of treatment; and types of incapacities: usually grouped into three categories: (1) treatment, (2) admission to a care facility, and (3) personal assistance services. The HCCAct. refers to all types of incapacities that do continue outside of a hospital, The Appellant concedes this; But Psychiatric Treatment because of its invasion of security of the person and imposition of toxic chemicals constituting cruel and unusual punishment, must follow strict protocols according to the fundamental principles of Justice. The Judge invokes s.24 falsely, since it clearly is intended to apply to personal care, admission to a care facility, and medical treatment incapacities; in fact it severely restricts its application to psychiatric treatment in s.24(2) "to a guardian or attorney for personal care who have specific authority to consent to the admission". This section was meant to deal with the elderly, mentally handicapped, senile, infirm, and children under 16 years of age. It would rarely if ever apply to a psychiatric patient; but since the HCCAct was intended to apply to all types of incapacity the wording is deceivingly generalized. J., Ferguson fails also to appreciate the different types of treatments referred to in this section: The Health Care Consent Act 1996, defines treatment as anything that is done for, "therapeutic, preventive,. palliative, diagnostic, cosmetic, or other health related purposes" and includes a course or plan of treatment. Thus the Appellant contends that this section does not apply to his circumstances of discharge. Under the new committal criteria in Bill 68 (Brian's law) a finding of incapacity is now necessary before committal, but the circumstances are entirely different than those of the Appellant;. And further there is onus on the hospital to follow up such a finding with admission, committal and treatment. Under Bill 68 CTOs or Community Treatment Orders, a patient who fits the criteria for committal can be released into the community under an Undertaking of a community treatment plan, with his consent or the consent of his SDM; But here again these circumstances do not apply to the Appellant --who was not subject to a CTO -- as this type of patient is still considered to be detained in the hospital, and not discharged. In any case this law only came into effect on June 23rd, 2000; under crazier than a box full of nuts Elizabeth Witmer and crazy Mike Harris [Actually the most evil, Satanic Premiers in history were Ernie Eaves and Bill Davis]; and do not apply to the Appellant. Bill 68 was a very ill advised piece of legislation in the mean style of Mike Harris: intended to Persecute and Torture The Mentally ill; and is not helpful to what had been a steady improvement in mental health law. No-one will use Bill 68 or CTOs because it is unenforceable and meaningless. This is a repeat of how Harris made it easier: to evict and jail tenants; to fine and jail squeegee kids, the homeless and pan-handlers; to kill natives --The Dudley George Inquiry; to cut welfare benefits and give it to the rich; to cut environmental protection and increase halogen toxins; to close the proposed dump site in Pickering and truck garbage to Michigan ...
The notion of forced psychiatric treatment is a horrific one, This Court must not be frivolous in interpreting the provisions of mental-health law like J., Ferguson did. This is a matter of life or death (see Issue 10). The bottom line is that if the Doctor was at all serious about his finding of incompetence, he would not have discharged the Appellant, without compelling reasons to do sol The only logical explanation is he felt the Appellant was competent at the time; and then was forced to reverse himself due to outside forces beyond his control. Further proof of this is that Dr, Gojer did make another finding of incompetence on July 21st, 1998; (See Exhibit#1 pg 35) thus admitting that the previous one was moot; He even admitted this in Court as J., Ferguson concedes in his 'Reasons'. But since the Board determined that the circumstances of the Appellant had not changed -vis-a-vis incapacity ---and six months had not elapsed, they refused to hear that appeal, rightly so! Even if this Court wanted to be procedurally fair to the hospital they cannot prevail, for they chose to accept the appeal of the May 8th, '98; Board as valid; after trying to use the July 21st, 1998; finding to treat the Appellant; from this date to Oct. 7th, 1998; but chose not to, or were foiled by the Appellant. Stanley would rather be incarcerated in hospital than be released into the community under forced treatment. So that when he is released (as they have to release him sometime) he will be free. For the sake of mental health jurisprudence in Ontario This Court with respect must rule in the Appellant's favor. Since there a need for consistency and clarity in mental health jurisprudence everywhere: this Court must rule in the Appellant’s favor: That an incapacity finding lapses on discharge.

3) The Doctor labelled disagreement with him vis-à-vis medications as incapacity; which The Appellant attests is the wrong test for capacity. The main issue here is that the doctor needed to present evidence that the Appellant's decision on medication was based on the delusion and not on rational grounds. ; (although he believed he would get privileges and be released even if he did not take medication) Mr. D'Almeida's decision on medication was independent of whether or not he thinks he is mentally ill; which is the sole basis for the Board confirming incapacity. He would rather stay healthy in the Hospital without treatment then to be treated into a death-like state, without any self-respect or dignity in the community. The Appellant was so depressed and suffering after forced medication, that at one point he was contemplating suicide. Another point Stanley made to the Board is that Stanley is performing' satyagraha', he is absorbing their soul energy, by being in murderous custody under the System, (see above) which is resulting in the utter destruction of the System; there is no purpose to be released into the community unless it is concomitant with the total destruction of the System and his ascension to the throne of Canada; or the Dama maximum custodial sentence has been reached. Stanley wants to be released, but not on any terms, The Board was so biased that it also dismissed Mr. Cohen's argument that the medication had no tangible affect; especially on Mr. D'Almeida's claim of Kingship which was the primary diagnosis; and there seemed no justification for forcing medication on a person simply to make him suffer. Whereas it did cause numerous side effects: tremors,  The decision against medication had nothing to do with his claim of kingship; nor had it to do primarily with the fact that he did not consider himself mentally ill, as the Board and Doctor try to imply falsely. The fact is that all the evidence the Doctor produced was that Stanley disagreed with him on the benefits of medication; but he has the right to disagree and still be capable supra. [Starson v. Swayze(2003) see 722 Major J.;] Similarly in Mr. D'Almeida's case the Board misapprehended his reasoning, and falsely attributed to Mr. D'Almeida statements made by Dr. Barron. The case law is consistent that in order to prove incapacity the physician must show that the decision on medication is based on the delusion and not on rational grounds. Nowhere did the Doctor even attempt to do this; instead the Board and Doctor tellingly use their own "false test for incompetence" to find Mr. D'Almeida incapable, solely because he does not believe he has an illness; In an attempt to bury their heads in the sand and avoid conforming to accepted jurisprudence. Their whole case against the Appellant is superficial, hollow and vacuous; and will fall apart with rigorous scrutiny by the court of the evidence.


Mr. D'Almeida's position vis-a-vis medications has been consistent and unchanged for 23 years: (1) They would significantly harm his health and body, they are highly toxic; (2) They would not affect his length of stay in hospital; (3) The period he would have to take them would be indefinite and still the doctors would never be satisfied; (4) That it would have no effect on his thinking or behaviour; (5) It would cause incredible pain and suffering and loss of dignity and self respect, without any corresponding benefits. [See exhibits 30-38] In the transcript Mr. D'Almeida made it clear repeatedly that he was suffering immensely, both physically and psychologically, from the side-effects of the medication and was so depressed he was at one point contemplating suicide. The Board is so incorrect in their analysis that they can be accused of lying to support their false test for capacity.

Supreme Court of Canada Vancouver (City) v. Ward (July 23rd, 2010) held that damages may be awarded for a breach of Charter rights, even where public officials have not acted in bad faith and the individual has not suffered any monetary damages. In a unanimous decision, the Court noted that section 24(1) of the Charter gives courts of competent jurisdiction a broad power to grant “appropriate and just” remedies for Charter breaches. Prior jurisprudence held that an appropriate and just remedy will:
(1) meaningfully vindicate the rights and freedoms of the claimants;
(2) employ means that are legitimate within the framework of Canada's constitutional democracy;
(3) be a judicial remedy which vindicates the right while invoking the function and powers of a court; and
(4) be fair to the party against whom the order is made.
The Court concluded that damages for breach of a claimant’s Charter rights may meet these conditions:
They may meaningfully vindicate the claimant’s rights and freedoms. They employ a means well-recognized within our legal framework. They are appropriate to the function and powers of a court. And, depending on the circumstances and the amount awarded, they can be fair not only to the claimant whose rights were breached, but to the state which is required to pay them. I therefore conclude that s. 24(1) is broad enough to include the remedy of damages for Charter breach. That said, granting damages under the Charter is a new endeavour, and an approach to when damages are appropriate and just should develop incrementally. Charter damages are only one remedy amongst others available under s. 24(1), and often other s. 24(1) remedies will be more responsive to the breach.
The Court held that, where a Charter breach has been established, a functional approach must be taken to determining whether a remedy of damages would be appropriate. That is, for damages to be awarded, they must further the general objects of the Charter as reflected in three interrelated functions that damages may serve:
The function of compensation, usually the most prominent function, recognizes that breach of an individual’s Charter rights may cause personal loss which should be remedied. The function of vindication recognizes that Charter rights must be maintained, and cannot be allowed to be whittled away by attrition. Finally, the function of deterrence recognizes that damages may serve to deter future breaches by state actors.
If it is determined that an award of damages would fulfill one or more of the related functions of compensation, vindication of the right, and/or deterrence of future breaches, the state will have an opportunity to convince the court that countervailing factors, such as the existence of alternative remedies or concerns for good governance, would render an order of damages inappropriate or unjust in the particular circumstances of a case.
Finally, where it has been determined that damages should be awarded, the quantum of damages must also be appropriate and just having regard to the principles of compensation, vindication and deterrence. In some cases, the Court noted, the claimant’s losses will be non-pecuniary. While harder to measure, such losses are not by that reason to be rejected. "Pain and suffering are compensable. Absent exceptional circumstances, compensation is fixed at a fairly modest conventional rate, subject to variation for the degree of suffering in the particular case." The Court concluded:
...[T]o be “appropriate and just”, an award of damages must represent a meaningful response to the seriousness of the breach and the objectives of compensation, upholding Charter values, and deterring future breaches. The private law measure of damages for similar wrongs will often be a useful guide. However, as Lord Nicholls warns in Ramanoop ... “this measure is no more than a guide because . . . the violation of the constitutional right will not always be coterminous with the cause of action at law”
Applying these principles to the facts In this case, the Court held that the $5000 in damages ordered for the strip search was appropriate:
In this case, the need for compensation bulks large. Mr. Ward’s injury was serious. He had a constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, which was violated in an egregious fashion. Strip searches are inherently humiliating and degrading regardless of the manner in which they are carried out and thus constitute significant injury to an individual’s intangible interests ...
The corrections officers’ conduct which caused the breach of Mr. Ward’s Charter rights was also serious. Minimum sensitivity to Charter concerns within the context of the particular situation would have shown the search to be unnecessary and violative. Mr. Ward did not commit a serious offence, he was not charged with an offence associated with evidence being hidden on the body, no weapons were involved and he was not known to be violent or to carry weapons. Mr. Ward did not pose a risk of harm to himself or others, nor was there any suggestion that any of the officers believed that he did. In these circumstances, a reasonable person would understand that the indignity resulting from the search was disproportionate to any benefit which the search could have provided. In addition, without asking officers to be conversant with the details of court rulings, it is not too much to expect that police would be familiar with the settled law that routine strip searches are inappropriate where the individual is being held for a short time in police cells, is not mingling with the general prison population, and where the police have no legitimate concerns that the individual is concealing weapons that could be used to harm themselves or others...






15.)       ISSUE: Did the Board, The SCJ Court and the Respondent’s Lawyer base their decision confirming incapacity on “best interests” and the patient’s non-belief in an illness; which the supreme court and others, have ruled is the wrong test for capacity?
          Argument: The Board and Respondent have used a cunning and evil ploy, in slipping a discredited minority ruling by CJ., B. McLachlin as their own basis for incapacity. Why? Because Ms. McLachlin has introduced a Satanic concept into legal circles that: It is a high “societal value” to force Medical as well as psychiatric treatment on individuals; She is an absolute Satanist; in that she believes the police state can do whatever it wants to us; and that we do not have any rights. By ignoring the majority decision In Starson v. Swayze [2003] SCC 32, pg. 25, para. 108; Ms. Mclachlin used best interests as her basis for finding incapacity, and she was severely admonished by J., Major of the majority decision for doing so, he states: “I disagree with the conclusion of my colleague, McLachlin C.J. Her reasons with respect, appear to disregard the bulk of Professor Starson’s testimony…Although McLachlin C.J. accepts that the respondent was aware of his condition and its manifestations, she concludes that his denial of an illness renders him incapable. The conclusion of his incapacity is founded on his disagreement with the diagnosis of his physicians. In my respectful view, this was the error the Board made. The conclusion of the Board adopted by McLachlin C.J. comes from an appraisal of the patient’s best interests rather than whether the evidence established his capacity to decide.”
The current Board under Karen Lindsay-Skynner clearly have followed McLachlin in using ‘best interests to determine capacity; In the “Record of Appeal” on page 11-12 of her ‘Reasons for Decision’ she states:
           “The evidence of Dr. Barron was, that as a consequence of a lack of treatment, Mr A. would begin to deteriorate as quickly as in two weeks or as long as two months time. Mr. A’s delusions would increase in number , he would become less cooperative and less able to relate to others.     
“In contrast the consequences that Mr. A listed were quite opposite. He stated that if he were not taking the medication he would improve and would not be depressed or suicidal. He would have an increased quality of life and decreased suffering. …
          “In the opinion of the Board, both Dr. Baron and Mr. A (D’Almeida) provided evidence about a completely different list of consequences. Mr. A was only able to appreciate his own list of consequences and was unable to appreciate Dr. Baron’s. The Board gave more weight to Dr. Baron’s list of consequences…”
           “Mr. Cohen argued that Mr A had been in hospital for years without treatment and had not deteriorated during this time. As a result Mr. A appreciated there would be no deterioration. … and there was no evidence that the treatment altered the central fixed belief that Mr. A was the King of Canada.”
         “Respectfully the panel disagreed … Clearly, Mr. A’s behaviour improved in hospital, even without medication, as compared to outside hospital. However, Dr. Baron said that Mr A had made significant further progress since treatment began. Mr. A was unable to appreciate this benefit. As a result he was unable to appreciate that a failure to agree to treatment would result in corresponding deterioration.” [code word for best interests: deterioration]
          “The Board concluded that it was possible that Mr. A did have the ability to appreciate some of the negative consequences regarding side-effects and the corresponding positive benefits of not taking medication. However this limited appreciation without the further ability to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable consequences of treatment did not result in capacity.”
The basis for this Satanic reasoning comes from Beverly McLachlin C.J.; Skynner is adopting McLachlin’s “actual appreciation” model, in that if you do not accept the Dr.‘s and her version of the benefits of medication you lack appreciation and are incapable; and it is in your best interests to force treatment on you. The problem is if the appellant accepted the Dr.‘s version of benefits of treatment, he wouldn’t be appealing his finding in the first place! The Board’s callous dismissal of Mr. D’Almeida’s perspective regarding the side-effects of the medication is “unreasonable in law” as well and a reviewable error for this Court to rule the Appellant capable. Surely 30 years of being forcefully medicated makes his appreciation of consequences deserving of respect. Let us review McLachlin’s views from Starson v. Swayze 2003 pg. 5, para. 6: “The second value is effective medical treatment -- that people who are ill should receive treatment and that illness itself should not deprive an individual from leading a full and complete life.” This is not a “value” recognized in Canadian jurisprudence but a concoction from McLachlin; she does play lip service to the value of “autonomy” but trumps that by stating if a person is incapable he must lose autonomy; and she determines incapacity by “best interests”! She crystallizes her Satanism with her belief in “actual understanding and appreciation”; She quotes Professor Weisstub:
          “… there is a strong feeling that the distinction between actual understanding and (appreciation) the ability to understand one’s situation is merely a theoretical point. While it may be generally true that actual understanding is an appropriate guide of the ability to understand, the distinction could still be important, for example, for patients who would be able to understand their situation if sedated somewhat less, or, of course, for those who have not received complete information about their situation.”
Thus McLachlin believes if the patient is given all the information he must come to a fixed, definite conclusion! As determined by her and the doctor, else he is incapable. This is Satanic jurisprudence! She states pg.7 para. 16: “The patient must be able to acknowledge his or her symptoms in order to be able to understand the information relevant to a treatment decision.” Thus her model for finding incapacity is simple: If you don’t come to the “right conclusion”; If you don’t believe you are mentally ill; If you do not accept that medication will make you better, then you should be forced to receive treatment. On pages 8-16, She goes on to defend a clearly biased Board who used “best interests” as determined by Two Courts of Law including the SCC; because she too believes in using best interests to determine capacity! On page10, pp32, she states. “Starson was in denial about his mental illness, … his denial was compounded by … refusal to acknowledge  any benefits of medication whatsoever, even in the abstract. Although I base my opinion that the Board’s decision was reasonable primarily on Mr. Starson’s clear lack of appreciation of the foreseeable consequences of refusing treatment, he also appears to have lacked the ability … Like a cancer patient advised to undergo chemotherapy or a diabetic advised to inject insulin, a mentally ill patient advised to take antipsychotic medication must be able to understand its benefits and drawbacks in order to be deemed capable of making a treatment decision. … requires a willingness to  follow the scientific evidence regarding its effectiveness.” McLachlin like the Board, insists the patient must accept the benefits of treatment, and must accept he is mentally ill, else he is incapable. On page 11-12 of their “Analysis” the Appellant’s Board (Skynner) said exactly the same thing: that they gave more weight to Dr. Baron’s consequences than Mr. A‘s, which Mr. A did not appreciate, therefore he was incapable. The Satanic foreshadowing in McLachlin’s statement above, is her reference to medical treatment: the Satanic bitch clearly intends to force people refusing medical treatment to be forced to do so; based on this Satanic logic! Section 21(2) of the HCC Act defines best interests, McLachlin is clearly using s.21(2)(c) verbatim to base her decision on treatment and capacity; and it was insightful of J., Major to ferret her basis out; But even in using best interests, McLachlin is using the worst aspects of those s.21 clauses, that deny any say of the patient in treatment (totally Satanic). On pg12pp38, She concurs with that (Starson’s) board’s conclusions: that Starson was not able to appreciate the consequences of refusing treatment because he lacked the ability to appreciate three things: (1) the possible benefits of the medication, (2) absent medication he would never return to his previous level of functioning and would continue to deteriorate, and (3) the relationship between lack of treatment and future dispositions by the Review Board. Justice Major shoots her down: Starson v. Swayze (2003) pg19pp75-76: “the right to refuse unwanted medical treatment is fundamental to a person’s dignity and autonomy, this right is equally important in the context of treatment for mental illness. [see Fleming v. Reid (1991), 4O.R.(3d) 74(C.A.), per Robins J.A. at pg. 88]:
          “Few medical procedures can be more intrusive than the forcible injection of powerful mind altering drugs which are often accompanied by severe and sometimes irreversible side-effects.”
“Unwarranted findings of incapacity severely infringe upon a person’s right to self determination. … the legislative mandate of the board is to adjudicate solely upon a person’s capacity. The Board’s conception of the patient’s best interests is irrelevant to that determination.” On pg20pp77 he quotes Professor Weisstub:
       “The tendency to conflate mental illness with lack of capacity, which occurs to an even greater extent when involuntary commitment is involved, has deep historical roots … even with changes in the law over the past twenty years, attitudes and beliefs have been slow to change. For this reason it is particularly important that autonomy and self determination be given priority when assessing individuals in this group.”
      J., Major continues to hammer away at her, pg21, para.80-81, quoting L.H. Roth et al: “from the proposed treatment, the foreseeable benefits and risks, alternative courses of action and the expected consequences of not having treatment. From these parameters if the patient shows appreciation for them --regardless of whether he weighs or values the information differently from the physician and disagrees with the treatment recommendation --he has the ability to appreciate the decision he makes.”     … a patient’s failure to demonstrate actual appreciation, does not lead to a conclusion of incapacity. … A finding of incapacity is justified only if those reasons demonstrate that the patient’s mental disability prevents him from having the ability to appreciate consequences of the decision.”
       J., Major comes to the heart of the matter: pg.22 para.91-92: The Board … seems to be overly influenced by its conviction that medication was in Mr. Starson’s best interests … it failed to focus on the overriding consideration in in this appeal, that is, whether the adult patient had the mental capacity to choose whether to accept or reject the medication prescribed. The enforced injection of mind-altering drugs against the respondent’s will is highly offensive to his dignity and autonomy, and is to be avoided unless it is demonstrated he lacked the capacity to make his own decision.” In the Board Transcript [Pages: 96,99,153] the Doctor Barron, describes the Appellant as a very intelligent man; and Dr. Gojer also describes the Appellant [Exhibit#27 pg.23] “in my conversations with him, he comes across as being an articulate and intelligent person, quite pleasant to converse with.” The Appellant is a Graduate from the University of Toronto, with a Double Specialist Degrees in Zoology and Computer Science! Surely he has the “Mental Capacity” to choose whether to accept or reject medication?! On the benefits of treatment Starson states pg23 para98: “medication attempts have always been the most horrible experiences of my life”. J., Major conclude by stating both C.J., McLachlin and the Board improperly allowed their own conception of Professor Starson’s best interests to influence their findings of incapacity; and they failed to show he had an inability to appreciate the risks and benefits of treatment. Since it is clear the Board used best interests and denial of an illness as their test for capacity; their standard for review is correctness: Thus The Appellant should win this appeal.
16)    ISSUE: Since Mr. D'Almeida was discharged from the Hospital since the April 29th, 1998 'finding' of incapacity; is he not entitled to a new 'finding' of capacity and a new Board Hearing? Does an incapacity finding lapse on an absolute discharge into the community? Is There not a presumption of competence when not under the observation, care and treatment of a physician?
16)    ARGUMENT: Note: The Court of Appeal ruled falsely that Dr. Gojer discharged the Appellant because his assessment order expired; but the Form 8, and warrant will show that he was discharged 36 days before the two month assessment order expired! It is accepted jurisprudence in mental health circles that an incapacity finding lapses on discharge unless there is a continuing community treatment order (CTO) or its equivalent. In A.M. vs Benes (1999) SCJ., The Court rules that Administrative Law issues are moot after discharge; In L.L. v. I. T. [1998] O.J.N04205 (Oct. 28th, 1998)Sutherland J.,Page 3,pp11: Sutherland J., mentions that the capacity
issues in another case (A.M. v. Benes) became moot after the patient was discharged from the psychiatric facility; The case law for this is endless that capacity issues are moot after discharge. The seminal ruling
was established by the Appellant himself in Almeida vs. Musisi (1988)D.D.C. (July 22nd, 1988) E.R. Lovekin; Page 16 of The transcript of which reads: "Mr. Almeida is obviously a very intelligent gentleman. However, if Mr. Almeida, for whatever reason, were to get in ... to Whitby Psychiatric Hospital ... in two hours from now he would have to be reassessed for competency for one is presumed to be competent under the Act. If Mr. Almeida were hospitalized today the hospital could not treat him as a treatment incompetent person ... That would be totally illegal and in my submission totally abusive." To allow a lapsed finding to stand would subject thousands of former mentally ill patients if re- hospitalized, to be without legal protections under statute and would also be unconstitutional. “A person has the right to life, liberty and security of the person, and not to be deprived of same unless under the fundamental principles of justice". The Health Care Consent Act(1996) says: s.4(2) There is a Presumption of Competence; s.15(2) capacity is dependent on time. Under Common Law principles too there is also a presumption of competence. Under The Mental Health Act(2000): s.34: “A person shall be discharged from a psychiatric facility when he is no longer in need of the ... treatment provided therein"; s.6,7,8: “this Act retains primacy over all other Acts pertaining to psychiatric facilities and treatment." There is a fallacy that since the HCCAct uses 'person' instead of 'patient' in its capacity definition that forced treatment can occur in the community; the answer to this is "no"; The Mental Health Act(2000) still retains primacy over psychiatric treatment and has no provisions to forcefully treat people in the community. With a CTO, An incapable person can now be treated voluntarily in the community with the use of an SDM; but this was not Mr. D'Almeida's situation. If an incapable person fails to comply with a CTO, he is liable to be brought back to hospital by the police for forced treatment. At no time was Mr. D'Almeida subject to a CTO. In almost all cases in Ontario, a patient is only discharged after being declared capable and voluntarily taking medication. Dr. Gojer had informed the Board at his May 8th, 1998; Hearing that "Mr. D'Almeida would remain on the ward until his form 8 expires"; [Exhibit#37 pg. 25] yet he suddenly discharged Stanley with 42 days left on his remand. The original treating physician Dr. Gojer only discharged Mr. D'Almeida because he believed him to be capable at the time; for under s.34 supra of The M.H.Act (2000) he could not legally discharge Mr. D'Almeida otherwise. In all of Mr. D'Almeida's hospitalizations since 1983 The Doctors in their 'Final Notes' make sure to state that Stanley was 'competent' at discharge. [Exhibits: 30-38] In fact in Mr. D'Almeida's NCR Hearing the Dr. Gojer admits that were Stanley to be readmitted to Hospital he would have to make a new 'Finding' and a new assessment for capacity. [Exhibit #15 pg. 66] Dr. Gojer is an expert on mental health law --with over 30 years experience in psychiatry-- his opinion should close this matter once and for all. In fact the Hospital's Policy and Procedure Manual make it compulsory for a reassessment at each admission [Exhibit#15 pgs. 66-67]. Dr. Gojer did in fact make a new finding on July 21st, 1998; [Exhibit# 1] but that is not the finding that this case is being appealed to this Court from. The Hospital is free to use that July 21st, 1998; finding or make another finding if it wishes; but Mr. D'Almeida is entitled to a new Finding after that discharge, and a new application to the Board; where s.18 would apply. This honorable court should rule that the April 29th, 1998; finding has lapsed. Furthermore, A person could lose his statutory right of appeal, rights advice, applications to the Board and his s.18(3) of the HCCAct protection: "not to be treated until the final disposition of his appeals". Dr. Gojer on reading Mr. D'Almeida's incisive, hard hitting and cogent "Notice of Appeal" on May 22nd, 1998; promptly realized the patient was indeed competent and discharged him. In fact He told the Appellant, “I have seen thousands of patients go through here, you are the only one to successfully appeal your finding to the Courts; I am going to discharge you”. There are fundamental human rights in question here: can a person be labelled incapable for life and forcefully treated unto death? Should we be creating second and third class citizens in the community without the fundamental rights to life, liberty, security of the person, to be free from cruel and unusual treatment and punishment, right to privacy and equality under the law?
17.)        ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: Was the Board’s & Doctor’s dismissal of the Appellant’s weighting severe side-effects as vital in deciding not to take medication unreasonable on the facts? And did they use the wrong test for capacity by basing it solely on denial of an illness.
17.)  In the Board’s “Analysis” pg. 9, states, “In the opinion of the Board, Mr. A did not have the ability to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable positive benefits of a decision to consent to treatment. He was similarly unable to appreciate the reasonably foreseeable negative consequences of a decision to refuse. He did have some ability to appreciate that if he consented to treatment he might experience negative side-effects and that if he refused treatment, he would avoid side effects. However, his ability to appreciate was only partial and as a result the Board confirmed the finding of incapacity.”  The consequences of treatment or lack of treatment were never clear; but Mr. D'Almeida made it clear that he did not want medication even if it meant he couldn't go to a group home in the community, or have privileges; Stanley appreciated what the Doctor believed were the benefits of medication but he made a rational decision that he would rather take the alternative. He stated that he considered health issues, personal freedom, security of the person and quality of life more important than living "like a zombie in a group home". That the side-effects of medication were so abhorrent that he would rather die than take medication. The importance of side effects received court sanction in Flemming v. Reid (1991) 40.R. (3d)74. And in Starson v. Swayze (2003) SCC. There was documentary evidence before the Board that the Appellant experienced: constant nausea, fever, vomiting, gastro-intestinal pain, constant pain, anxiety, restlessness, depression, severe weight gain, obesity, tremors, akathasia, akinesis, Suicidal thoughts, weakness, constant pain, restlessness, loss of health, risk of diabetes and heart disease, pain and suffering, loss of dignity and deep psychological trauma (See below for the side effects Stanley has personally suffered). J., Mesbur too said that there is no clinical evidence of the necrotizing fascitis and other severe side-effects the Appellant was claiming; which is false; these were past side-effects: The literature is filled with proof that these medications cause tremendous pain, suffering, death, pre-cancer, cancer and suicidal thoughts; most of the symptoms are internal physical pain and mental suffering until one suddenly drops dead. Stanley has been forcefully treated with the most toxic chemicals known to Mankind for 30 years now, surely his suffering makes him an expert on the side-effects of the medications? In Flemming v. Reid (1991) JJ.A. Robins, Grange & Carthy pg84: “the efficacy of the drugs is complicated by serious side-effects: muscular side-effects or extra-pyramidal reactions, dystonia, protrusion of the tongue; akathasia (internal restlessness or agitation) ; akinesis (physical immobility); and Parkinsonism drooling, muscle stiffness, tremors). The drugs also cause blurred vision, dry mouth, weight gain, dizziness, fainting, depression, low blood pressure, cardiovascular changes and sudden death! … and Tardive Dyskinesia … these drugs carry risks of short and long term harmful side-effects.”  Stanley is not a complainer he suffers in silence, yet the clinical Record showed horrendous symptoms and side-effects: “tremors, weight gain, restlessness, visible shaking, akathasia, nausea, vomiting, fever, fainting, gastro-intestinal pain & suicidal thoughts.” (pages 122-128 of B. Transcript) But this was from a short period before the Hearing; In the Appellant’s 30 years he has suffered massive death-like side-effects The Board also focused only on the side-effects listed on the ‘nurses notes’, problem was he had suffered side-effects over 24 years of previous treatment that formed the basis of his decision; The Board callously dismissed his years of suffering as nothing! Failure of the Board to address any of the rational reasons the Appellant raised vis-a-vis medication, makes their decision weak and doubtful. The Board in law 'unreasonably' misrepresented Mr. D'Almeida's position on medication. The case law is substantive that the failure of the Board to account for Mr D'Almeida's position on treatment is a reviewable error. On this issue pp. 101 in Starson v. Swayze (2003) The Supreme Court states, "the Board appears to have entirely misapprehended the respondent's reasons for refusing medication." The Court goes on to emphasize the importance of the side effects of medication; it goes on to state that, "It is clear that he views the cure proposed by his physicians as more damaging than his disorder". The Board determined the Appellant incapable without considering any of Mr. D'Almeida's perspective. In so doing they made an error that ought to be reviewed by this honorable court. The standard for review of the Board's decision has been met, as the Board misapplied the law, unreasonably misrepresented the Appellant's position on medication and are clearly unreasonably wrong on the facts.
6)    ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: Is the Board and the physician simply paying lip service to accepted jurisprudence on incapacity (Saying “his illness has stolen his ability to process the information that he may suffer from a mental illness or its manifestations“  --without giving any proof or connecting these assertions to facts! In actuality The Board and Doctor are using the wrong test of: if a person does not believe he has an illness; they conclude he cannot appreciate he could get better with medication, therefore he is incapable? [see overview]. Did this cause the Board to misrepresent and dismiss the Appellant's position on medication, and ignore the correct test? In Thomson v. Chan [1999] Sedgwick J., pg. 7; The Judge rules: “Denial of mental illness of itself does not equate to incapacity. There must be a direct and significant correlation between the belief or delusion and the impairment of capacity.” The Board is still clinging to their simplistic test of competence; but is trying to use obfuscating language to hide their incorrectness in law. On page 38 of the Transcript the Doctor summarizes his false concept of capacity: "Dr. Barron: In any case, he has continued to express the belief that he is here for political reasons, that he is king of Canada, that he does not suffer from a mental illness and therefore does not appreciate the consequences of accepting or refusing treatment for his condition. That has not changed during the period of time that I've been involved." [emphasis added] Again on page 149 the Doctor explains why he didn't make a new finding:
"It was patently obvious as a practicing clinician that he was incapable of making treatment decisions. He didn't believe he had a mental illness. That's been consistent. There wasn't anything dramatic new to look at". On page 10, last paragraph, The Board in its so called 'analysis' repeatedly states, "With respect, Mr. A told the Board in his direct evidence that he was the King of Canada. he was not mentally ill and as a result he did not require treatment. We preferred the evidence of Mr. A (D'Almeida) in this respect. In the opinion of the Board, a very clear link between the mental illness and the inability to appreciate the consequences was demonstrated." The Board is incorrect on the facts, at no time did Mr. D'Almeida say that he did not require treatment primarily because he was not mentally ill (this is their own false sequence of events in their incorrect test for capacity, she also got the Doctor to say this by asking him leading questions (on pgs. 155-159) rather it is the Board who used this denial of an illness to falsely confirm his incapacity. The Board uses the wrong test for capacity, by relating denial of illness with the decision on medication; rather than the illness itself with the decision on drugs. The Board repeats their lies on page 11, para. 6, "Respectfully, the panel disagreed. Mr. A's evidence was not that he had a condition and was refusing to take medication, as the medication was doing nothing to ameliorate his illness. Rather, his evidence was that he did not suffer from an illness or experience delusions of any kind. It was on that basis that he was refusing to take medication." [emphasis added] The Board in misrepresenting Mr. D'Almeida's stance is betraying their and the Doctor's own false test for capacity; (i.e. if a person does not believe he has an illness he is incapable) and trying falsely, to equate the denial of the illness with the decision to take medication. It was the Doctor who gave the Board this statement --not Mr. D'Almeida-- after being offered leading questions by the chairwoman on pages 155-159 of the Transcript. This is the wrong test since the Board must show how the illness itself impacts the decision to take medication --not the denial of illness. The Board in showing their bias never asked any questions of Mr. D'Almeida, because they were intending to get, and only use a one-sided analysis from the Doctor all along. In a highly unusual and unprecedented occurrence, the Doctor had a Ministry lawyer Ms. Heather Mackay representing him at the Hearing; in Mr. D'Almeida's then 23 years of psychiatric experience, no psychiatrist felt they needed assistance from legal counsel at a Board Hearing. The problem with this is that the lawyer very likely coached the Doctor on what to say and to lie, while Mr. D'Almeida's lawyer did not tell him what to say at all. Thus Doctor Barron's basis for finding Mr. D'Almeida incapable was carefully camouflaged, all we get are bold assertions from leading questions --without accompanying evidence. The reason he lied was that this Appellant had previously filed a brilliant Factum to the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal: Proving himself capable because the Board had used the wrong test of denial of an illness to confirm incapacity --his counsel and Ms. Skynner coached him to lie. His absolute bias is evident in his assertion that Mr. D'Almeida did not even pass the first part of the test --which contradicts the previous doctor Gojer. If left alone without legal help from the chair and counsel his finding could be even more easily refuted. Furthermore the chairwoman was so biased and onesided that she would interrupt Mr. Cohen, refused to allow Mr. D'Almeida to finish his evidence in chief, nor allow him to make his own submissions at the end, refused to ask Mr. D'Almeida any questions and worst of all she led the Doctor with questions that showed bias. [Transcript Pages: 210-211,96,99,153,155-159.] The Appellant had a right to have a Board that was objective, impartial, fair, and factual in its conduct. At no time did Stanley state the above quotations (he didn't believe he had an illness) were the reasons for his decision vis-a-vis medication; (See Point 1) in fact he made it clear that it was primarily the sideeffects of the medication, (see above, a lengthy expose on the side effects that Mr. D'Almeida has suffered) the fact that they were toxic molecules, his future freedom and quality of life issues were the reasons his decision was based on. {See B. Transcript pages: 120-129,167-169,173-176, 199-209} Thus there was insufficient evidence to prove the correct test: that the Appellant's decision on medication was affected by the delusion and not based on some rational ground. Stanley asks this honorable court to rule that: The statutory test has not been met by the Doctor or Board, Stanley does have the ability to appreciate as well as does appreciate the consequences of treatment or lack thereof. [See Transcript pages: 136,167 -178, 193,198-201, 225-230.] {See Transcript pages: 120-129,167-169, 173-176, 199-209}, ['Reasons for Decision' pgs. 10 & 11. ]

 

8)      ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: Is Mr. D'Almeida currently entitled to the statutory protection under s.18(3) of The Health Care Consent Act(1996)?
8)     ARGUMENT: The Appellant's lawyer Mr. M.
Cohen made a lengthy motion for treatment to stop until the disposition of the appeal as is a statutory right
under s.18(3) of The HCCAct; but was denied even a hearing of the motion by the biased Board. [See B. Transcript pages 6-23] Mr. D'Almeida had applied due diligence in applying to the Board as often and as early as possible; [See Affidavit of Stanley D'Almeida] to deny Stanley the statutory protection of s.18(3) would deny him equal treatment under the law; and make it easier to treat 'mentally capable' patients by merely incarcerating them and by constantly litigating the incapacity finding to exhaustion till the patient loses all his statutory protections. In a letter to 'Drug Progra!ns Branch' the Doctor was under the impression that he could only treat Stanley 'within the six month window' starting from the supreme court decision of July 14th, 2005; (he had also told Stanley this) and in the J.E. Ferguson MJ., Endorsement, she implies too that Stanley's s.18(3) rights would return after the six month window was up, the Doctor lied about what he had said to Mr. D'Almeida,
and refused to stop forced medication. In a related issue: After the Appellant revoked his 'Power of Attorney' of Mrs. Kamla Fisher on September 22nd, 2005; which the Doctor had been using as the SDM to forcefully treat Mr. D'Almeida; on being informed of this on September 25th & 26th, 2005; The Doctor ignored the Appellant replying, "you can't revoke your 'power of attorney'“ and ordered that Mr. D'Almeida be forcefully treated anyway at 9:30AM on Sept. 26th--this was highly illegal is Mr. D'Almeida's contention. It was only later in the day of Sept. 26th, after Ministry Counsel Ms. Diana Schell informed Dr. Barron that the revocation of the PoA was proper that he recanted; but Stanley was not given legal redress for this horror of being treated illegally. The Doctor had already tried desperately to find another SDM to treat Stanley but he was refused by Stanley's parents; it was only after September 28th, 2005; that he contacts the PGT; and receives written consent ten days later. [Exhibits #4 & #9] The fact is that the Doctor had already treated Mr. D'Almeida without having a valid SDM to give substitute consent on September 26th, 2005; for which he must be sanctioned by this Court. Since legal "treatment" did "stop" for a period of 48 hours s.18(1)(b), 18(3){a) & 18(3){d) of The HCCActwould prevent treatment from resuming again as Mr. D'Almeida had already applied to the Board. To allow the Doctor to illegally treat Mr. D'Almeida for even two days without remedy would bring the administration of Canadian Justice into disrepute. Since Mr. D'Almeida has also successfully appealed the Board's decision to the Court s.18(3)(d){ii) should apply where treatment cannot start again until the final disposition of his appeal! The Appeal process lacks meaning if s.18(3) provisions are so callously ignored by the Board and the Doctor. The Appellant asks this honorable court to reinstate s.18 protections until the duration of this appeal. [Transcript pages: 6-23; Exhibits: #4, #8, #9, #18, #25 & #11 ; Affidavit of Stanley D'Almeida]


9)        ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: Did Mr. D'Almeida have the right to protection under s.672.19 of The Criminal Code of Canada when 'the Court' directed the hospital to treat him? Does this make the April 29th, 1998 finding even weaker by this act?
9)         Under s.672.19 of The Criminal Code of Canada The Court cannot 'direct' the Hospital to find a person 'incapable' and treated on an order for assessment. It turned out that on April 24th, 1998; the Crown Attorney Ms. Lisa Cameron --acting for the Court--- faxed the Hospital 30 pages of documentation with the covering letter saying, "We are all hoping you will find (Mr. Almeida) incompetent and treat him". Jeff Honey the amicus curiae --appointed by the court-- also did the same, he faxed a letter to Dr. Gojer, asking for treatment. In fact this is exactly what Dr. Gojer did do within two minutes of Mr. D'Almeida entering the Hospital on April 28th, 1998; The fix was in. There is a legal separation between the jurisdictions of The Criminal Courts and a Mental Hospital for good reason: The Appellant was entitled to an independent, impartial and fair assessment under Law. This further weakens the April 29th, 1998 'finding' with the only real remedy being for this honorable court to throw it out and force the Doctor to make a new finding --if desired-- and allow Stanley a new application to the Board where s.18 would apply. [See Record Exhibits#: 28 & 29]
9) Was Section 672.19 violated by the Court in 'directing' that treatment be carried out on the order for assessment? The contact person for the Section 22 of The MHAct assessment for The Court was the Crown Ms. Lisa Cameron: -she was thus acting for the Court-- She sends a 30 page Fax to the Hospital Dated April 24th, 1998; ( See whole 30 page fax in the Appellant's Superior Court Factum) Starting with this page: (also in The Exhibits Tab 9, exhibit 9); in which she provides the hospital ample biased evidence that Stanley claims to be the King of Canada and saying: "Almeida found guilty today of threatening to kill justice Eberhard. He'll be sentenced after the assessment. We're all hoping he'll be found incompetent and treated. Parents are most anxious to co-op and will consent to treatment if authorized. 11 There was enormous pressure laid to bear on Dr. Gojer to put Stanley into the Mental-health system: J., Eberhard started the whole scheme by appointing a Amicus Curiae to look into "an alternative to the criminal justice system for addressing Mr. Almeida's circumstances" (See Exhibit 13); Nurse Cathy Brown from the Don-Jail also sent letters to the Court asking them to do an assessment, and Darrell Dodds a Probation Officer also weighed in asking for an assessment (Exhibits 13-15). The Fix was in! This had been going on for many years even though Stanley had been found fit and not NCR time and time again, he was being worn down; Dr. Gojer soon realized the mistake he had made when he read the Appellant's incisive preliminary 'Notice of Appeal' filed on May 22nd, 1998; (See Superior Court Factum; and 'The Record') and discharged the Appellant believing him competent at this time. Unfortunately on May 22nd, 1998; a few racist nurses castigated Stanley's mother Mrs. Almeida for trying to get him into the hospital system; Mrs. Almeida after talking to Dr. Gojer for six hours, then wrote a frantic letter to Dr. Gojer who had informed them he needed evidence that Stanley had received treatment in the past and had gotten better with treatment; and that they would cooperate with the hospital with Stanley's care in future. The problem was this information was already available to him on the Clinical Record; which was ignored, or he would have found little to support hospitalization. Even Jeff Honey the Amicus Curiae weighs in (The Exhibits Tab 9 Exhibit 9.) saying, "In advising the Judge as to sentencing options herein, I indicated the possibility of Mr. Almeida being determined incompetent to consent to treatment, and thus subject to the imposition of a drug program. Mr. Almeida's parents say some success was had under such a program, but eventually Mr. Almeida eventually refused same .... could you advise if any steps have been taken towards a finding of incompetence, or how same could be furthered". Dr. Gojer who had already discharged the Appellant believing him to be competent, was forced under the barrage of all these forces to reverse himself and instead seek an NCR finding; as he had also determined that the Appellant was not committable either, the Court too could not discharge Stanley into the Hospital. The only option was an NCR finding, done on such sudden notice that the conviction stamp had to be manually crossed out and an NCR verdict written in by hand. (see FACTS Affidavit, and S.E. Exhibits 14-15). All told the above interference in the process of assessment on competence, fundamentally denied the Appellant the Right: to a Fair, Impartial, Independent and Unbiased assessment; and to be treated under the fundamental principles of justice. In addition from OCA ruling R. v. Lenart, [1998] O.J. No. 1105, March 17, 1998. 'if conflicting provisions exist between the MHA and the criminal code, The Criminal Code Takes precedence over provincial statutes', Thus a violation of section 672.19 is fatal to the subsequent finding of Dr. Gojer.


10)    ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: Is Mr. D'Almeida
entitled to s. 7,12 & 15 Charter Rights especially as neuroleptic drugs are potentially the most toxic chemicals known to Mankind?
That the evidence is significant that neuroleptic drugs cause horrific diseases like cancer, life-threatening sideeffects and death; these are not acceptable risks; these chemicals are akin to the banned pesticide DDT; they are deliberately formulated to be poisons. The newer
atypical neuroleptics which Mr. D'Almeida is on, (Olanzapine) are somewhat less toxic; but the devastating side-effects are significant even in the smallest but cumulative doses. Flemming vs. Reid (1991)(OCA) JJA Robins et al, pgs.84-89:
          “Few medical procedures can be more intrusive than the forcible injection of powerful mind altering drugs which are often accompanied by severe and sometimes irreversible side-effects.”
Only ionizing radiation from nuclear fission atomic by-products (Stanley also vetoes nuclear power) can cause more damage to biological tissue than Neuroleptics! Antipsychotics/Major Tranquilizers: Polycyclic-Polyphenyl-SuIphide-Alkaloid-Organic-Halogens: potentially (depending on the number of halogen atoms attached to it) The most toxic molecules on Earth. Neuroleptics are specifically designed to attack Brain and Nerve Tissue; which destroys the body from the inside out. Stanley has personally suffered almost all the Horrific side effects of these drugs. The fact that he is still alive is that he is tough in nature. But this does not mean he does not experience excruciating pain and suffering --all so the world may be free. [The following 8a is an excerpt from Mr. D'Almeida's 2004 Court of Appeal submission and is still relevant today. Notice the emphasis Stanley places on the side-effects of the medications --most of which he has himself suffered.]
10a)         ISSUE:    Does the forceful imposition of a neuroleptic treatment program meet the definition of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment under s. 12 of the charter? To a Man like The Appellant who has personally suffered the effects of The Most Toxic Chemicals Known To Mankind over 24 years of murderous torture; the answer is clearly "yes". But This Court also has an obligation to Society, to Humanity, and to Victims of Neuroleptic Drugs (Poisons!) Globally, to very seriously consider this question. To properly consider this question the Court must consider The Big Picture: The proliferation of very Toxic Halogens: Fluorine F, Chlorine CI, Bromine Br, and Iodine I; into almost every facet of our lives without any alarm being raised. There are other chemical halogens beside neuroleptics that are harmful to Mankind: CFCs chlorofluorocarbons in our refrigerants (damages the ozone layer) the true cause of legionnaire's disease covered up by Dupont Inc., chlorine bleaches in our pulp and paper industry, organic-bromines used as a mandatory fire retardant but which is showing up in the breast milk of mothers in ever higher concentrations causing cancers and birth defects -also being covered up by Dupont Inc.; chlorofluorochemicals used to process photographic film, pesticides or polychlorinated-aromatic chemicals that kill not only insects but humans as well; PCBs; chlorinated water that can kill: witness Walkerton; Sarin gas, VX Nerve agents, agent orange, herbicides, polyvinylchlorides, Dioxins given off by incineration of garbage and sewage, etcetera. But the most toxic chemicals on Earth are none other than Neuroleptic Drugs given to Human Beings! Organic-Aromatic-Phenyl-Sulphide-AlkaloidHalogens (S.E. Exhibit 25 on the structure of common neuroleptics) These chemicals have been formulated to cross the blood-brain barrier, and enter the brain causing death from the inside out. They are Lipophilic and highly protein-bound: they bind to proteins in the blood causing anemia & leucopenia; and deposit into fatty tissue. They are also anti-emetic, to prevent regurgitation if swallowed, by high HCI hydrochloric acid content. By being specifically formulated to be a poison with the latest advances in technology, they are deadly! even if given in small doses over a long period of time. How did a poison come to be considered treatment for a mental disorder? Because Society and The System turned a blind eye, in a deliberate conspiracy, to allow for the mass poisoning to death of individuals selected by the System for: Persecution, Torture and Death. The System's argument is that these Persons so poisoned were delusional, mentally ill, incompetent or stupid; and deserved to be poisoned this way. The problem is these people cannot ever be rehabilitated to a state of well ness with these methods. It is like teaching a dog to use a human toilet by beating it on the head till it learns or it dies. The legacy of The System's approach to Mental illness and Delusion is Mass Murder on a Global Scale. Is The System's approach Just, in a type of law of the jungle way? No! The Appellant has proved this argument wrong in that he was not delusional, and yet they persecuted him in a similar fashion! The imposition of
Punishment and Discipline must entail a goal of wellness: To produce rehabilitated, trustworthy, intelligent, upstanding, selfsufficient, decent, honorable, productive, contributing, reformed members of society. What if these people were unrehabilitatable? The System is still Guilty because it does not even try to cure or rehabilitate [the medication only covers the symptoms], and in fact treats the truly evil with better treatment and earlier release! To take advantage of the weak and delusional simply to prey on them and kill them is Evil! And for this The System must be Destroyed.
The Proof for the case against neuroleptics, has been gathered by Stanley over the years he was incarcerated in Whitby Mental Health Centre, Prisons, The Old Whitby Psychiatric Hospital, from the Toronto Star Newspaper, from Journals and Text Books, from direct Observation, From Personal Experience of Suffering 24 years of murderous Torture unto Death at The hands of The System. Supporting Evidence Exhibits 16-25 document a death toll from neuroleptics only from cases reported in the Toronto Star; There are thousands, millions perhaps billions of such deaths on all types of organisms, gone unreported. There is a puzzling phenomenon in these reports: some persons die from one dose of neuroleptic poisoning others survive longer; it is true that properly diagnosed schizophrenics have a higher resistance to these drugs; others given same drop dead quickly from: 'sudden death', "Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome", induced Heart Attacks, Brain Cancer, Flesh eating disease, non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Anemia, Agranulocytosis, induced Diabetes, lung cancer, induced liver jaundice, tardive dyskinesia, immune suppression, gastric hemorrhage, kidney infection, other cancers. The Appellant is in the category of people highly sensitive to neuroleptics; and would suffer excruciating pain and a fate worse than death if a treatment order is approved. S.E. Exhibit 25: has some of the symptoms of neuroleptics: akathasia -restlessness and pacing due to exorbitant continuous pain, akinesis -stiffness and rigidity due to paralysis of muscles--, blurred vision -due to optic nerve damage--, slurred speech, obesity, (see Notice of Constitutional Question for other symptoms) loss of muscle mass and control, induced Parkinsonism, loss of brain and nerve tissue, tremors, obesity, drooling, 'giving tongue', gangrene, necrotizing fascitis, urticaria, liver jaundice, excruciatingly painful pre-cancerous sores, excruciating tooth pain, tooth loss, lymph node & ear infection, poikilothermic effect, rigidity, restlessness, paralysis, death comes horribly. This indeed would be cruel and unusual treatment and punishment! This would also be an act of murder in the first degree and Genocide, But since Stanley claims Kingship, it is an act of High Treason, and a Crucifixion as prophesized. (see 'The Early Writings' Affidavit Exhibit 15: where Stanley points out The System's use of a Satanic Scheme to release Murderers into the Community [Baltovich, et cetera] and Crucify Stanley The King) Has the current Psychiatric System helped anybody? Not much! only if they used this opportunity to help themselves. The legacy of prison and mental health survivors is evident on the streets of Toronto: S.E. Exhibit 24: Street Nurse Kathy Hardill documents the deaths of former patients on the streets of Toronto: “Somebody is killing homeless people in Toronto .. and they must be made to pay for their crimes", Yes the 'secret police' never really stop poisoning them even when out of hospital; thus the death statistics of Prisons and Psychiatric Facilities hide the cruel truth: Neuroleptics do Kill, but no-one is keeping meaningful statistics or doing epidemiological studies on: the poor, unemployable, homeless people, mental health patients or prison inmates anymore. THE FINAL SOLUTION: In The Worst Hell Hole On Earth: CANADA: The Heart Of Darkness:
"The Horror The Horror The Horror"! AAAAAAAAAAAARGH!!!!!
S.E.Exhibit 16: [See Affidavit below] The Marc Bastien murder is demonstrative of methods employed by security police (CSIS, RCMP, police) the world over, they secretly poison people to death even here in Canada. Politicians like Stan Waters the Reform Senator died of brain cancer for delusionally believing Senators can be elected under our Constitution---, Richard Hatfield who died of brain cancer after run ins with the RCMP for being homosexual and using marijuana--, Robert Bourassa died of cancer after Meech Lake where CSIS or RCMP poisoned the Premiers food to get them to agree to the deal, Lucien Bouchard lost his leg to flesh eating disease -for not unilaterally declaring independence--, media reporters --for spreading delusion (Exhibit 23), whole populations in Iraq, N. Korea and Afghanistan in the aftermath of the Gulf War (Exhibits 20,22), suspected terrorists (ex. 20) --for believing in a garbage religion, the list goes on and on. The System cannot kill the Good and non-delusional: thus the liberals, PCs and socialists (NDP) are the most delusional and get the most poisoned to death although they totally worship and obey the System and Satan. Prison Inmates also receive massive doses of neuroleptics while in custody --usually from the poisoning of their food-- (exs. 17,21) they die from infections that never heal because neuroleptics suppress the immune system. Psychiatric Hospitals murder on a daily basis (Exhibits 18,19) even their own staff are not immune: just last May 2004 Stanley witnessed the death of Vera Cates age 56, a “Rights Adviser" --something anathema to a bureaucracy hell bent on medicating people. Stanley lost his own female cousin at age 34, to breast cancer; her litigious mother worked for WPH; and exposed her daughter to a poisoning milieu, because she sued the hospital for wrongful dismissal for over six years! There is mass murder taking place in nursing homes today, where the elderly are medicated secretly by massive doses of neuroleptics till they die! The System does not allow unproductive, obnoxious, willful, incontinent seniors to live on tax-payer's money; the Appellant had an aunt who recently (sept '04) died this way (by poison). The delusion of the left-wing worship of 'Medicare' is that they get the worst treatment and poison in hospitals anyway, because they are delusional. Athlethes : Mario Lemieux got nonHodgkin's Lymphoma because he was French and a Star who wouldn't play for Canada; Perdita Felicien: Poison caused her crash in the Olympics because she was Black & Barbadian to a racist System. This is indeed a Horror Story unparalleled in Human History. It is conversely the final solution to DELUSIONAL liberals and left wingers as well. We need to stop the cradle to grave welfare system espoused by the NDP, for the price is death: for such a delusion. Zero Taxes, Zero Government, Privatization, Anti-trust legislation, and Competition will help create the discipline to get off the dependency on government that only increases the delusion of the people and the power of the System to murder them. (See Economic Reform: The King Of Canada's Royal Edict: A New Royal Mandate: To Implement On Pain Of Death!; ["Grounds of Incompetency!!! Appeal", Appeal Book Tab 9, pages 32-41] and [ "The Early Writings" Exhibits: 12,13,17] )
Stanley is The Great Man, A Genius, He learnt the lesson the System was Demonically trying to teach and is in turn Royally teaching the People. But he will teach Truth, Discipline, Austerity and hard-work: Justly, Truthfully, and with a view to promote greater Freedom and Happiness for The People.



11)       ISSUE AND ARGUMENT: Does not Mr.
D'Almeida have the right to a determination of 'prior competent wishes' at his Board Hearing?
11)       The issue here is that other than from an application for capacity review, there is no other avenue to enforce a patient's prior competent wishes pcw, if an incapable person's SDM refuses to adhere to them; and the physician is hell-bent on treatment. The Board refused to make a determination of 'prior competent wishes' even though Mr. D'Almeida had a well documented long history of being found competent in psychiatric hospitals and has consistently refused all medications. Under Flemming vs. Reid(1991),O.R.(3d) 74 (O.C.A.) “A person's right not to be treated contrary to his prior competent wishes was held to be an important constitutional right under s.7 of the charter and deserving of the highest protection"; but how can they be enforced if the Board refuses to exercise its power and the SDMs are too afraid of the hospital or too ignorant of mental health law to enforce same? This issue is properly before this court because under s.80(1) of The HCCAct, “A party to a proceeding before the Board may appeal the Board's decision to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on a question of law or fact or both". In exhibits 30-38 Mr. D'Almeida is consistent in always refusing medication while being found competent while doing so; In fact Stanley has never been forcefully treated with medication in 20 years prior to September 12th, 2005. The reasons for refusing medication were also consistent: (1) They would significantly harm his health and body, as they are highly toxic substances; (2) They would not affect his length of stay in hospital; (3) The period he would have to take them would be indefinite; (4) That it would have no effect on his thinking or behaviour; (5) It would cause incredible pain and suffering and loss of dignity and self respect, without any corresponding benefits. Had the Board ruled on this matter Mr. D'Almeida's prior competent wishes could be enforced; The Appellant was denied procedural fairness; and has no way of protecting his rights except by appealing to this court. The Appellant asks this honorable court to refer this matter back to the Board for a determination of PCW. [Record Exhibits: 30-38].


12)        ISSUE: Is mental capacity akin to treatment capacity? Is intelligence related to ability to appreciate consequences? And is the fact that Mr. D'Almeida was able to formulate such a complex and incisive Factum above; strongly imply that he is treatment competent too?
12)         ARGUMENT: The Issue here is that although intelligence cannot be always directly correlated with mental illness, it can be correlated with ability to appreciate consequences. The reasoning here is that if a person demonstrates a mental ability to process information and evaluate it properly in another field of life, it strongly implies that he has the capacity or ability to process information relevant to making mental health decisions correctly. In the Transcript of the Hearing the Doctor concedes that Mr. D'Almeida is a very intelligent man; [Pages: 96,99,153] yet he biasedly and disingenuously refuses to accept that Mr. D'Almeida's intelligence can be applied to capacity issues. The Doctor repeatedly claims that Mr. D'Almeida can understand and appreciate capacity issues in general and in others but magically cannot apply it to himself. [Pages: 95,97,98,137,153,155] In Starson v. Swayze pg.22 para.91-92: Justice Major says: “The Board … seems to be overly influenced by its conviction that medication was in Mr. Starson’s best interests … it failed to focus on the overriding consideration in in this appeal, that is, whether the adult patient had the mental capacity to choose whether to accept or reject the medication prescribed. The enforced injection of mind-altering drugs against the respondent’s will is highly offensive to his dignity and autonomy, and is to be avoided unless itn is demonstrated he lacked the capacity to make his own decision.” Note the underlined words “Mental Ability”, the Majority ruling finally struck at the heart of the issue, instead of obfuscation and Satanism: that if you have the mental capacity to rationalize, regardless of what decision you come to, you are CAPABLE!  In the Board Transcript [Pages: 96,99,153] the Doctor Barron, describes the Appellant as a very intelligent man; and Dr. Gojer also describes the Appellant [Exhibit#27 pg.23] “in my conversations with him, he comes across as being an articulate and intelligent person, quite pleasant to converse with.” But his intelligence and personal experience would make him best suited to appreciate the consequences of treatment and to make treatment decisions. Stanley is a University of Toronto graduate with a 4 year BSc., with double specialist degrees in Zoology and Computer Science. He is a true master of the ancient Hindu practice of Yoga; He is beyond book learning and in the realm of the Gods in knowledge. The Doctor is making the error in law between ability to appreciate consequences and actual appreciation. There is no magic about mental illness and treatment capacity. Contrary to popular perception, mentally ill people cannot be geniuses. A disease of the mind would manifest itself in this above Factum that Mr. D'Almeida compiled at short notice. Mr. D'Almeida brilliantly appealed his capacity case all the way to the IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA; without any legal assistance. Could a mentally ill and incapable person do so and be right on target regarding the issues and argument? The basis for Kingship is not a fanciful claim, it is based on 29 years of bitter suffering at the hands of the most evil race of people and System in the history of mankind. Stanley survived all that the System threw at him and still boldly claims to be the King of Canada. Can a man so logical and brilliant as to out-manoeuvre Satan himself and the whole System, be incapable in any way? By the Doctor's own words the Appellant is an intelligent man, but that disproves his claim that Mr. D'Almeida does not have the ability to appreciate consequences. A man capable of launching himself from the depths of hell to the King of Canada cannot be incapable only regarding treatment, as the Doctor contends. The Appellant asks this honorable Court to use common sense, (a mentally ill or incapable person could not possibly file a proper factum to the superior court of justice, and the Court of Appeal for Ontario) and rule that the Appellant has the ability to appreciate consequences; and thus meets the statutory test for competence.

CONCLUSION: Has the Doctor or the Board proved the second part of the test for capacity? The Appellant contends they have not! They have made assertions, hollow claims and accusations; none of which are connected to facts and evidence. The Board , the respondent’s counsel and the SCJ Judge all evilly use a discredited minority decision of CJ., McLachlin; in order to deny the Appellant fundamental justice; by confirming incapacity by a “best interests” test. Since the standard for review on matters of law is correctness, the Appellant has to prevail. Secondly, The Doctor never even attempts to connect the claim of Kingship with treatment decisions; his and the Board's real basis for incapacity remained the simplistic notion that the "Appellant does not believe he is ill", therefore cannot see himself getting better with treatment, so he is incapable. [pages: 38,149; 'Reasons': pgs. 10 & 11] The Jurisprudence is very strong that to prove incapacity the Doctor has to show (with specific evidence) that the mental illness (in this case a claim to be The King of Canada) directly connects to his decision to take treatment, and is not based on independent rational grounds; and or also must show that the delusion is connected to his non-belief in an illness, and that this too is not based on rational grounds. This is law. The Doctor clearly fails this test since he never bothers to discuss or rationally address the Appellant's rational basis for Kingship; which is crucial for correctness. In the Hearing and preamble to this Factum the Appellant rationally explains concisely his basis for claiming Kingship of Canada; the doctor does not even bother to refute the rationality of it. [Tr. Pages: 172-174,199-200] When asked a direct question by Mr. Cohen Does the belief in Kingship affect the Appellant's ability to appreciate consequences or if that a King could not be mentally ill, the Doctor answers in the negative. [Pages: 112-113] Also for this the Doctor would have to show 'manifestations of an illness' (confront the Appellant with 'incidents' and evidence) and The Appellant's inability to recognize same which he did not do. Thirdly, the connection between the Appellant's treatment decision and Kingship is never made by the Doctor, and thus he fails to prove incapacity. (although the Board tries to misrepresent the Appellant's position here) The Appellant again rationally explained to the Board that his decision on medication was based on: the severe side effects, the length of time medicated, quality of life issues, it would not affect thinking vis-a-vis Kingship, loss of dignity and self respect. {See Transcript pages: 120129,167-169,173-176, 199-209} The Doctor failed to refute the rationality of this. Mere hollow assertions without specific evidence does not meet the test for capacity. The burden of proof is on the physician, so The Appellant should prevail. The Fourth error in law made by the Doctor and Board is that the test involves ability to appreciate consequences not actual appreciation. If Mr. D'Almeida has the ability to appreciate illness in general but not apply it to himself in the way the Doctor desires him to; he still is capable because he has a right to disagree and still be capable; [Starson v. Swayze(2003) sec 722 Major J.;] the Doctor has not shown an inability to appreciate consequences. [B. Tr. Pages: 95,97,98,137,153,155] Thus the Appellant should prevail on this point of law as well. Since the Board adopted all the assertions and statements of the Doctor, the doctor's errors in law can be applied to them as well; “the standard for review on law is correctness, on fact is reasonableness; no deference is owed to the Board on this, and the Appellant must prevail.” The Appellant also relies on the strength of his 12 strong issues and arguments in this Factum above.




Roy v. Furst[1999] O.J.No.1490 (Gen. Div.).
9.    1011.      R. v. Lenart,(1998),O.J. No.1105,(O.C.A.)
           [May 22nd, 1998].














A Report By Stanley D'Almeida for WMHC :
The History of Mental Illness:
Mental illness (MI) as we know it in modern times, is not much different than what it was in earlier times: It Is Simply Demon Possession! (Although Modern Satanic Psychiatry Tries To Mystify MI, To Gain A Monopoly On Diagnosing And Treating Mental Illness! And Can Persecute And Murder Political Prisoners With False Diagnoses! Stanley Wants To Emphasize That The System Treats Political Prisoner Stanley Far Worse Than The Mentally Ill! He Is Not Lumping Himself With The Mentally Ill; But Is Simply Reporting On The MI Problem.) Until about 400 years ago, the incidence of mental illness was very rare, it was associated with Demon Possession1, and what MI individuals did exist, still lived in the community, fending for themselves or supported by the extended family and by society. Modern mental illness is characterized by: Increased Severity Of Impairment: Lack of ability to function in the community without state assistance, (Because The New Toxic Medications Have Destroyed The Health, Mental Functioning And Bodies Of Treated Patients!) Genocidal Policies Of Government Have Caused a higher rate of mental illness which has reached epidemic proportions with now more than 20% of the population impaired (including children)2 lack of family support, persecution and disrespect in the community, much more severe impairment, and frequent, repeated incarcerations in mental hospitals or asylums and most evil and murderous of all: The forced administration of very highly toxic anti-psychotic and neuroleptic drugs.  So what happened ~500 years ago to dramatically increase the rate of M.I.? The Satanic Prussian-Saxon-Aryan Tudor King Henry VII, Murdered and deposed the Norman-French Kings in 1485 AD. [Note: The Prussians Are Not German; But Anglo-Saxons From The Region Of Denmark & Northwest Germany Where The Anglo-Saxons Originate. The Prussian Saxon-Aryan Kings Never Conquered England: They Ruled As Puppets Of The English Anglo-Saxons; Who Wanted To Keep Out Legitimate Kings, With Real Powers --By Installing Satanic Puppets!!! The Prussians Also Installed Their Kings In Russia, Austria-Hungary & Spain: Leading To The Russian Revolution To Remove These Satanic Kings!!!  The Anglo-Saxon Aryans Are All Possessed By Devils And Blindly Obey Satan As Their God!!!] Tudor Saxon-Aryan Satanic Puppet-King Henry VIII & Elizabeth I, began this horror in England by confiscating all the farmland of the Catholic Church and the People, He further Confiscated all land that the People did not have a “Deed” to issued by the State; The State also prevented Peasants from farming on “Common Land” previously a Right calling it “Crown Land“ only for hunting by the Aryan elite, and pasture for their cows. This caused the forced land dispossession, disenfranchisement, enslavement, impoverishment, starvation, famine and herding of almost all people into the city, and the Genocidal Lifestyle destruction of all Human-Beings. Whereas Before: food, shelter and clothing were self produced and free, now they had to work as slaves under harsh abusive worse conditions just to exist. These Genocidal Policies were carried over to Canada, the USA and the rest of the Western World. This enslavement was run along racial lines, where the blonder-bluer-eyed Saxon-Aryan race enslaved the Celts, Welsh and Irish in Britain, and the Natives in N. America; They controlled the Monarchy, Army, Police, Secret Police and The Government. The diet of the enslaved population which was more vegetarian and grain based, was forcefully changed to that of the Saxon-Aryans of Beef and Milk. The Aryans attempted forced assimilation of captive races through inter racial marriages; but this didn’t work and tended to create MI offspring; and these were forced into madhouses; whereas before the family took care of its own.
The Modern Era of MI:
16th--18th centuries: those judged “insane” were forced into workhouses, poorhouses, jails or madhouses; with restraints and forced incarceration for the violently disturbed or those who refused to work. Madhouses constantly increased to 50 in London alone, holding ~350 people in each. The System believed that street people were malingerers from work-slavery, and in England if caught were branded with a “V” for vagrant, for the first offence and executed on the second arrest! [This is an underlying theme in the System’s treatment of the mentally ill: Not being able to work, was seen as rebelling to their slave-masters the Saxon-Aryans: and so their treatment was harsh, cruel, and murderous; to prevent “malingerers” escaping slavery into the MI population. Has Any One Of You Tried To Stop Working, And See How The System Will Try To Murder You? You Are A Slave, You Are Just Too Dumb To Realize It: So Thank Stanley For Liberating You!] The MI were seen as stubbornly refusing to conform or assimilate because they were like animals, and were given harsh physical (somatic/painful) treatment resembling torture, with restraints, no visitation, chains and whips and kept in public asylums, little more than prisons. The most famous being Bedlam. But These Harsh Somatic Treatments Were More Humane Than What Was To Follow: For These Treatments Did Often Work, And Did Result In Cures (As It Drove The Demon Out! Modern Psychiatry Fails To Even Acknowledge That MI Is Caused By Demon Possession, And Doesn't Even Attempt To Cure MI; Instead They Are Trying To Murder MI People With Poison!!) In the 18th century the Saxon-Aryan doctors began to take a monopoly on madhouses and “treatment”, the medics made fortunes running brutal regimes they called treatment and resisted any reforms. Political freedom is closely related to psychiatric freedom: For example the only reforms and humane treatment MI people ever received was called “Moral Treatment” from 1800-1850 AD. (see below) which was based on humane psychologically oriented therapy, This treatment was only allowed by the System due to the influence and fear of the French Revolution3. According to a student of the originator of moral treatment, Philippe Pinel, “moral treatment” is the application of the faculty of intelligence and of the emotions in the treatment of mental alienation” (Grob, 1994). An era of “moral treatment” was introduced from Europe at the turn of the 19th century, representing the first of four reform movements in mental health services in the United States (Morrissey & Goldman, 1984; Goldman & Morrissey, 1985) . The first reformers, including Dorothea Dix and Horace Mann, imported the idea that mental illness could be treated by removing the individual to an asylum to receive a mix of somatic and psychosocial treatments in a controlled environment characterized by “moral” sensibilities. The term “moral” had a connotation different from that of today. It meant the return of the individual to reason by the application of psychologically oriented therapy19 (Grob, 1994). The “moral treatment” period was characterized by the building of private and public asylums. Almost every state had an asylum dedicated to the early treatment of mental illness to restore mental health and to keep patients from becoming chronically ill. Moral treatment accomplished the former objective, but it could not prevent chronicity.3[Note: Stanley Does Not Approve Of "Moral Treatment" (Although It Is More Humane) Because It Is Not Tough Enough In Causing Pain; And It Doesn't Understand Demon Possession Either!]
The 19th century:
With forced industrialization and population growth: the size and number of insane asylums grew rapidly. Laws were made to force authorities to forcefully confine all those deemed insane by “family” and hospital superintendents. Although “moral treatment” had great success, with the defeat of the French militarily; the doctors once again gained a monopoly on treatment of ‘lunacy‘, by stressing that somatic physical or organic problems caused madness, and psychotherapy was ignored. It is important to note that modern psychiatrists falsely claim, that none of these MI had the exact symptoms of what we today would call schizophrenia. But The Nature Of The Illness Has Always Remained The Same: Demonic Possession. Modern Psychiatrists Have Attempted To Mystify Schizophrenia, And Have Usurped Exalted Status To Diagnose And Treat It; But Their Failure To Accept It As Demon Possession, Has Resulted In A Total Failure In Treating It! By 1870 the rate of mental disorders was increasing rapidly especially among the poor, and so were insane asylums.
The 20th Century:
The term asylum became hospital and “inmates” became “patients”; “mental illness” became a medical disease like any other, female nurses gained more power; social workers and psychology developed as a sop or adjunct to psychiatry. Theories of eugenics spurred massive sterilization and “extermination” movements world-wide of MI patients in public hospitals. In Nazi Germany over 200,000 mentally ill and handicapped people were put to death by psychiatrists and psychiatric hospitals --a little known fact. [Note: The Fact That Political Prisoners, And MI Are Still Poisoned To Death Long After The Defeat Of Germany: Is Proof The It Was The "Satanic Anglo-Saxon Race" Running These Concentration Camps That Committed These Murders --Not The Germans!] By 1950 Things were about to get far worse: Family members began to sexually molest children on a mass scale, which would have new implications for mental illness; The enslavement of the people began to get far worse with the intrusion of government into all spheres of life and the massive increase in taxes to support this government police state apparatus of slavery; thus the people not only had to pay for their food, shelter and clothing, but now pay extra punitive taxes to their slave-masters. The destruction of the nuclear family ensued, with increased interracial sex with Aryans; and a new phenomena developed: mixed families developed a hatred of their own MI children and Aryan family members put them in mental hospitals or asylums; for forced treatment. By 1950: Lobotomies, insulin shock therapy, Electro convulsive therapy, and the “neuroleptic” chlorpromazine came into use for treatment of MI; but Until The 1960's, MI still lived long lives! In the 1960’s ex-patients began to fight back, parents became more likely to take their children back home, deinstitutionalization gradually occurred with psychiatric hospitals closed down, in favour of community mental-health services. But this didn’t help because the MI were still shunned by society and ended up homeless or in prisons; But a stirring of dissent from ex-survivors developed. Lithium (a salt) was invented and greatly helped bi-polar MI, but psychiatrists still insist on adding more harmful medications to treat them. The psychiatrists and nurses struck back with a “new treatment” a highly toxic slew of antipsychotic drugs called phenothiazines which allowed psychiatry to inflict far more damage on the body and brain; i.e. the drugs had the same effect as a 100 blows to the head, but the outward signs of the murderous barbarity were difficult to detect. Psychiatry also developed a propaganda machine that mystified mental illness as beyond comprehension, that only “deified” psychiatrists and nurses (RNs) had the monopoly to diagnose and treat; and that the only treatment is to take toxic medications with severe side-effects until you die young. This allowed psychiatry to forcefully treat people who were not mentally ill, Especially political prisoners --Like Stanley-- and dissenters to slavery. It would take decades to realize that the mortality rate of schizophrenic patients was murderously high; and that we are worse off than at any time in History! In the 80’s the toxic level of drugs and murderous abusive treatment of the MI had reached its zenith; but hospital stays tended to be acute --of less than six months.-- so a “drug holiday” was built in, (although they only released MI if they agreed to take their meds.); parents were discouraged from taking MI home; and MI were given welfare or family benefits to live independently or in group homes in the community; But a deliberate “Revolving Door” committals of MI was instituted that only gave them an illusion of freedom. In the 1990’s patients’ outcry at the harmful effects of medications and arbitrary committals, resulted in another mini-wave of psychiatric hospital closings; but since there was no housing except for abusive, forced very-high-medication “group homes”, most MI ended up on the street or in prisons. While it became more difficult to convict criminals of crime, because of liberal judges. Stanley Got The Harshest Prison Sentences for Very minor crimes, by these same Devil-Possessed Liberal Judges! It Must Be Emphasized That Stanley Received Even Harsher Treatment Than The Mentally Ill: Mentally Ill People Are Not In Full Control Of Their Senses, And Cannot Suffer The Full Load --As Stanley Did! Stanley Was The Premier Political Prisoner In Canada --Yet Was Falsely Labelled MI!!! As A Propaganda Ploy To Deceive Third-World Countries As To How Satanically Evil Canada Really Is! (Stanley spent 9 continuous years in prison for just breaches of probation!! And For All The Nine Years They Poisoned His Food With Some Of The Most Toxic Poisons Known To Mankind!!!) [Note: Stanley Was Not Ever Mentally Ill; He Was A Political Prisoner! But The System Labelled Him MI To Avoid Showing Any Respect For Him --Which Was The Most Gruesome Form Of Torture!!! (Like The British Refused To Accept The IRA In N. Ireland, As Anything More Than Terrorists!) They Chose To Treat Stanley The King Of Canada Without Any Respect: And That Is Why Stanley Will Bring Them To Justice: By Executing Them All For High Treason! --When He Comes Into Power: Revenge Is Sweet!!!] With massive increases in immigration, taxation, lifestyle-genocide and slavery (the GST, deficits, debt, spending, programs) things were bound to get worse . The “forensics” And NCR programs beginning in 1997AD. With (AA) Atypical Anti-psychotics, allowed mini-expansion of psych-hospitals, with Criminal Code patients, With Very Minor Crimes, now often incarcerated and forced to take toxic medications for over ten years or more ---from the previous 6 months. Thus although the medications seemed less toxic, their duration was much longer with no drug holiday, as before. New Studies Show AA Drugs Are Just As Toxic, As Previous Drugs, But In A Different Way, Causing: Cardio-Vascular Diseases, Diabetes, Obesity, Cancer, High Blood Pressure etc. Currently the hospitals still force toxic medications on the MI; there is some housing available but it is very scarce; and this is where we are today. Any gains in our treatment were obtained by the blood and suffering of previous generation of “political” MI patients, but we have far to go.
              Holistic Treatment is based on restoring that lost free farming or religious lifestyle of 500 years ago, through Yoga and other daily disciplines that painfully affect the Mind, Body And Soul and also restore our political freedom --By Working To Overthrow The System!  (Psychiatry only treats the physical brain & Body with toxic chemicals, not the mind or spirit) Despite the propaganda of the psychiatric drug approach to mental illness: patients are much worse off than they were at any time in our history. The rate of incarceration has dramatically increased than ever before (although more patients are released into the community since the 70’s -- They are being forced to continue taking toxic drugs in a chemical straight-jacket, endure chemical brutality and in restrictive conditions like group homes, in a “Hospital Without Walls”-- the overall rate of incarceration including in prisons and mentally ill street people has dramatically increased). In other words compared to 500 years and even a 100 years ago the rate of incarceration overall, Forced medication with toxic drugs, Forced Sterilizations, CAS confiscating ~100% Of babies from MI or poor families, Homelessness, Imprisonment, Death Rates and State and Societal persecution has dramatically increased: If a schizophrenic commits a major crime it gets front page coverage with massive hatred and hysteria, and calls to lock them up for life --But The Reason Some Of Them Commit Major Crimes Is The Result Of Being Forced To Take Poisonous Drugs! Violence Begats Violence: Forced Anti psychotic Drugs Is The Most Violence of All!!! Holistic Treatment: Believes “First do no harm”. But Stanley Believes That Harsh Somatic Treatments (Without Toxic Medications) Must Be Carried Out: Holistic Treatment Must Cause Pain To The Body As Well As The Mind: Like Forced Exercise, Cold Baths, Fasting, Vegan Diets, Political Protests, Satyagraha, Civil Disobedience, Wrecking; Are Harsh Treatments To Drive The Demon Out!)
                The epidemiological statistics Prove That Anti-Psychotic Or Neuroleptic Drugs Are POISONS: schizophrenia (which affects 1-2% of the community) who have been forced to take anti-psychotic drugs have a 5.1 times greater death rate4 than the general population in males, and a 5.6 times greater death rate in females. They also have a 13% rate of suicides; They are also given the most toxic anti-psychotic drugs. The classification of Schizophrenia as a mental illness is less than 100 years old, But it is significant in that these patients are singled out by the State to receive the harshest most horrific treatment: “Schizophrenia is a cruel disease. The lives of those affected are often chronicles of constricted experiences, muted emotions, missed opportunities, unfulfilled expectations. It leads to a twilight existence, a twentieth century underground man… It is fact the single biggest blemish on the face of contemporary American medicine and social services, when the social history of our era is written, the plight of persons with schizophrenia will be recorded as having been a national scandal.” ---Surviving Schizophrenia.5 They also have a higher rate of imprisonment, homelessness and medical diseases like diabetes, heart-attacks and cancer (caused by the medications!). Even the more recent Atypical Antipsychotic medications (AA) that are being promoted as “better” may have increased the mortality due to weight gain and metabolic syndromes: which cause a three-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality and a two-fold increase in all mortality. Thus researchers concluded that AA medications like risperidone, clozapine and olanzapine; “was likely to contribute to an even greater disease burden in coming decades”.6 People with bipolar disorder” also have a significant risk of early death by 35-200% than the general population;7 Unhealthy Lifestyle, adverse pharmacological effects, are possible underlying causes. Street-People also suffer extremely high death rates, violence and persecution in Canada, and are mainly composed of former MI patients. The System Persecutes MI and street people for their inability and refusal to work as slaves And Because They Want Them Dead, than anything else!!! They Are An "An Inconvenient Truth" The Physical Evidence: That There Is Evil, Satan & Devil-Possession In The System: The "Walking-Dead", Poisoned, Zombie Bodies Are Constant Proof Of The System's Genocide Of Our Racial Ancestors!!! RESOLUTION 1: Research and Practical steps to increase the physical health and Quality of Life of people with schizophrenia and bipolar-disorder is a moral imperative; and we on Patient Council support this. First Do No Harm!
              In going Holistic or GREEN in health care: We find that psychotropic drugs are toxins with potentially serious and lethal side-effects: from depression, instability to deadly violence and health issues. The Psychiatric Model of Treatment only seeks to Mask the symptoms of mental illness with high doses of toxic chemicals, but the rate of relapse even while on drugs is over 30%, and 80% when off drugs; thus it leads to a very poor quality of life for MI persons who have to endure severe side-effects and repeated hospitalizations and Early Death. Psychotropic drugs are linked to these side-effects: Brain and liver damage, shrinkage of the brain, immune suppression, flesh-eating disease, teeth-loss, painful acne, obesity, anaemia, involuntary movements, sudden death, gangrene, skin lesions, jaundice, impaired vision, constipation, nausea, stiffness, Parkinsonism, muscle weakness, agitation, restlessness, Diabetes, insulin resistance and weight gain, Cancer, frequent relapses even when on medication, early mortality rates: antipsychotics can reduce your lifespan by 25 years, Gastro-intestinal disorders, sexual dysfunction, illegal addiction to street drugs and smoking.8 Research has also uncovered hidden consequences of antipsychotic drugs: Suicides, School Shootings, Violent aggression, Mass Shootings, Murder in sudden attacks, Increased hospitalization due to side-effects, Increased violent crimes and Imprisonment, Increased Deaths, drug addiction and homelessness, and Increased medical costs. “First Do No Harm”.
                In Holistic Treatment or Going Green In Body, Mind and Spirit:  We believe The MI are “throw-backs” persons whose Souls  remember and preserve Mankind’s ancient natural lifestyles; Who Are Being Doubly Victimized By An Evil System For Not Turning To Satan And Embracing Devil Possession Like The Rest Of The Public! MI have a lot to contribute to society with their unique insights; and for this they are persecuted and murdered by drugs. A person’s worth should not be how much work he can do as a slave, but how well he reaches the full potential of his body, mind and soul. We believe that there is a cause and effect relationship for all mental illness and that it can be safely controlled and CURED! The CAUSE of all Modern Mental Illness; is the forced enslavement by herding all humans from the farmland into the city and the associated loss of freedom, Loss Of Political Power To The Saxon-Aryan State and lifestyle destruction that Resulted! Forced Assimilation through interracial marriages to Aryans, Boarding Schools increased the numbers of MI. Returning a person to practice his previously Natural or God-Ordained lifestyle through Forced painful daily discipline or daily Yoga is the basis of the cure.  Thus Mental Illness is a disconnect to what your soul wants you to think and do and what you are thinking and doing. Mentally Illness is also associated with: child-sexual abuse, Unprosecuted Rape, drug, alcohol, smoking and sexual addictions; lack of true spirituality, hearing voices (demon possession), hallucinations, having given children up for adoption, being from inter-racial Aryan families, inappropriate sexual lifestyle, lack of daily exercise, undisciplined diet, weight gain, lack of discipline in mind and body, lack of adherence to their races’ ancestral religion. The Hospital’s Policy is to deliberately refuse to give patients “Lifestyle Management” advice and mental discipline that would cure patients in an effort keep them ill, child-like, demon-possessed, immature and ignorant; to perpetuate their dependence on toxic medications. We believe patients should have a choice between receiving Holistic or Medication Treatment! Holistic Treatment means treating the person with Respect and Dignity, and believing that they can be cured and restored to full wellness in the community as fully functioning, equal and respected citizens. But unlike “moral treatment” Holistic Treatment is somatic or PAIN based just like psychiatry: thus we do believe all treatment must significantly and painfully affect the body and mind and reflect the wishes of the soul; But unlike psychiatry we believe in “first do no harm” thus no physical harm is allowed on patients: internally or externally. Holistic Treatment means treating the Whole Person in Body, Mind and Soul. The Practice of Holistic Treatment: Is that it must be Staff Enforced, Structured, Disciplined and “somatically or Pain based“, i.e. it must affect the body as well as engage and discipline the mind with significant PAIN: Involve serious and caring mental and physical discipline; For example in exercise therapy the patient must exercise till he or she feels pain or a burn and must break through that pain barrier; and the patient must engage and discipline his mind to push his body to its limit. In return for patients accepting Holistic Treatment and fully practising it, they should be weaned off the medication to a state of wellness without drugs. Treatment Begins with making an assessment of a patient’s full life history, their family history and their racial history; then a lifestyle assessment is made and the patient observed to decipher where the patient’s weaknesses lie and offer mental and physical discipline and support in those areas. Most patients come in broken, weak and vulnerable and have been abused & victimized in society: For example if child sexual abuse or Rape, is reported, the hospital must address this issue by creating an evidential basis of expert professional opinion that can help obtain a conviction and jail-time against the abuser; This helps the patient gain closure and gain recovery (currently the hospital takes no action or dismisses assaults, rape or child-sexual molestation allegations). The Therapies: would include ancestral diet discipline in removing red meat and milk from their diet because it can cause heart-attacks, diabetes and strokes; Vitamin therapy temporarily to eliminate deficiencies from bad diets, introducing sea-weed and spirulina algae into our diets, and following a Religious Vegetarian or Vegan Diet strictly; teaching grain crop farming and irrigation like our ancestors lived and ate. (currently the hospital discourages vegan diets as much as possible by shoddy fare and pushes meat on patients). The second part of the therapy would teach the patient how to purge with salt-water and fast safely for a few days at a time, fasting is an excellent discipline that restores a patient’s mind, body and soul and eliminates toxic chemical build-up that can cause disease, at the same time. (currently the hospital gets hysterical at a patient fasting and try to scare patients into quitting) The third therapy can include Addictions Therapy: introducing Strict sexual discipline through the practice of Yoga; in a patient addicted to promiscuous sex, drugs, alcohol, smoking, by introducing A "NO-SEX" Sex education: teaching values like abstinence, committed relationships, saving oneself till marriage, warning that birth-control is not even 95% effective and can cause sexually transmitted diseases like AIDS, Herpes, Syphilis, Warts, HPV, Gonorrhoea, and pregnancy even if used conscientiously; Or teach them that there is a time and place for making love: when you are being forced to take toxic poisons, is not the time to be having sex! sexual intercourse should be forbidden until a person is cured or recovered!; Making love is about male dominance and female orgasm --not about male ejaculation-- as the Satanic Aryans Teach!!! Warn them that CAS (Children's Aid) removes ~100% of children from MI persons thus it is irresponsible to have children in this environment, that there is a proper place and time for having sex and they will have a opportunity when it is safe to do so, and with a person that is in love with them. All Addictions must be treated “cold turkey” confinement, and with education, prayer and group therapy like A.A.; and relapses must result in severe loss of privileges, until the patient himself mentally resolves to quit; and gives Staff assurances he will. (currently the hospital ignores the rampant drug, alcohol, smoking and high risk sexual activity occurring on the grounds --In Fact The Hospitals Satanically Encourage Incompetent Inmates To Have Sex With Free Condoms And Conjugal Rooms!). The Fourth therapy would include a compulsory daily program of yoga style stretching exercises that every patient can safely do, and aerobic activity that builds discipline and endurance, physical stamina and a feeling of well being and accomplishment. The fifth therapy could include swimming and breath control under-water to promote discipline in breathing; and having cold-water baths or showers like our ancestors did; that builds mental and physical discipline. The sixth therapy would include looking deep within one’s soul to look for spiritual fulfilment and the ancestral religion of a patient’s ancestors Which Is Sanatana Dama Or Hinduism; Most patient’s ancestors were forcefully converted to Protestantism from Catholicism, or to Islam from Hinduism, or from Native spirituality to Christianity; But we were all once Hindus! Finding one’s true spirituality will reconnect the soul with the mind and body and will remove the void or “split” (that evil or the “demon” fills: Schizophrenia!) that was causing the MI in the first place; this break with the current religion does involve pain and discipline as older ancestral religions tend to be more strict and austere, and thus is somatic or painful. The most important therapy is to teach racial awareness in patients and the dangers of inter racial marriages: most MI come from mixed Aryan families whose goal was to assimilate with Aryan lifestyles (Which Is Genocide!!!); and since their own non-Aryan lifestyle was ignored; the soul had no place to go and MI developed. Secondary Therapies: Non-Somatic treatments are less effective than Somatic ones, but can be used to reinforce and enhance physical treatments. Other therapies can include Yoga Medicine, Fasting, and Acupuncture is a safe and effective somatic therapy if it causes pain to the skin, and body, and can be used as an alternative to Quack Modern Medicine! Daily prayer and Meditation that is practised intently will draw a patient closer to a connection to a spiritual wholeness that gives them strength to overcome their illness; and gain insight into their illness. Ultimately these therapies will cure the MI patient much quicker if the patient is committed to wanting to be cured, and puts forward genuine effort and diligence in his daily lifestyle. Patients must be encouraged to engage in debates on current affairs and politics: because ultimately it is justice and political change like a Revolution that will eliminate the cruel suffering of MI people; Satyagraha must be encouraged. But we cannot always control politics, while we can control our bodies and minds and hone them into lean, mean fighting machines. Green Therapy also includes helping our Environment; using less resources like our ancestors did, reuse, return and recycle; reduce use of fossil fuel, shun nuclear power, save on heating, gasoline and electricity; Use of firewood, hydro clean power etc. Group Therapy where patients gather to support each other become well and share their experiences will greatly speed up their own recovery, reassurance and feedback.
              RESOLUTION 2: IMPLEMENTATION: Every Patient should be given the CHOICE between Holistic and Drug Treatment. Holistic treatment cannot gain ascendency over the Drug model unless there is Staff support, encouragement and enforcement; and Ex-Patients taking a leadership role in reform! Yes the word “Treatment” means it must be enforced, “Holistic Treatment” like medication Treatment means that a minimum amount of Painful Discipline, Daily structure, incentives and Strict enforcement must be used to begin recovery and a cure for the Patient. Sometimes a MI person is incapable of judging what is in his best interests and then a substitute decision maker must make those decisions for them, even if it involves some discipline to effect a cure. The difference with the drug model is that medications cause severe pain, violence, suffering and early death; whereas exercise discipline can only be good for you, and causes no harm. What is the greater Good of a Patient versus the consequences of no treatment should influence the choice. Once a person begins to take charge of his or her own treatment no structure need be used on them; as the patient is invested in their own recovery, and disciplines himself.
     CONCLUSION: The MI represent an “Inconvenient Truth” of past lifestyle Genocide: that the System wants to hide and eradicate, the MI are non-assimilatable, non-working, non-conforming relics of a freer age; and no amount of persecution, torture, extermination, poisonings, and murder is going to make them go away. Modern Psychiatry Has Exalted Doctors To A Secret Priesthood, And Have Tried To Mystify Schizophrenia With Complex Gobbledygook Diagnoses And Convoluted Phraseology; But All It Is Is Simple Demon-Possession, With Hallucinations And "Hearing Voices" That Even Jesus Was Dealing With 2,000 Years Ago! Demon & Devil Possession Has Increased Exponentially Since, Because It Has Been Forced And Promoted By The Satanic Saxon Aryan System, Mainly By Their Promotion Of Child-Molestation, Rape And Homosexual Rape!! But The Problem Is Analogous! But Psychiatry Is Trying To Murder These Victimized People By Poison! While the Holistic Model of Treatment, Treats The Causes Of Of Demon Possession, And Lack Of Discipline Directly; And not only Cures Mental Illness but gives them a better quality of life, with the full respect and dignity in society owed to them as human beings.

Sources:
1) Green Body and Mind.com, Santa Cruz Residents CA, USA.
2) History of Mental Health Services, From Wikipedia.             
3) History of Mental Disorders, By wikipedia.
4) Schizophrenia Disease - Treatment of , By Peter Sarns.
5) Surviving Schizophrenia, By E. Fuller Torrey, MD.
6) Schizophrenia Diagnosis Associated with Higher Mortality
     Rate, By Peggy Peck.
7) Bipolar Disorder and Premature Death, Babak Roshanaei-
     Moghaddam, MD., and Wayne Katon M.D. Psychiatric
     Services, February 2009 vol.. 60 No. 2.
8)

Dated: January 16th, 2013.

A recovery paradigm is each person’s unique experience of their road to recovery. . . .My recovery paradigm included my reconnection which included the following four key ingredients: connection, safety, hope, and acknowledgement of my spiritual self (Long, 1994, p. 4).

To return renewed with an enriched perspective of the human condition is the major benefit of recovery. To return at peace, with yourself, your experience, your world, and your God, is the major joy of recovery (Granger, 1994, p. 10).




Script embedded in HTML

Script embedded in HTML

Script embedded in HTML

Website Builder